Neutrinos and the LHC R. N. Mohapatra June, 14-19, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can we experimentally test seesaw and leptogenesis? Hitoshi Murayama (IPMU Tokyo & Berkeley) Melbourne Neutrino WS, Jun 4, 2008 With Matt Buckley.
Advertisements

TeV scale Universal seesaw, vacuum stability and Heavy Higgs at the LHC Yongchao Zhang ( 张永超 ) Center for High-Energy Physics, Peking University w/ Rabi.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Neutrino Mass and Grand Unification R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland LAUNCH, 2007 Heidelberg.
TeV scale see-saws from higher than d=5 effective operators Neutrino masses and Lepton flavor violation at the LHC Würzburg, Germany November 25, 2009.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Neutrinoless double beta decay and Lepton Flavor Violation Or, in other words, how the study of LFV can help us to decide what mechanism is responsible.
1 Lepton Flavor Violation Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) October 7, rd International Conference on Flavor Physics National Central University, Taiwan.
Compelling Questions of High Energy Physics? What does the future hold? Persis S. Drell Physics Department Cornell University.
Neutrino Mass Seesaw at the Weak Scale, the Baryon Asymmetry, and the LHC Z. Chacko University of Maryland, College Park S. Blanchet, R.N. Mohapatra.
Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for → e and −e Conversion Ren Bo Coauther : Koji Tsumura, Xiao - Gang He arXiv:
F. Richard Feb 2003 A Z’ within the ‘Little Higgs’ Scenario The LHC/LC Study group meeting CERN.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Left Right Symmetry around a TeV Scale R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland.
Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions Enrique Fernández-Martínez MPI für Physik Munich.
Probing Majorana Neutrinos in Rare Meson Decays Claudio Dib UTFSM I.S. & B.K. Fest, UTFSM, May 2010 G. Cvetic, C.D., S.K. Kang, C.S. Kim, PRD 82, ,
P461 - particles VII1 Glashow-Weinberg-Salam Model EM and weak forces mix…or just EW force. Before mixing Bosons are massless: Group Boson Coupling Quantum.
Doubly charged Higgs bosons at Hadron Colliders and neutrino mass hierarchy Mayumi Aoki (KEK) A.G.Akeroyd and M.A. PRD72, (2005) (hep-ph/ )
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Perspectives on Grand Unification in View of Neutrino Mass R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland.
Neutrino Mass Physics at LHC R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland NO-VE, 2008, Venice.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
Fermion Masses and Unification Lecture I Fermion Masses and Mixings Lecture II Unification Lecture III Family Symmetry and Unification Lecture IV SU(3),
1 the LHC Jet & MET Searches Adam Avakian PY898 - Special Topics in LHC Physics 3/23/2009.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Unified TeV Scale Picture of Dark Matter and Baryogenesis R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland Neutrino Telescope 2007, Venice.
Looking for New Effects in Electroweak Precision Data J. de Blas In collaboration with F. del Águila & M. Pérez-Victoria XXXI Reunión Bienal de la Real.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation, Proton and Rare Lepton Decays PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation,
NNbar program: 3:30-5:30 R. N. Mohapatra: 3:30-4:00 (25+5) What physics from NNbar ? K. S. Babu: 4:00-4:25 (20+5) Origin of matter and NNbar R. Shrock:
Neutrino Mass and Flavor Physics R. N. Mohapatra.
Neutrino Mass and Grand Unification of Flavor R. N. Mohapatra Goranfest, June 2010 Split.
Can we distinguish among different models for mass in the near future? Carla Biggio Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany Convegno informale.
2-nd Vienna Central European Seminar, Nov 25-27, Rare Meson Decays in Theories Beyond the Standard Model A. Ali (DESY), A. V. Borisov, M. V. Sidorova.
Neutrino Mass Origin of Matter: Probing at LHC R. N. Mohapatra MPI-Heidelberg Seminar,2009.
Relating dark matter and radiative Seesaw neutrino mass scales without beyond SM gauge symmetry Xiao-Gang He 1. Introduction 2. Radiative seesaw and dark.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
Probing Majorana Neutrinos (in Rare Decays of Mesons) 11/17/ DBD11 C. S. Kim arXiv: (PRD82,053010,2010) G. Cvetic, C. Dib, S.K. Kang, C.S.
Takehiro Nabeshima University of Toyama ILC physics general meeting 9 jun Phenomenology at a linear collider in a radiative seesaw model from TeV.
Test Z’ Model in Annihilation Type Radiative B Decays Ying Li Yonsei University, Korea Yantai University, China Based on J. Hua, C.S Kim, Y. Li, arxiv:
Supersymmetric Models with 125 GeV Higgs Masahiro Yamaguchi (Tohoku University) 17 th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow State.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation PROBING B-L UNIFICATION via N-N-bar Oscillation R. N. Mohapatra University of.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Neutrino Mass Seesaw, Baryogenesis and LHC
March 2005 Theme Group 2 What can N-N-bar Oscillation teach us about physics Beyond the standard model ? R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland NANO workshop,
Ohio State DUSEL Theory Workshop Stuart Raby Underground Detectors Investigating Grand Unification Brookhaven National Lab October 16, 2008.
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking without Higgs Bosons in ATLAS Ryuichi Takashima Kyoto University of Education For the ATLAS Collaboration.
Yukawa and scalar interactions induced by scalar relevant for neutrino masss generation are: Since is assumed to be an exact symmetry of the model has.
Neutrino mass models at the TeV scale, naturally BENE 2012 ICTP Trieste Sept , 2012 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF:
Duality in Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism Michele Frigerio Service de Physique Théorique, CEA/Saclay Rencontres de Physique des Particules March.
Probing the new physics heavy bosons at LHC In collaboration with Shou-Shan Bao, Xue Gong, Shi-Yuan Li, Zong-Guo Si and Yu-Feng Zhou Hong-Lei Li
Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model with Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter Nobuchika Okada Miami Fort Lauderdale, Dec , 2010 University.
SUSY GUT Predictions for Neutrino Oscillation Mu-Chun Chen Brookhaven National Laboratory DUSEL Workshop, January 4-7, 2005 University of Colorado at Boulder.
Family Gauge Bosons with an Inverted Mass Hierarchy Yoshio Koide (Osaka University) in collaboration with Toshifumi Yamashita (Maskawa Insititute, KSU)
03/31/2006S. M. Lietti - UED Search at SPRACE 1 Universal Extra Dimensions Search at SPRACE S. M. Lietti DOSAR Workshop at U.T. Arlington.
Probing Majorana Neutrinos in the LHC Era YongPyong2010 Seoul National University of Tech. Sin Kyu Kang.
M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai (arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D77:015006, 2008 D. Demir, M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai, I.Turan ( arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D78:035013,
1 Summary of the session: Interplay between neutrino masses and other phenomenological signatures Tommy Ohlsson Department of Theoretical Physics, Royal.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS AND LEPTOGENESIS Alicia Broncano Berrocal MPI.
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis International workshop on double beta decay searches Oct SNU Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul National University of.
1-2 Mass Degeneration in the Leptonic Sector Hiroyuki ISHIDA (Tohoku University) Collaboration with : Takeshi ARAKI (MISC) Ref ; T. Araki and H.I. arXiv.
Carla Biggio Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Neutrino masses and new TeV scale HEP 2007, Manchester, England, 19-25/07/07 Based on: Antusch, CB,
and what we unsuccessfully tried to explain (so far)
Grand Unification and Neutrino Masses
Phenomenology of Three-Loop Neutrino Masses Models
TeV-Scale Leptogenesis and the LHC
Neutrino Mass Seesaw, Baryogenesis and LHC
Testing Realistic Seesaw Model at LHC
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Oklahoma State University Work with I. Gogoladze and C. Kolda
Oklahoma State University Work with I. Gogoladze and C. Kolda
Lepton Flavor Violation
Presentation transcript:

Neutrinos and the LHC R. N. Mohapatra June, 14-19, 2010

Neutrino mass  New physics beyond SM: Two generic Issues: New mass scale to explain why ? How to understand the flavor puzzle : Why quark and lepton mixing patterns are so different ? Low energy probes: Oscillations,, Probing this new physics at LHC :  This talk

1. Scale of new physics Why is ? Seesaw Paradigm: Add heavy right handed neutrinos to SM and play seesaw: Seesaw scale is the new physics scale !! Different experimental signatures depending on Majorana or Dirac

Type I seesaw Majorana New scale -Neutrino majorana  small nu mass natural since key parameter to test seesaw Minkowski,Gell-Mann, Ramond Slansky,Yanagida, Mohapatra,Senjanovic,Glashow

Inverse Seesaw Mostly Dirac i.e. add another singlet (RNM’86; RNM, Valle’86) Seesaw testing parameter or larger;

Seesaws without RH Nus Type II (scalar triplet) Type III (fermion triplet) (Maag,Wetterich, Shafi, Lazaridis; (Foot, He, Lew, Joshi) RNM,Senjanovic; Schecter, Valle)

New seesaw related particles: Minimal case Type I and Inverse seesaw: Right handed neutrinos: Type II: Scalar bosons Type III: triplet fermions: If their masses (seesaw scale ) are sub-TeV, LHC is ideal machine for their search:

Decay modes: RH neutrino : ~Dirac (Inverse) Majorana (Type I) Scalar triplet (Type II) Fermion triplet: (Type III)

Collider Production: Type II and type III: New particles couple to W, Z and and can be produced via, Type I and Inverse-N- SM singlets, do not couple to, W or Z- Only production mode is via nu-N mixing.

Testing Type II: Doubly charged member  Striking signal Production Decay Final state: inv mass can be used to reduce bg. LHC reach ~TeV; leptonic couplings give nu mass matrix (roughly) (Han, Perez, Huang, Li, Wang; Akyroid, Aoki; Azuelos, Mukhopadhyay,)

Signals of Type III Y=0, fermion triplet: (Bajc, Senjanovic, Nemesvec,..) Like sign dileptons+ 4 jets LHC Reach <TeV

Type I, Inverse: Need Low energy bounds on = vs M N Type I Atre, Han, Pascoli, Zhang Only observable for inverse seesaw forM N < TeV Situation different with gauge forces: FromNA3, CHARM,DELPHI, L3, NOMAD, double beta decay

How plausible are new gauge forces for Type I or Inverse case ? Type I : why seesaw scale below Planck scale: Local B-L symmetry Inverse seesaw case: Why why not Case for new Gauge symmetry compelling !! LHC can see their signals !!

What Gauge Symmetry ? Standard model: gauge sym. Fermions:

What Gauge Symmetry ? Standard model: gauge sym. Fermions: N R  Gauge group : New

Parity an exact symmetry of nature The weak Lagrangian of model: Weak Lagrangian conserves Parity Low energy parity violation due to RNM, Pati, Senjanovic 74-75

Bound on LR scale Most stringent bounds come from CP viol. Observables e.g. depends on how CP is introduced: Two minimal scenarios Parity defined as usual:( ) minimal model: ;2 CP phases (An,Ji,Zhang,RNM ’07) Parity as C (as in SUSY i.e. ) more CP (Maezza, Nesti Nemevsek,Senjanovic’10) phases With SUSY: bounds weaker: > 1-2 TeV (An, Ji, Zhang’08) Collider (CDF,D0) GeV;

Bounds from Nu-less double beta decay New contributions from WR-N exchange (only for Case I) (RNM, 86; Hirsch, Klapdor, Panella 96) Diagram:  From Ge76:

TeV Seesaw signal from Nu contribution: (Feruglio, Strumia, Vissani) Inverse hierarchy Normal hierarchy (Rodejohann’s talk) Punch line: Suppose long baseline  and nonzero signal for (+ RP if susy )  could be a signal of TeV WR and type I

LR type I seesaw at LHC WR and Z’: ; (Keung, Senjanovic; Han, Perez,Huang,Li, Wang; Del Aguila, Aguilar-Saavedra; de Blas, Azuelos, N-decay: (a) mixing and/or (b) exchange type I : (a) negligible; Signal: like sign dileptons+jets; no missing E Background from

LHC Reach for WR (Ferrari et al’00 ; Gninenko et al, 07) Datta, Guchait, Roy’92 Maleza, Nemevsek,Nesti, Senjanovic

Signals of LR Inverse seesaw N mostly Dirac and  No like sign dileptons Possible displaced vertex Distinguishes between Type I and Inverse seesaw;

~50 fb-1 per year ~100 fb-1 per year Mike Lamont Expectations at the LHC Physics updated from De Roeck Luminosity projections from Jenni, 3/10 TeV GeV GeV →  Large 9TeV 1.5TeV 3 TeV TeV

Seesaw search at LHC and Grand unification MSSM Type I seesaw (Kopp, Lindner, Niro, Underwood’09; Parida, Sarkar, Majee, Raichaudhuri’09) TeV type I seesaw does not grand unify: Discovery of doubly charged Higgs or type I signal at LHC will rule out GUTs.

TeV Inverse Seesaw (LR) does unify New result! Inverse seesaw does unify –TeV WR and Z’ (Dev, RNM, 09; PRD; arXiv: 1003:6102); New motivation to search for WR,Z’ at LHC !!

Testing GUT Scale Type I Seesaw In GUTs, type I seesaw scale is near GUT scale: no low energy tests. With susy, LHC tests possible: Neutrino mixing  lepton superpartners mixing  flavor violating signals (Porod, Hirsch, Romao, Valle, Moral)

Conclusion: Seesaw scale can be in the TeV range in very reasonable class of theories (even SUSY GUTs) A likely model of TeV scale seesaw is left-right sym. model - parity restored at TeV. Premium channel for probing WR and Z’ at LHC are like sign dileptons or trileptons. Discovery of TeV seesaw signal will provide an understanding of the origin of the second mass problem in particle physics, that of -will surpass in impact the discovery of the Higgs boson !!

LR Z’ at LHC Z’ – first to show up at LHC; Current limit~TeV (Langacker) To tell it is related to neutrino mass (e.g. LR) is hard: couplings needed (Petriello, Quackenbush’09) 300 fb^ fb^-1 Heavier the Z’, the harder it is.