Multi-Tiered Intervention Provision: Service Delivery & Student Eligibility Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
RTI Levels  Schools must organize their interventions into levels of increasing intensity.  Three Tiers – Tier I, II, III  Higher the need of the student.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Malissa Patrick and Kim Thorndycraft February 25, 2010.
RtI in Early Childhood Lisa Kelly-Vance, UNO and Kristy Feden, Papillion- LaVista Schools.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Webinar 3 Core Instruction (Tier 1). Assessments: – Screening – Evaluating effectiveness of core instruction Research-based/Evidence-based Instructional.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
K ILLING 2 B IRDS WITH 1 T RIANGLE R T I & PBIS Dean Richards, OrRtI Sarah Crane-Simpson, UMESD.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Response to Intervention
Systems Requirements for RTI The nuts and bolts that hold it all together!
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
Students At-Risk for Reading Difficulties: High and Low Responders Sharon Vaughn and Greg Roberts Center on Instruction, University of Texas Sylvia Linan-Thompson,
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Response to Intervention By Kristy Shinaver. What is Response to Intervention (RtI)?  A multi-tiered method of service delivery in which all students.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
RTI 101 Jon Potter Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Severe Discrepancy vs. Response to Intervention. Severe Discrepancy Model of Eligibility Determination (1974 – present) This method is used for students.
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Tiered Intervention Provision: Service Delivery & Student Eligibility Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium

Overview The importance of a multi-tier model The importance of a multi-tier model Examples of multi-tier models for academic and behavioral supports Examples of multi-tier models for academic and behavioral supports The use of multi-tier models within the existing school infrastructure The use of multi-tier models within the existing school infrastructure Guidelines for making data-based decisions about the provision of services (including special education) Guidelines for making data-based decisions about the provision of services (including special education)

Importance of the Multi-Tier Model Based on the Public Health Model of prevention and early intervention Based on the Public Health Model of prevention and early intervention More cost effective solution than waiting to intervene More cost effective solution than waiting to intervene Capitalizes on promoting protective factors and reducing risk before more extensive problems arise Capitalizes on promoting protective factors and reducing risk before more extensive problems arise

Multi-Tier Model Characteristics Provides a framework for serving students with various levels of need Provides a framework for serving students with various levels of need Key components Key components Universal screening of all students to identify those at risk Universal screening of all students to identify those at risk Use of rules to guide evidence-based instruction/intervention and eligibility decisions Use of rules to guide evidence-based instruction/intervention and eligibility decisions Ongoing intervention delivery and monitoring of student progress Ongoing intervention delivery and monitoring of student progress

3-Tier Model A prevention/early intervention model for serving all students before they fall significantly behind A prevention/early intervention model for serving all students before they fall significantly behind Instruction/intervention is provided in response to students’ increasing needs Instruction/intervention is provided in response to students’ increasing needs Designed to meet the needs of all students Designed to meet the needs of all students Involves use of data-based decisions to guide instruction/intervention delivery within each tier Involves use of data-based decisions to guide instruction/intervention delivery within each tier General Instruction Supplementary Intervention Intensive Intervention Decision rules Intensity of Intervention

Rationale for a 3-Tier Reading Support Model Promotes early identification of students in need of additional assistance Accommodates supplemental instruction for students with early reading difficulties Provides for intensive instruction targeting those at risk of reading failure Accommodates continuous curriculum-based progress monitoring of all students

Example: 3-Tier Reading Model Tier I Instruction/Intervention Core research-based reading program Involves Big 5 reading components identified by the National Reading Panel Screening Curriculum-based screening each fall, winter, and spring Decision rules used to identify at-risk students eligible for Tier 2/Tier 3 intervention

Example: 3-Tier Reading Model (e.g., UT Center for Reading & Language Arts; Vaughn, 2003) Grade 1 - Tier I (> 1.5 hrs daily, universal) Instruction Instruction Phonemic awareness (e.g., phoneme segmentation) Phonemic awareness (e.g., phoneme segmentation) Alphabetic principal (e.g., blending & word construction) Alphabetic principal (e.g., blending & word construction) Fluency (e.g., monitored oral reading) Fluency (e.g., monitored oral reading) Comprehension (e.g., pre-, concurrent-, post-strategy instruction) Comprehension (e.g., pre-, concurrent-, post-strategy instruction) Vocabulary (e.g., direct instruction, concept-word association practice) Vocabulary (e.g., direct instruction, concept-word association practice) Screening Screening Curriculum-based screening each Fall, Winter, & Spring Curriculum-based screening each Fall, Winter, & Spring

Example: 3-Tier Reading Model Tier II Instruction/Intervention Instruction/Intervention Small-group supplementary instruction in addition to classroom instruction Small-group supplementary instruction in addition to classroom instruction Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring Curriculum-based monitoring of student progress in response to Tier 2 intervention Curriculum-based monitoring of student progress in response to Tier 2 intervention Decision rules used to identify students’ response to intervention and Tier eligibility Decision rules used to identify students’ response to intervention and Tier eligibility

Example: 3-Tier Reading Model (e.g., UT Center for Reading & Language Arts; Vaughn, 2003) Grade 1 - Tier II (> 30 min. daily for at least 10 wks., eligible based on screening/progress monitoring data) Instruction Additional guidance/practice in small group (3-5 students) Additional guidance/practice in small group (3-5 students) Content: Content: Phonemic awareness (e.g., phoneme segmentation) Phonemic awareness (e.g., phoneme segmentation) Alphabetic principal (e.g., blending & word construction) Alphabetic principal (e.g., blending & word construction) Fluency (e.g., monitored oral reading) Fluency (e.g., monitored oral reading) Comprehension (e.g., pre-, concurrent-, post-strategy instruction) Comprehension (e.g., pre-, concurrent-, post-strategy instruction) Vocabulary (e.g., direct instruction, practice with concept-word associations) Vocabulary (e.g., direct instruction, practice with concept-word associations) Progress monitoring Curriculum-based progress monitoring every 1-2 weeks to determine Tier 2 or 3/ other-service eligibility Curriculum-based progress monitoring every 1-2 weeks to determine Tier 2 or 3/ other-service eligibility

Example: 3-Tier Reading Model Tier III Instruction/Intervention Instruction/Intervention Intensive and individualized research-based instruction in addition to classroom instruction Intensive and individualized research-based instruction in addition to classroom instruction Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring Curriculum-based monitoring of student progress in response to Tier 3 intervention Curriculum-based monitoring of student progress in response to Tier 3 intervention Decision rules used to identify students’ response to intervention and Tier/SLD eligibility Decision rules used to identify students’ response to intervention and Tier/SLD eligibility

Example: 3-Tier Reading Model (e.g., UT Center for Reading & Language Arts; Vaughn, 2003) Grade 1 - Tier III (> 30 min. twice daily for at least 10 wks., eligible based on screening/progress monitoring data) Instruction Individualized guidance/practice (1-3 students) Individualized guidance/practice (1-3 students) Increased examples, duration, and instructional scaffolding Increased examples, duration, and instructional scaffolding Content: Content: Phonemic awareness (e.g., phoneme segmentation) Phonemic awareness (e.g., phoneme segmentation) Alphabetic principal (e.g., blending & word construction) Alphabetic principal (e.g., blending & word construction) Fluency (e.g., monitored oral reading) Fluency (e.g., monitored oral reading) Comprehension (e.g., pre-, concurrent-, post-strategy instruction) Comprehension (e.g., pre-, concurrent-, post-strategy instruction) Vocabulary (e.g., direct instruction, practice with concept-word associations) Vocabulary (e.g., direct instruction, practice with concept-word associations) Progress monitoring Curriculum-based progress monitoring every 1-2 weeks to determine Tier 2 or 3/ other-service eligibility Curriculum-based progress monitoring every 1-2 weeks to determine Tier 2 or 3/ other-service eligibility

Research Example: Intervention within a 3-Tier Reading Model Vaughn, Linen-Thompson, & Hickman (2003) Participants Participants 45 2 nd -grade students identified by Texas Primary Reading Inventory as at- risk for reading disabilities 45 2 nd -grade students identified by Texas Primary Reading Inventory as at- risk for reading disabilities Instruction/Intervention Instruction/Intervention Core classroom instruction Core classroom instruction 10 or 20 wks of daily intervention in small-groups (3 students): 10 or 20 wks of daily intervention in small-groups (3 students): Fluency (5 min) Fluency (5 min) Phonemic Awareness (5 min) Phonemic Awareness (5 min) Instructional-level reading (10 min) Instructional-level reading (10 min) Word analysis (10 min) Word analysis (10 min) Writing (3-5 min) Writing (3-5 min) Data-based decision rules for “responsiveness” Data-based decision rules for “responsiveness” Texas Primary Reading Inventory: 5 of 8 words read correctly Texas Primary Reading Inventory: 5 of 8 words read correctly Test of Oral Reading Fluency: median > 55 correct WPM with 55 correct WPM with <5 errors Fluency reading: 50 correct WPM for at least 3 weeks Fluency reading: 50 correct WPM for at least 3 weeks

Research Example: Intervention within a 3-Tier Reading Model Vaughn, Linen-Thompson, & Hickman (2003) Results Results At 10 weeks: 10 students met criteria At 10 weeks: 10 students met criteria At 20 weeks: 14 additional students met criteria At 20 weeks: 14 additional students met criteria At 30 weeks: 10 additional students met criteria At 30 weeks: 10 additional students met criteria Conclusions/Discussion Conclusions/Discussion After a maximum of 30 weeks of intervention, 34 of the 45 at-risk students met responsiveness criteria After a maximum of 30 weeks of intervention, 34 of the 45 at-risk students met responsiveness criteria 23 of the 24 students who met criteria after 20 weeks continued to make progress in the classroom without supplemental instruction 23 of the 24 students who met criteria after 20 weeks continued to make progress in the classroom without supplemental instruction

3-Tier Reading Model: Summary Provides a framework for a continuum of services for all students Provides a framework for a continuum of services for all students Addresses the needs of students at-risk before they fall significantly behind in the classroom Addresses the needs of students at-risk before they fall significantly behind in the classroom Encourages accountability and data-based decision-making through screening and progress monitoring Encourages accountability and data-based decision-making through screening and progress monitoring

Importance of a 3-Tier Behavioral Support Model Helps to clarify and increase awareness of behavioral norms Helps to clarify and increase awareness of behavioral norms Provides a framework for a range of supports for students with behavioral or social-emotional difficulties Provides a framework for a range of supports for students with behavioral or social-emotional difficulties Decreases the risk for behavior problems Decreases the risk for behavior problems Is more cost effective and less time intensive than waiting to intervene Is more cost effective and less time intensive than waiting to intervene

3-Tier Behavioral Support Model Tier I: Universal Support Instruction/Intervention Instruction/Intervention Proactive, universal interventions that target all students Proactive, universal interventions that target all students Positive Behavioral Supports Positive Behavioral Supports Establishing and teaching rules and routines for the school environment Establishing and teaching rules and routines for the school environment Altering the physical arrangement (e.g. separating students with challenging behaviors) Altering the physical arrangement (e.g. separating students with challenging behaviors) Goal: Goal: Promote students’ social and academic readiness Promote students’ social and academic readiness Prevent the acquisition of norm-violating behaviors Prevent the acquisition of norm-violating behaviors Screening Screening Students are screened through teacher nomination or school archival data (e.g. office referrals) to determine which students need more intensive intervention Students are screened through teacher nomination or school archival data (e.g. office referrals) to determine which students need more intensive intervention

3-Tier Behavioral Support Model Tier II: Targeted Support Instruction/Intervention Instruction/Intervention Targeted behavioral supports, such as: Targeted behavioral supports, such as: a “ social skills club” a “ social skills club” a “check in/check out” procedure a “check in/check out” procedure planned behavior education planned behavior education rearrangement of environment rearrangement of environment Goal: Goal: Decrease access to situations where problem behavior might occur Decrease access to situations where problem behavior might occur Establish effective pro-social repertoires Establish effective pro-social repertoires Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring Direct observations and review of school archival data Direct observations and review of school archival data

3-Tier Behavioral Support Model Tier III: Individualized Support Instruction/Intervention Instruction/Intervention Intensive, individualized, and comprehensive interventions, including functional assessment practices to guide planned behavior education and rearrangement of environment Intensive, individualized, and comprehensive interventions, including functional assessment practices to guide planned behavior education and rearrangement of environment May involve collaboration with family & community agencies May involve collaboration with family & community agencies Goal Goal Reduce the intensity, frequency, and complexity of the problem behavior patterns Reduce the intensity, frequency, and complexity of the problem behavior patterns Provide pro-social replacement behaviors Provide pro-social replacement behaviors Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring Direct observations and review of school archival data Direct observations and review of school archival data

Guidelines for Making Data-Based Decisions Regular screening and progress monitoring should be conducted with sufficient frequency to produce a reliable indication of a students’ performance Specific data-based decision rules should be established to determine eligibility for services within each Tier of intervention Across all levels of the tiers, evidence-based interventions should be delivered for a minimum of 24 sessions prior to determining their cumulative effectiveness Within tiers, evidence-based interventions should be delivered based on their appropriate fit to students’ needs Services provided within each tier should be carried out with documented integrity

Guidelines for Making Data-Based Decisions For Specific Learning Disability verification: For Specific Learning Disability verification: Each building should identify how to address the relationship between Tier III and special education placement Each building should identify how to address the relationship between Tier III and special education placement A minimum of two interventions/intervention phases should be provided before a student is considered as having a SLD A minimum of two interventions/intervention phases should be provided before a student is considered as having a SLD Nebraska Department of Education will be providing additional guidelines to schools and districts for using RTI to identify students with SLD Nebraska Department of Education will be providing additional guidelines to schools and districts for using RTI to identify students with SLD

Additional Resources 3-Tier Reading Supports 3-Tier Reading Supports Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts: Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts: Provides access to professional development guides, training academies, videos, CD-ROMs, and booklets that cover various topics related to effective, research-based reading instruction/interventions. Big Ideas in Beginning Reading: Big Ideas in Beginning Reading: Provides access to resources on the five big ideas of early literacy. Includes instructional information and examples. 3-Tier Behavioral Supports 3-Tier Behavioral Supports OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: Provides access to resources related to implementing School-Wide Positive Behaviorial Support within a 3-Tier model.