Brazil: “PLANTAR” Project Sustainable Fuelwood and Charcoal Production and Substitution of Coke in Pig Iron Production Sao Paulo November 21, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon Finance in Gas Flaring and Venting Reduction Veronique Bishop Carbon Finance Business The World Bank OPEC – GGFR Workshop Vienna, June 30-July 1,
Advertisements

Fundamentals of Emission Reductions Purchase Agreements HCC Annual Meeting February 15, 2004.
CDM – LULUCF Project Cycle Winrock International Sandra Brown Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects.
A practical overview from planning to practice on of the capture and combustion of methane from landfill. Source: Clean Energy Regulator (CER) July 2013.
Catalyzing Changes: An Analysis of the Role of FSC Forest Certification in Brazil The Forest Stewardship Council: A Developing Country Perspective.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Ecosystem Services & Emerging Markets and Payments
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
CARBON CONTRACTS - the PCF experience September 30, 2002.
With the financial support of the European Commission Impact on employment of CO2 reduction strategies in the steel industry by 2030.
Carbon Trading: The Challenges and Risks John Drexhage Director, Climate Change and Energy International Institute for Sustainable Development Agriculture.
The reality of Carbon Sinks Projects Examples from Brazil and Uganda Presentation by Jutta Kill SinksWatch
Presented by Dean Current, PhD Center for Integrated Natural Resources and Agricultural Management (CINRAM) Department of Forest Resources University of.
Overview of BioCF ERPA terms December 15, 2005 The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Finance of the Payment for Environmental Services Programme.
Madagascar: the Mantadia Biological Corridor REDD/ AR project Madagascar: the Mantadia Biological Corridor REDD/ AR project BioCF Training February, 8.
CONTENTS Introduction Introduction Changes in Forest Cover Changes in Forest Cover Reforestation Reforestation Community Forestry Community Forestry Forest.
Introduction to Climate Change: - global warming - basis steps in a clean development project - connection of CDM with European Trading Scheme Wim Maaskant.
Prototype Carbon Fund Training Workshop: Project Formulation for the Clean Development Mechanism Hanoi, Vietnam September 30- October 2, 2002 Eduardo Dopazo.
CDM Projects: Risks and Contracts charlotte streck pcf Sao Paulo, Brazil, November 22, 02.
Creating the Carbon Asset: PCF Approaches to Baselines and Additionality Sao Paulo, Brazil November 20-22, 2002.
Case Study: Sustainable Fuelwood and Charcoal Production for the Pig Iron Industry in Minas Gerais, Brazil “The Plantar Project” (Sustainable Development.
What Goes Into a Good PIN and a PCF Project? PCF Training Workshop on Project Formulation under the Clean Development Mechanism Hanoi, Vietnam September.
PCF project cycle Training Workshop : Project Formulation for the Clean Development Mechanism Hanoi, Vietnam September 30 – October 2, 2002.
Expertise everyday, everywhere Verifying Sinks and Bio-energy Projects Irma Lubrecht Société Générale de Surveillance.
LULUCF Concepts Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects February 8 th 2008 Timothy Pearson and Sarah Walker Winrock International.
Managing Risk and Uncertainty in Carbon Finance Training Workshop : Project Formulation for the Clean Development Mechanism Hanoi, Vietnam September 30.
Canadian National Workshop on the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) Delta Hotel, Ottawa January.
Clean Development Mechanism Cell, Ministry of Environment, Government of Pakistan Global Carbon Market and CDM Potential in Cement Production Industry.
Relationship between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Protocol Flexible Mechanisms, from the Perspective of Bioenergy and C Sequestration Relationship between.
Managing carbon project risks Presented by Adam Shepherd Regional Workshop on Legal, Institutional and Financial aspects of Carbon Finance Istanbul, Turkey.
Module 6: PINs M6. M6. PINs Contents: Project Identification Notes – how to structure them (including eligibility, baselines and additionality) Two projects.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 31 Former tropical forest…. TROPICAL FORESTS Located between tropics of Capricorn and Cancer At least 10 percent woody cover Important.
Potential for Carbon Finance in Agriculture and Forestry Katoomba V, Tokyo Forest Trends November 5 th, 2002.
FINANCING REDD – A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE REDD MECHANISM Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor 1.
WB Carbon Finance Project Cycle and Role of Key Players Introduction to Carbon Finance March 10, 2004.
Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM B. Schlamadinger.
Welcome. The legal framework of CDM - UNFCCC, at Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit, Kyoto protocol, CDM, Parties and Benefits Basic requirements.
CDM A/R Investors' and Developers' Workshop, Beijing 2010 CDM Afforestation/Reforestation Projects: International workshop for developers and investors.
PROPOSED PROJECT Objective: To make charcoal from sustainably managed planations a viable alternative to coal/coke in pig iron production Project: 23,100.
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
IUCN, WBCSD, Sep 2007 Markets for Ecosystem Services: New Challenges and Opportunities for Business and the Environment.
CDM and Forestry Sector in India Carbon Pool of Forestry Sector in India The growing stock of the country has been estimated to be 4,740 million m³.
Forests and Climate Change: Mitigation and Adaptation through Sustainable Forest Management Pekka Patosaari Director, UN Forum on Forests Secretariat 6.
World Bank Carbon Finance and Emerging Strategy Public Side Event, CoP8, New Dehli, October 24 th, 2002.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative RGGI John Marschilok, P.E. Environmental Engineer Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Workshop on Tools for Risk Mitigation in Clean Infrastructure Projects The Plantar Project Alexandre Kossoy CF Unit - World Bank November 19-20, 2003.
U.S. Office: 1877 Garden Avenue Eugene, Oregon USA.
Carbon sequestration and trading: Implications for agriculture François FALLOUX Eco-Carbone Presentation to International Policy Council Stratford, October.
CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.
CDM: Quick Overview Matt Spannagle Technical Manager Millennium Development Goals Carbon Facility Bureau for Development Policy United Nations Development.
El Gallo Hydroelectricity Project PDD Analysis
1 Distribution of world climate risks Low-income countries are the most vulnerable.
Sustainable Forest Management and markets for environmental services David Brand Hancock Natural Resource Group (Australia) SUMBER:
Eucalyptus Tree Plantation of Plantar S.A. in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) European Commission expert group on forest fires Antalya, 26 April 2012 Ernst Schulte, DG ENV on behalf.
Integrating Carbon Finance into the Bank’s Work PCF project cycle.
Forests & The Resource Curse The Anatomy of A Forest Destruction 1.
Introduction to the Project Cycle Jane Ebinger Senior Energy Specialist Sustainable Development Department The World Bank.
Incorporating Carbon Finance into Operations Integrating Carbon Finance in the Bank’s Work November 19, 2001.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
West and Central Africa Tropical Forest Investment Forum - August 2007 © EnviroMarket Ltd Forest-Backed Securities: alternative finance for tropical natural.
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT Zonal Level REDD+ Awareness Creation Workshop MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST Tigray Regional State, Mekele September 3 &
INITIATIVES RELATED TO FORESTS AND REDD+ IN NORTH WESTERN PROVINCE June 2011.
Makala: the necessary evil
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT
Potential for Carbon Finance in Agriculture and Forestry
REDD+ Financing Instruments & Activity Types
GEF-5 Focal Area Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Brazil: “PLANTAR” Project Sustainable Fuelwood and Charcoal Production and Substitution of Coke in Pig Iron Production Sao Paulo November 21, 2002

The Plantar S/A is privately held family company founded in Silviculture: Forest services - plantation & seedling production supporting 25,000 ha/yr (>400,000 ha so far) Charcoal production: Charcoal from sustainable harvested sources for lump charcoal export market and for Pig Iron production Pig iron production: 180,000 t/yr < 1% of country’s foundry pig iron production, but represents 4% of the independent producers using charcoal PROJECT SPONSOR

SECTOR BACKGROUND Pig iron producers Steel producers (coal based) Pig iron export 2,665,000 t Foundry pig iron 25,212,570 t Coal based industries 18,833,000 t Charcoal based integrated 1,617,000 t Charcoal based independent producers 4,762,570 t Plantation Indigenous forest Without carbon finance, plantation, charcoal based pig iron production cannot survive and their market share will be taken over.

EMISSION REDUCTIONS BY COAL SUBSTITUTION from CHINA, POLAND, JAPAN IMPORTED COKE

Project Objective: To make sustainable charcoal production a viable alternative to coke in pig iron production Project: Four Components Sustainably managed Eucalyptus plantations (FSC certified) on land that was pasture in 1989: 23,100 ha (3,300 ha x 7 years); Project lifetime 21 years (3 harvesting cycles of Eucalyptus) Restoration Forestry: Reforestation of pasture land with native Cerado forest: 478 ha Improved Charcoal production: (reducing methane and local pollution) Charcoal displacing Coal/Coke in Pig iron production and produced for lump charcoal market in Europe

Project Financing Required Investment for Core Proposal Entire investment (for newly established plantation): US$38.8 million PCF contribution at $3.50/tCO2e = $5.3 million Other carbon finance potential = ~$10-20 million Financial Structure and IRR Plantar Equity: $33.9 million injected over seven years Debt financing: $4.9 million up front IRR without Carbon finance, 12.5%; with CF, 20.7%

Project ERs Category of ERsERs (t/CO2) by source over project life Substitution of Coke in Blast Furnace 7,903,262 Sequestration in Plantations and Forest Ecosystem Rehabilitation 4,545,398 Methane Emissions Reductions 437,325 Totals 12,885,985

Component 1: Sequestration ERs 4.5 million CERs ha of Eucalyptus Plantations Based on Advanced Clones

CARBON STORED IN THE PLANTATION

Biodiversity and Land Management Certifiable Benefits Production and Conservation Landscape –4600ha of set-aside managed for restoration of Cerado dry forest – no carbon credit –478 ha of additional restoration forest – for carbon credit –Biodiversity, soil and water quality baseline validated with monitoring protocol Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) certification in place for existing plantations –Must be obtained and maintained for future plantations Biodiversity Asset Certified and bundled with Carbon

Component 2: Carbonization ERs Reduction of Methane Emissions from Charcoal Production 0.4 million CERs

Traditional Brazilian Brick Beehive Kiln used in about 90% of Brazilian charcoal operations Efficiency: about 4m 3 wood for 1m 3 Charcoal

Improved Brazilian Brick Kiln: < 2m 3 wood to 1m 3 charcoal (The baseline for charcoal production)

The Project’s Charcoal Production Flares Methane with automatic spark ignition device, collects tars/oils in smoke – minimizes local air pollution.

Social and Health Benefit Certified Charcoal Worker Respiratory Health –Monitoring protocol established and validated Certification of good labor practices and no use of child labor –ABRINQ independent certification standard in place –To be maintained under carbon purchase contract

Component 3: Industrial ERs Substitution of Charcoal in Pig Iron Production 7.9 million CERs

Environmental Standards for Plant Emissions Minas Gerais State licence in place that plant is is operating under loal environmental requirements Upgraded charcoal dust filtration system installed to mitigate health hazard ISO certification process in train for approval by mid-2003

Component 4: Cerrado Forest Restore native Cerrado forest to enhance biodiversity ~ 80,000 CERs ~ 80,000 CERs

Use of imported coal-coke in pig iron and forest loss Biodiversity loss, land degradation Impact: end of small pig iron producers, loss of rural employment, out migration Environmentally sustainable industry Cost: $38.8 million Energy: lower cost sustainable charcoal replacing imported coal $ 5.3mm from PCF; ~$10-20mm from other carbon sales Baseline Project PCF Project Certified Outcomes: Biodiversity restored in native forests. Worker heath improves Outcomes: small pig iron sector survives, rural employment increases Brazil Plantar Project in Overview

Baseline\MVP Approach for Plantar Fuel-Switching Component –Scenario analysis based on historical trends –Investment constraints (most plausible approach cannot be financed without carbon) –Monitor industry wide production to detect leakage Charcoal Production Emissions Reductions –Historical and current charcoal-making technology –Control group of 10 peers in pig iron industry; included in MP for revalidation (>50% rule) “Cerrado” Rehabilitation –Scenario analysis based on historical trends: deforestation –Investment analysis (if needed)

Issues in Validation Final Validation Opinion issued. Preliminary only with respect to CoP9 rules on A/R sinks Key issues were: 1.Eligibility of end-of-life plantation lands for CERs 2. Leakage of “deforesting” pig iron industry to other Brazilian states to avoid charcoal raw material resource crunch 3.Emissions Coefficients for Pig Iron Coal/Coke baseline 4.“Double-counting” of methane emissions from charcoal kilns

Plantar: Issues in Validation Eligibility of “sequestration reductions” from replanting end-of- life eucalyptus plantations Issue: DNV claimed that it was “conservative and reasonable” to assume that Parties would make eligible at CoP9 only those ERs from land that was pasture in Dec 1989 Response: Plantar had to commit to buy all new land that can be proven to be pasture in December 1989 Response: To avoid “leakage”, Plantar had to assume all former end-of-life plantations were deforested and deduct these “losses” from sequestration on new pasture land; Response: To further avoid leakage, Plantar must monitor the former land-owners to assure that they don’t deforest!

Plantar: Issues in Validation Coefficients for displacement of coal/coke emissions by climate-neutral charcoal from plantations during pig iron production. Issue: DNV proposed either use of IPCC default values which were ~20% lower than claimed or detailed proof of proposed coefficients Response: Detailed engineering process analysis new was commissioned and agreed with DNV. DNV proposed submitting the process to IPCC to create new default value for this process

Plantar: Issues in Validation Claiming Methane Emissions Reductions from flaring methane in exhaust gases from charcoal production after charcoal is produced from new plantations Issue: DNV noted that such ERs could not be claimed after 2008 when new plantations were converted to charcoal as it would be “double-counting” baseline emissions as per agreed carbon emissions coefficient. Response: Plantar/PCF agreed. Claims eliminated for charcoal produced for pig iron production and claimed only for lump charcoal trade production Response: Plantar agreed to continue flaring methane after 2008 in pig iron charcoal kilns

Plantar: Issues in Validation Leakage of small scale blast furnace operations from Minas Gerais to Carajas State as plantation estate declined due to lack of replanting in Minas Gerais (baseline case). Issue: DNV claimed that such leakage may occur despite impending shortage of native forest in Carajas and lack of investment capital for new blast furnace construction. Response: Plantar will maintain detailed record of pig iron production from plantation and native charcoal sources in Minas Gerais and Carajas, with and without benefit of carbon finance

Emission Reduction Purchase Agreement PCF Purchase million ERs at cost of $5.3 million -Or $3.50 per tonne CO 2e -PCF purchase planned for Replacement CERs planned for PCF purchase enables Sponsor to secure $4.9 million loan to enable planting

Brazil Biomass/Pig Iron Project ER payments are used to amortize commercial loan.

PCF Emissions Reduction Purchase Options OPTION 1OPTION Sequestration ERs 1,300,402 Carbonization ERs 213, ,389 Industrial ERs 1,239,897 TOTAL ERs1,514,286 $3.50 per tonne CO 2e

OPTION 1: PCF Emissions Reduction Purchase

OPTION 2: PCF Emissions Reduction Purchase

Allocation of Kyoto Protocol Risk -Brazil has ratified Protocol -Seller covers eligibility risk of sequestration reductions with obligation to substitute with Carbonization and Industrial ERs -Host Country to issue Letter of Approval within 180 days of entry into force Emission Reduction Purchase Agreement

Management of Project Performance Risk Market—ERPA paying on delivery of early sequestration ERs and carbonization CERs makes project feasible (early cash flow). Environmental-- Sponsor to maintain quality assurance program, continue to qualify for forestry certification, and operate in conformance with local environmental regulations and World Bank safeguard policies Social--sponsor to maintain certification for sound labor practices

Conditions of Default and Remedies Kyoto Failure to secure and plant land that was pasture in 1989 Environmental and Social Failure to: -maintain FSC certification and certify new land -maintain Abrinq certification -comply with MP, permits, environmental and social law