LNG PAT WOOD III Federal Energy Regulatory Commission December 17, 2003.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Pat Wood III, Chairman Federal Energy Regulatory Commission New Englands Platform for Infrastructure Development Boston September 13, 2004.

Advertisements

FERC 1 APGA Annual Conference Halifax, Nova Scotia FERC Priorities in an Evolving Natural Gas Market Suedeen G. Kelly Commissioner, FERC August 2, 2005.

1 The Honorable Suedeen G. Kelly Commissioner, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission IPAA 2004 Mid-Year Meeting June 14, 2004 “A FERC Perspective on Natural.

All Things Natural Gas Infrastructure, Rates and Policy

LNG A BRIDGE TO OUR ENERGY FUTURE. 2 This presentation contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements” within.

Capitol Hill Ocean Week Managing Emerging Demands for LNG.

ACC Workshop Regarding Notice of Inquiry on Natural Gas Infrastructure September 10, 2003.

Environmental Regulation and Liquefied Natural Gas Commissioner Suedeen G. Kelly, FERC Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum November 19, 2004.

Pat Wood, III, Chairman Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Energy Infrastructure Washington D.C. April 5, 2005.

What’s Up With Infrastructure? Interstate Pipeline Regulatory Committee Jeff Wright, Chief Energy Infrastructure Policy Group Office of Energy Projects.

LNG USA 2005 IQPC Houston, Texas November 9, 2005 Bruce F. Kiely Baker Botts L.L.P. Washington, D.C.

The FERC Review Process and Interaction with State Authorities Council of State Governments July 27, 2005 Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory.

IPAA Oil & Gas Investment Symposium New York April 20, 2004 Charif Souki – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer “Is it too late?” Cheniere Energy,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Pivotal Development: Regions of Possibilities Dana Grams Senior Vice President, Pivotal Development.

Coastal Zone Federal Consistency The most powerful permitting program you’ve probably never heard of…

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Item No. C- 7 Weaver’s Cove Energy & Mill River Pipeline June 15, 2005.

NATURAL GAS ROUNDTABLE Commissioner Suedeen G. Kelly, FERC February 24, 2004 “Pending Natural Gas Issues”

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission GITA Seminar on: New Construction Project Lifecycle JW Marriott Houston, TX September 20, 2004 Lonnie Lister, Chief.

Natural Gas In California LNG Imports UCSB Bren School Corporate Partners Summit May 14, 2004.

Eric J. Tomasi – Project Manager Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Northeast Energy.

FERC & Hydrokinetic Projects Ocean Energy for New England Conference Hosted by the Marine Renewable Energy Center at the Advanced Technology and Manufacturing.

Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) Facilities. LNG: What is it? Natural gas converted to liquid at -260 F Natural gas converted to liquid at -260 F 1/600 of original.

The Natural Gas Act & NEPA: How will FERC review the proposed Dominion pipeline? Greg Buppert, Southern Environmental Law Center.

FERC and the Development of an Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Robert J. Cupina, Deputy Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Commissioner Suedeen Kelly Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Energy Infrastructure in the West February 24, 2006.

Natural Gas Transmission Networks: So You Want To Build A Pipeline?

FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission EPAct 2005 Authorities & FY06 Status of LNG Facilities and Pipelines IRWA Federal.

NOI on Arizona Natural Gas Infrastructure Strawman Proposal and Workshop Comments of Sempra Energy Global Enterprises September 25, 2003.

Public Symposium on LNG Bowdoin College Brunswick, Maine Robert J. Cupina, Deputy Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Regulatory Overview of LNG LSU Center for Energy Studies Energy Summit Baton Rouge, Louisiana October 20, 2005 Robert Cupina, Deputy Director, Office of.

FERC Organization Chart

Imported Liquified Natural Gas and its Role in Energy Independence Samuel Brown.

Natural Gas Transmission Regulation in the US Jeff Wright, Chief Energy Infrastructure Policy Group Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory.

MassDOT P3 Project Overview. MassDOT Project Mobility.

A wholly owned subsidiary of Cheniere Energy, Inc. American Stock Exchange: LNG Cheniere LNG Energy Summit 2004 “Securing Louisiana’s Economic Growth in.

Natural Gas: Fuel of Choice Indefinitely? By: John Harpole Presentation to: CREA Energy Innovations Summit October 28, 2013.

Regulation and Investment in the U.S. Robert J. Cupina, Deputy Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission GIE Annual Conference.

ALASKA NATURAL GAS SYMPOSIUM Regulatory Update J. Mark Robinson, Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission December 2, 2004.

Challenges in Transmission. 2 Environmental and Public Affairs Consulting for the Energy Industry Energy Sectors  Oil & Gas  Pipeline  Storage  LNG.

Energy Action Plan Natural Gas Update California Public Utilities Commission California Energy Commission Randy Roesser December 8,

LNG in North America Tommy Stone – Vice President, Operations & Engineering Trunkline LNG Company, LLC – Lake Charles, LA Tommy Stone – Vice President,

FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Global LNG Outlook 2004 Regulatory Status & Challenges in the U.S. Richard R. Hoffmann, Director Division of Gas – Environment.

The FERC Review Process and The Importance of Safe Pipeline and LNG Terminal Operation NASFM Annual Meeting- July 8, 2005 Office of Energy Projects Federal.

LNG Regulatory Update 2 nd Annual Global LNG Outlook October 27, 2005 Houston, Texas Jeff C. Wright, Chief Energy Infrastructure Policy Group Office of.

LNG: Regulatory and Regional Considerations The Energy Council’s LNG/CNG Workshop Biloxi, Mississippi April 8, 2005 Robert Cupina, Deputy Director, Office.

Frank J. Macchiarola Executive Vice President May 6, 2015 Conference of Western Attorneys General The LNG Export Opportunity.

TEXAS TEXAS Current Status of Liquid Natural Gas Terminals & Offshore Wind Farms Jerry Patterson Commissioner Capitol Hill Ocean Week 2006 – State and.

Wyoming Pipeline Authority Public Meeting January 15, 2008 A Spectra Energy Proposal.

Douglas A. Sipe Outreach Manager Outreach Manager Division of Gas-Environment and Engineering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects.

LNG USA Houston, Texas J. Mark Robinson, Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission September 23, 2004.

1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission John M. Wood, Acting Director Division of Pipeline Certificates Office of Energy Projects FERC Update Florida Energy.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.

Managing Our Future: A Case for LNG NARUC Summer Committee Meetings Keith Meyer President, Cheniere Marketing July 2007 CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.

1.What is the standard relicensing process in the U.S. and what is the ALP (Alternative Licensing Process) ? 2.How did we convince FERC to agree to an.

Office of Energy Projects 1 FERC Update Robert J. Cupina Deputy Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Wyoming Infrastructure.

California Energy Commission LNG’s Role for Expanding Natural Gas Supplies and Update on West Coast Projects Presented to West Coast PTTC Workshop Valencia,

FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Richard Hoffmann, Director Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Policies Affecting.

1 Is there LNG in California’s Future? “LNG: When East Meets West” Zeus Development Conference Long Beach, CA by David Maul Manager, Natural Gas Office.

Landon Derentz Energy Policy Advisor Bureau of Energy Resources U.S. Department of State Shale Gas and Tight Oil Production in the United States 1.

Continuing Progress of LNG Terminals in the Gulf Coast Region

Prepared for: Prepared by: Identifying and Constructing a Dredged Material Placement Site while Protecting a Unique Coastal Freshwater Marsh October 2012.

California Energy Commission 1 LNG Permitting and Environmental Review: the View from California DOE LNG Forum Los Angeles June 1, 2006 Kevin Kennedy,

LNG Terminal Permitting J. Mark Robinson, Director Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission before the California Senate Energy,

Understanding the Impacts of Incremental Gas Supply on the Flow Dynamics Across the North American Grid Canadian Institute Vancouver, BC November 20, 2006.

INTERSTATE PIPELINE FORUM Presented by: Rebecca F. Zachas, Esq.

EPA Ocean and Coastal Protection Programs in New England Melville P. Coté, Jr., Manager Ocean and Coastal Protection Unit U.S. Environmental Protection.

United States LNG Terminal Update

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

CPES Meeting Cromwell, CT

Presentation transcript:

LNG PAT WOOD III Federal Energy Regulatory Commission December 17, 2003

FERC Existing Terminals with Expansions A. Everett, MA : Bcfd (Tractebel) B. Cove Point, MD : 1.0 Bcfd (Dominion) C. Elba Island, GA : 1.2 Bcfd (El Paso) D. Lake Charles, LA : 1.2 Bcfd (Southern Union) Approved Terminals 1. Hackberry, LA : 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy) 2. Port Pelican: 1.0 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) Proposed Terminals – FERC 3. Bahamas : 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express) 4. Bahamas : 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel) 5. Freeport, TX : 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere / Freeport LNG Dev.) 6. Fall River, MA : 0.4 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy) 7. Long Beach, CA : 0.7 Bcfd, (SES/Mitsubishi) Proposed Terminals – Coast Guard 8. Gulf of Mexico: 0.5 Bcfd, (El Paso Global) 9. California Offshore: 1.5 Bcfd, (BHP Billiton) 10. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing – Shell) Planned Terminals 11. Brownsville, TX : n/a, (Cheniere LNG Partners) 12. Corpus Christi, TX : 2.7 Bcfd, (Cheniere LNG Partners) 13. Sabine, LA : 2.7 Bcfd (Cheniere LNG) 14. Humboldt Bay, CA : 0.5 Bcfd, (Calpine) 15. Mobile Bay, AL: 1.0 Bcfd, (ExxonMobil) 16. Somerset, MA : 0.65 Bcfd (Somerset LNG) 17. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (McMoRan Exp.) 18. Belmar, NJ Offshore : n/a (El Paso Global) 19. So. California Offshore : 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal Energy) 20. Bahamas : 0.5 Bcfd, (El Paso Sea Fare) 21. Altamira, Tamulipas : 1.12 Bcfd, (Shell) 22. Baja California, MX : 1.3 Bcfd, (Sempra) 23. Baja California : 0.6 Bcfd (Conoco-Phillips) 24. Baja California - Offshore : 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 25. Baja California : 0.85 Bcfd, (Marathon) 26. Baja California : 1.3 Bcfd, (Shell) 27. St. John, NB : 0.75 Bcfd, (Irving Oil & Chevron Canada) 28. Point Tupper, NS 0.75 Bcf/d (Access Northeast Energy) 29. Harpswell, ME : 0.5 Bcf/d (Fairwinds LNG – CP & TCPL) 30. St. Lawrence, QC : n/a (TCPL and/or Gaz Met) 31. Lázaro Cárdenas, MX : 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel) 32. Corpus Christi, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (ExxonMobil) 33. Gulf of Mexico : 1.0 Bcfd (ExxonMobil) 34. Sabine, LA : 1.0 Bcfd (ExxonMobil) 35. Providence, RI ; 0.5 Bcfd (Keyspan & BG LNG) Existing and Proposed Lower-48 LNG Terminals December 2003 FERC A C B D

FERC Maximum LNG Deliverability Growth

December 2002 FERC Policy Change A Open Access At Delivery of Liquid to Terminal LNG Suppliers LNG Buyers A B B Open Access At Delivery of Vapor into Interstate Pipeline System Liquid to Vapor Flow FERC

LNG Terminal Siting Issues Safety Take Away Capacity Local acceptance Federal and State approvals

FERC Safety Proximity to residential and commercial areas raises public safety concerns. –Exclusion zones DOT/OPS enforces security. FERC performs pre- and post-certificate reviews of LNG terminals. –Biennial reviews continue for life of terminal. Coast Guard enforces offshore ship safety.

FERC Takeaway Capacity Is there an existing pipeline with takeaway capacity? Does the project require new pipeline construction? NEPA requires an analysis of the cumulative effects. –Can not have an LNG terminal without takeaway capacity.

FERC Federal and State Approvals Must get approvals: –FERC – NGA Approval –DOT/OPS – Exclusion Zones –Coast Guard – Vessel Operating Plan –Corps of Engineers – Dredging, Wetland Filling, Alternative Sites –NMFS, FWS – Endangered Species Act –Coastal Zone Consistency Determination –State Agency Requirements

FERC Traditional vs. NEPA Pre-Filing Process Announce Open Season Announce Open Season Develop Study Corridor Develop Study Corridor Conduct Scoping Conduct Scoping Review Draft Resource Reports & Prepare DEIS Issue Draft EIS Issue Draft EIS File At FERC Issue Order Issue Order File At FERC Prepare Resource Reports Prepare Resource Reports Issue Final EIS Issue Final EIS (months) Traditional - Applicant Traditional - FERC NEPA Pre-Filing - Applicant NEPA Pre-Filing - FERC

FERC Making the NEPA Pre-Filing Process Work Projects Can Be Expedited Only If –The company follows the NEPA Pre-Filing guidelines; –Public involvement is made an integral part of the project planning process; –The company works in partnership with the agencies; and –The project is READY to move forward.

FERC NEPA Pre-Filing Lessons Learned Management support needed for project teams’ work with stakeholders. Participating agencies early involvement is needed. Stakeholder involvement needs to be planned.

FERC Benefits of NEPA Pre-Filing More interactive NEPA process, no shortcuts Earlier, more direct involvement by FERC, other agencies, landowners Goal of “no surprises” Time savings realized only if we are working together with stakeholders FERC staff is an advocate of the Process, not the Project!

FERC Companies Need a Plan for Public Participation A Plan is required for NEPA Pre-filing, strongly encouraged otherwise Must be an intentional component It won’t happen by accident