Change Initiative Common Curriculum Review. Change Initiative Portfolio

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
When Students Can’t Read…
Purpose of Instruction
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Change Initiative Common Curriculum Review

Change Initiative Portfolio

Change Initiative Outline Data Analysis - Are Students reaching achievement targets with current materials? Review Assessment Results Review Available Resources Clarification of Standards - What are students expected to know? Student Friendly Language Depth of Knowledge Review/Revise Assessment Items Curriculum Guide for Instruction - How will curriculum be implemented in the classroom? Unit/Pacing Assessment Mapping

Standards Matrix – Element 1 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 1.2The administrator will demonstrate the skills needed to work with the board of education and district/community members to facilitate the development of a vision of learning for a school district that promotes the success of all students Materials were developed for Curriculum Task Force members to use when presenting the Common Curriculum Review Process to their local school board. The presentation explains the positive effect of an aligned written, taught and assessed curriculum has on student learning. Building a vision was discussed in our very first session with Karen Hart. Our change initiative fits perfectly with the vision of our Curriculum Task Force. Our Vision: Our Vision: The Curriculum Task Force will provide a coordination of curriculum, assessment, and pacing guides to support higher student success, while continuing to keep districts abreast of the changes in educational practice, and supporting each other in implementation.

Standards Matrix – Element 1 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 1.3The administrator will use data-based research strategies to assure the district vision takes into account the diversity of learners in a district The Common Curriculum Review Process uses research based strategies identified in Align the Design to help move the schools throughout our ISD toward our vision of coordinated curriculum, assessments, and pacing guides to support student success Align the Design: A Blueprint for School Improvement by Mooney & Mausback is the test resource that was provided to all Curriculum Learning Institute participants. This book does a good job of laying out a plan for how to drive change in schools. In addition to the tools presented in the book, the authors included personal reflections and other texts that have inspired them in their work.

Standards Matrix – Element 1 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 1.6The administrator will use data-based research strategies and strategic planning processes that focus on students learning to develop the district vision, drawing on relevant information sources such as student assessment results and current responses to these results, student and family demographic data, and an analysis of community needs An integral part of the Common Curriculum Review Process will be to review student assessment data and determine which curriculum processes are having a positive effect on student learning and where there are achievement gaps In the Balanced Assessment session, Ed Roeber & Kim Young discussed the three types of data: formative, interim, and summative. All three data types are reviewed as a part of the Common Curriculum Review Process. Additionally, they pointed out that in a Balanced Assessment System, all elements of the system are aligned (standards, curriculum, instruction, learning, assessments, & professional development). This is one of our key goals in a common curriculum review. District Data Sample Data Review Data Action Plan

Standards Matrix – Element 2 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 2.4The administrator will show evidence of promoting technology and information systems to enrich district curriculum and instruction, including strategies to engage underrepresented students Technology integration strategies will be integrated into the strategies for each content area. Specifically, technology integration will be discussed when creating the guide for instruction where teachers are creating units and pacing for instruction. The Quality Instruction presentation by Karen Hart & Karen Mlcek reviewed strategies for integrating technology. Technology can be used to differentiate instruction allowing all students to access to appropriate learning. Technology systems provide us with data on individual & groups of students progress in each standard. Sample Book Study Artifact

Standards Matrix – Element 2 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 2.9The administrator will adopt appropriate research strategies to profile student performance in the district and to analyze differences among subgroups An integral part of the Common Curriculum Review Process will be to review student assessment data and determine which curriculum processes are having a positive effect on student learning and where there are achievement gaps. During the curriculum review, we will use training tools from DataDirector, Data for Student Success, and MI School Data to review results by district building, and teachers (including subgroups). The Quality Instruction presentation by Karen Hart & Karen Mlcek did a good job of reviewing how data warehouse systems can be used by staff members to view and disaggregate student data. The data for instruction portion of the Curriculum Learning Institute helped create a strong data analysis portion of our process.

Standards Matrix – Element 2 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 2.13The administrator will promote and foster building level leadership skills Teacher representatives will be in a leadership role as they present the curriculum review group’s work and decisions to their co-workers. The Implementing and Monitoring Systems presented by Marcia Logie and Ben Boerkoel helped us put structure to how teachers participating in the Common Curriculum Review Process will go back and share information with the building principal and other teachers across the district. Review Team

Standards Matrix – Element 3 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 3.7The administrator will involve stakeholders in aligning resources and priorities to maximize ownership and accountability During each Common Curriculum Review, representatives from each local district will work together ensuring that we have by-in from each district. The Relationship and Culture presentation by Larry Thomas and Jennifer Davidson provided us with tools on trust building that we have used with a group of teachers from across the ISD is starting their work together. Affirm Remind New

Standards Matrix – Element 3 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 3.8The administrator will use appropriate and effective needs assessments, research-based data, and group process skills to build consensus, communicates, and resolve conflicts in order to align resources with the district vision The instructional consultants from the ISD facilitate the Common Curriculum Review Process and help keep the focus of these days aligned with the vision of the Curriculum Task Force The Professional Learning Communities session with Nancy Colflesh provided us with tools for group process and building consensus

Standards Matrix – Element 3 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 3.9The administrator will develop staff communication plans to support a district’s schools and divisions A communication process and final reports templates were developed as a part of the Common Curriculum Review Process to ensure teachers and administrators in all seven districts understood the process and had access to the final products The Professional Learning Communities session with Nancy Colflesh provided us with guideline for creating the contracts, and presentations for local districts Sample Board Presentation

Standards Matrix – Element 4 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 4.1The administrator will collaborate with families and other community members and facilitate the planning and implementation of programs and services that bring together the resources of families and the community to positively affect student learning The Common Curriculum Review Process will be a collaborative effort between seven local education agencies The Relationship and Culture presentation by Larry Thomas and Jennifer Davidson provided us with resources on materials that helped us with bringing together staff from multiple communities to work together “ Simply put, trust means confidence.” Stephen M.R. Covey

Standards Matrix – Element 4 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 4.11The administrator will interact effectively with individuals and groups that reflect conflicting perspectives Facilitation strategies will be used to help our diverse groups to come to consensus The Planning and Facilitating Groups presentation by Nancy Colflesh provided with some ideas for consensus building

Standards Matrix – Element 4 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 4.15The administrator will demonstrate how to use district resources to help the community solve issues of joint concern Facilitation strategies will be used to help our diverse groups to come to consensus The Planning and Facilitating Groups presentation by Nancy Colflesh provided with some ideas for consensus building Sample Agenda

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 5.2The administrator will establish and uphold policies that hold self and others accountable for acting with integrity and exercising ethical behavior Facilitation strategies will be used to help our diverse groups to come to consensus while ensuring that the groups function in an ethical manner The Planning and Facilitating Groups presentation by Nancy Colflesh provided with some ideas for consensus building “ They speak in terms of “we” rather than creating “us-and-them” distinctions.” Communication Plan Template

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 5.6The administrator will consider the impact of one’s administrative practices on others The group will reflect on how these curriculum decisions will affect the other teachers in their district The Relationship and culture presentation by Larry Thomas and Jennifer Davidson provided us with some ideas and materials to use in group reflection

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 5.8The administrator will make and explain decisions based upon ethical and legal principles Facilitation strategies will be used to help our diverse groups to come to consensus and ensure that the groups acts in an ethical manner The Planning and Facilitating Groups presentation by Nancy Colflesh provided with some ideas for consensus building

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 6.4The administrator will demonstrate the ability to work with local board of education members and political leaders at the local, state, and national level The Common Curriculum Review Process has several communication tools built into the process The Planning and Facilitating Groups presentation by Nancy Colflesh provided with some ideas for consensus building

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 6.9The administrator will communicate regularly with all segments of the district/community concerning trends, issues, and policies affecting the district Monthly reports will be made to the Curriculum Task Force and participants will develop action plans to be shared with their building administrator The Planning and Facilitating Groups presentation by Nancy Colflesh provided with some ideas for consensus building

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 6.11The administrator will advocate for policies and programs that promote equitable learning opportunities and success for all students, regardless of socioeconomic background, ethnicity, gender, disability, or other individual characteristics Data review will be a huge part of the Common Curriculum Review Process and will include all subgroups In the Balanced Assessment session, Ed Roeber & Kim Young discussed the three types of data: formative, interim, and summative. All three data types are reviewed as a part of the Common Curriculum Review Process. Additionally, they pointed out that in a Balanced Assessment System, all elements of the system are aligned (standards, curriculum, instruction, learning, assessments, & professional development). This is one of our key goals in a common curriculum review.

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 7.4The administrator will communicate expectations consistently for the use of technology to increase student achievement The Common Curriculum Review Process is based on research based strategies for aligning curriculum and increasing student achievement The Quality Instruction presentation by Karen Hart & Karen Mlcek reviewed strategies for integrating technology. Technology can be used to differentiate instruction allowing all students access to appropriate learning. Technology systems provide us with data on individual & groups of students progress in each standard. Sample Book Study Artifact

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 7.6The administrator will promote the use of technology to plan, monitor, and revise improvement processes for teaching and learning Technology will be integrated into the Common Curriculum Review Process when creating units of instructions, when reviewing resources, and when reviewing assessment data The Quality Instruction presentation by Karen Hart & Karen Mlcek reviewed strategies for integrating technology. Technology can be used to differentiate instruction allowing all students access to appropriate learning. Technology systems provide us with data on individual & groups of students progress in each standard. Curriculum Review Workspaces

Standards Matrix – Element 5 Standard for Central Office Administrator Preparation Change Initiative AlignmentConnection to Curriculum Learning Institute 7.7The administrator will promote the use and assessment of emerging technology as pedagogical tools Technology will be integrated into the Common Curriculum Review Process when creating units of instructions, when reviewing resources, and when reviewing assessment data. The Quality Instruction presentation by Karen Hart & Karen Mlcek reviewed strategies for integrating technology. Technology can be used to differentiate instruction allowing all students access to appropriate learning. Technology systems provide us with data on individual & groups of students progress in each standard.