Lecture 6 Bus Rapid Transit, design elements and operational issues Dr. Muhammad Adnan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMMITTEE ON UBS CORE GROUP ON UBS CORE GROUP ON UBS Professionals/ Experts OEMs-Bus, ITS Asso. of bus body builders SIAM ASRTU CIRT & ARAI Operators.
Advertisements

Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
Consultation on key routes which run parallel to Oxford Road corridor September 2012 Bus priority package.
Asia BRT Conference HUBLI-DHARWAD BRTS PROJECT Presented by: Commissioner, DULT.
lesson 4.3 PARKING MANEUVERS Parking your car is a skill.
Noor E Alam, Ministry of Road Transport and Bridges, Bangladesh 2 nd ASIA BRTS, Ahmedabad, India BRTS IN D HAKA : D ESIGNING UNDER C ONSTRAINTS.
East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project Description August 11, 2011.
Sample questions from the Rules of the Road units of the Driving Theory syllabus. ESOL for Driving.
9/7/2012 MBS UU.
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority THE HEATHLINE EUCLID CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Michael J. Schipper, P.E DGM- Engineering & Project.
MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program Joanne Haracz, AICP responsive client solutions since 1976 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association April.
MAXIMIZING THE AIR QUALITY BENEFITS OF BUS RAPID TRANSIT Walter Hook, BAQ Conference Agra, India, December, 2004 Funded by the US Agency for International.
An Integral Perspective on the S.E. 17 Corridor October 29, 2013 Calgary.
Rajkot Municipal Corporation. About City  Location : 20.18N & 70.51E  Heart of Saurashtra region  Area : Sq.Kms  Population : 12,90,000 (as.
Euclid Corridor Design TRB BRT Workshop July 21, 2008.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
VTA Light Rail System and Safety Enhancements MTC Railroad Crossing Seminar May, 21, 2008.
Presentation by: Permanent Secretary - PMORALG Mr. Jumanne Sagini 3 rd June 2014.
Design Considerations for BRT Level Boarding Station Platforms
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
1 Corridor Cities Transitway Presented to: Amberfield HOA January 15, 2015.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
BRT LOST IN TRANSLATION
BRT in India Delhi Case study. What is Delhi HCBS Delhi HCBS is not a BRT system. It is primarily a road infrastructure project. It was not conceived.
1/30/03 Page 1 Rescue Muni’s Recommendations for Geary Rapid Transit For PAR 1/30/2003.
7 May 2015 Introduction to bus rapid transit. What is BRT? Enclosed and secure stations New, clean, high- capacity buses Pre-board payment with smart.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
CHAPTER 12 Trolley Buses and Duo-Buses GUIDELINES FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA A MULTI MODAL ANALYSIS.
Grade separation.
Bus Rapid Transit Infrastructure Design Roadway and Junctions Bus stops Shreya Gadepalli Senior Program Director Institute for transportation and.
February 2014 Bus Rapid Transit for Chennai. Chennai city bus service GOOD PATRONAGE  50 lakh daily passenger trips  3650 buses  Maximum flow of.
May 10, 2007 Presented by: Bill Ball, AICP and Joel Rey, P.E., AICP BRT To Maximize Person Capacity Within Limited ROW Using.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Mind Moo-ver Objective: SWBAT understand and practice executing parking techniques QOD: What is a “Value” – what is something that you value?
Virginia Department of Education
Shreya Gadepalli Regional Director (India) August 2015 The BRT Standard Bus Rapid Transit Best Practices.
7 May 2014 Sustainable transport vision for Greater Cairo.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Left Lane Mixed-Traffic BRT August 22, 2012 Stefano Viggiano and Jack Gonsalves.
Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments Topic 1 -- Characteristics of Expressways Topic 2 (through Lesson 1)-- Entering, Changing Lanes, and.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Greetings from India. A Country of a billion people with 350 million in urban areas.
Understanding the Virginia Driver’s Manual
Traffic Signs Part Two. What do these 2 signs tell you?
SEPARATED BIKE LANE PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDE. Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide Context Conforms to federal and state standards and guidelines:
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Cleveland HealthLine Bus Rapid Transit Kenneth G. Sislak, Associate Vice President; Manager of Transit/Rail.
1 Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan May BRT Strategic Plan Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of six BRT corridors Establish framework for.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project Presentation to the San Francisco.
MODULE 3: PLANNING & DESIGN Lesson 2: Modal Characteristics and Impacts.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System: Nablus Case study
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Milton Road – Bus Stop and Crossings Workshop WSP
Free MetroRide Travel Time and Reliability Improvements
Tapping Transit to Transform a Thoroughfare
City of Alexandria Virginia Transportation and Environmental Services
M14A/D Select Bus Service
Central Avenue Rapid Transit
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 6 Bus Rapid Transit, design elements and operational issues Dr. Muhammad Adnan

Design Elements Corridor Demarcation Ridership Consideration Bus-type selection Alignment and cross-sectional elements Priority Junctions Bus Stop Location and its Design Scheduling and Fleet Size Fare and its collection system BRT Terminal Location

Corridor Demarcation Result of a Macro-level Planning Model – Four stage Modelling process Largely dependent on Potential Ridership Future Consideration (LRT system Line-Feeder)

Corridor Demarcation Yellow Line – Dawood Chowrangi (Korangi/Landhi Industrial Area) to Numaish Chowrangi through locations such as Qayyumabad Junction, FTC Flyover, Shahra-e- Quaideen) -General Guidelines from Authorities Should be aligned alongside Road Median Stations utilizing built-up median space Articulated Buses (18m length) with off-board Fare collection

Alignment Features; – Identification of stretches for Separate ROW based on situational analysis or Recky survey – Identification of stretches for operation in mixed traffic based on situational analysis or Recky survey – Proposed Developments in future – Stretches of Bus Weaving (Left to Right lanes or vice versa)[AASHTOO recommendation: 250m length availability in congested conditions] – Signal Priority Junctions Identification

RUNNING WAY TYPE Outer Exclusive Lanes Median Exclusive Lanes Elevated Corridor Median Exclusive BRTS Lane Outer Exclusive Lanes Median BRTS ELEVATED LANES Elevated Corridor Exclusive BRTS Lanes Median Exclusive Lanes (At-Grade)

RUNNING WAY SEPARATION Lane marking Curb stones Barrier with Fence BRTS Lane Lane Marking BRTS Lane Mixed Traffic Lanes BRTS Lane Raised Curbstones BRTS Lane Mixed Traffic Lanes BRTS Lane Barrier / Fence BRTS Lane Mixed Traffic Lanes

Barrier / Fence Options 2.0 m Normal NJ Barrier 1.2 m Fence 0.6 m Cost per M = Rs. 15, m Mini Barrier 1.6 m Fence 0.6 m Cost per M = Rs. 16, m 0.6 m Cost per M = Rs. 16,600 Curb Stone Option-1, Fence with Normal Barrier Option-2, Fence with Mini Barrier Option-3, Fence with Curb Stone 1.2 m 0.8 m 2.0 m 1.6 m 0.4 m 0.2 m 1.8 m Fence

STATION LOCATION STATION Curb Side Station STATION Mixed Traffic Lanes BRTS Lane Mixed Traffic Lanes STATION Median Side Station Mixed Traffic Lanes BRTS Lane Mixed Traffic Lanes BRTS Lane

Curb-side station (2 platforms)Median station (1 platform)  This configuration enables straight flow without bulging for the bus lanes.  Bus lanes have to bulge around median station  Provision of curb side stations leave one lane free for overtaking.  Overtaking is not possible without the provision of an extra lane at the station  Two different platforms have to be provided at every station which increases and maintenance cost.  A single platform involves less infrastructure and maintenance cost.  Separate stations reduce overall passenger friction and results in increased boarding and alighting efficiency.  Single platform increases passenger movement conflicts within station.  Normal passenger buses can also utilize transit corridor enhancing flexibility and allowing phased operation.  Only special BRT buses with doors on right side can use the corridor. COMPARISION OF STATION LOCATION

LOW FLOOR BUS (+ 0.3 m)HIGH FLOOR BUS (+0.9 m)  Low floor buses 1.5~2.0 times costlier than High floor buses.  Wastages of standees space due to wheel block cut out.  Low Floor buses may easily get inundated while passing flooded street during rains.  Separate emergency door required while stopping away from stations. COMPARISION OF VEHICLE FLOOR HEIGHT