Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. U.S. 70 Corridor Commission June 19, 2014 Paula Dowell,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Examples of TranSight Applications What Does TranSight Analyze? Model Structure.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
What Is The Economic Value of Your Airport? Presentation to the Association of California Airports Annual Conference September 14, 2011 Presented by Doug.
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
The Impact of Changing Economic Conditions Since 2005 on the Forest Sector W. Brad Smith U.S. Forest Service Research & Development Washington, DC FIA.
Private Sector Challenges and Opportunities Inherent in advancing the Complete Visitor Economy Abid Butt Chief Executive Officer Banyan Tree Hotels and.
Moving Goods, Creating Jobs: Planning Portland Region Corridors for Economic Growth.
Economic Development Benefit/Cost Transit Slides.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
1 GOODS MOVEMENT IN CALIFORNIA. 2 California is facing a significant transportation infrastructure shortfall. California is using innovative approaches.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
Working Together to Position British Columbia’s Human Capital as a Global Competitive Advantage Shannon Baskerville ASSISTANT DEPUTY MINISTER – Labour.
Economic Impact of Medical Education Expansion in Nevada & Recommended Approach FUTURE 1.
Mike Elliott, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen (BLET), Washington State Legislative Board (WSLB) February 2014.
Mark Kempic President Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc. Maryland-District of Columbia Utilities Association Fall Conference Fueling the Economic Engine.
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation February 17, 2010.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Bae Economic Impact of San Francisco’s Cruise Industry June 8, 2007.
The Impact of Changing Economic Conditions Since 2005 on the Forest Sector Richard W. Guldin and W. Brad Smith U.S. Forest Service Research & Development.
Greater Manchester Strategy Rebecca Heron and Rod Fawcett GM Integrated Support Team 12 April 2013.
2009 Economic Forecast Update & Three -Year Outlook.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Southeast Florida Regional Vision & Blueprint for Economic Prosperity Economic Development Briefing John Kaliski Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February 15,
Estimating Economic Impacts of Border Wait Times in the San Diego-Baja California Region February 24, 2006.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
The Green of Gray: THE NEW ECONOMY of an Aging Population Michael D. Alexander, AICP “Mike” Research and Analytics Division Manager Atlanta Regional Commission.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Manufacturing 20/20 Prospects for a Competitive North American Economy Jayson Myers Senior Vice-President & Chief Economist, CME.
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
Best Practices in Business Retention. Economic Development Best Practices in Business Retention TVA Perspective Business Case for Retention Award Winning.
By Mr. Kittipong Chantaraskul Department of Foreign Trade
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
Wireless Sensor Network Solutions Regional Mobility Solutions Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other.
Lecture 9: The Economic & Political Role of Airports By: Zuliana Ismail.
Economic Case for Transformational Infrastructure Graham Russell AMION Consulting June
Global Fleet Management Market 2015 to 2020 No. Pages :145 Published on : October-2015.
Enterprise & Environment Directorate TRANSPORT FOR REGIONAL GROWTH 5 NOVEMBER 2015 Keith Winter, Executive Director, Enterprise and Environment, Fife Council.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 8 Location Planning and Analysis.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 8 Location Planning and Analysis.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
Economic Impacts of Agricultural Exports to Cuba Presented at “Free Trade of the Americas, the WTO and New Farm Legislation: Responding to Challenges and.
SWOT Strengths, Weakness, Opportunity, Threats BOCC Workshop February 1, 2011 BOCC Workshop February 1, 2011 Strategic Planning Group, Inc. 1.
Making the Job-Infrastructure Connection CALCOG Region Issues Forum Darin Chidsey.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Gauteng Economic Indaba Commission 2 9 June 2016.
© ATAG INTRODUCING… AIR TRANSPORT.
North Carolina’s Supply Chain US70 Corridor Commission / May 26, 2016 Charles HW Edwards, Director – Logistics Strategy.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
1 Davis Chacon Hurtado, Eleni Bardaka, Ruiman Yang, Konstantina Gkritza, and Jon D. Fricker HOUSTON, TX – JUNE , 2016 Transportation and Economic.
CE 2303 Railways, Airports & Harbor Engineering
Regional Roads Committee
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
Location Planning and Analysis
Global and Regional Electric Motor Sales Industry Production, Sales and Consumption Status and Prospects Professional Market Research Report.
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
N.C. Strategic Transportation Corridors Master Plans
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Production and Operations Management
Presentation transcript:

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. U.S. 70 Corridor Commission June 19, 2014 Paula Dowell, PhD Rocky Lane U.S. 70 Corridor Economic Impact Assessment

Agenda 1 Economic Development Analysis 2 Traffic Analysis 3 Economic Impact Findings

Economic Development Analysis

Input into Analysis Interviews Counties Municipalities Utilities Regional Economic Development Organizations Focus Groups Data Research

Importance and Current Conditions of US 70 Varies widely from West to East Critically Important for Communities Along 70 Rated 5 on a 1-5 Scale with 5 being the highest Description “Our Main Street” “The Main East-West Artery” “The Only Way In or Out “We Live and Die by What Happens on 70”

All major employers located within two (2) miles Lenoir County ~DuPont – 70 Trucks/Day going to I-95 ~500 Trucks/Day in/out of the main Industrial Park ~Thousands of Jobs within ¼ mile of the US 70 Centerline-Kinston A factor in most plant expansion decision Completion of the Bypass system improves competitive position Raw materials in/Finished goods out Expansion of labor pool Economic Development Implications

Lost Projects in the Region Existing Company Expansions Big Rock Sports ~US 70 Conditions – not the key, but a contributing factor ~Lost 160 Jobs – 80 remain New Locations Boeing-Access to I-95 Gatorade-Access to I-95 Boat Builder

Implications for Port and Global TransPark Completion from I-95 to Port rated “High” Benefits to Port and Counties ~Improve Quality of Port Projects ~Open sites for Port Users Connectivity to I-95 - “Very Important” Global TransPark Enhances GTP’s prospects Potentially opens sites and parks in other Corridor counties Necessary but not sufficient

Military Importance Rated at 4 Out of 5 Connectivity to I-95 – “Very Important” Primary corridor for delivery of mission critical elements - aircraft fuel & parts Primary corridor for personnel going to the Washington, DC area US 70 is not critical to fulfillment of mission Deployment – Non-Issue BRAC – Non-Issue Key Issues – Logistics & commuting related

Summary Economic Profile - solid and healthy Facing Challenges - Not all could be solved with completion of Bypass system Improvements benefit all sectors of economic development Improvements benefit not only the corridor but all of North Carolina

Traffic Analysis

Methodology Based on NCDOT forecasts Individual bypass studies Stakeholder input Key Assumptions Traffic projections completed at bypass level and not corridor level Growth adjusted based on planned development, e.g., 6,000 jobs at GTP in 2040

Change in Travel Times

Economic Impact Analysis

Productivity Market access Business costs GDP Employment Income Impact Categories Business Competitiveness Economic Impacts Travel time Vehicle operating costs Safety cost Reliability Traffic volumes Direct User Impacts

Economic Impact of Not Completing US Source: Cambridge Systematics analysis using the REMI economic model. ( ) denotes negative values

Economic Impact of Completing US

Market Access Analysis and Induced Economic Development Economic development assessment Stakeholder input Site analysis Gap analysis I-40 Corridor US 64 Corridor

Gap Analysis Compare growth rate by industry along corridor Identify area where corridor is over and under performing Examine role of transportation Estimate impact of enhancing transportation on closing any gaps

Growth Comparison

Employment Impact of Closing the Gap I-40 Growth Rate U.S. 64/264 Growth Rate Average Annual Additional Jobs along U.S ,350

Summary Findings Source of Impacts Total Impacts Metric Build U.S. 70 Corridor Business Transportation Costs ($ Billions)($.056) Gross Regional Product ($ Billions) $ $3.80 Personal Income($ Billions) $ $2.85 Jobs (average annual full-time) 1,150 – 1,900 Rest of North Carolina Gross Regional Product ($ Billions) $1.40 Personal Income($ Billions) $1.05 Jobs (average annual full-time) 600 Source: Cambridge Systematics analysis using the REMI economic model. ( ) denotes negative values

Key Takeaways No build results in slower economic growth 340 fewer jobs per year and $800 million less in GRP between 2014 and 2040 Completing US 70 results in $56 million in business cost savings for existing users, $1.2 billion in GRP between 2014 – 2040 Increasing efficiency, accessibility and connectivity translates into 1,150 to 1,900 additional jobs per year along U.S. 70 In total, the upgrading the entire U.S. 70 corridor could give rise to an additional 1,150 to 1,900 jobs along the corridor and up to 2,500 jobs per year statewide