1 © JR Central 2014 Texas Central High-Speed Railway Project Update / February 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estonian Road Administration overview of tasks related to public transport management 6 May 2013.
Advertisements

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
Transportation Systems Highway Transportation Characteristics.
| 1 The Municipal Farm Sustainable Reuse Plan Project funded through a Brownfields Area-Wide Planning Pilot Grant from the United States Environmental.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
The Sustainable Communities Partnership and U.S. DOT’s Livability Initiative 6 th Annual East and Southeast Fort Worth Economic Development Summit Don.
Oregon Passenger Rail EIS Project Leadership Council Hal Gard, Rail Administrator, ODOT John Sibold, Cascade Rail Corridor Director, WSDOT Salem, OR June.
CALTRANS’ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS CTP 2040 PAC 1 Kris Kuhl Assistant Division Chief, Division of Traffic Operations 4/15/2014 CREATING.
1 SCORT 2010 September 21, 2010 David Valenstein Federal Railroad Administration State Rail Planning.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
Great Transport Debate Public transport and sustainability: challenges for the next government Stephen Joseph, Campaign for Better Transport.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
MTF Rail Development Forum
Market Research and Analysis Demand Forecasting Overview May 30, 2013 Agenda Overview of Demand Forecasting Model Demand Forecasting.
M IAMI F ORT L AUDERDALE W EST P ALM B EACH O RLANDO Addresses Florida’s demand for express, intercity rail travel. Is designed to serve tourists, business.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Recent Developments in UK Travel and Tourism BTEC National Travel and Tourism.
Transport support in foreign economic activity
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Tourism Planning Lecture 3.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Thriving Communities planning the places we need Adam Beck Manager Sustainable Communities Green Building Council of Australia.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Obstacles and Opportunities for Renewable Energy Transmission Carl Zichella, Sierra Club Southwest Renewable Energy Transmission Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
Staying Positive: Responding to Transit Critics Eron H. Linn Federal Relations Manager Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) 1.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
1 Context Sensitive Solutions For Designing Urban Thoroughfares Brian Bochner Senior Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute Brian Bochner Senior.
Early Implementation of Coalition Initiatives ARK-LA-TEX Rail Summit May 9, Transportation Department North Central Texas.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI) A new initiative to reduce greenhouse gases in the transportation sector in Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states.
Land Use and Economic Development in Rural Areas Supplemental Module.
TOURISM & CO-OPS A Symbiotic Relationship Presentation By Rajiv I.D. Mehta Director – Development, ICA - AP.
TOURISM & CO-OPS A Symbiotic Relationship Presentation By Rajiv I.D. Mehta Director – Development, ICA - AP.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
Lakes Region Transportation Workshop November 15, 2013.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
Context Sensitive Solutions Focus Group Session Lynn Purnell Parsons Brinckerhoff Prosperity Church Road Corridor December 8, 2005.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Orht I-5 North Coast Corridor Project CA Transportation Planning Conference – New Directions in Planning Integrating Resource and Infrastructure Plans.
___________________________ Principles, Practices, Philosophies TOURISM TWELFTH EDITION Charles R. Goeldner J. R. Brent Ritchie © 2012 John Wiley and Sons,
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
CONTEXT-SENSITIVE DESIGN 2002 Texas Department of Transportation Design Conference.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Ohio Rail Development Commission November 15, 2017 Meeting
Stormwater Management Tools
Transit Systems Planning
Mr. Ashok Agarwal : CEO - New Initiatives
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

1 © JR Central 2014 Texas Central High-Speed Railway Project Update / February 2015

2 Texas Central High-Speed Railway (TCR) is promoting the development and operation of a private, for-profit high-speed passenger rail system connecting Dallas and Houston in less than 90 minutes Our approach is guided by three fundamental principles— 1.Apply the discipline of the market to determine route and station locations, maximize transit-oriented development opportunities, and provide benefits to consumers 2.Utilize Japan Central Railway’s state-of-the-art “N700-I Bullet System” to deliver a “true high-speed rail” experience that is exceptionally safe, comfortable, and convenient 3.Look for opportunities to collaborate with the communities we serve, U.S. companies, and the State of Texas to take advantage of the transformational nature of high-speed rail service About TCR

3 2035: More People

4 2035: More Congestion

5 A Better Alternative Where others see… Frustrating road congestion, an unpleasant air travel experience, and expanding populations making matters even worse We see… A market opportunity to provide consumers with a fast, safe, affordable, convenient, and comfortable alternative The “Joy of the Journey” Frequent & dependable service Flexible scheduling & digital ticketing Wide-bodied seats w/plenty of elbow room Quiet, comfortable, relaxing travel experience Free Wi-Fi & recharging outlets Quality food & beverage service Convenient car rental & access to major roadways

6 Fundamentally different from proposals Texans have considered in the past and efforts now being pursued in other states Government agencies play a role in approving technology, reviewing environmental impacts, coordinating with construction, and regulating operations But this is NOT a government project Not created by a government agency Requires no federal or state grants System will be built without government grants and operated without taxpayer subsidies TCR is a private business promoting the development of a product in an industry that is regulated by the government High Speed Rail the Lone Star Way

7 Free-Market Led Approach TCR’s Free-Market Led Approach Promotion led by TCR Route selected based on economic, environmental, and land use factors Project led by private owners Purpose—meet consumer demand Government-Led Approach Procurement led by state/federal agencies Route selected based on environmental and political factors Purpose—meet planning objectives One size does NOT fit all TCR believes our approach will succeed because of— Texas’ unique business culture and pro-business climate The unique characteristics of the Houston-to-Dallas corridor The capabilities of JRC’s total system approach

8 What Does “Market-Led” Mean? Revenues must exceed costs from day one Therefore, TCR is sensitive to… Alignment Development/Construction delays Station location Ticket cost Connectivity with other modes of transportation

9 Maximize Use of Existing ROW Previously: Identified possible ROW I-45 (blue) - BNSF (red) – UP/Utility (green) Recently: TCR crafted Preferred Alternatives Places heavy priority on using existing ROW In rural areas respects local communities & preserves existing land use; in urban areas also connects to transportation networks Reflects 4+ years internal analysis During EIS: Public & Stakeholder Input Comment on preliminary alignments & suggest alternatives/adjustments

10 TCR Preferred Alternatives BNSF (red) – UP/Hempstead/Utility (orange) Maximizes use of existing ROW corridors Isolated and grade separated – Elevated in urban areas and where required for land access Respects local communities & preserves existing land use; connects to existing and planned transportation networks Reflects 4+ years internal analysis During EIS: Public & Stakeholder Input Comment on preliminary alignments & suggest alternatives/adjustments

11 Next Steps Ensure public understands what makes this proposal fundamentally different from previous efforts & other projects elsewhere Continue formal environmental review Continue formal technology review and approval Continue close coordination with political and community stakeholders in transparent manner and maintain open lines of communication Finalize plan of finance

12 © JR Central 2014 Thank You Learn More on Twitter

13