Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
Advertisements

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
PREPARING FOR NCATE May 19, 2008 Teacher Education Retreat.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
“Sticking Points” Conceptual framework has five structural elements Conceptual framework has five structural elements Standard 1 requires data, not information.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Standard 4 Diversity. Presented By: Facilitator: Shirley L. Barnes, Ph.D.,Chairperson Diversity Committee: Esenc Balam, Ph.D. Necoal Driver, Ph.D. Daniel.
NCATE 2000 Update July 2000 Donna M. Gollnick
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
A Roadmap for Meeting the NCATE Preconditions* *(and keeping everyone in the unit on speaking terms) Pamela Ehrenberg NCATE.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Welcome to Teacher Education at ECU. Teacher Education Undergraduate programs lead to initial license in NC in 21 different teaching areas Director of.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
NCATE Standards 1 & 2 January 2002 Donna M. Gollnick & Antoinette Mitchell.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Introduction to NCATE and PSC Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Developing Educational Leaders Who Create Tomorrow’s Opportunities: Issues for Partner Instructors in the College of Education April 10, 2008.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Enhancing Implementation of the CEW Standards through the PA SAS (Standards Aligned Systems)
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
PESB Standards Standard 4: Program Design. How Standards are Judged Standards are deemed unmet, met or exemplary. A standard is deemed ‘met’ if: A program.
A conceptual framework establishes the shared vision for a unit’s efforts in preparing educators to work in P–12 schools. … Conceptual Framework.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
 1. Presentation Portfolio - showcases a teacher's achievements, strengths, and areas of expertise.  2. Working Portfolio - contains items that are.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
NCATE Unit Standards…Revised Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Performance-Based Accreditation
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
What It Is and How It Works
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
NJCU College of Education
Assessment Committee Meeting December 15, 2010
Writing the Institutional Report
February 21-22, 2018.
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005

Conceptual Framework The conceptual framework(s) establishes the shared vision for a unit’s efforts in preparing educators to work effectively in P-12 schools. It provides direction for programs, courses, teaching, candidate performance, scholarship, service, and unit accountability. The conceptual framework(s) is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with the unit and/or institutional mission, and continuously evaluated.

Represents the guiding structure of the unit Represents the guiding structure of the unit Represents the vision and direction for the unit and its work Represents the vision and direction for the unit and its work Is a process, not a thing. Is a process, not a thing. Is codified in a document but also infused throughout the unit Is codified in a document but also infused throughout the unit Is not a standard by itself, but is assessed as part of the unit standards Is not a standard by itself, but is assessed as part of the unit standards Provides the opportunity to showcase the unit’s values and beliefs Provides the opportunity to showcase the unit’s values and beliefs A conceptual framework:

What’s the purpose of the conceptual framework? To inform the process by which the unit develops its goals To inform the process by which the unit develops its goals To articulate the goals of the unit To articulate the goals of the unit To ensure that administrators, faculty, K-12 partners and candidates are working toward the same articulated goals To ensure that administrators, faculty, K-12 partners and candidates are working toward the same articulated goals To ensure that the goals encourage professionally sound commitments and dispositions To ensure that the goals encourage professionally sound commitments and dispositions

Examples Visit “resources” section of NCATE website for examples of conceptual frameworks Visit “resources” section of NCATE website for examples of conceptual frameworks

Conceptual framework should be: Developed collaboratively Developed collaboratively Emerging from the institutional mission Emerging from the institutional mission Shared by all stakeholders Shared by all stakeholders Consistent with institutional and unit mission Consistent with institutional and unit mission Continuously evaluated Evident in different aspects of the unit Knowledge-based Owned by all stakeholders

Element 1: The vision and mission Vision: Vision:  What does the unit see as its ideal?  What does the unit hope to achieve?  What does the unit strive to do?  What kind of educators does the unit want to produce?  Mission:  What is the unit going to do? - an action statement  What is the mission of the institution?  How do the unit and institutional missions relate?

Element 2: Philosophies, purpose and goals Philosophy: Philosophy: What is the unit’s overarching belief system? What is the unit’s overarching belief system? Purposes/goals: Purposes/goals: What are the broad goals or outcomes of the unit? What are the broad goals or outcomes of the unit? How are they connected to philosophy and mission. How are they connected to philosophy and mission. How are diversity and technology addressed. How are diversity and technology addressed.

Element 3: Knowledge bases, including theories, research, and wisdom of practice Knowledge bases: Knowledge bases: What theories, research, and wisdom of practice undergird the unit’s belief that its purposes/goals are worthwhile and of value? What theories, research, and wisdom of practice undergird the unit’s belief that its purposes/goals are worthwhile and of value? Using literature, the unit should be able to explain why are the unit’s purposes/goals are important. Using literature, the unit should be able to explain why are the unit’s purposes/goals are important.

Element 4: Candidate proficiencies aligned with professional, state, and institutional standards The unit clearly identifies candidate proficiencies – the expectations of candidate performance that flow from the unit’s purposes/goals. The unit clearly identifies candidate proficiencies – the expectations of candidate performance that flow from the unit’s purposes/goals. Candidate proficiencies should be aligned with state, institutional, and SPA standards. Candidate proficiencies should be aligned with state, institutional, and SPA standards. A table often is used to illustrate the relationships between proficiencies and standards, especially for state and institutional standards. A table often is used to illustrate the relationships between proficiencies and standards, especially for state and institutional standards.

Element 5: Candidate assessment At what critical points are candidates assessed? At what critical points are candidates assessed? What assessments are used? What assessments are used? Do assessments link to unit proficiencies? Do assessments link to unit proficiencies? How does the unit ensure that assessments are accurate and consistent? How does the unit ensure that assessments are accurate and consistent? What happens when candidates do not perform at levels expected by the unit (counseling, remediation, etc)? What happens when candidates do not perform at levels expected by the unit (counseling, remediation, etc)?

When & where are the elements assessed?  Initial institutions - the conceptual framework is submitted as a precondition  Continuing institutions - BOE team will look for evidence related to each standard during the visit

Evidence for the Conceptual Framework’s Integration Shared vision Shared vision Coherence Coherence Professional commitments and dispositions Professional commitments and dispositions Commitment to diversity Commitment to diversity Commitment to technology Commitment to technology Candidate proficiencies aligned with professional and state standards Candidate proficiencies aligned with professional and state standards Evidences are assessed by BOE team on-site Evidences are assessed by BOE team on-site

How is the CF connected to the unit standards? Integrated throughout the standards Integrated throughout the standards types and content of assessments (Standards 1 & 2) types and content of assessments (Standards 1 & 2) commitment to diversity (Standards 1, 3 & 4) commitment to diversity (Standards 1, 3 & 4) commitment to technology (Stds. 1, 2, 3, 5, & 6) commitment to technology (Stds. 1, 2, 3, 5, & 6) commitment to teaching competence and student learning (Standard 1) commitment to teaching competence and student learning (Standard 1) curriculum and instructional methods (Std. 5) curriculum and instructional methods (Std. 5)

Some Concerns with Conceptual Frameworks  The unit argues that its conceptual framework is based on state standards.  Cooperating teachers or methods faculty from Arts & Sciences have no idea whether the unit has a conceptual framework.  Evidence can not be found that the conceptual framework is supported in courses, field experiences, clinical practice, or assessments.