2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro TRAINING WORKSHOP ON FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT September 27 – October , Istanbul, TURKEY.
Advertisements

PROTECTING AND PRESERVING GROUND WATER with MONITORING SYSTEMS and VULNERABILITY MAPS PAPATHEODOROU Konstantinos, Assoc. Professor 1 EVANGELIDIS Konstantinos,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
PROMOTING A COORDINATED GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT FOR LAGOS STATE: WAY FORWARD By PROFESSOR E.O. LONGE, PhD FACULTY OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL.
GIS IN GEOLOGY Miloš Marjanović Lesson
Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination in Texas
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Environmental Modeling Basic GIS Modeling Suitability Index Modeling.
Vulnerability map of the Edwards Aquifer Rami Harfouch November 2009, Austin.
Distribution of Nitrate in Ground Water Under Three Unsewered Subdivisions Erin P. Eid Mike Trojan Jim Stockinger Jennifer Maloney Minnesota Pollution.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
Applications of Hydrogeologic settings in Groundwater vulnerability mapping in LaGrange County, Indiana, USA Solomon A. Isiorho, PhD Dept. of Geosciences.
Groundwater Vulnerability Is There a Groundwater Quality Problem? U.S. Geological Survey, IN Dept of Environmental Management, USEPA, and IN Dept of.
Oromia Water Works Design and Supervision Enterprise
Study of the groundwater vulnerability of Sockcho area by using GIS
GIS – BASED DRASTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING
PROPOSAL FOR STATEWIDE GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY STUDY FOR MARYLAND By Olufunso S. Ogidan GEOG 596A 05 January 2010 A DVISER : D R. B ARRY E VANS.
WPS Application Development of geospatial web application for site selection for artificial recharge of groundwater CSIR-National Environmental Engineering.
SHARP detailed experiences, good practices identified and information on SHARP manual Hans Kupfersberger, Joanneum Research external expert to lead partner.
KELLY HAYDEN Applying GIS to Watershed Pollution Management.
Towards Participatory Geographic Information Systems for Community Planning and Environmental Decision Making Piotr Jankowski Department of Geography San.
Integrated Approach for Assessing the Characteristic of Groundwater Recharge in Basin Scale Hsin-Fu Yeh*, Cheng-Haw Lee, Kuo-Chin Hsu Department of Resources.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
Viktor Yurochko Minsk’2011 Subregional Workshop of the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers for EECCA Countries Modern technologies of.
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 Web based catchment characteristics (info tool) – Digital Waterbook (DWB) Since the free web tool.
NGR: Postcode: © Crown Copyright All rights reserved. Image reproduced with permission of Ordnance Survey and Ordnance Survey of Northern Ireland.
Osh Technological University GIS Introduction & Overview Gulzara Mamazhakypova OshTU.
1 SCNR State Cadastres of Natural Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Tools for map analysis1 TOOLS FOR MAP ANALYSIS: MULTIPLE MAPS The ultimate purpose of most GIS projects is to combine spatial data from different sources,
STATEWIDE DRASTIC GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY STUDY FOR MARYLAND
Potential for water buffering A landscape based approach Lieselotte Tolk, et al.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Application CPA (Large Scale Map and Text Amendment): A request initiated by Alachua County to amend Conservation and Open Space Element as follows:
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
AQUIFER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: PROJECT REVIEW COLUMBIA COUNTY June 11, 2009 Columbia County, Florida Advanced GeoSpatial Inc. Alan Baker, P.G. James.
German Guidebook on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive Dr. Harald Irmer Germany.
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Comparing different scenarios with the use of DSS.
Study on scaling property of Topindex and the aquifer rating-curve in Illinois with the application of TopModel CE394K Term Project Presentation CE394K.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil.
2 nd International Conference Graz October, 10 th 2012 Key noteSHARP Sustainable Hydro Assessment & Groundwater Recharge Projects Hans Zojer Technical.
New activities Tour de Table – Lithuania Kestutis Kadunas, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
Development of Spatial Probability Models to Estimate, Integrate, and Assess Ground- Water Vulnerability at Multiple Scales Earl A. Greene and Andrew E.
GE 3128: Geographical Research Methods Mr. Idrissa Y. H. Assistant Lecturer In Geography Department of Social Sciences State University of Zanzibar Friday22.
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS AWRA Specialty Conference Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and.
DIAS INFORMATION DAY GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE Date: 09/07/2004 Research ideas by The Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences (DIAS)
Board of County Commissioners October 14, 2008 Vinzant Landing Swallet Santa Fe River.
Environmental Modeling Weighting GIS Layers Weighting GIS Layers.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
HYDROCAREHYDROCAREHYDROCAREHYDROCARE PP6 - Laboratory of Hydrology and Water Resources Management1 PP6: Laboratory of Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
A method to map flooding-prone areas in Iran using Landsat satellite images and GIS Ali Bozorgi, Iran Water Resources Management Company,
NGR: Postcode: © Crown Copyright All rights reserved. Image reproduced with permission of Ordnance Survey and Ordnance Survey of Northern Ireland.
Ljubljana, | Slide 1 Groundwater Quality Assessment Determination of chemical status and assessment on individual sites Austrian experience.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
Abstract No. M02 1. Introduction Many of Australia’s water management areas are over-allocated or highly developed, particularly in the Murray-Darling.
Final Presentation of GIS in Water Resources
Groundwater Vulnerability To Contamination
Estimation of Runoff & nonpoint source pollution using GIS techniques
DRASTIC Source Water Assessment Method for
Which method is most appropriate for assessing exposure?
Lab Director, Center for Environmental Quality Wilkes University
use of GIS to assess groundwater recharge in the Texas High Plains
Groundwater area protection plans in water management
Groundwater risk assessment in Regione Piemonte - Italy
The inventory of Finnish groundwater resources
Workshop Groundwater Characterisation, Brussels, 13th October 2003
at Umweltbundesamt GmbH Wien
GIS – BASED DRASTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
Presentation transcript:

2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability Maps Vulnerability maps inform about the need of groundwater protection and pollution prevention. The maps help to determine which areas may have groundwater vulnerability problems and what types of site-specific data or studies may be needed. Hazard assessment is used to define the potential hazards caused by human activities and can potentially have an impact on groundwater. Risk assessment is defined as a combination of hazard and vulnerability. Overlaying vulnerability maps, with maps showing the location of pollution sources or polluting land use activities, produces the pollution risk maps. In RWM “GIS-Vulnerability maps” have been developed using the DRASTIC method. The DRASTIC methodology was developed in the United States under cooperative agreement between the National Water Well Association (NWWA) and the USA Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for detailed hydro-geologic of evaluation pollution potential and is a model used to spatially and comparatively display high vulnerability areas in contrast to low vulnerability areas with respect to the potential to pollute groundwater. DRASTIC is an acronym for: D - Depth to water table R - net Recharge A - Aquifer media S - Soil media T – Topography I - Impact of the vadose zone C - hydraulic Conductivity of the aquifer Determination of the DRASTIC index involves multiplying each parameter weight by its site rating and summing the total. The equation for the DRASTIC Index (DI) is: DI=DrDw + RrRw + ArAw + SrSw + TrTw + IrIw + CrCw where: D, R, A, S, T, I, C were defined earlier, r is the rating for the study area and w is the importance weight for the parameter. Existing know-how of RWM focuses on indexing methods and in particular on the DRASTIC method because of below advantages. (+) The choice of the most appropriate method for groundwater vulnerability mapping to be used in any area depends on the data availability, spatial data distribution, mapping scale, purpose of the map and hydrogeological setting. The better the data availability, the more detailed the map. In areas where data availability is low but the general hydrogeological setup is known, DRASTIC would be a suitable method of choice. (+) DRASTIC is a popular model for groundwater vulnerability assessments as it is relatively inexpensive, straightforward, and uses data that are commonly available or estimated, producing an end product that is easily interpreted and incorporated into the decision-making process. (+) Vulnerability maps created in a GIS environment offer storage, manipulation and analysis of data in different formats and at different scales. This technique requires that all parameters are geographically referenced, digitized, and entered into a data base. Once in the data base, it is possible to register all data as data layers with a common coordinate system and manipulate them to produce thematic maps, and the final vulnerability map of a region. (+) Implementation of DRASTIC in Western Macedonia region is supported by the Geology Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, which is located close to RWM. (-) The shortcoming of DRASTIC is that it underestimates the vulnerability of fractured aquifers and that its weighting system is not scientifically based. Existing Good Practices Fig. 2: Vulnerability map for Sarigkiol Basin