C-Nav GPS System & the Seamless Vertical Datum

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Globally Corrected GPS (GcGPS): C-Nav GPS System
Advertisements

UTS:Faculty of Engineering and IT International Leaders in Practice-Based Education The 16th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications 31 Oct. - 3 Nov.
RTK Developments from NavCom Technology Inc. RTK GPS for Hydrographic Surveys and Seamless Vertical Datums Workshop NASA John C. Stennis Space Center 27.
The leading pioneer in GPS technology The StarFire Global Satellite Based Augmentation System Ron Hatch NavCom Technology, Inc.
Ohio University Russ College of Engineering and Technology School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Avionics Engineering Center Ranjeet Shetty.
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) for Precision Farming
CS 128/ES Lecture 10b1 GPS. CS 128/ES Lecture 10b2 A guide to GPS theory …
CS 128/ES Lecture 11a1 GPS. CS 128/ES Lecture 11a2 Global Positioning System
Where we are going today… GPS GPS GIS GIS Hey, there are exams next week. Oct. 4 th and 6 th. Powerpoints now online. Hey, there.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
StarFire: A Global High Accuracy Differential GPS System Ron Hatch, Tenny Sharpe, Paul Galyean NavCom Technology Inc. Presented by Jose Romero-Mariona.
Surveying with the Global Positioning System Code Pseudo-Ranges
Algorithms behind Global Positioning Murray Grace Josh Collins.
Global Positioning Systems (GPS)
Differential and precision GPS surveying for sub-meter and centimeter accuracy Feb 2007 Dr. Gary Oppliger.
NRCS Global Positioning Systems (GPS) & Geographic Information Systems (GIS) RESOURCE INVENTORY  Soil Survey  National Resources Inventory (NRI)  Wetlands.
Presented By: Scott Rodgers UNC Chapel Hill, Engineering Information Services Types of GPS Receivers.
ESSC Lecture 1/14/05 1 Global Positioning System (GPS)
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Geographic Information Systems
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
DISCUSSION SESSION 3: FUTURE PPP USER SOLUTIONS GNSS PPP W ORKSHOP : R EACHING F ULL P OTENTIAL J UNE 2013, O TTAWA What will near-term PPP user.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
for Maritime Services)
Global Positioning System GPS Fully functional for Military use in 1995 Frequencies of operation L1 = MHz and L2 = MHz. SPS (Civil) uses.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
Understanding GPS-GNSS Michael Buschermohle Precision Agriculture Specialist UT Extension Michael Buschermohle Precision Agriculture Specialist UT Extension.
GPS How it Works For a full tutorial on GPS and its applications visit the Trimble WebsiteTrimble Website.
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
C-Nav GPS System GPS Services Group
Global Positioning Systems Glen T. Huettl Agricultural Education Garrison High School.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
High Accuracy Nationwide Differential Global Positioning System (HA-NDGPS) UPDATE Jim Arnold September, 2009.
InCORS INDIANA’S STATEWIDE GNSS-GPS REAL TIME NETWORK Presented by Derek Fuller, PLS Land & Aerial Survey Office.
Lecturer: Jinglin Wang Student name: Hao Li Student ID:
Global Positioning System
Trimble NetR8 GNSS Reference Receiver
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future GLONASS Russia’s global satellite navigation system 24 satellites in three.
By Andrew Y.T. Kudowor, Ph.D. Lecture Presented at San Jacinto College.
Common Questions - Global Positioning System Devices
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.
Fugro Chance Inc. Comparison of Network and State Space DGPS Services Real Time Tidal Monitoring for Seismic Data Collection Applications Richard Barker.
Naval Oceanographic Office Charting Products Division (N43) Naval Oceanographic Office Hydrography Department upgrades to its Positioning Systems and Hopes.
GSI Japan - 21st of June 1999 GPS-Positioning using Virtual Reference Stations - Theory, Analysis and Applications Herbert Landau Spectra Precision Terrasat.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
Introduction To Localization Techniques (GPS)
Introduction to Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Mark Smith, Assistant Professor/Wildlife Extension Specialist.
Lecture 5 – Differential Correction
M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.
GPS Services Group C&C Technologies, Inc., C-Nav GcGPS System Background and Accuracy.
Global Positioning System Overview
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
USM RTK Workshop Fugro Chance Inc. Starfix HP: High Performance GPS For Offshore Marine Survey, Navigation and Positioning Richard Barker, Dr. Dariusz.
Satellite Network. Satellite Network 24 satellites in orbit, plus 3 backups lbs, solar powered Orbit height is roughly 20,000 km (Earth radius.
AiA In Australia 2015 GPS Accuracy And RR/RP Integration.
Redundancy in Dynamic Positioning (DP) Applications based on Satellite Navigation. High Precision Navigation and Positioning Conference,
Revised 10/30/20061 Overview of GPS FORT 130 Forest Mapping Systems.
Astronomisches Institut der Universität Bern Global Navigation Satellite Systems for Positioning and Time Transfer T. Schildknecht, A. Jäggi R. Dach, G.
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
A GADGET WHICH CHANGED THE WAY THE WORLD OPERATES Global Positioning System Seminar by: B V Aparna ECE CMR College of Engg. And Tech.
Global Positioning System
GPS: Global Positioning System
Introduction to GPS Global Positioning System
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Presentation transcript:

C-Nav GPS System & the Seamless Vertical Datum GPS Services Group C&C Technologies, Inc., (Lafayette, La) www.cctechnol.com

Real Time Gipsy (RTG) Current release provides sub-meter level horizontal accuracies. Version 12.2 (beta) test indicates decimeter level horizontal accuracy. We will be discussing Version 12.2

The C-Nav RTG Methodology Does not use the ‘traditional’ (RTCM) measurement domain or position domain correction methods, nor is it RTK. Corrects each source of error. Broadcasts correctors for orbits and satellite clocks. Dual-frequency code and carrier phase measurement are used to form pseudoranges free from ionospheric delays. Three approaches (Abousalem, 1996) to solving the wide area differential GPS problem: The measurement domain approach solves for the mean of the individual DGPS Reference sites correction values The position domain approach solves for the mean of the actual GPS position solutions resulting from using the individual DGPS reference site corrections. The ‘State-Space’ method solves the problem more elegantly by computing the actual physical quantities comprising the pseudorange error Whitehead et.al. state that the advantages are:- Superior spatial de-correlation properties, such that the end user solution performance is independent of the reference station location or distance. Fewer reference sites are required over the large coverage area Minimal bandwidth is required to transmit the correction data Performance degradation is insignificant for any single Reference Site loss or failure and degrades gracefully for multiple-reference site loss. Some References: A Close Look at SatLoc’s Real-Time WADGPS System – Whitehead et.al. (GPS Solutions, Vol 2, No.2, 1998) A Real-Time Wide Area Differential GPS System – Bertinger et.al. (Revised February 1998) Precise Post-Processing of GPS Data: Products and Services from JPL – Zumberge & Webb (ION 2001) ION Proceedings over the past ‘several years’ IGDG (Internet-based Global Differential GPS) - http://gipsy.jpl.nasa.gov/igdg/index.html NavCom Technology, Inc., Technical Archives - http://www.navcomtech.com/tech_archiv/index.htm

Real Time Gipsy (RTG) ‘Worldwide’ Global GPS Network (GGN) reference stations transmit all of their RAW GPS dual frequency observations to three Network Processing Hub locations (SF & JPL) via TCP/IP and the ‘Internet’. The NPH’s performs the task of breaking down the GPS range error sources into their component, User Independent, parts in real-time. Independent Refraction Corrected Orbit and Atomic Clock Offset corrections (to the broadcast ephemeris) for all GPS satellites are computed (by the NPH), and transmitted via Land Earth Stations for uplink over StarFire L-Band communication satellites. The user requires a Dual-Frequency GPS receiver to be used at their remote location so that computation of the ‘local’ Refraction Corrected pseudorange observations can be obtained. The GPS receiver applies the received RTG Orbit and Clock corrections along with the internally computed, Refraction Corrected, GPS Satellite pseudorange observations to compute a 3D surface position. Over the past 20 years the California Institute of Technology’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory has evolved into one of the premier centers for research in precise orbit determination. The venerable GIPSY-OASIS software suite, used by research teams worldwide for geodetic analysis and orbit determination was developed at JPL. Internet based Global Differential Gps - IGDG was used to control and operate the SATLOC commercial differential service from 1995 until 2000 (when the system was bought by a competitor and then shut down). While operating, the SATLOC service had the best reliability and accuracy record of any wide area differential service. IGDG's impressive performance in the SATLOC service was probably key to the FAA's decision to adopt IGDG and its concept of operations for its wide area augmentation system. IGDG was successfully implemented in the FAA WAAS by the prime contractor, Raytheon, and later was also implemented in a similar system Raytheon built in Japan. Over the last six years, the GPS group at JPL has created a system, based on adaptations and refinements of the core GIPSY algorithms, which operates in real time to produce high precision GPS corrections suitable for broadcast to navigation users. This system, called Real Time GIPSY (RTG), accurately estimates and models many parameters and error sources in the GPS satellite system using real time data received via the Internet from a worldwide network of ‘dual-frequency’ GPS reference receivers, and utilizes the dual-frequency GPS receiver at the user location to resolve for the local area Iono/Tropo errors (Refraction Correction) by ‘differencing’ the C/A code measurements of the L1 and L2 frequencies.

StarFire Global Network The figure shows an overview of the StarFire WADGPS network. At a conceptual level, it is similar to other wide-area DGPS systems such as : WAAS - Wide Area Augmentation System (FAA North America) EGNOS – European Geo-stationary Navigation Overlay System MSAS – Multifunctional transport Satellite-based Augmentations System (Japan) SNAS – Satellite Navigation Augmentation System (China) GRAS – Ground-based Regional Augmentation System (Australia – VHF) For the WCT networks, a number of reference/monitor sites are distributed across the continental U.S., Europe, South America and Australia. (sites in green) For the RTG network, another set of reference/monitor sites are distributed across the entire world (sites in red). Each reference site sends dual frequency code and phase observables for all GPS satellites in view as well as system integrity information to two redundant network processing hubs (NPH) via terrestrial communication links (sites in blue) in North America.

RTG Reference Sites Global Network (26+) Brewster, USA Cordoba, Argentina Christiansted,Virgin Islands Fairbanks, USA Galapagos Island, Ecuador Greenbelt, USA Goldstone, USA Dededo, Guam Krugersdorp, South Africa Bangalore, India JPL Pasadena, USA Kokee Park, USA Robledo, Spain Ross Island, Antarctica Mauna Kea, USA Moscow, Russia Franceville, Gabon Norilsk, Russia Lamont, USA Quezon City, Phillipines Bishkek, Kryghystan Santiago, Chile Tidbinbilla, Australia USNO, USA Usuda, Japan Yakutsk, Russia Two key correction factors are computed for transmission to the user navigation receivers: 1) Clock corrections for each active GPS satellite are computed every few seconds. Like the WCT method, these corrections are based on refraction corrected measurements and are therefore optimized for dual frequency user equipment. 2) Orbit corrections for each active GPS satellite are computed every few minutes. Computation of these corrections is facilitated by measurements from a globally distributed network of reference receivers that provide observability of the orbit errors with sufficient geometry. The Network Processing Hubs are located at: Redondo Beach, CA Moline, IL The L.E.S. for WCT(Conus) is located in Reston, NJ The L.E.S. for the Inmarsat Americas is located in Laurentides, Canada The L.E.S. for the Inmarsat Europe/Africa is located in Goonhilly, U.K. The L.E.S. for the Inmarsat Asia is located in Auckland, New Zealand

C-Nav GPS User System Basic System Hardware ‘Bundle’: 1 x C-Nav GPS Receiver 1 x C-Nav Control Display Unit (CnC D.U.) 1 x C-Nav GPS Receiver Data and Power Y-Cable 1 x DC Power Cable 1 x Power Supply 1 x C-Nav Operations Manual 1 x Software Utilities

C-Nav GPS Receiver Design Multi-function L-Band antenna 12 channel dual-frequency, geodetic grade GPS engine L-Band communications receiver and embedded microprocessor Patented multi-path reduction signal processing capability and P code recovery algorithm Dual-frequency code and carrier phase measurement are used to form smooth refraction corrected code pseudoranges Compact size and integrated package design The GPS engine has twelve (12) dual frequency GPS channels, ten (10) of which are allocated for GPS signal tracking and the remaining two (2) for WAAS, L-Band, signal tracking. It produces GPS observables of the highest quality suitable for use in the most demanding applications including millimeter level static surveys. Key features of the GPS engine include:  ·        A patented multipath reduction technique is built into the digital signal processing ASICs of the receiver. This greatly reduces the magnitude of multipath distortions on both the CA code and P2 code pseudorange measurements. When combined with extended, dual frequency code-carrier smoothing, multipath errors in the code pseudorange measurements are virtually eliminated.  ·        A patented technique is used to achieve near optimal recovery of the P code from the anti-spoofing Y-code resulting in more robust tracking of the P2/L2 signals.  ·        The compact size (4” x 3”x 1”) of the Geodetic Grade, Dual Frequency, GPS engine allows it to be readily integrated into the StarFire GPS User package.  ·        The GPS engine provides a high-resolution 1pps output signal, synchronized to GPS time. This signal is used by the L-band communications receiver to calibrate its local oscillator and thus accelerate acquisition of the StarFire correction signal. NavCom Technologies has also patented this technique.

C-Nav Features ‘Global corrected’ GPS Positioning ( RTG, WCT & WAAS ) 1Hz NMEA Msgs ( GGA, GLL, GSA, GST, RMC, VTG, ZDA ) Proprietary NMEA Data Msgs ( SATS, NAVQ, RXQ, NETQ ) RTCM Output ( Standard RTCM Type 1 PRC – every 5 seconds ) Dual Frequency, Geodetic GPS Engine to resolve local Ionospheric delay observation errors Multipath Mitigation Algorithm Rugged and waterproof Single Integrated Package Low Power Consumption ( < 10 Watts – 9v to 40v d.c.) 5Hz positioning and data output ( w/o CnC Display Unit ) Automatic Restart based on last operating configuration The GPS engine has twelve (12) dual frequency GPS channels, ten (10) of which are allocated for GPS signal tracking and the remaining two (2) for WAAS, L-Band, signal tracking. It produces GPS observables of the highest quality suitable for use in the most demanding applications including millimeter level static surveys. Key features of the GPS engine include:  ·        A patented multipath reduction technique is built into the digital signal processing ASICs of the receiver. This greatly reduces the magnitude of multipath distortions on both the CA code and P2 code pseudorange measurements. When combined with extended, dual frequency code-carrier smoothing, multipath errors in the code pseudorange measurements are virtually eliminated.  ·        A patented technique is used to achieve near optimal recovery of the P code from the anti-spoofing Y-code resulting in more robust tracking of the P2/L2 signals.  ·        The compact size (4” x 3”x 1”) of the Geodetic Grade, Dual Frequency, GPS engine allows it to be readily integrated into the StarFire GPS User package.  ·        The GPS engine provides a high-resolution 1pps output signal, synchronized to GPS time. This signal is used by the L-band communications receiver to calibrate its local oscillator and thus accelerate acquisition of the StarFire correction signal. NavCom Technologies has also patented this technique.

C&C (C-Nav) Locations

Vertical Accuracy IHO SP 57, 1987 0.3 meters at 90% confidence Assuming Gaussian: 0.36 meters at 95% confidence

Vertical Accuracy IHO S 57, 1998, category 1: Depth error of 0.5 m at 95% confidence. Assume sounding error of 0.36 meters at 95%: Allowable “Tide” 0.35 meters at 95% confidence.

Vertical Accuracy IHO S 57, 1998, category “special”: Depth error of 0.25 m at 95% confidence. Assume sounding error of 0.15 meters at 95%: Allowable “Tide” 0.20 meters at 95% confidence.

Vertical Accuracy NOS Specifications and Deliverables January 2002: Tidal errors range from 0.2 m to 0.45 m at 95% confidence.

Vertical Accuracy A vertical accuracy of 0.35 meters at 95% confidence is sufficient for all IHO categories except “special” and is about as accurate as a tide-based datum. A vertical accuracy of 0.2 meters at 95% confidence is sufficient for IHO “Special” surveys and is about as good as the best tide based datum.

    Figure 1: SD = 0.386 m Figure 2: SD 0.277 Figure 3: SD = 0.197 m

High Multipath

Good Data 95% of data is within 0.41 meters of the mean. Max HDOP = 3, max speed = 6 m/s; Discard stand alone GPS.

Good Data

How Good? Vertical accuracy of about 0.41 meters at 95%. About the same as NOS zoned tides in the most difficult areas. Can be used for IHO Category 1, but sounding errors must be limited to 0.3 meter at 95%. Further testing needed to confirm accuracy and understand restrictions.

Conclusions Vertical accuracy of about 0.41 meters Multipath needs to be controlled. About ten minutes to sub-meter data. About 2 hours to decimeter data.