Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Defining Capacity of Airport Passenger Buildings Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Engineering Systems and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Planning and Queuing Models
Advertisements

PEDESTRIANS Osama Tabash Khaled El-Yazory Dr. Essam Almasri
Capacity, Level of Service, Intersection Design (1)
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Configuration of Airport Passenger Buildings Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Engineering Systems and Civil.
Capacity Setting and Queuing Theory
S. D. Deshmukh OM V. Capacity Planning in Services u Matching Supply and Demand u The Service Process u Performance Measures u Causes of Waiting u Economics.
Belfast Dublin Edinburgh London. Evacuation Modelling in Design Jeremy Gardner Jeremy Gardner Associates.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN  Forecasting Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Engineering Systems and Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Vehicle Flow.
1 1 Capacity Measurements in Airport Sector: Drawbacks of Conventional Methods and Benchmarking Airports Using Declared Capacity Tolga Ülkü Presented in:
Queuing Models Basic Concepts
Model Antrian By : Render, ect. Outline  Characteristics of a Waiting-Line System.  Arrival characteristics.  Waiting-Line characteristics.  Service.
1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Sep-09Operations Management: Waiting Lines2  Made-to-stock (MTS) operations  Product is manufactured and stocked in advance of.
Queuing Systems Chapter 17.
Chapter 13 Queuing Theory
Queues / Lines You manage a call center which can answer an average of 20 calls an hour. Your call center gets 17.5 calls in an average hour. On average.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Queuing CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
14-1. Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 14 Capacity Planning and Queuing Models.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN AIRPORT PASSENGER BUILDINGS: EFFICIENCY THRU SHARED USE  Dr. Richard de Neufville  Professor of Engineering Systems.
Denver Airport Baggage Handling System (DABHS)
Operations Management Waiting-Line Models Module D
QUEUING MODELS Queuing theory is the analysis of waiting lines It can be used to: –Determine the # checkout stands to have open at a store –Determine the.
WINTER 2012IE 368. FACILITY DESIGN AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT 1 IE 368: FACILITY DESIGN AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Lecture Notes #3 Production System Design.
1 Congestion Pricing and Queuing Theory Giovanni Andreatta and Guglielmo Lulli Dip. di Matematica Pura ed Applicata - Università di Padova.
OPSM 301: Operations Management
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis
Introduction to Management Science
1 Chapter 16 Applications of Queuing Theory Prepared by: Ashraf Soliman Abuhamad Supervisor by : Dr. Sana’a Wafa Al-Sayegh University of Palestine Faculty.
Management of Waiting Lines McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Massachusetts Institute of Technology Richard de Neufville © Recognition of Uncertainty Slide 1 of 25 River Length.
Terminal Design Passenger Processing. errata  Consider TSA impacts.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Cultural Differences Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Introduction to Operations Research
Evaluation of Level of Service at Airport Passenger Terminals: Individual Components and Overall Perspectives Anderson Correia Department of Civil Engineering.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN  Airport Strategic Planning Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Engineering Systems and Civil and Environmental.
Structure of a Waiting Line System Queuing theory is the study of waiting lines Four characteristics of a queuing system: –The manner in which customers.
Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Richard de Neufville © Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamic Programming Slide 1 of 35 Dynamic Programming.
18 Management of Waiting Lines.
Waiting Lines and Queuing Models. Queuing Theory  The study of the behavior of waiting lines Importance to business There is a tradeoff between faster.
Spreadsheet Models for Managers: Session 12 12/1 Copyright © Richard Brenner Spreadsheet Models for Managers Session 12 Service Systems Single-Server.
8/24/04 Paul A. Jensen Operations Research Models and Methods Copyright All rights reserved Material Movement The movement of material through the.
Traffic Flow Fundamentals
Parking Instructors: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Dr. Essam Almasri.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY LEADING EDGE GROUP Welcome Using Simulation Modelling to improve the performance of Healthcare Facilities.
Vehicle Flow. Homework Ch 3 # 1,4, 7, 15 Vehicle Flow How do vehicles operate in the system –capacity –speed –headway –density.
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Airport and Airline Access Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Systems Engineering and Civil and Environmental.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Design of Components of Airport Passenger Buildings Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Engineering Systems and.
Components of AP Pax Bldgs Slide 1 of 27 / RdN © Design of Components of Airport Passenger Buildings Richard de Neufville Professor of Engineering Systems.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Design Aducation Forum for Africa Conference, Pretoria, June 2004 How design links with NEPAD strategies and requirements The air transport infrastructure.
12/08/ J/ESD.204J1 Real-Time Control Strategies for Rail Transit Outline: Problem Description and Motivation Model Formulation Model Application.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 13-14: Queue management Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Queueing Theory.
Management of Waiting Lines Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Abu Bashar Queuing Theory. What is queuing ?? Queues or waiting lines arise when the demand for a service facility exceeds the capacity of that facility,
MODULE 4, LESSON 5 Developing Service: Calculating Capacity.
INAIR →November 13 th, 2015 →“Benefits from an optimization culture” →Thomas Hoff Andersson Director of Airport Optimization, Copenhagen Airports.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Defining Capacity of Airport Passenger Buildings
Dr. Richard de Neufville
Transportation Engineering Basic Queuing Theory February 18, 2011
Dr. Richard de Neufville
Dr. Richard de Neufville
Design of Components of Airport Passenger Buildings
Dr. Richard de Neufville
Terminal Design Passenger Processing
Queuing Models and Capacity Planning
Presentation transcript:

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Defining Capacity of Airport Passenger Buildings Dr. Richard de Neufville Professor of Engineering Systems and Civil and Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Defining Capacity of Airport Passenger Buildings Objective: To Present and Explain Standards for Sizing Topics  Concepts of Capacity  Design Concept  Levels of Service  IATA Space Standards (New Version in 2004!)  Dwell Time  Flow Standards  Summary

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Concepts of Capacity I 1. Static: Storage Potential of Facility 2. Dynamic: Ability of Facility to Process Flows  The Central Concept for the Design of Airport Passenger Buildings  Passengers, bags, cargo always Queue for and Move through Services (e.g.: Check-in, inspections, waiting for departures, etc.)

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Concepts of Capacity II Dynamic Capacity can be: 1. Sustained: Maximum flow over a significant period i.e., a morning arrival period 2. Maximum: Maximum flow for a brief period Dynamic Capacity is a Variable!!! Unlike Static Capacity, of a bottle

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Design Concept From Queuing Theory recall: More Space, Service => Less Delays Design for Dynamic Flows is: Tradeoff between Delays … and Cost of Service, Space Dynamic Capacity depends on:  1. Acceptable level of Delays and thus:  2. Length of Period over which delays build up For Short Periods, More Delays OK

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Level of Service (LOS) A verbal description of Quality of Service in terms of Ease of Flow and Delays 6 categories (IATA Airport Development Man.): LOSFlowsDelaysComfort A - ExcellentFreeNoneExcellent B - HighStableVery FewHigh C - GoodStableAcceptableGood D - AdequateUnstablePassableAdequate E - InadequateUnstableUnacceptableInadequate F - Unacceptable--- System Breakdown ---Unacceptable System Managers should Specify LOS, e.g:  Level C = standard minimum ; Level D = for crush periods

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN IATA LOS Space Standards (old version: Airport Development Manual, 8th ed.,1995) Useful intro to more sophisticated new version In square meters per person More space needed for movement, with bags

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN IATA Stds: Wait / Circulate (new version: Airport Development Manual, 9th ed., 2004) Old: New:  Distinguishes locations, likelihood of carts  References speed

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN IATA Stds: Passport / Hold (new version: Airport Development Manual, 9th ed., 2004) Old: New (for hold rooms only):  Assumes 1.7 m 2 /pax sitting, 1.2 m 2 / standee  LOS defined in terms of % of space used

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN IATA Stds: Bag Claim Area (new version: Airport Development Manual, 9th ed., 2004) Old: New:  Assumes 40% of Passengers use carts  Has a wider range: more for A, less for E

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN IATA Stds: Check-in Area (new version: Airport Development Manual, 9th ed., 2004) Old: New:  Reflects impact of number of bags, carts

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Snake Line at LOS = C

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Snake line at LOS = E

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Note: Kiosks change process Kiosks = automated check-in machines => CUSS (Common Use Self Service) if common Speeds up check-in  Automated data entry (try to enter “de Neufville”) Less Staff, Less counter Space  Old layouts obsolete: e.g., Boston Internatl. Bldg Disperses Queues  Latest standards do not apply easily… CUSS at Las Vegas, Tokyo, in Canada

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Dwell Time Determines Capacity of any space or process A Central Concept: Source of Major Problems Is Average Time a body is in a space or process When a person leaves a space, Replacement can use it As people move faster  Dwell time is shorter  More replacements can use space in any period

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Formula for Space Required Space Required, sq. meters = (Load, pers./hour) (Std, sq.m./person) (Dwell time, hours) = (Persons/Time) (Area/Person) (Time) = Area Example: What space is required for passport inspection of 2000 passengers per hour when maximum wait is 20 minutes? Space Needed = 2000 (1) (1/3) = 667 sq. m.

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Formula for Capacity of a Space Load, persons per hour = (Space, sq. m.) / (Std, sq. m. per pers)(Dwell time, hrs) Examples:  What is the recommended load (LOS =C) for a waiting room 30x50m, in which transit passengers average 90 minutes? Recommended load = (30) (50) / (1.9) (1.5) = 1500 / 2.85 = 527  What is the crush capacity of the same space? Crush load = (30) (50) / (1.5) (1.5) = 667 pers. per hr.

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Flow Standards  In terms of PMM = Persons/Minute/Meter

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Level of Service Diagram for Passenger Flows generously comfortable OK for peak hours LOS D LOS C

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Assumptions of Flow Standards Two Factors  1. Space per Person e.g.: 1.9 sq. m. per person for LOS = C  2. Walking Speed e.g.: 66 meters/min = 4 km/hour => Low Dwell Time => High Capacity Example: Capacity of Corridor, 5m. wide, 40m. long Dwell time = 40 / 4000 = 0.01 hour Recommended Load, persons per hour = (5) (20) / (1.9) (0.01) = 5,000

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Formula for Flow Areas Total Corridor Width Needed, meters = Effective Width + 1.5m. for edge effects Eff. width = (Persons /Minute) / (PMM) Example: What is recommended width of corridor to handle 600 persons per quarter hour, in both directions? Effective width = 80 / 20 = 4.0m Required width = = 5.5m Note: Corridor capacity is very great!  Most corridors > need ; Architectural considerations dominate

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN LOS varies over day, year! Example Distribution from Toronto

Airport Systems Planning & Design / RdN Summary Key concepts about capacity:  1. Not purely technical issue  2. Management decision about tradeoffs Cost vs. LOS  3. Financial and Service Objectives are critical Key technical details:  1. Dwell time critical factor  2. Through flows slash dwell time  3. Capacity of corridors enormous