1 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission 1 1 How to build High Speed Rail (HSR)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The travel solution for our time 1 High-Speed Rail at Amtrak Frank Vacca, Chief Engineer June 24, 2011.
Advertisements

Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
STATE OF NEW YORK Andrew M. Cuomo Governor New York State DOT Joan McDonald Commissioner Presentation by NYSDOT to the Transportation Border Working Group.
America’s intercity provider
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
First Statewide Comprehensive Rail Plan for MN Commissioned by 2008 Legislature Compliant with 2008 PRIIA Federal Rules 6 Months to prepare, 10 Months.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
1.  NCHRP Report 657 is the general guidebook for implementing passenger service on shared corridors  This guidebook “drills down” on the issue of service.
Section 209 Activity Report September 12, 2011 Federal Railroad Administration.
1 Amtrak’s Vision for the Northeast Corridor PRIIA 305 Annual General Meeting – June 14 th, PRIIA305 DMU Approval Meeting Andrew Wood Chief, Next.
Oregon Passenger Rail EIS Project Leadership Council Hal Gard, Rail Administrator, ODOT John Sibold, Cascade Rail Corridor Director, WSDOT Salem, OR June.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Petra Todorovich Director of America 2050 Regional Plan Association
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
1 The Northeast Megaregion Robert Yaro President, Regional Plan Association Megaregions + MetroProsperity Sustainable Economics for the Texas Triangle.
URBAN FREIGHT Getting kicked to the curb?. How will we live?
CSSC Regional Rail Partners, September 18, 2012 Chesapeake Connector : Freight and Passenger Rail Benefits Study.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
An Action Plan for the Restructuring and Rationalization of the National Intercity Rail Passenger System Briefing by the Amtrak Reform Council February.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
High Speed Rail on the Horizon State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Westin Hotel, Seattle, WA August 3 - 5, 2010 Paula Hammond Secretary.
ACT CANADA 2014: Using Business Cases To Get Great Projects Financed and Delivered December 1, 2014| Michael Sutherland.
Service Integration: Service Integration for Our Grandkids Jim Allison Manager of Planning Capitol Corridor.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS SYSTEM PLAN 2040
Market Research and Analysis Demand Forecasting Overview May 30, 2013 Agenda Overview of Demand Forecasting Model Demand Forecasting.
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS Chicago Area Rail Infrastructure 16,000 acres, twice the area of O’Hare 78 yards, including 21 intermodal (rail-truck)
US Amtrak Network Major Josiah Pickett Captain Philip Zlatsin Lieutenant Brett Robblee 1.
1 HSIPR Caucus Briefing February 2012 Stephen Gardner Amtrak VP, NEC Infrastructure and Investment Development.
The Northeast Megaregion in a National Infrastructure Plan
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
FLORIDA HIGH SPEED RAIL Presented by: Nazih K. Haddad Florida Department of Transportation USHSR Conference March 4, 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
April 29,  Investment in new and improved services, with a strong focus on customer experience  Investment focused on improving efficiency  Shorter.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program March 14, 2011 Federal Railroad Administration.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program March 14, 2011 Federal Railroad Administration.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
December 12-13, 2007 Item 4.4 Tab 31 California State Rail Plan to
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Structure of Presentation Federal Requirement Methodology WMATA Expenditures and Core Capacity Constraint Draft Revenues and Expenditures for 2015 – 2040.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 DRAFT Bay Area Regional Rail Plan August 2007 Workshops.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
1 Northeast Corridor - Overview Regional Plan Association Spring 2010.
Drive Safe Hampton Roads Thelma Drake, Director September 27, 2013.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Amtrak: America’s Railroad Todd Stennis, Director Government Affairs, South.
Impact of the California High Speed Rail System Lee Ann Eager, Chief Operating Officer Economic Development Corporation serving Fresno County.
Regional Transportation & Land Use IREM / BOMA Real Estate Forecast Breakfast 2009 Rich Macias, Director Regional & Comprehensive Planning Southern California.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Amtrak Gov’t Affairs October 19, 2007 Amtrak Key Facts Summary November 12, 2007.
Ron O’Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617) Session 3 Multi-Modal Transportation Projects Moderator: Peter Clary.
Making the Job-Infrastructure Connection CALCOG Region Issues Forum Darin Chidsey.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger Rail Alliance February 24, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger.
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

1 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission 1 1 How to build High Speed Rail (HSR) in Scandinavia Andrew M. Wood Chief, Next Generation Integration, HSR, NEC Infrastructure and Investment Development Amtrak 10 th April 2013 The Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail

2 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission The Amtrak System  Congressionally-chartered National Railroad 20,000 employees operate a 21,100 mile system 310 daily intercity trains; 528 stations 70% of our train-miles run on track owned by other railroads  Set ridership (31.2M) and ticket revenue ($2.0B) records in FY 2012  FY 2012 Federal funding for Amtrak was $1.418 billion: 466 million for operating expenses 952 million for capital needs  FY 2013 Federal funding request for Amtrak is $2.2 billion  FY 2014 Federal funding request for Amtrak is $2.065 billion

3 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission The Amtrak Network Cascades California corridors Chicago Hub Northeast Corridor Long distance routes connect major hubs and corridor services

4 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Northeast Great Lakes Piedmont Atlantic Florida Gulf Coast Texas Triangle Front Range Sun Corridor Southern California Northern California Cascadia America’s Megaregions

5 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission The Northeast Corridor Mainline and Branches 899 Route-miles 546 Miles Amtrak- owned 66% electrified 8 commuter operators Freight Service 2,200 daily train movements Amtrak Acela Express, Regional, State-supported & Long-Distance

6 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Northeast Corridor - Complex Operations  153 of Amtrak’s 305 daily trains, plus more than 1,800 daily commuter trains  Approximately 750,000 riders every day (Amtrak plus commuters)  Approximately 75 freight trains per day  Amtrak owns and maintains 363 of the 457 route-miles 17 tunnels (six underwater tunnels to access Manhattan) 1,186 bridges (14 of them moveable)  Top speeds of 150 mph for Acela Express and 125 mph for Northeast Regionals

7 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Population Density in the Northeast Corridor Image: Regional Plan Association

8 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission The Northeast Corridor: Uniquely Connected to Rail Transit Networks Source: America 2050, High-Speed Rail in America, 2011.

9 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission NEC Markets Compare Favorably to Successful HSR Corridors Population Distribution by Metropolitan Area

10 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Other Modes Can ’ t Handle Entire Increase in Demand  Airlines New York area airports account for half of U.S. flight delays Carriers are reducing service within NEC to focus on more profitable longer flights  Highways 18 of the 40 “most congested” highway segments are between Washington and Boston  Buses Limited appeal for business travel (lengthy and variable trip times) Curbside buses exacerbate center city traffic congestion Source: Alan Ferguson, “Approaching Lindbergh Field” Source: Wikimedia Commons, Megabus NYC NY Penn Station stop

11 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission  2030 Forecasts Train miles: + 37% Intercity & commuter riders: + 60%  Investment needs by 2030 : SGR Backlog:7.9 B SGR Replace:$9.1 B Core Growth:$32.9 B Baltimore Tunnel:$2.0 B Total:$51.9 B Average of $2.6 B annually  Modest increase in capacity  Segment capacities along NEC exceeded by 2030 But the NEC Faces Capacity Constraints and Deferred Investments Previously Identified Chokepoint 2008 Capacity Utilization > 75% Northeast Corridor 2030 Capacity Utilization > 100% Commuter Railroad Source: NEC Master Plan.

12 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Centenarian Hall of Fame Pelham Bay Bridge (NY) B&P Tunnel (MD)

13 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Status of NEC Planning Efforts for Growth  These plans are now inputs into the FRA-led “NEC FUTURE” process  Advancing Major NEC improvements require pursuing two simultaneous paths: Incremental NEC Improvements permissible under 1978 PEIS Major improvements - “NEC FUTURE” program

14 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Two progressive and overlapping programs: 1.NEC Upgrade Program (“Stairstep Plan”) - Advance projects under current PEIS that improve HSR and other services: Create additional capacity Raise top speeds and reduce trip times Increase Trans-Hudson capacity Achieve a State of Good Repair and Master Plan improvements Amtrak’s Program for NEC Improvement and Expansion

15 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission 2.Next Generation High-Speed Rail Program (“NextGen HSR”) – Develop and advance NextGen HSR services as part of an integrated NEC network: Phased implementation of new, mostly dedicated two-track alignment for high-capacity, high-speed services Separate high speed trains from regional and commuter trains, creating additional capacity for all services and improved reliability and efficiency New station development Integration with existing network to maximize network growth Amtrak’s Program for NEC Improvement and Expansion

16 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Implementation Phasing Strategy NJ High Speed Improvement Program High Speed Equipment PurchaseNEC 160 mph MAS: NYC to WAS NEC Gateway: Newark to NYC NextGen HSR: NYC to WAS NextGen HSR: NYC to BOS NEC-UP (Upgrade Program) ( ) NextGen HSR ( )

17 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission  Augment the existing NEC with a new high-capacity, high- speed rail system: Dedicated 2 - track alignment; 220 mph top speeds up to 12 HSR trains an hour per direction 40% - 60% travel-time reductions in key markets  Sufficient growth capacity for the century ahead: Allow HSR to carry larger portion of Northeast’s intercity travel market  Radically improve trip times and frequencies: Reshape geography, induces demand, and create economic gains for the whole region  Shift high speed trains to mostly dedicated infrastructure: Create additional capacity on the existing NEC and improve reliability and performance for all users. Advancing a Bold Future - NEC NextGen HSR

18 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission NEC NextGen HSR - Updated Conceptual Alignment

19 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission  Early improvements in the existing NEC from 2015 thru 2025 would provide travel time and capacity gains to boost high-speed service quality  Near-term gains would also be significant (e.g. 8-minutes faster from NYC to PHL by 2020 and 28 minutes faster from NYC to WAS by 2025)  With increased capacity, improved reliability and shorter travel times, high- speed service becomes an attractive alternative to highway and air modes NEC NextGen HSR – Updated Travel Times

20 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission  Purpose: Develop strategies to achieve the NEC Integrated Capital Investment Program, guiding Amtrak on how to turn our vision into reality Explore how to fund and finance the NEC Integrated Capital Investment Program for both improvements to today’s NEC and the development of the NextGen HSR  Parameters: Starting point was the NEC Integrated Capital Investment Program Amtrak as the key developer and operator of the system – with partners and vendor support  Products: New revenue & ridership and cost models developed and handed over to Amtrak Comprehensive Station-area real estate assessment Complete Plan detailing finding and recommendations Outreach and communications support The Business & Finance Plan ( )

21 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Business and Finance Plan - Key Findings 1.The Program can be built and is worth doing: A combination of upgrades to the existing NEC and newly built alignment will allow Amtrak to deliver a fundable Program to respond to the congestion and mobility challenges faced along the NEC. 2.Ridership and Revenue: Market size, demand, ridership and revenue potential of this full-build system are all greater than we originally estimated.

22 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Business and Finance Plan - Key Findings 3.Scheduled Capital investments are too ambitious for the time-frame 4.Future Phasing offers Opportunities 5.Federal Support 6.New User access fees are central to successful funding and delivery of the Program 7.Private Sector Participation 8.State and Local Partnerships are Key 9.Organizational Structure 10.Near Term Goals and Gaining Momentum

23 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission  Phasing and Integration of the Program is Critical – Plan identified options to phase Master Plan and Vision in order to create a realistic construction expenditure profile that reduces the annual outlay from the “base case”. Base Case – Total Capital Expenditures by Segment and Total Net Operating Revenue (in Billions - $2011) Enhanced Base Case – Total Capital Expenditures by Segment and Total Net Operating Revenue (in Billions - $2011) NEC Business & Financial Plan – Key Findings $5-$11B Average Annual Capex Rate $3-$5B Average Annual Capex Rate and Deferred Cost of $57B

24 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Significant funding is required to meet the capital needs of the program. Amtrak is exploring the following:  Access fees based on fully allocated costs Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) requires a standardized formula for determining and allocating costs, revenues, and compensation among all users of the NEC.  Additional Real Estate Opportunities  Yield Managed Fare Structure  State and Local Support Funding Availability

25 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission  Refine and develop program alternatives to match capital expenditures with revenue and funding  Coordinate with and support the FRA NEC FUTURE – PRCIP Program: Share Business and Finance plan findings Develop suggested high-level alternative to be evaluated  Complete PRIIA 212 cost sharing methodologies through the NEC Commission  Continue outreach with NEC stakeholders to build support and resources for the Program: Administration and Congress States and cities Commuter and freight users UIC and HST industry Business and Finance Plan Recommended Next Steps

26 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Preliminary Alternatives

27 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Preliminary Alternatives

28 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission  Advance near-term planning with States, FRA and Northeast Corridor Advisory Commission  Coordination with Other Land Use and Transportation Plans  Private Sector Engagement  Advance Funding and Financing options  Initiate Near-Term Improvements Moving Forward

29 Amtrak Northeast Corridor Vision for High Speed Rail Proprietary – Not for distribution without Amtrak permission Thank You for Your Attention WAS to PHL: 54 Minutes | PHL to NYC: 37Minutes | NYC to BOS: 94 Minutes