Implementation Approach UCPUCP

UCPUCP Lessons Learned Renewed and heightened focus on pedestrian mobility. Pedestrian realm (sidewalks and crosswalks) Building / sidewalk relationship

UCPUCP Elements Under Consideration 1. Pedestrian cross section

UCPUCP Elements Under Consideration 2. Build-within-zone 3. Minimum built frontage 4. Minimum transparency 5. Sidewalk entrances 6. Driveway spacing standards

UCPUCP Illustration 10’ Planting & Utilities 5’ Pedestrian Zone 75% Min. Transparency 25% 75% Built Frontage Curb Edge of Pedestrian Realm Property Line 10’ Build Within Zone

UCPUCP Issues to Consider 1. Mandatory vs. incentivized 2. Geographic application 3. Neighborhood protection

UCPUCP Mandatory vs. Incentivized 1. Mandatory elements – all corridors A. Pedestrian realm standard B. Driveway spacing 2. Other elements may be incentivized

UCPUCP Mandatory vs. Incentivized 1. Economic / market implications A. Direct costs B. Market / risk (“1,321’ effect”) 2. Opportunities for incentives A. Urban corridor standards B. Obtainable benefits Increased buildable area Reduced parking requirements

UCPUCP Increased Buildable Area

UCPUCP Geographic Application Pedestrian Core District Other Corridor University Uptown

UCPUCP Geographic Application 1. Uptown A. Incentivized 2. “Other corridor” A. Incentivized B. Linked to neighborhood protection 3. Core pedestrian district A. Possibly mandatory elements & “automatic” benefits B. Also possible additional incentives

UCPUCP Neighborhood Protections 1. Angular plane A. Tied to incentives 2. Single family share threshold for withholding incentives 3. “Other corridor” areas only Angular Plane Lot Line

UCPUCP Upcoming Process 1. Ordinance & Policy Drafting 2. Defined Review Process A. Mixed Use / TOD Committee B. Planning Commission C. City Council Committee on Regulation, Nbhd Protection and Development D. City Council

Implementation Approach UCPUCP