Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US 491 South Corridor FLH-666-1(49)17 CN 2357 Navajo 9 to Sheep Springs (NM 134) MP 15 to MP 46 Public Information Meeting November 1, 2006.
Advertisements

U.S. Route 30 Environmental Impact Statement & Phase I Design Report Community Advisory Group Meeting Thursday May 8, 2008.
Resource Team/TEER Meeting October 19, CBRT Meeting October 19, 2006 Agenda 10:00 AM 10:05 AM 10:30 AM 11:30 AM Noon Introductions and Housekeeping.
September 24, 2007 I-35 South Environmental Assessment North End of I-35 / SH 9W Interchange Ramps North to ½ Mile North of Main Street in Norman Public.
The presentation will follow this format:
September 18, 2008 I-35 South Environmental Assessment North End of I-35 SH 9W Interchange Ramps North to ½ Mile North of Main Street in Norman Public.
PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.
Great Western Corridor Feasibility Study
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Maryland Avenue and Arkwright Street Jerry Auge, PE Project Manager Ramsey County April 2, 2013.
Harlan to Hazard Study Public Workshop #2 Harlan to Hazard Study Public Workshop #2 Harlan, Leslie, & Perry Counties, KY December 2003 Harlan, Leslie,
Public Scoping Meetings September 26, 2011 and September 29, 2011 Cajalco Road Widening and Safety Enhancement Project.
Friends of the Fox River November 9, 2014 Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
U.S. 33 Northern Connector Alternative
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
TBG MKE West Waukesha Bypass Study Community Sensitive Solutions Advisory Group Meeting No. 5 January 31, 2011 Community Sensitive Solutions.
S.R. 3 / South State Street Added Auxiliary Lanes Project in North Vernon Wednesday, June 29, :30pm Presentation Jennings County High School.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF April 1, 2015 Stakeholder’s Meeting.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
© 2003 TranSystems Corporation Advisory Committee Meeting January 19, 2010.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Agency Scoping.
S.R. 144 Intersection Improvement and Road Reconstruction Project Tuesday, October 11, :30pm Presentation Neil A. Armstrong Elementary School 1000.
Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF May 14, 2015 Public Meeting.
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
Highway 169 Phase 2 (Part 2) – Cross Range Expressway April 30, 2014 Public Information Meeting Taconite Community Center.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
ILLINOIS ROUTE 23 (LaSalle St.) DOWNTOWN RE-ALIGNMENT December 2, 2008.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road April 11, 2013 Welcome!
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
S.R. 930 and Green Street Intersection Improvement Project Tuesday, May 22, :00 p.m. Presentation Park Hill Learning Center Auditorium New Haven,
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
Phase I Engineering and Environmental Studies Project Development Flowchart US Route 45; IL Route 132 to IL Route 173 and Millburn Bypass CSS
Fern Valley Interchange Project Development Team Meeting February 3, :00 – 11:00 p.m.
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
Public Involvement Meeting December 10,  Introduce the project  Explain the benefits of the project  Discuss tasks completed since last public.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
REMOTE SENSING and the CSX RAIL RELOCATION EIS NCRST-E GICAP 2002 Workshop Session 3.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
State Route 109 (Portland Bypass) Robertson & Sumner County, TN NEPA Public Hearing November 12, 2015.
Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
U.S. 20 Intersection Improvement Project at Waverly Road Porter Town Hall Thursday, August 13, 2015.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
I-35W/Highway 62 Crosstown Commons Reconstruction Nathan Aul, Bob Krussow, and Michael Martin.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
BROOKS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY February 18, 2016 Project Briefing for Presenters: April Williams, P.E. (FDOT Project Manager) Steve Schnell, AICP (HDR.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
State Route 28/U.S. Highway Route 127 Improvements Project Fentress County, Tennessee Public Hearing March 15, 2011 South Fentress Elementary School 5018.
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study F ROM M ANDY L ANE TO T HOMAS D RIVE I NTERSECTION B AY C.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Visit Our Website at: Click to edit Master title style.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Assessment Public Meeting US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting October 4, 2011 October 4, 2011

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Introductions ODOT SAIC FHWA

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Bob Rose – Field Division 7 Engineer “The mission of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation is to provide a safe, economical and effective transportation network for the people, commerce and communities of Oklahoma.”

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Meeting Purpose Provide Project Information Obtain Input/Feedback

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Purpose and Need Reduce Travel Time for Traffic Traveling through Chickasha Reduce Congestion along US 81 through Chickasha Central Business District Improve Safety along Existing US 81 through Chickasha

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Project History Previous ODOT Studies 1978 Background Report 1992 Feasibility Study 2007 Corridor Study

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Projected Traffic Volumes along US 81, Year 2030 – No Bypass

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment 2007 Corridor Study North Bypass Alignment West Bypass Alignments Recommended Alignment

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment North Bypass Alignment

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment North Bypass Alignment Elimination North Bypass Alignment Eliminated Low Future Traffic Demand, based upon Results of Origin-Destination Study Required Construction of Two I-44 Interchanges Only Alignment Utilizing I-44 (Turnpike) OTA Must Toll All Use of Facilities in Accordance with Bonding Requirements

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment North Bypass Alignment – Traffic Analysis Summary of Origin-Destination Study Diverted Traffic Daily Traffic AM Peak PM Peak North Bypass 12% 8% 13% West Bypass 35% 32% 41%

Approximate Travel Time US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment North Bypass Alignment – Traffic Analysis Comparison of Distance and Travel Time, North and West Bypass Alignments North Bypass Would Not Serve Northbound US 81 Traffic to Westbound US 62 Bypass Alignment Approximate Distance Approximate Travel Time North 16 miles 18 minutes West 11 miles 12 minutes

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment West Bypass Alignments

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Recommended Alignment from 2007 Corridor Study Consideration of Environmental Constraints Residential, Commercial, Church, and Utilities Developed a Hybrid Alignment that Combined Features of Each Considered Alignment

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Bypass Alignment 3-4 Hybrid

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Recommended Alignment from 2007 Corridor Study

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Projected Traffic Volumes along US 81, Year 2030 – With Bypass

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Proposed Project Controlled-Access 4-Lane Divided Western Bypass of Chickasha From South of US 81/SH 19 East Intersection North to US 81/US 62 Intersection

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Proposed Project Environmental Assessment Process Will Determine: Alignment Endpoints Interchange Locations

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Roadway Improvement Process Establish Project within ODOT Complete Environmental Process Begin Design Process Acquire Right-of-Way Relocate Utilities Finalize Construction Documents Construct Project

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment NEPA Process National Environmental Policy Act Decision Making Process

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment NEPA Process Minimize Social, Environmental, & Economic Impacts of the Project Solicit Input from Federal, Tribal, State, Local Agencies, and Public Collect Environmental Data Estimate Construction, Right-of-Way, and Utility Costs Evaluate Data and Costs to Select Preferred Improvement

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Proposed Project Phases Initial: Acquire Right-of-Way and Relocate Utilities for West Bypass Ultimate: Construct Bypass 4-Lane Controlled Access Facility

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Study Area

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Environmental Issues Update Environmental Constraints Map Cultural Resources (Historic – Archaeologic) Waste Sites and Underground Storage Tanks Wetlands Biological Resources Floodplains Oil & Gas Activity Farmlands Noise Impacts Residential Development

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Traffic Issues Traffic Counts (Ongoing) Existing and Future Traffic Analysis Determine Roadway Geometry and Interchanges Needed Justification for New Access to Interstate (I-44)

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Current Project Status Solicited Input from Local, State, and Federal Entities Topographic Survey In Progress

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Plans for Public Involvement Two (2) Public Meetings Public Hearing

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment What Happens Next? Consider Comments from Public Meeting Complete Traffic Analysis Identify Alignment Alternatives Traffic Engineering Environmental Public Input

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment What Happens Next? Second Public Meeting (Spring 2012) Select Preferred Alternative Conduct Environmental Specialist Field Studies Prepare Draft EA Document

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment What Happens Next? Approved Draft EA Document Public Hearing (Spring 2013); Comment Period Finalize EA Obtain FONSI from FHWA (Mid-2013) Begin ROW Acquisition and Utility Relocation Process

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Information Sources Web Address: http://www.odot.org/meetings/other.php Scott Stegmann – ODOT Phone: 405.522.8014 200 NE 21st Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105 E-mail: sstegmann@ODOT.org Diane Abernathy – SAIC Phone: 405.701.3167 3700 W. Robinson, Suite 200 Norman, OK 73072 E-mail: jeanna.d.abernathy@saic.com

US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

Question and Answer Session US 81 Bypass Environmental Assessment Question and Answer Session