NSW AIM FRB Utilization Discussion Karen Pohl Curriculum Systems Director Naval Special Warfare Center 4-6 November, 2009 Orlando, FL 1

Discussion Points Use of traditional AIM I/II LP/TG content –Including estimated hours of content & estimated number of courses Electronic classroom and ILT delivery JTA/NJA data and process Other comments 2

Use of Traditional AIM II LP/TG Content Currently ≈ 42 ILT legacy 130A courses – ≈ 7400 hours Have not used to build SCORM/RLO Most are high risk courses Implementation issues Multiple databases (geographic locations) Expecting considerable growth to up to 93 courses 3

Electronic Classroom and ILT Delivery Limited use – most instruction in field –Display graphic media –Low end ECR refresh for POM-12 Need more infrastructure to support blended delivery –Define requirements for SOCOM sponsorship Expected growth will drive infrastructure POM-12 seeks to resource AECs 4

JTA/NJA Data and Process Occ Standards have recently been approved (CENSEALSWCC) Plan future use of modernized AIM –Facilitate JTA/JMETL/NMETL alignment to NLOS –Completed some preliminary alignment of BUD/S objectives to OCC STDS (prototype) 5

Innovations on Traditional Model SOCOM LMS/ETMDS study –Delivery and tracking of ILT via SOCOM LMS –Authoring support for DL –Blended formats where appropriate ILE projects - Future –CPM/LO Module use 6

Unique AIM Implementation SOCOM vs. NETC –Balancing requirements/business rules –High risk document function to enable NSW solution We need to learn from others Karen Pohl Curriculum Systems Director Naval Special Warfare Center