Container Port Of UK （英国集装箱港口）

一、 The world trade for container transportation demand 二、 British major container ports

World Trade(Billion Dollar) World Trade(Billion Dollar)

Trade and globalization, promoted the rapid rise of global trade

One of the largest container ports in Europe —— Felixstowe

一、 Port of Felixstowe(PFL) profile

二、 Felixstowe Facilities Currently has nine of container berths, length 3972meters and depth is 15 meters. Currently has nine of container berths, length 3972meters and depth is 15 meters. 50,000m ² of covered warehousing on a 22 acre site equipped to handle almost anything 50,000m ² of covered warehousing on a 22 acre site equipped to handle almost anything Newly racked food grade warehousing Newly racked food grade warehousing Temperature controlled facility Temperature controlled facility Covered marshalling areas with multi-loading bays with dock levellers Covered marshalling areas with multi-loading bays with dock levellers Extensive outdoor storage facilities Extensive outdoor storage facilities 24 hour CCTV security 24 hour CCTV security

三、 The advantage and the main routes of port Felixstowe The superior geographical position makes the current status of Felix's port The superior geographical position makes the current status of Felix's port Main routes to UK others ports and Europe and world ’ s other ports Main routes to UK others ports and Europe and world ’ s other ports

四、 Main goods through port of Felixstowe

Northeast emerging container port -Teesport

The reason of Teesport port emerging Location of Teesport Container port Facilities

The End Thank You

YANGSHAN DEEP SEA PORT UPDATE YANGSHAN

BLUE PLAN OF YANGSHAN (XIAO YANGSHAN) PROJECT BLUE PLAN OF YANGSHAN (XIAO YANGSHAN) PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS OF YANGSHAN TERMINAL SPECIFICATIONS OF YANGSHAN TERMINAL SIPG ’ S OBJECTIVES FOR YANGSHAN PHASE I SIPG ’ S OBJECTIVES FOR YANGSHAN PHASE I MARKETING/OPERATIONAL CONCERNS MARKETING/OPERATIONAL CONCERNS TARIFF ANALYSIS – WGQ vs YANGSHAN TARIFF ANALYSIS – WGQ vs YANGSHAN CARRIERS ’ GENERAL FEEDBACK CARRIERS ’ GENERAL FEEDBACK

Blue Plan Of Yangshan Terminal

Yangshan Develop Plan (XiaoYangshan Part)

Organization Of Yangshan Terminal – Phase I  Terminal Operator: Shanghai Shengdong International Container Terminal Co.,Ltd (SSICT)  Investor: Shanghai Port Container Company (SPC) 51% Shanghai International Port (Group) Co.,Ltd (SIPG) 49% Shanghai International Port (Group) Co.,Ltd (SIPG) 49%

- Terminal specifications – Phase I 18

22nd Sep,2005 M/V “Clementine Maersk” test berthing on Yangshan Phase I terminal. 30th Nov,2005 TNWA CEX M/V “APL Iris” made her first calling on Yangshan Phase I terminal.

Investment Of Yangshan Terminal – Phase II Investor: Investor: Hutchison Whampoa 32% AP Moller Maersk 32% SIPG 16% COSCO 10% China Shipping 10%

 Spans 32KM with 2 way 6 lanes (exclude 2 parking lanes)  Function for transportation, power/water supplies and communication  Yearly capacity of movements 4 millions teus (design capacity)  Linked up on 25 th of May 2005 and was opened for traffic in Middle of Nov  No toll fee after opening - DONGHAI BRIDGE

 Industrial Area: about 200km  Harbor New City: about 100km  Connect with Yangshan Inter’l Port through “DONGHAI” Bridge  Simultaneous development of Port, Urban Area, Industrial Area and Bridge with respective emphasis, to make this area a key composite of Shanghai Inter’l Shipping Center  Lingang Group is the developer of Lingang Industrial Area, undertaking the tasks of infrastructure construction and commercial development. - LUCHAOGANG AREA

Luchaogang Town Rail Station Supporting Area (Phase I) Int’l Carrying Trade Composite Usage Service & Trade Int’l Procurement & Distribution  Layout Plan

ation Policy Policy - Most favorable and open policy in china Land Land - Comparatively abundant - Low cost Labour Labour - Low cost - Supported with industry research & learning base Freight Freight - Fast multimodal transport with efficient operation to lower inland transportation cost Operation Operation - Search for top strategic partnership Scale Scale - combination of both tax and tax-free business - Simultaneous development of the Logistics zone, the port and the equipment industrial area Information Flow Information Flow - Integrated Speedy Customs Clearance, transparent government affairs, and online services - Integrated information with the support of related sectors C - ompetitive  Advantages

 ENSURE A SMOOTH PHASE I OPERATION FOR THE YANGSHAN PROJECT  ACHIEVE MILLIONS THROUGHPUT IN 2006 TO PRESENT A BRILLIANT FEAT & PREDICT TO 3.5 MILLIONS BY END OF 2007  SET A FAIR PLAN TO MOVE INTER-TERMINAL SERVICE TO PHASE I BY EACH INDIVIDUAL NEGOTIATION WITH CARRIERS  ALL EUROPE STRINGS ARE SELECTED AS PHASE I CALLERS SIPG ’ s Objectives For Yangshan Phase I >>> THE BACKGROUND INFORMATIONS AS FOLLOW

 ABOVE PIE-CHART INDICATES SHANGHAI CONTAINER THROUGHPUT BY TRADE WISE IN 2004  2.14 MILLION TEUS FOR EUROPE ON LINEHAULS MILLION TEUS FM TRANSHIPMENT, TOGETHER WITH REASONABLE VOLUME GROWTH WILL SUPPORT TO TARGET OF MILLIONS

 EXISTING SERVICES WILL BE MOVED TO YANGSHAN PHASE I

Marketing Concerns - CARGO FLOW FOR IMPORT/EXPORT

 Exaggerate market competition in EU service due to slot increment - Deep port allow much more loading without draft limitation - Deep port stimulate carrier to allocate more big ships  Trucking cost impact (Incremental cost to customers) - Feeder service could be more requested in Jiangsu area - Possible cargo(ex Zhejiang origins) will migrate to Ningbo port

 Exaggerate market competition in EU service due to slot increment - Deep port allow much more loading without draft limitation - Deep port stimulate carrier to allocate more big ships  Trucking cost impact (Incremental cost to customers) - Feeder service could be more requested in Jiangsu area - Possible cargo(ex Zhejiang origins) will migrate to Ningbo port

 T/S operation for river feeder in WGQ - River barge service cut-off for export will be advanced by 2 days - Total transit time will be increased - Sea-going feeder will raise up its rate (at a later stage)  Limited/Increased cost for international T/S at this stage  Wayport shipment influence - EU wayport service meet competition from WGQ direct service - Wayport service for EU in WGQ challenge EU in Yangshan  Empties return – inbound laden Most inbound clients prefer to return to PUDONG depots but they all predict depots in LUCHAOGANG will become popular once phase II & III start to operate

Operational Concerns  Vessel Operation - No draft limitation - Flexible berthing/sailing time - Less steaming time by saving along 10hrs - Weather impact is an uncertain factor on terminal operation  Export Cargo - Customs pre-declaration is required before gate-in - Tax refund can be applied upon cargoes’ in terminal - More spending on truckage/time for land transportation - Bridge risk by weather factors and traffic condition  Import Cargo - No penalty due to late customs declaration - Free port policy declaration - More spending on truckage/time for land transportation - Bridge risk by weather factors and traffic condition

 Empty Reposition - 2 Scenario offered by SIPG for empty repositioning: to WGQ (by barge) to Luchao port (by trucking) to Luchao port (by trucking) - Higher reposition cost from Yangshan terminal to Pudong depot(Appr. USD90/wagon) - Export empty picking up in Luchao area is needed to develop gradually  Inland and Coastal T/S Service - ‘Marine shuttle buses’ are set for inland river feeder’s T/S at WGQ (3 Gangs per Day) - Extra cost/time spending on T/S between WGQ and SSICT for export - For export, CY-cut is to be advanced by 2 days at WGQ - Weather/sea condition impact (if marine shuttle bus suspend by bad weather) - Steaming is saved for costal feeder service  Un-containerized cargo operation  Un-containerized cargo operation - Floating crane dispatch from inner port is with difficulty - Shipper’s barges for break bulk are not sea-going vessel - Bridge transportation over the sea is another big risk

 Pilot Fee (Cost Down)  Tug Fee (Cost Down) Tariff Analysis - WGQ vs Yangshan (In RMB)

 Stevedoring Charge (Cost Down)  “ Marine Shuttle Bus ” T/S charges at WGQ (Cost Up) - By Shuttle Feeder: RMB350/RMB575 PER S2/S4 - By Shuttle Trucking: RMB500/RMB750 PER S2/S4  Other port Charge (no change) (Mooring/Unmooring, Hatch cover moving, Wharfage, Fresh water supply, Tally fee, Harbour due, Tonnage due … etc.) Stevedoring charge in WGQ to be increased by 10% fm 2006

 A fair shifting plan by using same trade service  Yearly workable days of terminal is still the key concern even 339 days is announced by SIPG  Seeking more cost absorbing by SIPG for T/S operations & empty reposition between WGQ & Yangshan, and extension of free storage at port or Luchaogang areas  Gradually development of empty picking up for export shipment in Luchaogang depots  Most carrier plan to set on-site office in Yangshan terminal area Carriers ’ General Feedback