France & Belgium gaming updates Legal Gaming in Europe Summit London, 22 January 2007 Thibault VERBIEST Partner – ULYS
Legal Gaming Summit Content 1. France Parliament voting new law ►measures against online gambling operators 2. Belgium Draft Games of chance Act
Legal Gaming Summit Draft measures against private gaming operators Fines against operators of “illegal” online gaming sites to be doubled from euros fine to euros for sports betting and lotteries operators; from and euros fine to and for horse betting operators; Fines against “advertisers”: euros + possibility for courts to multiply this fine by four times the amount invested in the advertising expenses
Legal Gaming Summit ISPs to inform clearly subscribers of the gambling sites which are considered by Home affairs as “inappropriate” (“blacklisted”) under sanction of up to a year imprisonment + € fine Banks to stop the flow of funds from individuals or “blacklisted” companies which organise betting or gaming activities Law likely to be voted by the end of February
Legal Gaming Summit Unlawful character of the Act Community law principles ► article 49 and Gambelli Lack of notification under Directive 98/48 Freedom of expression (ECHR) Commission currently examining French answer to letter of formal notice
Legal Gaming Summit Ongoing actions Complaint to DG competition High administrative court seized of consistency of monopoly with EU law Lobby against the new law but highly political climate makes any drastic change unlikely (presidential elections) Annulment by the French Constitutional Court ?
Legal Gaming Summit Belgium Parliament voting on new Games of chance Act Possibility for EU remote gaming operators to obtain “certificate” with Gaming Commission if fit and proper All games to be subject to control of Gaming Commission Gaming Commission to allow only limited number of licences Act was set to be adopted via 2006 Finance Act but lobby by National Lottery+ some Belgian casinos Act now undergoing normal legislative procedure Likely to be adopted as such within 3-4 months
Legal Gaming Summit Concluding remarks France toughening its stance but difficult to know whether it will “walk the talk” Gaming policy inconsistent with EC law Political matter and pre-electoral period Senate report calls for a new simplified and harmonized gaming policy Belgium likely to adopt new Act ►regulation rather than prohibition Lack of harmonisation between gaming legislation
Thank you for your attention