Developed by The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Dr. Sherry Broome, Regional Lead Self-Evaluation Training for Better School Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Continuous Improvement Professional Learning Community Framework What does it look like? What does it look like? Module Two.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Agenda December 11, 2008 Learning by Doing Break
Continuous Improvement
Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom
Data Analysis Chapter 11..powerful professional development tool that can lead to school improvement.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
Semonti Basu PBS Technical Assistance Facilitator Grace Martino-Brewster PBS Specialist Austin Independent School District Connecting Data Dots Using data-based.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Pioneer High School Our Journey: Becoming and Sustaining a Professional Learning Community.
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Self-Evaluation Training for Better School Improvement Developed by The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Dr. Sherry Broome, Regional Lead.
School Improvement Planning. Helen Timperley, “Using assessment data for improving, teaching practice”, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
The Quality Review A Reflection.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Math Professional Development October 17, 2013 Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?
School Governance for Parents: SSC Fundamentals An Introduction to the School Site Council (SSC) and Your Role in Developing the Balanced Scorecard.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Reflect and Revise: Evaluative Thinking for Program Success Tom DeCaigny and Leah Goldstein Moses.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
CFI: Quality Review Institute Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources Division of School Support August-September 2009 Network Leaders’ Guide.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Esd113.org ESD 113 Your partner for learning solutions Early Learning Data Institute Using the Cycle of Inquiry and Action For Program Improvement.
School Self – Evaluation
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Afternoon session. Aims  to become familiar with the rationale and structure of the renewed frameworks, including support for planning, teaching and.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
A Mission of Restoration
STAKEHOLDER MEETING Selecting Interventions to Improve Utilization of the IUD City, Country Date Insert MOH logoInsert Project logoInsert USAID logo (Note:
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
10+ Ways to Analyze Data Presenter: Lupe Lloyd Lupe Lloyd & Associates, Inc.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
Data Driven Instructional Leadership Region 18 – Leadership Development.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
WELCOME! DATA TEAM COACH TRAINING  Review the PLC Process, Roles and Expectations  Provide an opportunity for questions and possible responses.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Welcome to the (ENTER YOUR SYSTEM/SCHOOL NAME) Data Dig 1.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Evergreen Heights Elementary
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Developed by The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Dr. Sherry Broome, Regional Lead Self-Evaluation Training for Better School Improvement Day 2  Day 2

Review Why are we ALL here? What is CNA? How will CNA help? How can we foster change? Why do we need multiple measures ? Where do we find authoritative data?

Authoritative Data

Activity: Additional Key Data Sources Using the template provided, revise your Bernhardt Circles by adding/deleting data. List each under the appropriate category.

Today our focus is to… Deepen understanding of data and data sources Model the CNA process Identify a problem and generate possible data sources to address the problem Engage in process to identify root causes of the problem Discuss and outline a plan for implementing the CNA process in your department

Activity: Identifying Key Areas for Improvement In teams: Complete a self assessment using the CNA rubric. You must be able to justify your rating with data. You must be able to justify why a sub-dimension is not applicable to your department. Share and reflect on the problems you selected last night. Is your problem derived from a sub-dimension in which you identified your department as less than leading? Prioritize the problems.

Triangulation Direct Observation

“ When we focus only on student learning measures, we see school personnel using their time figuring out how to look better on the student learning measures. We want school personnel to use their time figuring out how to be better for all students.” Bernhardt,V. L., (1998,March). Invited Monograph No. 4.California Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (CASCD).

Morning Break

So Much Data… So Little Time... What will it tell you? What do you need to know? How can it help you? Where is it found?

Starting Data Dialogue Are there any patterns/trends? Does anything stand out to you?

Tree Map Activity Write your problem at the top of the chart paper you have been given. Create a tree map using the Bernhardt categories as the headings. List the data sources your department may use to analyze this problem.

Low Academic Achievement Demographics Perceptions Department Process Enrollment Ethnicity Gender Dropout Rate Attendance Teacher Licensure TWC Survey Parent Surveys Student Surveys Observations EOG/EOC Scores Benchmark Data Formative Assessment Data Teacher Observations Student Learning School Schedule Professional Development Plan Supplemental Programs Budget Transportation

Demographics Perceptions Department Processes Student Learning STATE THE PROBLEM DATA SOURCES

Creating a Culture of Inquiry “Willingness to ask questions—and to look for the real answers—gets to the heart of how data can stimulate the... change process.” Ruth S. Johnson, “Using Data to Close the Achievement Gap: How to Measure Equity in Our Schools”, 2002

Gallery Walk Place your group’s poster on the wall. When you hear the signal, move clockwise to the next chart. As you move about the room, look for commonalities between departments. We will debrief after the gallery walk.

Summary of Gallery Walk Aha’s Similarities (Overarching themes) Differences Impact

“Data make the invisible visible... revealing strengths and weaknesses that are easily concealed.” Mike J. Schmoker

Determining the Root Cause The Four Why’s

State the Problem Why is it a problem? Why is it a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem? Why is this a problem?

Four Whys – example Don’t think it will help They aren’t comfortable Don’t feel welcome Parent’s concerns not addressed Parents don’t have a positive view of schools Invitation seen by school as their responsibility Limited meeting agenda Historic practice No strong links with local community leader That has been their experience Their experience of schools was being told See school as a part of the ‘establishment’ No alternative models Only educational professionals involved Only concerned with what happens age 5-11 Aimed at solving school’s problems Classroom issues seen as priority Left school without sense of achievement Parents have no link to what their children are learning Parents not experienced adult education or training They had poor teaching Think that school will tell not listen Impersonal invitations – from a stranger Friends/wider family not invited Usually asked to come to school when there is trouble Learning seen as separate from everyday life Agenda limited to educational issues Agenda is school’s, not children’s Negative experiences as children Parents don’t engage Don’t respond to communications from school

Four Whys – example Don’t think it will help They aren’t comfortable Don’t feel welcome Parent’s concerns not addressed Parents don’t have a positive view of schools Invitation seen by school as their responsibility Limited meeting agenda Historic practice No strong links with local community leader That has been their experience Their experience of schools was being told See school as a part of the ‘establishment’ No alternative models Only educational professionals involved Only concerned with what happens age 5-11 Aimed at solving school’s problems Classroom issues seen as priority Left school without sense of achievement Parents have no link to what their children are learning Parents not experienced adult education or training They had poor teaching Think that school will tell not listen Impersonal invitations – from a stranger Friends/wider family not invited Usually asked to come to school when there is trouble Learning seen as separate from everyday life Agenda limited to educational issues Agenda is school’s, not children’s Negative experiences as children Parents don’t engage Don’t respond to communications from school

Activity: Four Whys – process State the challenge identified on the left side of the paper. Complete the diagram by moving from left to right. Move from the problem/issue statement by asking the group the question “why?” Capture the responses – this can be done by using Post-Its. For each response, again ask the question “why?” Continue to record responses and move across to the right of the diagram. Try to go to four levels of “whys.”

Four Whys – example Don’t think it will help They aren’t comfortable Don’t feel welcome Parent’s concerns not addressed Parents don’t have a positive view of schools Invitation seen by school as their responsibility Limited meeting agenda Historic practice No strong links with local community leader That has been their experience Their experience of schools was being told See school as a part of the ‘establishment’ No alternative models Only educational professionals involved Only concerned with what happens age 5-11 Aimed at solving school’s problems Classroom issues seen as priority Left school without sense of achievement Parents have no link to what their children are learning Parents not experienced adult education or training They had poor teaching Think that school will tell not listen Impersonal invitations – from a stranger Friends/wider family not invited Usually asked to come to school when there is trouble Learning seen as separate from everyday life Agenda limited to educational issues Agenda is school’s, not children’s Negative experiences as children Parents don’t engage Don’t respond to communications from school

Where are we now?

Models of Excellence Understanding others Share the vision Personal Values and Passionate Conviction Monitor, evaluate and improve Build commitment and support Gather data and gain understanding Plan for delivery

Next Steps – The Process T Chart What do you do well? How do you know? Perception v measurable evidences Bernhardt Circles Identify multiple sources of data Triangulate data to identify/address problems CNA rubric self-evaluation Identify areas of strengths and weaknesses Identify/Prioritize areas of need The Four Whys Identify root causes Determine those over which you have control Identify focused actions Create the Plan – Day 3

Homework Go through the process with your staff Identify departmental areas of need based on your CNA ratings Continue collecting data which are focused on the 14 sub-dimensions to bring to the next training

Feedback on Today Even better if … What went well?