Integrating PBIS with State Initiatives

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT August 7, 2009 Directors Conference Peoria, IL.
Integrated Systems to Support Implementation
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation Getting From Here to There! Vermont.
Planning for Success: Using Implementation Data to Action Plan for Full and Sustained Implementation Barbara Sims Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Anne Lucas, WRRC/ECTA Ron Dughman, MPRRC Janey Henkel, MPRRC 2013 WRRC Leadership Forum October.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
SectionVideo/PresentSlidesTotal Time Overview + Useable Intervention8:30 min Stages7:19 min Teams PDSA Terri present Drivers8:50 min Lessons Learned +
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Karen A. Blase, PhD & Allison Metz, PhD Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill Terms of Reference:
Presented by Shawn Fletcher Special Thanks To: Oregon DATA Project Team, EBISS, & David Douglas School District.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Selecting, Training and Coaching for Effective and Sustainable RtI Implementation A Model for Leadership Teams Margie McGlinchey; Ph.D. Kim St. Martin;
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Barbara Sims Brenda Melcher Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Michelle Duda Washington, D.C. July 2013 Keep Dancing After the Music Stops OSEP Project Directors’
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Activity  Talk to your neighbor:  What excites you about PBIS?  What questions do you still have?
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. &
State Scaling-up Workgroup March 6, SWG Agenda 9:00 Welcome & Introductions 9:15 Review Agenda/TIPS Meeting Form 9:20 Purpose of the Scaling-Up.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
State Implementation and Scaling up of Evidence-based Practices U.S. Department of Education July 2010 Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. Michelle.
Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
Michelle A. Duda Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase October 2, 2012 Making It Happen With Active Implementation Frameworks: Implementation Drivers.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Coaching and Supervision:
CEEDAR Center Cross-State Convening
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation
Universal Components Defining behavior expectations
Activity Talk to your neighbor: What excites you about PBIS?
Activity Talk to your neighbor: What excites you about PBIS?
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Integrating PBIS with State Initiatives Barbara Sims, Illinois Marick Tedesco, Oregon

Current Status Multiple initiatives and mandates Ever changing Federal and State regulations Increasing pressure on staff and administrators District Regional State Federal

Efficient Systems of Support “The typical school operates 14 different prevention activities concurrently, and the typical activity is implemented with poor quality.” Gottfredson, Gottfredson, Czeh, Cantor, Crosse & Hantman, 2000

Typical Innovation Born in a moment of great interest, Implemented soon after Peaks in about a year and a half. Followed by a decline in enthusiasm Dies about four years from the time that interest in it was first generated. Interest focuses on another innovative idea and the process begins anew. Latham, G. (1988)

PBIS Creating schools that are positive, safe, predictable and consistent environments

Integrated Systems Creating districts that are positive, safe, predictable and consistent environments

From Parallel Play to Integrated Systems Unite multiple initiatives and mandates into a cohesive, integrated system that’s doable by our educational staff

From Parallel Play to Integrated Systems What will we do differently? Attend to key components of implementation Develop district capacity to build a district wide system to support implementation in buildings Model Expectations

Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Karen A. Blase, Ph.D., Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., Sandra Naoom, MSPH, Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW, Allison Metz, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network (NIRN) http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/ State Implementation and Scale-up of Evidence-Based Practices (SISEP) www.scalingup.org Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill

Implementation An effective intervention is one thing Implementation of an effective intervention is a very different thing Dean Fixsen © Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008 (c) Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008

Sobering Observation "All organizations [and systems] are designed, intentionally or unwittingly, to achieve precisely the results they get." R. Spencer Darling (Business Expert) © Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008 Horner, George Sugai, 2008 (c) Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008 11

What is Implementation? A specified set of purposeful activities at the practice, program, and system level designed to put into place a program or intervention of known dimensions with fidelity. © Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008

GAP Science to Service SCIENCE IMPLEMENTATION SERVICE © Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008

KEY COMPONENTS Implementation Stages Implementation Drivers Implementation Teams Improvement Cycles

Stages of Implementation Exploration Explore Evidenced Based Practices that match needs Look at what it might take to implement new practice Exploration is always happening Installation Put in place infrastructure to support new practice Make adjustments to allow for implementation Initial Implementation Begin to implement new practice May review components agreed upon in previous two stages Full Implementation Implementation is happening throughout Care is taken to implement with fidelity © Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008

Implementation Drivers

Implementation Drivers Implementation Drivers Create the Infrastructure Implementation Drivers are mechanisms that Help to develop, improve, and sustain practitioners’ ability to implement an intervention to benefit children Help ensure sustainability and improvement at the organizational level © Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008

Implementation Team Overarching Roles and Responsibilities: Moving the project through the stages of implementation Ensuring that the implementation drivers needed for fidelity and sustainability are integrated and successfully embedded in the overall effort Identify barriers and find solutions Identify facilitators and institutionalize them

PDSA Cycles Plan – Develop specific things to do Shewhart (1924); Deming (1948); Six-Sigma (1990) Plan – Develop specific things to do Do – Do them (make sure) Study – See what happens Act – Make adjustments Cycle – Do over and over again until the goal is reached (again) (c) Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase, 2008 (c) Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase, 2008 19 19

District Capacity Most school reform focuses on curriculum, teaching practices or school building practices Effective implementation of evidence- based practices that sustain over time requires more attention to the capacity of districts to host and support these practices Rob Horner 20

Social Competence & Academic Achievement STUDENT OUTCOMES Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making SYSTEMS DATA PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior 21

District Leadership Team Membership Necessary Superintendent (or designee) Director of Curriculum & Instruction Director of Special Education Board Member Principal Family member (not a district employee) Union representative District Level Coach(es) Encouraged ROE RESPRO Community Partner Data Manager Special Ed Cooperative Representative

Model Expectations Coaching Process Practice what we preach Guided discussions to lead them to build systems of support for their own coaches Develop Systems to Support Core Elements 23

Use Coaching Process Guide all District Leadership Team members through What effective District Improvement looks like What questions to be asking of themselves about how they are building an infrastructure of support What data to be examining to know the effectiveness of their practices/processes How to move through the stages of implementation How to identify and address roadblocks How to constructing a sustainable model Goal of coaching model is to give the skills away

CORE ELEMENTS Leadership Mission/Vision aligned with the District Improvement Plan Infrastructure in place to support district and building leadership and implementation teams Family, School and Community Partnerships Families and community members feel welcomed, valued and connected Family and community members are equal partners in the school improvement process Team Based Implementation Structured District Leadership and Implementation Team is in place Structured Building Leadership and Implementation Team is in place Evidence Based Practices A defined selection process is in place Resources are aligned with the support of selected evidence based practices Data Driven Decision Making The district ensures that necessary data are available in a timely fashion at the district, building and classroom level District and Building Leadership and Implementation Teams use data to make ongoing multi-tiered decisions for supporting students Professional Development Professional development is aligned with the School Improvement Plan and the District Improvement Plan. A coaching and support model is employed and supported by the district

Regular meetings for problem solving and removing barriers Model Expectations Shared planning, meetings, debriefing Documentation of Process Written records from each meeting Include minutes, observations, next steps Develop action plans Speak to priorities Include systems checks Identify indicators of success Regular meetings for problem solving and removing barriers 26

PLANNING FORM Subject: Example District 15 Location: Example, IL Date: 8/20/2010 1pm OBJECTIVES: First meeting. Getting to know each other and an understanding of ISSA and Scaling Up.  Key Concepts  Content and Activities     Person  Responsible   Materials and Handouts   Time  Required Welcoming - Intros Names, roles etc. 10min. Successes & challenges What are the districts Successes What are their challenges Brenda Chart Paper Record 30 min. Video What is scaling up— Youtube rethinking scaling up challenge Ann 10 minutes Who are we Powerpoint – SISEP, ISSA , Core elements 20 DLIT Activity Break before we begin- Gallery Walk Roles- What knowledge and skills do we bring to the table Followup- how do we communicate with our groups? How do we reach out to gather and share info? Ann & Brenda Chart Paper Markers 20 minutes at least (2 min per role) Partnership Agreement Just handout- has already been shared with Principals and Superintendent 5 min. Calendar How do we want to proceed- length of meetings, frequency, etc. CALENDAR – set upcoming dates. Our possible dates Sept- Friday 3rd, Tues 7th, th 9th October- Tu 12th, w 13th, w 20th, th 21st, th 28th, f 29th November M 1st after 2, Th 11th, m 15th, T 16th, December F 10th 15 min. 27

ISSA Observation Feedback Form Date April 21, 2010 Example District #27 Observer : Participants: Observations - Strengths All members spoke. Board President was an active participant and spoke last to make sure that others felt comfortable. He explained that his role was to be a team member not the leader or “boss”. Principal – We have no right to demand teacher’s time. Teacher – We are all teachers and parents Successes: data driven decision, kids are talking books, behavior has improved, scores or near that of a neighboring more up scale district. Roles activity was a success, team members teamed with ISSA members. Areas of Concern We were first concerned that Supt. was absent, and C & I Director did not plan to stay, but that concern was unwarranted. SMART Goals The Team chose to continue with SISEP, agreed to meet all day in the summer and to work to develop an action plan for the district..Agreement was made to meet for one year. District is working to de silo and to align PD to curriculum across the dist.( board Pres.) Closing June 29, 2010 next meeting. Lessons Learned: _ Bring roles already written on poster paper, post those an agenda in the room before meeting begins. Switching facilitator roles during the meeting worked well. The parent asked for clarification of acronyms. She has agreed to keep a list of unknown terms or acronyms and to ask when she does not understand. 28

Lessons Learned State Leadership Build relationships based on positive presuppositions Establish leadership teams that are representative of all key stakeholders Assist districts in creating readiness Build an infrastructure to implement and sustain the evidence based practice Model improvement cycle process for District Teams 31