1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Illustrative Results Based on E3’s Avoided Cost Model Thursday, April 19, 2012 Marginal Generation Costs.
Advertisements

Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
Cost of Service, Rate Design, and Price Efficiency Bruce Chapman Christensen Associates Energy Consulting October 3, 2012 Wisconsin Public Utility Institute.
TVPPA Accounting & Finance Conference October 21, 2011 Cost of Service, Hydro Credit, Environmental Adder, and Fuel Cost Jim Sheffield 1.
CLECO TRANSMISSION RATE CASE. AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Purpose of Meeting Transmission System Update Formula Rate Overview Formula Rate Protocols.
Interconnection of Distributed Generation and Net-Metering in MA Tim Roughan National Grid.
1 Northeast Public Power Association Electric Utility Basics Electric Rates and Cost of Service Studies.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Power Factor: What Is It and Estimating Its Cost Presented by:Marc Tye, P.E APPA Business & Financial Conference September 21, 2004.
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210)
Utility Analysis. Baseline Electricity Analysis  Understanding and documenting current energy use is called developing a baseline. Developing a baseline:
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
1 of 46 Tariff Development II: Developing a Cost of Service Study Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Ikechukwu N. Nwabueze,
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Cost of Service Ratemaking Michigan Public Service Commission Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.
1 City Light Rate Design- Review Presentation to Review Panel January 2013.
RETAIL RATE REVISIONS August 1, 2015 Presented By:
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
Lunch & Learn Project Presents to you: “The Electric Power Grid” By: Dexter Hypolite Electrical Engineer VIWAPA.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
LAKELAND ELECTRIC Pricing to Meet Net Meter Rules APPA 2009 Business & Finance Conference Sept 14, 2009 Jeff Sprague Manager Pricing & Rates.
1 Overview of Allocating Revenue Requirements Based on Shares of Marginal Costs May, 2012.
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
Distributed Generation Programs, Incentives and Interconnections Ian Loughran, P.Eng. DSM Program Leader Renewable Energy Programs
Managing Retail Rate Changes Presented by Walter Haynes, Sr. Project Manager, Patterson & Dewar Engineers Central District Power Accountants Association.
Contributions In Aid of Construction Mark Beauchamp Business & Finance Workshop Utility Financial Solutions
Interconnection of Small Wind & Solar Systems to Distribution Utilities: A Cooperative Perspective Patrick Parke Midwest Energy Hays, KS September 26,
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Contributions In-Aid and Development of Fees Utility Financial Solutions Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA President
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force
How to Help Your Customers Read Their Electric Bills and Apply for Incentives Charley Budd, KEMA.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
From an Intervener's Perspective by Matt White.  An intervener is a non-utility that participates in a rate case to advocate its interest  Interveners.
Utility Rates and Comparison of Investor Owned vs. Municipal Utilities Presented by: Kent Taylor Chairman KTM Energy Consulting Services th Street,
Virginia Energy Purchasing Governmental Association (VEPGA) Primer On Rate Design Concepts & Practices And Explanation of VEPGA Rates & Schedules (What.
September 24, 2007Paying for Load Growth and New Large Loads APPA September 2007.ppt 1 Paying for Load Growth and New Large Loads David Daer Principal.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Load Research Status January 15, © 2000 PACIFICORP | PAGE 2 What is Load Research? “An activity embracing the measurement and study of the characteristics.
Management and Organisation of Electricity Use Electrical System Optimisation Belgrade November 2003.
Northwest Power and Conservation CouncilProCost Version 2.2 RTF July 2007.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
WFEC and Its Rural Electric Cooperative Members Solar Power October 16, 2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
South Texas Electric Cooperative Load Forecasting Methodology ROS Meeting, 6/10/10.
LOAD RESEARCH Irrigation Load Study Utah Cost of Service Task Force August 25, 2005.
Presented to the City of Dover, Delaware June 6, 2006 Revenue Requirements, Cost of Service and Rate Adjustments for the Electric Utility.
Energy Intensive Industrial Customer Work Group March 24, 2014.
1 Before Ghana Public Utility Regulatory Commission Proposed Electricity Tariff Guidelines Workshop Ahmed Kaloko,Ph.D. Chief Economist Pennsylvania Public.
Cost of Service Studies April 14,  Used to reasonably allocate costs (revenue requirement) incurred by utility amongst customer classes  2 Types.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
2015 ElectriCities Advanced Meter School. Rate Design Goals The two primary goals of rate design are to (a)provide rates that lead to utility revenues.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Distribution Loss Factors for Cost To Serve study
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Cost Allocation Model Sensitivity to Changes in Inputs Unmetered Loads
Metropolitan Mayors Caucus Illinois Energy Bills
BILLS Electricity Bill Water Bill Telephone Bill
Presentation transcript:

1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor

2 Cost of Service Objectives & Methodology I. Conceptual Overview II. Current PacifiCorp Methodology A. Functionalization B. Classification & Allocation 1. Generation 2. Transmission 3. Distribution 4. Customer Service, Billing & Collections III. Cost of Service to Rate Design

3 Cost of Service Section I Conceptual Overview Getting from “How Much” to “Who Pays”

4 Utility Rate Setting Two Questions How Much & Who Pays

5 Cost of Service The Bridge between Revenue Requirement & Rates

6 Cost of Service Dividing the Revenue Requirement

7 Cost of Service A Three Step Process Functionalization Classification Allocation

8 FUNCTIONALIZATION Functionalization Classification Allocation Assignment into the functional categories of production (or generation, the process of converting other forms of energy into the utility service), transmission (including transmission, subtransmission, and distribution facilities which e.g., send the electricity generated at the centralized power station through wire at high voltage where it is transformed to low voltage) and distribution (electricity distributed from low voltage lines to individual ratepayer meters). (FERC Electric Rate Handbook, 1983)

9 CLASSIFICATION Functionalization Classification Allocation Assignment by energy usage, peak demand, and number of customers within the functional categories. (FERC Electric Rate Handbook, 1983)

10 ALLOCATION Functionalization Classification Allocation Assignment to stable customer groupings or classes consistent with Functionalization and Classification (FERC Electric Rate Handbook, 1983)

11 Cost of Service Section II Current PacifiCorp Methodology

12 Functionalization Generation Transmission Distribution Retail (Customer Service & Billing) Miscellaneous

13 Functionalization Procedures Direct Assign where Practical 80% to 90% of costs can be direct assigned to one of the primary functions FUNC Factors Composite more granular direct assignments % of Direct Assigned Plant Investment by Function % of Direct Assigned Labor by Function

14 Classification and Allocation

15 Generation Current Utah Methodology Classification Plant Investment & Other Fixed Costs 75% Demand / 25% Energy Fuel 100% Energy Firm Wholesale Purchases & Sales 75% Demand / 25% Energy Non-Firm Wholesale Purchases & Sales 100% Energy Total Generation Costs Approximately 50% Demand / 50% Energy

16 Generation Current Utah Methodology Allocation Demand Related Costs 12 CP Energy Related Costs Annual MWh

17 Generation Methodology used in Other States Idaho & Wyoming Same as Utah Oregon & California (Marginal Costs) Demand – Fixed Costs of SCCT Allocated on Average of 12 Monthly CP Energy – Fuel and remaining Fixed Costs of CCCT Allocated on Annual MWh Total Generation Costs Approximately 25% Demand / 75% Energy Washington Demand – ½ Fixed & Fuel Cost of SCCT running 200 Hours Allocated on top 100 winter & 100 summer peak hours Energy – All other costs Allocated on Annual MWh Total Generation Costs Approximately 13% Demand / 87% Energy

18 Transmission Current Utah Methodology Classification Plant Investment & Expenses 75% Demand / 25% Energy Firm Wheeling 75% Demand / 25% Energy Non-Firm Wheeling 100% Energy Allocation Demand - 12 CP Energy - Annual MWh

19 Transmission Methodology used in Other States Idaho & Wyoming Same as Utah Oregon & California (Marginal Costs) Backbone Transmission Classified & Allocated Same as Generation Local Transmission – Classified 100% Demand Allocated on Average of 12 Monthly CP Washington Same as Generation

20 Distribution Current Utah Methodology Classification Meters & Service Drops – Customer Related All Other Distribution Costs – Demand Related Allocation Substation & Primary Lines 12 Weighted Distribution Peaks Line Transformers Secondary Voltage Customers Only Class Maximum Month Customer NCP Adjusted for Customer per Transformer Coincidence Factor Secondary Lines Only classes where more than one customer shares line transformer Class Maximum Month Customer NCP Adjusted for Customer per Transformer Coincidence Factor Meters & Services Fully Installed Costs of New Meters and Services

21 Distribution Methodology used in Other States Wyoming Primary Lines Large Industrial Customers broken our separately All other Classes – 12 Distribution Peaks Washington Primary Lines Annual Schedule Peak (Class NCP) Oregon (Marginal Costs) Distribution Feeders (Primary and Secondary) Composite Feeder Distance Based Minimum System (Demand & Commitment) Transformers Zero Intercept Method

22 Retail Functions Customer Service – Billing - Collections Meter Reading Typical Meter Reading Times by Class (Including Travel Time) Customer Service – Billing - Collections Weighted Customers Average per Customer Billing Costs (Including Manual Bills) Average Write-off per Customer Many activities have same weighting for all Customers

23 Cost of Service Section III Cost of Service To Rate Design

24 Cost of Service Summary

25 Unit Costs Schedule No. 6 Demand per kW Month Gen$7.72 Tran$1.33 Dist$5.37 Energy per kWh Gen1.75 Cents Tran0.38 Cents Misc0.04 Cents Customer per Month Meter$13.36 Service$11.56 Retail$11.60

26 Cost of Service to Rate Design How Costs are Allocated How Bills are Paid