Olivia Clifton GloDecH Meeting May 28, 2014 Acknowledgments. Arlene Fiore (CU/LDEO), Gus Correa (LDEO), Larry Horowitz (NOAA/GFDL), Vaishali Naik (UCAR/GFDL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Advertisements

Simulating isoprene oxidation in GFDL AM3 model Jingqiu Mao (NOAA GFDL), Larry Horowitz (GFDL), Vaishali Naik (GFDL), Meiyun Lin (GFDL), Arlene Fiore (Columbia.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Atmospheric chemistry analysis and modeling at LDEO: Connecting global composition, climate, and air quality Atmos. Chem at CU Group Meeting Arlene.
CAM-Chem and hemispheric transport of ozone and PAN Chemistry-Climate Working Group 15 th Annual CCSM Workshop, Breckenridge, CO June 29, 2010 Arlene M.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
QUESTIONS 1.Is hexane more or less reactive with OH than propane? 2.Is pentene or isoprene more reactive with OH?
Outline Further Reading: Detailed Notes Posted on Class Web Sites Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GE 101 – Spring 2007 Boston University Myneni L29:
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
Interactions Among Air Quality and Climate Policies: Lectures 7 and 8 (abridged versions)
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
SETTING THE STAGE FOR: BIOSPHERE, CHEMISTRY, CLIMATE INTERACTIONS.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
This Week—Tropospheric Chemistry READING: Chapter 11 of text Tropospheric Chemistry Data Set Analysis.
Aerosols and climate Rob Wood, Atmospheric Sciences.
BIOGEOSPHERIC CHANGE RESPONSE OF ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE AND DISTRIBUTION TO ALTERED FORCING © 2007 T. Kittel Clarice Bassi - Anavilhanas.
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY: FROM AIR POLLUTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE AND BACK Daniel J. Jacob.
Southeast Nexus (SENEX) Studying the Interactions Between Natural and Anthropogenic Emissions at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change A NOAA Field.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Lecture 16 Observations of climate change Feedback mechanisms Air pollution The stratospheric ozone hole Changing land surfaces Greenhouse gases and global.
Konrad Cunningham, Joel Arberman, Nadine Bell, Susan Harder, Drew Schindell, Gavin Schmidt The Effects of Climate and Emission Changes on Surface Sulfate.
FROM AIR POLLUTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE AND BACK: Towards an integrated international policy for air pollution and climate change Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University.
Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam* and Yang Gao University of Tennessee Daniel Jacob, Loretta Mickley and Shiliang Wu Harvard University Oct 20, 2009 The effects.
Interactions between Climate and Air Quality 30 th NATO/SPS International Technical Meeting on Air Pollution Modelling and its Application San Francisco,
Natural and Anthropogenic Drivers of Arctic Climate Change Gavin Schmidt NASA GISS and Columbia University Jim Hansen, Drew Shindell, David Rind, Ron Miller.
EPS Colloquium, Harvard Cambridge, MA May 5, Arlene M. Fiore Acknowledgments: Olivia Clifton, Gus Correa, Nora Mascioli, Lee Murray, Luke.
Impacts of Aerosols on Climate Extremes in the USA Nora Mascioli.
Investigation of the U.S. warming hole and other adventures in chemistry-climate interactions Loretta J. Mickley Pattanun Achakulwisut, Becky Alexander,
IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air Quality Fiona M. O’Connor, Atmospheric Composition & Climate Team, Met Office Hadley Centre.
Effect of NO x emission controls on the long-range transport of ozone air pollution and human mortality J. Jason West, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz,
Human fingerprints on our changing climate Neil Leary Changing Planet Study Group June 28 – July 1, 2011 Cooling the Liberal Arts Curriculum A NASA-GCCE.
Research Needs for Decadal to Centennial Climate Prediction: From observations to modelling Julia Slingo, Met Office, Exeter, UK & V. Ramaswamy. GFDL,
Source vs. Sink Contributions to Atmospheric Methane Trends:
Assessment of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A synthesis of climate change impacts on ground-level ozone An Interim Report.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
MOZART Development, Evaluation, and Applications at GFDL MOZART Users’ Meeting August 17, 2005 Boulder, CO Arlene M. Fiore Larry W. Horowitz
Aerosols and climate - a crash course Marianne T. Lund CICERO Nove Mesto 17/9-15.
Air Quality and Climate Connections AQAST9 St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO June 3, 2015 Arlene M. Fiore Acknowledgments: V. Naik (GFDL), E. Leibensperger.
REGIONAL/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Greenhouse gases Halocarbons Ozone Aerosols Acids Nutrients Toxics SOURCE CONTINENT REGIONAL ISSUES:
Importance of chemistry-climate interactions in projections of future air quality Loretta J. Mickley Lu Shen, Daniel H. Cusworth, Xu Yue Earth system models.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western U.S. in spring Meiyun Lin Lin, M., A. M. Fiore,
Future Air Quality in Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios: Relationships Between Economic Wellbeing and Air Quality J. Jason West Steven J.
Symposium in celebration of Jennifer Logan Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Cambridge, MA May 10, Arlene M. Fiore Recent.
Key drivers of surface ozone variability, from WUS background to EUS extremes AQAST6 Rice University, Houston, TX January 15, 2014 Arlene M. Fiore Acknowledgments.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
ORIGIN OF BACKGROUND OZONE IN SURFACE AIR OVER THE UNITED STATES: CONTRIBUTION TO POLLUTION EPISODES Daniel J. Jacob and Arlene M. Fiore Atmospheric Chemistry.
Ozone pollution extremes over the eastern USA in summer: Recent trends, future projections U.S. EPA NCER/ASD Webinar Applied Sciences Webinar Series August.
Symposium on Abrupt Climate Change in a Warming World LDEO, Palisades, NY May 23, Arlene M. Fiore Acknowledgments: Elizabeth Barnes (NOAA/LDEO,
Background ozone in surface air over the United States Arlene M. Fiore Daniel J. Jacob US EPA Workshop on Developing Criteria for the Chemistry and Physics.
Why care about methane Daniel J. Jacob. Global present-day budget of atmospheric methane Wetlands: 160 Fires: 20 Livestock: 110 Rice: 40 Oil/Gas: 70 Coal:
Evaluating surface ozone- temperature relationships over the eastern U.S. in chemistry-climate models D.J. Rasmussen, Arlene Fiore, Vaishali Naik, Larry.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
Linking regional air pollution with global chemistry and climate:
Reducing tropospheric ozone with methane controls:
Ozone pollution (events) in the GFDL AM3 chemistry-climate model
Distribution and Trends: Impacts on Climate and Ozone Air Quality
Global Change and Air Pollution
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE AND OXIDANT CHEMISTRY
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Climate response to changing United States aerosol sources
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
AIR POLLUTION AND GLOBAL CHANGE: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED POLICY
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
The global cycle of methane CMI methane project
Presentation transcript:

Olivia Clifton GloDecH Meeting May 28, 2014 Acknowledgments. Arlene Fiore (CU/LDEO), Gus Correa (LDEO), Larry Horowitz (NOAA/GFDL), Vaishali Naik (UCAR/GFDL)

Surface Ozone (O 3 ): degrades air quality & is injurious to human health and vegetation Surface O 3 = NO x + sunlight +

NO x -limited Ridge Surface O 3 levels controlled by nonlinear chemistry NO x -saturated Reductions in NO x emissions achieve local-to-regional decreases in surface O 3 and reductions in CH 4 emissions lower the surface O 3 everywhere [Fiore et al., 2002] In highly polluted regions (very high regional NO x ), NO x can destroy surface O 3 OZONE CONCENTRATIONS vs. NO x & VOC EMISSIONS

Seasonal cycle of observational surface O 3 at NE monitoring sites during Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec mean across 3 regionally representative Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) sites [Reidmiller et al., 2008] Regionally representative site (each site has 4-6 years of observations) Washington Crossing, NJ Penn State, PA Connecticut Hill, NY

Seasonal cycle of observational surface O 3 at NE monitoring sites during Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec mean across 3 regionally representative Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) sites [Reidmiller et al., 2008] Highest surface O 3 during the summer due to presence of precursor emissions (both NO x and VOCs) and favorable meteorological conditions (i.e. high temperatures, low cloud cover, and stagnation) Regionally representative site Densely populated and highly polluted region

Change in seasonal cycle of observational surface O 3 over NE due to a 26% decrease in regional NO x emissions Solid: , pre-NO x emission controls Dashed: , post-NO x emission decreases -26% NE NO x Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Regionally representative site mean across 3 regionally representative Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) sites [Reidmiller et al., 2008]

Change in seasonal cycle of observational surface O 3 over NE due to a 26% decrease in regional NO x emissions Solid: , pre-NO x emission controls Dashed: , post-NO x emission decreases Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec How will the surface O 3 seasonal cycle over the NE US respond to further regional as well as global precursor emission changes during the rest of 21 st C? Regionally representative site -26% NE NO x mean across 3 regionally representative Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) sites [Reidmiller et al., 2008]

GFDL CM3 chemistry-climate model is the tool that we use to project 21 st C surface O 3 Donner et al. [2011]; Golaz et al. [2011]; Levy et al. [2013]; Naik et al. [2013]; Austin et al. [2013]; John et al. [2012] cubed sphere grid ~2°x2° 48 vertical levels Atmospheric Dynamics & Physics Radiation, Convection (includes wet deposition of tropospheric species), Clouds, Vertical diffusion, and Gravity wave Atmospheric Dynamics & Physics Radiation, Convection (includes wet deposition of tropospheric species), Clouds, Vertical diffusion, and Gravity wave Chemistry of gaseous species (O 3, CO, NO x, hydrocarbons) and aerosols (sulfate, carbonaceous, mineral dust, sea salt, secondary organic) Dry Deposition Aerosol-Cloud Interactions Chemistry of O x, HO y, NO y, Cly, Br y, and Polar Clouds in the Stratosphere Forcing Solar Radiation Well-mixed Greenhouse Gas Concentrations Volcanic Emissions Forcing Solar Radiation Well-mixed Greenhouse Gas Concentrations Volcanic Emissions Ozone–Depleting Substances (ODS) Modular Ocean Model version 4 (MOM4) & Sea Ice Model Modular Ocean Model version 4 (MOM4) & Sea Ice Model Pollutant Emissions (anthropogenic, ships, biomass burning, natural, & aircraft) Land Model version 3 (soil physics, canopy physics, vegetation dynamics, disturbance and land use) Land Model version 3 (soil physics, canopy physics, vegetation dynamics, disturbance and land use) GFDL-CM3 GFDL-CM3 Atmospheric Chemistry 86km c/o V. Naik

Evaluation of CM3 with observational surface O 3 over NE -10% IMW NO x Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec -26% NE NO x Solid: , pre-NO x emission controls Dashed: , post-NO x emission decreases OBS CM3 mean across 3 regionally representative CASTNet sites [Reidmiller et al., 2008] Regionally representative site 3 Ensemble member mean

Evaluation of CM3 with observational surface O 3 over NE -10% IMW NO x Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec -26% NE NO x Solid: , pre-NO x emission controls Dashed: , post-NO x emission decreases OBS CM3 Despite high bias, CM3 captures the overall structure of the seasonal surface O 3 changes over the NE & thus the response of surface O 3 to the NO x emission controls mean across 3 regionally representative CASTNet sites [Reidmiller et al., 2008] Regionally representative site 3 Ensemble member mean

Evaluation of CM3 with observational surface O 3 over NE -10% IMW NO x Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec -26% NE NO x Solid: , pre-NO x emission controls Dashed: , post-NO x emission decreases OBS CM3 We conclude that we can use CM3 to determine how surface O 3 will respond to future precursor emission changes Despite high bias, CM3 captures the overall structure of the seasonal surface O 3 changes over the NE & thus the response of surface O 3 to the NO x emission controls mean across 3 regionally representative CASTNet sites [Reidmiller et al., 2008] Regionally representative site 3 Ensemble member mean

Month of peak monthly mean surface O 3 (3 ensemble member mean) Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec

Month of peak monthly mean surface O 3 (3 ensemble member mean) Clear shift in the peak from summer to winter/early spring over Eastern US Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec

Month of peak monthly mean surface O 3 (3 ensemble member mean) Clear shift in the peak from summer to winter/early spring over Eastern US Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Under RCP8.5 RCPs created in conjunction with IPCC AR5 and CMIP5 Designed to attain a specific RF (8.5 W/m 2 ) by 2100 The most extreme 21 st C Climate scenario with doubling of global CH 4 abundance by 2100

Month of peak monthly mean surface O 3 (3 ensemble member mean) Under RCP8.5 RCPs developed by CMIP effort in support of IPCC Designed to attain a specific RF (8.5 W/m 2 ) by 2100 The most extreme 21 st C Climate scenario with doubling of global CH 4 abundance by Clear shift in the peak from summer to winter/early spring over Eastern US Investigate the drivers of this shift over NE (drastic regional NO x emission decreases, changes in global CH 4 abundance, increased climate warming, or some combination?) by examining the change in seasonal cycle at beginning & end of 21 st C Evaluate the magnitude of the change in surface O 3 & the change in shape of seasonal cycle Compare RCP8.5 with RCP4.5 (moderate; 10% decrease of global CH 4 ) as well as with sensitivity simulations Investigate the drivers of this shift over NE (drastic regional NO x emission decreases, changes in global CH 4 abundance, increased climate warming, or some combination?) by examining the change in seasonal cycle at beginning & end of 21 st C Evaluate the magnitude of the change in surface O 3 & the change in shape of seasonal cycle Compare RCP8.5 with RCP4.5 (moderate; 10% decrease of global CH 4 ) as well as with sensitivity simulations Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec

Surface O 3 seasonal cycle at beginning and end of the 21 st C under RCP4.5 and RCP % NE NO x -10% global CH % global CH 4 Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Each symbol is ensemble member; lines are ensemble member mean (3)

Surface O 3 seasonal cycle at beginning and end of the 21 st C under RCP4.5 and RCP % NE NO x NE resembles baseline O 3 conditions by end of 21 st C [NRC, 2009; Parrish et al., 2013] Reversal of the NE surface O 3 seasonal cycle during 21 st C after 2020s (not shown) -10% global CH % global CH 4 Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec

Surface O 3 seasonal cycle at beginning and end of the 21 st C under RCP8.5 and a sensitivity simulation holding all CH 4 at 2005 levels Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec -90% NE NO x +114% global CH 4 -90% NE NO x +0% global CH 4 The doubling of global methane abundance raises the entire seasonal cycle by about 6-11 ppb, with the greatest differences between RCP8.5 and RCP8.5_2005CH4 during January through March when the O 3 lifetime is longest

Surface O 3 seasonal cycle at beginning and end of the 21 st C under RCP8.5 and a sensitivity simulation holding all CH 4 at 2005 levels -90% NE NO x +114% global CH 4 -90% NE NO x +0% global CH 4 Reduced NO x emissions play a role in increasing surface O 3 during the winter in highly polluted regions [US EPA, 2014] While NO x exerts a dominant influence on the shape of the surface O 3 seasonal cycle, global CH 4 abundance influences the baseline surface O 3 abundance during all months Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec

Rising baseline surface O 3 by 2100 from increases in global CH 4 abundance RCP8.5_2005CH4_rad same as RCP (not shown) RCP8.5_2005CH4_chem (dashed) same as RCP8.5_2005CH % IMW NOx The CH 4 impact on surface O 3 in the model occurs mainly though atmospheric chemistry, rather than through the additional climate forcing from CH 4 Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec NE US N 80-70W IMW US 36-46N W - 90% NE NOx

Impact of a warming climate on the surface O 3 seasonal cycle Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec RCP4.5_WMGG & RCP8.5_WMGG isolate impacts from a changing climate JJA NE temp inc. by 5.5ºC JJA NE temp inc. by 2.5ºC Same findings under RCP4.5_WMGG & RCP8.5_WMGG, but magnitude of each change depends on the regional temperature increases

Impact of a warming climate on the surface O 3 seasonal cycle Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec RCP4.5_WMGG & RCP8.5_WMGG isolate impacts from a changing climate JJA NE temp inc. by 5.5ºC JJA NE temp inc. by 2.5ºC General increases in summertime surface O 3 over NE reflect “Climate change penalty” Wu et al., 2008 need for stricter emission controls to achieve a given level of air quality due to warming climate (but in absence of precursor emission changes)

Impact of a warming climate on the surface O 3 seasonal cycle Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec RCP4.5_WMGG & RCP8.5_WMGG isolate impacts from a changing climate JJA NE temp inc. by 5.5ºC JJA NE temp inc. by 2.5ºC Climate change penalty predominantly affects surface O 3 during the photochemically active season, May-September, in regions with sufficiently high anthropogenic NO x emissions Broadening of the summertime peak over the NE with similar levels of surface O 3 in June- August, as opposed to a clear peak in July

Conclusions Reversal of NE US high-surface O 3 season Changing regional emissions alters high surface O 3 season Climate change broadens surface O 3 peak in NE US Rising global CH 4 can offset O 3 decreases from U.S. precursor reductions NE at end of 21 st C more representative of baseline O 3 conditions