Applications of Hydrogeologic settings in Groundwater vulnerability mapping in LaGrange County, Indiana, USA Solomon A. Isiorho, PhD Dept. of Geosciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROTECTING AND PRESERVING GROUND WATER with MONITORING SYSTEMS and VULNERABILITY MAPS PAPATHEODOROU Konstantinos, Assoc. Professor 1 EVANGELIDIS Konstantinos,
Advertisements

What Do You Know About Michigans Hidden Resource? All photos by Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western Upper Peninsula Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental.
PROMOTING A COORDINATED GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT FOR LAGOS STATE: WAY FORWARD By PROFESSOR E.O. LONGE, PhD FACULTY OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL.
Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination in Texas
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
Robert Goldstein Senior Technical Executive, Water & Ecosystems WSWC–WGA Energy–Water Nexus Workshop Denver, April 2, 2013 Water Prism: Decision Support.
Regional Scale Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessments in the Mid-Atlantic Region Based on Statistical Probability Models A Multi-Scale and Multi-Threshold.
Prepared by: Earth Data N.E., Inc. August 19, 2008.
EVALUATION OF MINIMUM WELL SEAL DEPTH IN IDAHO
Vulnerability map of the Edwards Aquifer Rami Harfouch November 2009, Austin.
Distribution of Nitrate in Ground Water Under Three Unsewered Subdivisions Erin P. Eid Mike Trojan Jim Stockinger Jennifer Maloney Minnesota Pollution.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.
Groundwater Vulnerability Is There a Groundwater Quality Problem? U.S. Geological Survey, IN Dept of Environmental Management, USEPA, and IN Dept of.
Oromia Water Works Design and Supervision Enterprise
Study of the groundwater vulnerability of Sockcho area by using GIS
GIS – BASED DRASTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING
PROPOSAL FOR STATEWIDE GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY STUDY FOR MARYLAND By Olufunso S. Ogidan GEOG 596A 05 January 2010 A DVISER : D R. B ARRY E VANS.
MICHIGAN SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Michigan Section AWWA Annual Conference September 15, 2000 Bradley B. Brogren, P.E. Michigan Department of Environmental.
IMPORWARE EGYPT - WP2 Activities. Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) Established according to the Law 4/1994 (later amended by Law 9/1999) for.
Isiorho's paper Presented GSA May 19, 2005 Universities involvement of undergraduates in surface and groundwater research projects Universities involvement.
Core from Lake Wheeler Site 2 A’ Seven research sites are proposed for hydrologic investigation Map Number of Proposed Study Sites 1)Bent Creek Research.
Yield Determination Purpose Groundwater Classification Yield Methods Recent Issues.
Investigating Ground Water Contamination at Ohio’s C&DD Landfills Aaron Shear Ohio’s Solid Waste and C&DD Program Annual Meeting May 9, 2013.
Is it worth decontaminating groundwater ? Lessons from a cost benefit analysis in a French case study Stéphanie Aulong and Jean-Daniel Rinaudo Economic.
Chris M. Kapheim General Manager May 5, AID Groundwater Map.
STATEWIDE DRASTIC GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY STUDY FOR MARYLAND
Ground Water Conditions around the Lathers Property Town of Waukesha Douglas S. Cherkauer PhD, PG, PH November 15, 2007.
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
Hydrology is the science of water occurrence, movement and transport. Hydrology? Hydrogeology (hydro- meaning water, and -geology meaning the study of.
Harvey Thorleifson, Ph.D. Director Minnesota Geological Survey University of Minnesota.
INVOLVING UNDERGRADUATES IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER by ISIORHO, Solomon A. (PhD) Dept. of Geosciences.
GROUND-WATER AVAILABILITY Planning for Sustainable Future Water Supplies South of the C&D Canal Delaware Geological Survey – January 2007.
Study on scaling property of Topindex and the aquifer rating-curve in Illinois with the application of TopModel CE394K Term Project Presentation CE394K.
Groundwater Protection in the UK Tony Marsland National Groundwater & Contaminated Land Centre, Environment Agency, England & Wales.
Proposed Tools and Approach for Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessment (GWAVA) Using a Geographic Information System and Simulation Modeling Jack Barbash.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
Environmental Toolbox. Technical Module Introduction.
SOURCE WATER PROTECTION IN KARST SHENANDOAH VALLEY WATER CONFERENCE OCTOBER 28, 2008 WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA.
Probability of Detecting Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrate in Colorado’s Ground Water USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Shallow Ground-Water Quality in Agricultural and Urban Areas Within the Arid and Semiarid.
BRINGING GEOLOGY HOME TO UNDERGRADUATES USING YOUR SURROUNDING Solomon A. Isiorho (PhD) Dept. of Geosciences Indiana University - Purdue University Ft.
New activities Tour de Table – Lithuania Kestutis Kadunas, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
Estimating Groundwater Recharge in Porous Media Aquifers in Texas Bridget Scanlon Kelley Keese Robert Reedy Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of.
Water Cycle Review. Global Distribution of Water Quantity and QualityQuantity and Quality Demonstration activityDemonstration activity.
Development of Spatial Probability Models to Estimate, Integrate, and Assess Ground- Water Vulnerability at Multiple Scales Earl A. Greene and Andrew E.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
Understanding Wetlands “ Wetland Awareness: Results of a Campus Wide Survey” S. A. Isiorho & Katie M. Beard* Indiana University- Purdue University Fort.
South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe Source Protection Region Source Water Protection.
Determine most suitable area to artificial groundwater recharge in Parsyan basin in IRAN By: Mandana Ashouri GIS Supervisor: Dr. Maidment.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
NGR: Postcode: © Crown Copyright All rights reserved. Image reproduced with permission of Ordnance Survey and Ordnance Survey of Northern Ireland.
Son, Young Chul (K-water, Korea) World conference for Public Administration.
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AND LAND USE “It’s Cheaper to Prevent Contamination”
Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability through Statistical Methods I NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA.
The Dane County Regional Hydrologic Study. Conceptualized groundwater flow system for Dane County Source: Bradbury and others, 1999.
Final Presentation of GIS in Water Resources
Groundwater Vulnerability To Contamination
DRASTIC Source Water Assessment Method for
Aquifers and Groundwater flow
CLIMATE - HYDROGEOLOGY
Know the Flow: Exploring Ground Water Movement with 3-D Modeling
Relative volume of the ocean and Earth.
Planned risk assessment in Sweden
The inventory of Finnish groundwater resources
GIS – BASED DRASTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Hydrogeology of Ledgeview
Presentation transcript:

Applications of Hydrogeologic settings in Groundwater vulnerability mapping in LaGrange County, Indiana, USA Solomon A. Isiorho, PhD Dept. of Geosciences Indiana University - Purdue University Fort Wayne, IN

Outline of Presentation Problems Problems Study area Study area Hydrogeologic Setting Hydrogeologic Setting Methods/Discussions Methods/Discussions Conclusions Conclusions

Problems More than 60% depend on Ground water (100% in the study area) More than 60% depend on Ground water (100% in the study area) Three-dimensional detail geologic mapping…..to support informed decisions on land use, water resources development and protection, etc, is lacking Three-dimensional detail geologic mapping…..to support informed decisions on land use, water resources development and protection, etc, is lacking USEPA (1992)…maps did not correlate well with water quality analysis performed in the national Survey for Pesticides in Drinking Water USEPA (1992)…maps did not correlate well with water quality analysis performed in the national Survey for Pesticides in Drinking Water Increase in human population (~18% in 10 yrs (9% State wide 6.2 m )) Increase in human population (~18% in 10 yrs (9% State wide 6.2 m )) Contaminated potable water supply Contaminated potable water supply Several methods for assessing…produce different maps Several methods for assessing…produce different maps

Study Area LaGrange Map of Indiana USA North America

LaGrange County, Indiana

Hydrogeologic Setting

Unconsolidated Aquifer Groundwater flow direction (after Clendon & Beaty, 1987)

Groundwater flow direction (from T. Fleming, 1996)

Methods Examination of existing vulnerability map Examination of existing vulnerability map DRASTIC DRASTIC Collection of nitrate level data Collection of nitrate level data Compare nitrate levels distribution with DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability map Compare nitrate levels distribution with DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability map

DRASTIC D epth to ground water, Recharge rate, Aquifer media, Soil media, Topography, Impact of the vadose zone and Conductivity of the aquifer (DRASTIC).

Assumptions in DRASTIC The developers of DRASTIC noted that 1. Method does not replace site specific investigation 2. A measure of relative groundwater vulnerability…… one of many criteria used in decision making 3. Erroneous or inaccurate data entered may affect reliability of the results 4 Major Assumptions Uniform conditions within the subsurface environment Contamination reaches groundwater by precipitation Contaminant has the mobility of water Area of the study is greater than 100 acres

DRASTIC Criteria Data Source DRASTIC Criteria Data Source Depth to groundwaterWell logs USGS and IDNR Net recharge Water resource Reports Indiana 30 year Average Aquifer media Hydro-geologic report Soil media Soil Survey State Soils Geographic Database Topography Published Topographic maps USGS and IDNR Impact of vadose zone media Published Geologic reports K of an aquifer Published Hydrogeologic reports.

Vulnerability Map derived from DRASTIC (from Cooper, 1996)

Soil Map of LaGrange County

Vulnerability Map DRASTIC map SOIL map

Collection of Nitrate level Data Survey questionnaires 400 Survey questionnaires water bottles….507 nitrate data points…Health County personnel. 800 water bottles….507 nitrate data points…Health County personnel. Total of 1010 data points (503 from existing points) Total of 1010 data points (503 from existing points) Thirty one percent (311) high nitrate levels Thirty one percent (311) high nitrate levels But only 15% (150) are above 10ppm But only 15% (150) are above 10ppm 90% wells with high nitrate <15 m 90% wells with high nitrate <15 m Regression analysis…animal waste/depth significant with respect to nitrate level (F=-5.26, p<0.008) Regression analysis…animal waste/depth significant with respect to nitrate level (F=-5.26, p<0.008)

Nitrate Level Distribution Map (Red>10 ppm; Green =2-10ppm,Blue 10 ppm; Green =2-10ppm,Blue <2ppm; Black=0)

LaGrange County showing Nitrate levels above 10ppm LaGrange County showing Nitrate levels above 10ppm Nitrate levels Nitrate levels

Comparing Nitrate levels with DRASTIC Vulnerability Map

Why no perfect match between DRASTIC and Nitrate level maps? Hydrogeologic Setting/Landuse (from Summit Risk Inc)

Good correlation between nitrate detect and pesticides…implication for other contaminants Good correlation between nitrate detect and pesticides…implication for other contaminants (from ???) (from ???)

Effects of abandoned wells and impact of other land use (After Petty, 1996)

Conclusions Hydrogeologic mapping is important in the determination of groundwater vulnerability in any given area. Hydrogeologic mapping is important in the determination of groundwater vulnerability in any given area. Different methods yield slightly different groundwater vulnerability maps and would change with time. Different methods yield slightly different groundwater vulnerability maps and would change with time. Vulnerability maps produced for any area should be regarded as a working document. Future land use, including well construction and abandonment, would have great impact on such vulnerability maps. Vulnerability maps produced for any area should be regarded as a working document. Future land use, including well construction and abandonment, would have great impact on such vulnerability maps.