May 14, 2015 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Advertisements

Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
Road Diets and Roundabouts
Downtown Access Improvements Plan Town of Hillsborough 2014.
Hot Springs Public Meeting Reconstruction of US 18 & US 385
What is the S-48 Corridor? Study Area What’s Happened So Far? Previous Tasks  Project InitiationJune 2005  Existing ConditionsOct  Planning.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
City of High Springs - Traffic Study City of High Springs Traffic Study Sept. 16th, 2003 Public Meeting #2.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Tower Road Enhancement Project Prepared for Alachua County By Causseaux & Ellington, Inc. Alachua County Roadway Network Improvements.
US 52 Corridor Study Public Meeting November 15, 2010.
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
Southern Corridor Study Recommendations March 16, 2011.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
Transport.tamu.edu Options for Access Improvements Near MSC Wednesday, December 7, 2011.
Ed Cox City of Sacramento, Department of Public Works Bicycle Solutions in Sacramento.
Virginia Street Corridor Plan. From our Tier One University, world renowned recreation and our Midtown entertainment area to abundant cutting edge business.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Redwood Road & 35th Avenue Traffic Study. Problems Observed: High collision rate along the corridor was found at McArthur Boulevard intersection, with.
SUISUN CITY Suisun City Planned Development Area Connectivity for a Better Community.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
Welcome to the Open House Mount Seymour Road Area Traffic and Access Review The purpose of this Open House is for us to: Provide an overview of the study.
Efficiency through technology and collaboration Road Diet (Roadway Reconfiguration) Every Day Counts 3 Innovative Safety Initiative.
In association with: THOMAS ROAD STREETSCAPE 73 RD STREET TO HAYDEN ROAD PROJECT NO. T0606 City of Scottsdale.
2 $ Million investment in three transportation projects prioritizing the movement of people to and through the Loop Washington/Wabash CTA Station.
Main Roads WA Perth Bicycle Network - Operational Overview Cycling Safety Forum 14 th May 2011.
Third & Fourth Streets Traffic Calming Study Presentation to Transportation Commission May 14, 2015.
Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Presentation to RTC July 17, 2015 Project Purpose Extend RAPID to UNR Improve pedestrian safety & access Create.
Schools Jobs Revenues Services Recreation Environment Transportation Transportation Connectivity Housing Public Safety Pontiac’s.
Martha Moore, P.E. Ghyabi & Associates October 10, 2014
Lexington Town Center Streetscape Project Page 1 Battle Green Improvements Project Intersection of Bedford Hancock Street / Harrington Road Board.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
INTRODUCTION An intersection is the general area where two or more highways join or cross, including the roadway and roadside facilities for traffic movements.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
Madison Avenue Traffic Calming Who We Are: Consortium of 17 neighborhood associations, churches, schools, hospital, and businesses concerned about economic.
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Town of Cobourg Division Street Improvements Public Information Centre October 1, 2015 Image Courtesy of Google 2015.
Sustainable Transportation Design Project: Proposed Changes to Belmont/Morrison Couplet By: Bryan Blanc, Marisa DeMull, Andy Kading.
The Main Street Bike Lane Project LADOT Bike Program.
Oregon Transportation Commission October 14, 2015 OR 99 Rogue Valley Corridor Plan.
Northside Transportation Network Community Meeting November 17 th, 2010 UROC.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
September 15, 2011 Presented by: Clay Harris, PMP - City of Austin Federico Mendoza, PE, PTOE – Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc. Todd Lane Alternative Geometric.
Designing for Pedestrian Safety – Road Diets 9-1 ROAD DIETS.
10 -1 ROAD DIETS Before After Designing for Pedestrian Safety – Road Diets.
Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.
COUNTY ROAD 517 Improvements from State Highway 172 to Howe Drive DECEMBER 16, 2015 At Tribal Multipurpose Facility.
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
156 th Street Design in Bennington Public Open House Meeting October 28, 2009 City of Bennington, NE.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
SEPARATED BIKE LANE PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDE. Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide Context Conforms to federal and state standards and guidelines:
Martin J. Walsh Mayor Michael Dennehy Commissioner Public Hearing January 20, 2015.
 May 1, 2012 City Council approved lease of premises at MLK to the Lycée Français La Pérouse (the “Lycée Français”)  Under section 16.5, Traffic and.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
Before After ROAD DIETS MODULE of 9 Safety Proven Countermeasures.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
Bicycle Safety Countermeasures Module 4.
ROUNDABOUTING WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan
District 3 Complete Streets Projects
BELLE TERRE BLVD/PKWY CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
After the NACTO Guide Now I’m going to discuss the options available within the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide.
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
M14A/D Select Bus Service
Downtown Streetscape Project Routes 5&20 Corridor Reconfiguration
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
Project Location: 35th Ave HSIP8
Module 6 A 21st Century Transportation Network
Presentation transcript:

May 14, st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project

May 14, 2015 City of Chico Staff Steve Weinberger W-Trans City of Chico Staff and Steve Weinberger W-Trans Presented by:

BACKGROUND 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14,

Over the last decade discussions have taken place between the City of Chico and stakeholders regarding all modes of travel on 2 nd Street corridor. 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, BACKGROUND

2 nd Street & CSUC Gateway The 2 nd Street Corridor supports large volumes of pedestrians, automobiles, busses, and bicycles, but currently has no designated lane for bicycles. 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, BACKGROUND

Level of Service Heavy left turn movements from 2 nd Street on to Main and Broadway cause traffic congestion and level of service deficiencies – a well known issue. 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, BACKGROUND

As a result of the recently developed Transit Center, ongoing discussions of promoting bicycling on 2 nd Street have continued A holistic look at the Downtown area is necessary, which opened the idea for the concept of converting the direction of traffic on 1 st Street and 2 nd Street to one-way traffic, creating a “couplet 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, BACKGROUND

EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14,

2 nd Street 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, EXISTING CONDITIONS Four-lanes (two in each direction) Shared turn-through lanes No on-street bicycle lanes On-street parallel parking Bisects Downtown 9,500 ADT 10,000 ADT

1 st Street 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, EXISTING CONDITIONS Two to Four-lanes (one to two in each direction) Shared turn-through lanes No on-street bicycle lanes On-street parallel parking Underutilized traffic capacity 3,000 ADT

East-West Travel Time CorridorDirectionTravel Time 1 2 nd Street – Orange Street to Flume Street Eastbound165 seconds (18 mph) 2 nd Street – Orange Street to Flume Street Westbound156 seconds (16 mph) 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, EXISTING CONDITIONS Notes: 1.Travel time and average speed includes delay at intersections

Collisions Segment Collisions ( ) Daily Volume Calculated Collision Rate (c/mvm 1 ) Statewide Average Collision Rate 2 (c/mvm) 1 st St from Salem St to 2 nd St 42, nd St from Orange St to Broadway 48, nd St from Broadway to 1 st St 99, st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, Notes: 1.c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles Collision Data on California State Highways, California Department of Transportation EXISTING CONDITIONS

Pedestrian Facilities Full sidewalks within the corridor Marked crosswalks at all intersections Many signalized intersections do not have pedestrian signal heads (pedestrians must follow the traffic signal heads) 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, EXISTING CONDITIONS

Pedestrian Enhancements Textured Crosswalk with Bulbouts –2 nd Street/Main Street –2 nd Street/Broadway Pedestrian signal head with walk countdown timer –2 nd Street/Main Street –2 nd Street/Broadway 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, EXISTING CONDITIONS

Bicycle Facilities Currently, most of the corridor does not serve bicyclists well –Parts of Salem Street and 1 st Street are Bicycle Connectors –Bike lanes on Salem Street 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, EXISTING CONDITIONS

Transit Facilities 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, EXISTING CONDITIONS Downtown Transit Center B-Line Routes Served

PROPOSAL 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14,

The City is exploring modifications to the 1 st Street and 2 nd Street corridors with the goal of: – enhancing safety for all travel modes – promoting alternate modes of transportation – providing convenient additional parking – revitalizing the CBD without additional infrastructure improvements – converting to a ‘complete street’ 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL Road Diet Four-lane to three-lane conversion (one lane in each direction with a center turn lane) On-street bicycle lanes in both directions

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL One-Way conversion Reduce to two through lanes On-street bicycle lane(s) Increase parking supply by converting parallel parking to diagonal parking

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL Roundabout Transition one-way to two-way traffic Provides enhanced capacity for east-west traffic Accommodates non-standard intersection alignment Gateway to downtown Increase safety for all modes of travel

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL One-Way conversion Reduce to two through lane(s) (one lane west of Broadway) On-street bicycle lanes Increase parking supply by converting parallel parking to diagonal parking

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL Drop-off Circle Ongoing coordination with CSUC Transition one-way to two-way traffic Allow for northbound U-Turn movement Provide for a gateway entry to CSUC

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL Two-Way conversion One through lane in each direction Increase parking supply by converting parallel parking to diagonal parking Allow for more circulation options

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL Diagonal Parking Increase parking supply by converting parallel parking to diagonal parking

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

Intersection Modifications Roundabout at 2 nd Street/1 st Street/Flume Street –Better accommodates non-standard intersection alignment and one-way conversion point than a signal –Serve as a entry point for Downtown Drop-off Circle at 1 st Street/Salem Street –Serve as a entry monument for CSUC –Allows for the 1 st Street one-way conversion –Allows for northbound U-Turn 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street/2 nd Street/Flume Street 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street/2 nd Street/Flume Street 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, Roundabout Goals & Issues Bicycle Access Driveway Access Movement Restriction Driveway Access Right of Way Necessary Potential for Landscaping or Urban Design elements Diagonal Parking Gateway Monument or Community Art Pedestrian Access OptionsPROPOSAL Diagonal Parking

1 st Street/Salem Street (design pending) 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

1 st Street/Salem Street (design pending) 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, PROPOSAL

POTENTIAL RESULTS 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14,

East-West Travel Time CorridorDirectionExisting Travel Time 1 Proposal Travel Time 1 2 nd Street – Orange Street to Flume Street Eastbound165 seconds (18 mph) 176 seconds (17 mph) (6.7% increase) 2 nd Street – Orange Street to Flume Street (via 1 st Street to Broadway) 2 Westbound156 seconds (16 mph) 165 seconds (17 mph) (5.8% increase) 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS Notes: 1.Travel time and average speed includes delay at intersections 2.Traffic is routed though the one-way couplet resulting in a longer distance traveled

Intersection Levels of Service 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS Balance LOS and volumes along the 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Corridors Maintain acceptable LOS at all signalized intersection Maintain or improve LOS at all unsignalized intersections

Pedestrian Facilities Crossing enhancements –Intersection bulbouts Decreased pedestrian crossing distance Increases pedestrian visibility –Road Diet Fewer lanes to cross (less exposure area) –Intersection improvements Pedestrian push buttons Additional signal walk-time for pedestrian crossing Installation of count-down pedestrian signal heads ADA upgrades 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS

Traffic Calming Lane Reduction –Provides for slower, but steady progression of traffic Diagonal Parking –Narrows the street encouraging slower driving Roundabout –Steady flow of traffic at a controlled speed 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS

Utilize existing pavement to balance LOS and volumes without additional new infrastructure Reduced conflicts with turning vehicles Will provide space for on-street bicycle lane(s) Allows for replacing some parallel parking with diagonal parking Improved traffic flow 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS One-way Couplet

Road Diet Reduced conflicts with turning vehicles Slower, but steady flow of traffic Shorted pedestrian crossing distance Allows for installation of bicycle lane(s) Generally more comfortable for bicyclists and pedestrians 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS

1 st Street/2 nd Street/Flume Street Roundabout Reduced vehicle conflicts Steady flow of traffic at a controlled speed Shorted pedestrian crossing distance Improved transition for two-way to one-way traffic Creates a downtown gateway 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS

1 st Street/Salem Street CSUC Drop- off Circle Allows for 1 st Street to be one-way Creates a campus gateway Provides transition between two-way and one-way traffic 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS

Diagonal Parking Narrows street and provides traffic calming benefits Goal of increasing parking supply approximately 25% from parallel parking –Offsets loss where parallel parking is removed 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS

A “Complete Street” Approach Improve traffic flow issues related to left turn movements from 2 nd Street onto Main Street and Broadway Enhance bicycle circulation on 1 st Street and 2 nd Street with connections to CSUC Increase parking capacity Increase bicycle safety Reduction of conflicts at the intersection of 1 st / 2 nd Street/Flume Street near Camellia Way Bridge Increase pedestrian safety especially at intersection crossings Extension of downtown business potential by increased traffic on West 1st Street 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, POTENTIAL RESULTS

NEXT STEPS 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14,

City Staff is prepared to implement a construction schedule as early as Summer 2010, in order to continue with this goal, City Staff is requesting support from Internal Affairs on the following suggestions: 1 st Street & 2 nd Street One-way Couplet Roundabout at Flume Street/1 st Street/2 nd Street/Camellia Way Bridge Bulbout Pedestrian ramps Diagonal Parking Road Diet along West 2 nd Street from Broadway to UPRR Signal Improvements/Timing Adjustments 1 st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project May 14, NEXT STEPS