Traffic Controller Methodologies NEMA-based vs. Interval-based

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Configuration management
Advertisements

INSE - Lectures 19 & 20 SE for Real-Time & SE for Concurrency  Really these are two topics – but rather tangled together.
2009 MUTCD Revisions Part 4 – Traffic Signals Revisions to the 2009 MUTCD.
SCHOOL BUS STOPS OVERHEAD LIGHT and HAZARD LIGHT Effective July 21, 2004 Revised January 2007.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 7 Introduction to Transport Lecture 7: Signal Coordination.
CE 2710: Transportation Engineering Traffic Signals April 3, 2009 Nicholas Lownes, Ph.D.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD CA MUTCD 2012 Revisions to Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals.
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
CEE 764 – Fall 2010 Topic 7 Special Issues on Signal Coordination.
Chapter 221 Chapter 22: Fundamentals of Signal Timing: Actuated Signals Explain terms related to actuated signals Explain why and where actuated signals.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 4 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Signal Timing.
Lec 24, Ch.19: Actuated signals and detectors (Objectives) Learn terminology related to actuated signals Understand why and where actuated signals are.
Introduction to Transport
Copyright © 1998 Wanda Kunkle Computer Organization 1 Chapter 2.1 Introduction.
Lecture #15 Actuated Signals: Chapter 19. Objectives Understand the benefits of actuated signals Understand the basic parameters Application in a coordinated.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
SDLC and Related Methodologies
Lecture 2 Basics of Traffic Control Signals Any power-operated traffic control device other than a barricade warning light or steady burning electric lamp,
Configuration Management
AccuMax Multi-Point Injection Mechanics
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
Transportation Engineering
1 Chapter Overview Creating Sites and Subnets Configuring Intersite Replication Troubleshooting Active Directory Replication.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Network Design Essentials. Guide to Networking Essentials, Fifth Edition2 Contents 1. Examining the Basics of a Network Layout 2. Understanding Standard.
Administrative Policy Writing Spring Administrative Policy Writing Spring 2011 Introduction This week we are discussing a type of public-policy.
An Introduction to Software Architecture
Crosstalk Calculation and SLEM. 2 Crosstalk Calculation Topics  Crosstalk and Impedance  Superposition  Examples  SLEM.
Tuen Mun – Yuen Long LRT Traffic Control System 20 th April 2007 Prepared by Michael Chiu P26180/PS/PS PPT/LLH/13APR05.
Interaction Modeling. Introduction (1) Third leg of the modeling tripod. It describes interaction within a system. The class model describes the objects.
The Exacta ® Plus Process Control System. Exacta ® Plus Designed to increase the efficiency of jobs that require multiple tasks, such as audits and sequential.
Chapter 20: Actuated Signal Control and Detection
Chapter 101 Multiprocessor and Real- Time Scheduling Chapter 10.
Coordination Matt Wiesenfeld Darcy Bullock Purdue University.
Introduction to Traffic Signals Adam Kirk. Identify 1 part of the traffic signal.
CEE 764 – Fall 2010 Topic 3 Basic Signal Timing and Coordination Principles.
CCR Deadlock By: Laura Weiland April 30, Project Description Implement a module to the Train Operating System (TOS) that manages the deadlock problem.
Crash Record System Connecticut Version JB Technology Inc.
Sections © Copyright by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Problem 4: Clifton Country Rd/Route 146 Intersection Base Case Phasing and Volumes Analysis Plans Description of Analyses Overarching Issues 4a: AM peak.
Intro to Pre-Electrical Engineering The fundamentals of electricity and electrical science 1.
1 Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process Figure 13-1 Implementation discipline activities.
05/16/2008 Improved Traffic Signal Efficiency in Rural Areas through the use of Variable Maximum Green Time Aswini Rajagopalan.
Signal timing CTC-340. Key Elements Development of safe and effective phase plan and sequence Determination of vehicle signal needs –Timing of yellow.
Oracle eBusiness Financials R12 Oracle Receivables Functional Overview TCS Oracle Practice.
Mission Street Voyage Advanced Features Test Facility Mission street is a major arterial corridor that was re-timed 10 years prior to our project. Our.
Opticom ™ GPS Priority Control System 3M™ Opticom™ GPS Priority Control System Driver Training.
1 LONG ISLAND PSEG – LONG ISLAND LONG ISLAND Upgrade to NICE IEX 6.3 PRESENTED BY MARILEE MARIN AND RACHEL KASTELAN WFM SENIOR ANALYSTS.
City of Portland - Isolated Timing Operations January 9, 2005 Isolated Timing Operations - Workshop on Best Practices for Signal Timing Bill Kloos Signals.
Mission Street Project Update Voyage 2070 Advance Operation Systems Using ASTRO Proactive Plan Selection Average and Split Variant operations Prepared.
Thinking Inside the Box
EECE6017C Lab 1 Introduction to Altera tools and Circuit Simulation
Software Project Configuration Management
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
Oracle Subledger Accounting
Attestation Concept additional explanation and implementation proposal
Introduction To Flowcharting
GREEN WAVE TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION
* Topic 7 Field Operations
Telecommunication II.
KU College of Engineering Elec 204: Digital Systems Design
CPU Scheduling G.Anuradha
Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling
Project Management Process Groups
An Introduction to Software Architecture
Interaction Modeling Extracted from textbook:
School of Civil Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Traffic Controller Methodologies NEMA-based vs. Interval-based Signal Group University Traffic Controller Methodologies NEMA-based vs. Interval-based A lesson to attain a basic understanding of the two traffic controller programming methodologies used worldwide. 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

NEMA NEMA stands for the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. It is a volunteer organization of manufacturers. It is NOT a government body. Section 3 of NEMA is designated as Traffic Systems, otherwise known as NEMA 3-TS. Before 1989, there were no significant national traffic controller standards. NEMA published TS-1 (1989) that described a standard traffic controller for the general US market. Multiple revisions of TS-1 and subsequently TS-2 have been released and maintained by NEMA over the past 20 years. NEMA TS standards are voluntary and are not required that agencies use them in their own specifications. 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

NEMA-based A NEMA-based traffic controller meets certain hardware requirements, but also uses certain methodology and terminology common to the NEMA TS standards. NEMA is often referred to as “phase based”, but this is not an entirely accurate way to look at it because all controllers use phases, not just NEMA controllers. Note: The term “phase” is universally used as interchangeable with “vehicle movements”. (ex. A northbound through phase, or a eastbound left-turn phase). A better description of NEMA is that it is phase “focused”. This is because the timings for a particular phase can be programmed independently for that phase and not dictated by some other grouping in which that phase belongs. (see next slide for further explanation) 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Possible Green Extension NEMA phase “focused” The green portion of NEMA phases are typically defined with a minimum time and a maximum time that can be extended up to the maximum in incremental “steps”. The amber portion is a fixed length parameter. If a phase is not green or amber, it is considered off (i.e. Red). Possible Green Extension Minimum Green Time Maximum Green Time Step Time Amber Time 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

NEMA phase “focused” Each phase can be variable based on the parameters set for each individual phase. Φ1 Φ2 Φ8 Φ7 Φ6 Φ5 Φ4 Φ3 Cycle Length 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

NEMA Sequencing Φ1 Φ2 Φ3 Φ4 NEMA controllers use a ring structure to determine the sequence in which phases are activated, or “served”. It also uses this structure to determine compatibility between phases. Compatibility simply means which phases can be on (green or amber) at the same time without causing an unsafe traffic situation. NEMA allows multiple simultaneous rings. Think of them as stacked donuts. Φ1 Φ2 Φ3 Φ4 Φ5 Φ6 Φ7 Φ8 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

NEMA Compatibility Φ1 Φ5 Φ2 Φ6 Φ4 Φ8 Φ7 Φ3 Common NEMA 8-Phase, 2 Ring Configuration Φ1 Φ5 Φ2 Φ6 Φ4 Φ8 Φ7 Φ3 Ring 1 Φ1 Φ2 Φ3 Φ4 Ring 2 Φ5 Φ6 Φ7 Φ8 Concurrency Group Concurrency Group General Ring Compatibility Rules Phases in same ring are NOT compatible (i.e. Φ1 and Φ2) Phases in separate rings ARE compatible (i.e. Φ1 and Φ5, Φ6) Phases are not compatible with phases in another concurrency group (Φ1, Φ2, Φ5, Φ6 are NOT compatible with Φ3, Φ4, Φ7, Φ8) 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

NEMA Highlights So, basically, a NEMA-based controller sequences through the phases in a ring (or in parallel rings), while determining what phases can be on with what other phases. As long as phases follow the correct sequence and compatibility rules, the factors that determine how “long” a particular phase is on depends upon: The user definable phase parameters for each phase, and…. Outside influences that may require a phase to end sooner than normal, but no less than the minimum, like the need to serve a coordinated plan (the green wave of lights down a street), or emergency or transit preemption (a topic for later discussion). 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Interval-based The word Interval refers to an increment of time within the cycle time (time it takes to complete on complete rotation of the signal plan). Many people refer to Interval-based control as “Pre time”, but this is also misleading (see section on Pre time vs. Actuated). It is best to call it Interval-based. 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Intervals Interval-based plans are typically programmed using a matrix approach with Phases as one legend and Intervals as the other. Phases have no timings associated with them, but rather their activity is dependent on the timings of the Interval or Intervals that they belong. In the diagram below, the user would specify that the phase should be green in Interval 1 and Amber in Interval 2. The times for each of the Intervals would then be set up. All phases assigned to an Interval are subject to the Interval time. Interval I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4 I-5 I-6 I-7 I-8 Φ 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Interval-based Timing Plan Sequence and Compatibility is dependent on the programming of the timing plan. You basically tell the controller what to do and when. I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4 I-5 I-6 I-7 I-8 Φ1 Φ2 Φ3 Φ4 Φ5 Φ6 Φ7 Φ8 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Pre time vs. Actuated Pre time means that the length of time and decision to service a phase or not is predetermined and does not change. It is part of the timing plan. Actuated means that the length of time and/or decision to service the phase or not is variable based on demand (i.e. detectors). Semi-Actuated is a mixture of the two approaches. Some phases will be predetermined (a constant time and/or on “recall”, which means always serviced regardless of demand). Some phases will be demand driven. A good example of this is when a quiet side street intersects a busy main road. The phases for the main road will always be serviced each cycle, but detectors are installed at the side street and it gets serviced (i.e. green signals) only when vehicles are present. 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Pre time vs. Actuated (cont.) As you can see, Pre time is NOT the same as Interval. You can have pre time and actuated Interval traffic controllers and you can have pre time and actuated NEMA (so-called phase-based) controllers. The terminology should be mutually exclusive. 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Summary NEMA Interval With Interval controllers You: Ring 1 Φ1 Φ2 Φ3 Φ4 Ring 2 Φ5 Φ6 Φ7 Φ8 With Interval controllers You: Assign phase outputs to Intervals 1, 2, 3, …etc. Assign times to the Intervals The controller runs your plan just as you entered it With NEMA controllers You: Build the ring sequence Assign concurrency groups Set-up phase parameters The controller does the rest 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

NEMA Interval Legacy controllers that were Interval style controllers are: Honeywell HMC1000 TCT LMD40 Semex C200 Legacy controllers that were NEMA style controllers are: Transyt 1880EL TCT LMD9200 Peek 3000/3000E Mulitsonics 820A Traconex TMP390/390CJ 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

Is the ATC-1000 NEMA or Interval? The short answer is…….Both. This is the first controller that we know of that will do both methods without having to change firmware to convert from one to the other. The ATC-1000 can change between the two traffic “engines” the same way it changes between timing patterns. This can be done on a schedule (time of day), by central override, or any other method of changing patterns. This is helpful if there is a particular plan needed for an Intersection that cannot be accomplished with the traffic engine used during normal operations. Each traffic engine (NEMA and Interval) have their own feature sets. They are basically like two traffic controllers living in the same box. It is very important to remember that just because the controller has a feature in one traffic engine, it does not mean that it is in the other. The International version of the ATC controller will focus on adding features to the Interval traffic engine, while most likely having a way to disable the NEMA traffic engine to avoid confusion for those not familiar with the NEMA methodology. 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval

ATC-1000 Two Controllers in One NEMA Traffic Engine (Actuation Modes: Pre time, Actuated, or Semi-Actuated) Switches back and forth based on pattern control Interval Traffic Engine (Actuation Modes: Pre time only) Features Features Interval side of database is all proprietary. Though we use the NTCIP object (i.e. OID) structure, NTCIP does not specify Interval operations. NEMA side of database complies with NTCIP 1202 to support NEMA operation and “standard” NTCIP. Features not specified by NTCIP are proprietary. NTCIP Database 12/28/09 SGU- NEMA vs. Interval