14-5-2015 Application of Low Noise Road surfaces in the Netherlands: Excellent results but not enough to meet the legal targets Prepared by the Netherlands.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Holistic approach for rolling noise mitigation GRB 56 th Sep 3 – 5,

Advertisements

59 th GRB (28-30 January 2014) JASIC Japan proposal for Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle 1 Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle: GVM ≤ 2.5 ton PMR (power to mass ratio)

M+P | MBBM group Shifts in tyre sound levels between 2007 and 2013 Erik de Graaff (presented by Gijsjan van Blokland) Client: Netherlands.

Quiet Pavement ASPHALT: THE QUIET PAVEMENT

Portorož, Slovenia Statistical Properties of Road Traffic Noise Emission Measurements Marco ConterMarco Conter arsenal researcharsenal research ResearcherResearcher.

R&D in Norwegian Public Roads Administration Director Helen Riddervold.

CEDR Project Group Noise Value for Money in Noise Abatement Ingunn Milford Environmental Section Norwegian Public Roads Administration CEDR = Conference.

Noise classification for tendering quiet asphalt wearing courses Hans Bendtsen, Danish Road Directorate International Partnership MeetingWashington January.

Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.

Road Safety Policy in the Netherlands Road safety policy in the Netherlands

Triple-A tyres – benefits for environment, noise, safety and economy Results of ‘Potential benefits of Triple-A tyres in the Netherlands’, a study performed.

European Commission Enterprise and Industry New EU Regulation for the approval of 2-3 wheel vehicles and UNECE Regulations on sound level Working party.

Kyiv, May 16, 2005 Business Environment in Slovakia and Potential Learnings.

Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.

M+P – consulting engineers Müller-BBM group Acoustics Noise and vibration control Air quality Air Quality alongside motorways Air Quality alongside.

France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB

EU Transport Policy Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest, June Wioletta Szymanska Project Manager.

Measures for reducing vehicle noise

Applied AcousticsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Wolfgang Kropp Tor Kihlman Jens Forss é n Lars Ivarsson.

Dutch Campaign ‘Choose the Best Tyre’ Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda.

Traffic noise and motorway pavements W. Alberts, CEDR Road Noise, Geneva, Transmitted by the Conference of European Directors of Roads Informal.

Traffic Noise U.K. Perspective on Surfaces Presented by Mike Ainge 4 th – 6 th September 2006 Informal document No. GRB-44-6 (44th GRB, 4-6 September 2006.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Approval System for New Mobility The 52 nd Session for GRSP （ ~14 ） Ministry of Land,

Categorization of Light N1 Vehicles 58 th GRB (2 – 4 September 2013) JASIC This is a reference material for “GRB (Japan) Proposal for the 03 series.

Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,

RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.

1 Automotive industry Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles: New EU Commission legislative proposal World Forum on Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) 156.

LOA 5 D — Thin Noise-Reducing Asphalt Technology and Performance DAV, Bergisch Gladbach, 18 June 2012 Dipl.-Ing. Miomir Miljković The Faculty of Civil.

Regulatory Impact Assessment of New Vehicle Noise Test Colin Treleven Senior Consultant Environmental Assessment Group TRL Limited 6 th September 2005.

Influence of road surface on tyre rolling sound emission Report from the NordTyre project, part 2: Passenger car tyres. Truls Berge, SINTEF ICT, Norway.

Japanese proposal on R51 limit values JASIC 1 Informal document GRB Rev.1 (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda item 3(b))

Quiet road surfaces Eurocities - working group noise Chair: Henk Wolfert Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1.

Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP

Outcome of Meeting on “Environmentally Friendly Vehicle” on Noise Date : 15 th February th Informal Group Meeting on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS Assessment on the Minimum Sound Level of the Horn 60 th GRB Working Party on Noise September.

ICT 1 Scenario calculations on the effect of different source reduction on road vehicles using the TraNECam/Rotranomo calculation model, developed by H.Steven,

Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.

Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-45-3 (45th GRB, February.

Proposal Netherlands Tyre Noise Limits Original GRB Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3.

Results of the DISTANCE project Luc Goubert Belgian Road Research Centre LEO seminar, Oslo 2 June 2016.

Labelling road surfaces

Johan Sliggers Ministry of Environment The Netherlands

Security of In-Vehicle Software

The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China

Transmitted by the expert from Japan

64th GRB EU Regulation on AVAS requirements

Transmitted by the expert from Germany

Noise problems and driving conditions in China based on ECE R51.03

Noise Emission of Motor Vehicles

Reversing Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles

Timing to be activated the hazard lights

Strengthening Tyre Limits Informal doc GRB Rev.1

Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal Document No

43rd Session GRB 21 February 2006 Geneva, Switzerland

Driving conditions and conclusions of China on ASEP test method

Transmitted by the expert from Germany

Informal document GRB-68-29

CEDR = Conference of European Directors of Roads

New statistical needs in light of the EU climate action policy - introduction Task Force on the measurement of road traffic volumes in VKm, Luxembourg,

Informal document GRB-54-11

Strengthening Tyre limits ! New developments (2)

ETRTO answer to Contracting Party question from GRB 68th session

Amendment to regulation UN 117 Introduction of worn tyre performances

ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG

Update on forthcoming assessments by ETC/ACM

NL response to GRB (ETRTO)

Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017

New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects

Informal document GRB-55-16

China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.

Presentation transcript:

Application of Low Noise Road surfaces in the Netherlands: Excellent results but not enough to meet the legal targets Prepared by the Netherlands For GRB 44 Sept 2006 Geneva Informal document No. GRB-44-5 (44th GRB, 4-6 September 2006 agenda item 6.)

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 2 Why should we reduce noise? Noise = Health DALY= Disability Adjusted Life Years

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 3 Noise abatement Health  Laws  Levels of protection Conventional way: barriers and insulation. High growth of traffic  uncontrollable rise of cost NL: 4 bln EURO for national infrastructure alone All studies: source abatement is most effective and most cost efficient (max 1 bln EURO)

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 4 Sources of road traffic noise engine intake exhaust gearbox tyre/road contact wind

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 5 Source related noise abatement in the road sector Direct noise abatement at the source Vehicles (power train and wind noise) Tires Road surfaces Indirect noise abatement at the source: Town & infrastructure planning Traffic management −Speed & Driving behavior −Restriction of vehicles allowed in areas or time

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 6 Responsibilities Vehicle Noise limits: EU and UN/ECE Tire Noise limits: EU and UN/ECE Road surfaces: national or local

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 7 Potential of traffic noise reduction engine, tyre and road surface

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 8 Porous asphalt: Since 1940? reduction of splash & spray on airport runways Since 1980: application as low noise road surface (-3 dB at 120 km/h)

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 9 Acoustic optimisation of porous asphalt 1990: Two layered porous asphalt with improved surface texture

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands new types of silent Roads 2000: application of semi porous thin layers (very smooth surface texture Two-layered Porous Asphalt Thin Layer (semi porous)

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 11 Noise reducing Asphalt Layers

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 12 History of low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands Number of registered low noise road surface products 2001: Stimulation program Min Env 2004: Innovation program Min Env + Min Transp 1998: Type approval system Min Env

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 13 0 = reference dB(A) 50 km/h 120 km/h speed C road for light vehicles

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 14 Status low noise surfaces in the Netherlands 2006 Highways: 60% single layer porous 3% double layer porous Pilots on thin layers Future Double layer = standard in high noise regions

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands Can we sit back and relax now? Inhabitants of EU15 exposed to road traffic noise (data from 2000): >55 dB(A) >65 dB(A) >75dB(A) Percentage of population 32% 13% 2% Number of inhabitants (mln) Conclusion: NO! the necessary reduction is much bigger than the 5 dB we get from road surfaces

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 16 Spread in vehicle noise levels build up of two components: road surface effect, tyre/vehicle effect

Geneva, Sept 2006Low noise road surfaces in the Netherlands 17 What if we do not achieve the vehicle/tire targets? Health targets are often not reachable Local situations will enforce more often drastic measures drastic reduced speed Toll tunnel total vehicle ban Final cost for society is much higher than necessary

The end Thank you for your attention