SMALL UTILITY-SCALE RESOURCES (DISTRIBUTED GENERATION) 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Electricity Markets and Policy Group Energy Analysis Department Exploration of Resource and Transmission Expansion Decisions in the Western Renewable.
Advertisements

Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Green Technology and Renewable Energy Opportunities 4 th Annual India Trade Conference, June 23, 2011 Cerritos CA Gary Barsley.
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Renewable Resources Development Report California Energy Commission Business Meeting November 19, 2003 Ann Peterson Project Manager Technology Systems.
A Solar Generation Forecasting System for ERCOT Where Would the Data Come From? Jay Zarnikau | President Steve Wiese | Senior Consultant, Energy Efficiency.
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Making Clean Local Energy Accessible Now Storage Bid Evaluation Protocols Role of CEP, Quantifiable Benefits Stephanie Wang Policy Director Clean Coalition.
Solar Energy Florida Electric Cooperatives Association 2014 Finance & Accounting Conference Glenn Spurlock September 17, 2014.
Capacity Valuation.
22 April 2010 EWEC 2010 Warsaw2 Jesper Munksgaard Ph.D., Senior Consultant Merit Order Effect of Wind Power – Impact on EU 2020 Electricity Prices.
SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 JON PIETRUSZKIEWICZ RYAN PLETKA SCE SONGS SUBSTATION RENEWABLE DG POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
0 Smart Grid Computational Tool (SGCT) For best results view this presentation in Slide Show mode.
Potential Impacts of an Advanced Energy Portfolio Standard in Pennsylvania Ryan Pletka, P.E. Black & Veatch April 12, 2004 Supported by: Heinz Endowments.
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
OVERVIEW OF RPS CALCULATOR FUNCTIONALITY 1. Model Specification Model developed to provide plausible portfolios to CPUC LTPP and CAISO TPP to facilitate.
ENERGY ONLY RESOURCES & THE RPS CALCULATOR. Deliverability Overview Most resources procured to date have been procured to be fully deliverable – CAISO.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
LEVELIZED COST OF ENERGY. Summary Levelized costs are calculated as a proxy for the PPA price between a third-party developer and a utility LCOEs amortize.
Update on the 2015 Special Study June 29, 2015 Arne Olson, Partner Nick Schlag, Managing Consultant Gabe Kwok, Senior Consultant.
WGG Coal Retirement Case Transmission Repurposed for Renewables.
Resource cost and Potential
Review of progress and future work SQSS Sub Group 2 August 2006 DTI / OFGEM OFFSHORE TRANSMISSION EXPERTS GROUP.
Lamma Power Station Solar Power System. 2 Content Project Background Site Selection Amorphous Silicon Thin Film Photovoltaic System Environmental Benefits.
Long Term Study Task Force Update to ETWG ERCOT Long-Term Study: Scenarios, New Software, and Emerging Technology Assumptions January 27, 2012.
Slayton Solar Project RDF Grant Award EP3-10 Presentation of the Project Results to the RDF Advisory Board January 8, Project funding provided by.
Energy and Economy Transition California’s energy system to a highly efficient, renewables-based system and electrify transportation.
K E M A - X E N E R G Y Projecting the Impact of State Portfolio Standards on Renewable Energy and Solar Installations Ryan Wiser and Mark Bolinger January.
Summary of PV Potential Assessment in RETI and the 33% Implementation Analysis Re-DEC Working Group Meeting December 9, 2009.
1 Introduction, scope, context Terminology, high-level approach Methodology, Inputs, Assumptions –Portfolio development –Discounted core –Environmental.
Distributed Generation Benefits and Planning Challenges CREPC/SPSC Resource Planners’ Forum October 3, 2012 Arne Olson.
Copyright © 2015 Clean Power Research, L.L.C Prepared by Ben Norris, Clean Power Research on behalf of Utah Clean Energy April 27, 2015 Net Metering Workgroup.
Reaching the Next Level of the State’s Environmental Policy Goals Panel: Energy Procurement, Infrastructure and Policy: Climate Challenges Beyond 2020.
KEC Electricity Committee, March 12, 2008 Benefit Cost Study of the Governor’s 2015 Wind Challenge: 1,000 MW by 2015 Bob Glass KCC Utilities Division,
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 7/07/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
California Energy Commission California Energy Demand Preliminary Electricity Forecast July 7, 2015 Chris Kavalec Energy Assessments Division.
Long-Term Electricity Report 1 Susan Gray September 27, 2010.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
0 Distributed Energy Resources: Going Small IEP 2015 Annual Conference September 30, 2015 Colin Cushnie V.P., Energy Procurement & Management Southern.
DG Toronto Hydro’s Perspective Task Force on Distributed Generation Richard Lü VP, Environment, Health & Safety March 5, 2003.
THE MIX: FACTS, FIGURES, AND THE FUTURE INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 William A. Monsen MRW & Associates Oakland, California.
Study Results High EE/DG/DR Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the results of an increase of EE/DG/DR.
R E T I Coordinating Committee California’s Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative: Status Update California Public Utilities Commission California Energy.
The Role of Energy Storage as a Renewable Integration Solution under a 50% RPS Joint California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission.
OFFSHORE WIND CONNECTION & COSTS Mary Doswell Alternative Energy Solutions December 7 th, 2010.
1 August 3, 2015 Environmental Considerations in RPS Calculator CEC IEPR Workshop.
Integrating Land Conservation and Renewable Energy Goals in California: A Study of Costs and Impacts Using the Optimal Renewable Energy Build-Out (ORB)
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
Environmental Benefits of Renewable Portfolio Standards in an Age of Coal Plant Retirements September 10 th, 2015 Energy Policy Research Conference Denver,
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Projections: Revised Cases 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission December.
Economic Assessment of Implementing the 10/20 Goals and Energy Efficiency Recommendations – Preliminary Results Prepared for : WRAP, AP2 Forum Prepared.
Screening Potential Sites: Electronic Decision Tree tool 1 Purpose: To screen sites for suitability for a solar PV or wind energy project.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Integrated Energy Policy Report Workshop Landscape-Scale Environmental Evaluations for Energy Infrastructure.
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
UM 1751 Energy Storage Workshop #3 May 9, UM 1751 Workshop #3 Topics Most viable and beneficial applications (HB 2193 time frame: ) Emerging.
11 Regional Renewable Energy Study Review of Findings and Forecasts Presented to: Climate, Energy and Environment and Policy Committee Metropolitan Washington.
Renewable Energy Resource Assessment and Planning Tijana Radojičić IRENA – Country Support and Partnerships Dar es Salaam, 9 March 2016.
Strategic Value Analysis (SVA) Strategic Location of Renewable Technology Based on Grid Reliability George Simons, CEC Ron Davis, DPC Presentation to the.
1 RETI 2.0 Plenary Group Meeting 3/18/2016 DRAFT 2016 RPS Portfolios.
California Energy Commission Cost of Generation Model: Cost Competition and Technology Trends Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative 2.0 Plenary Group.
BLACK & VEATCH RETI 1.0 BACKGROUND AND RPS CALCULATOR RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.
Implications of TAC Assessment on Distributed Generation
Integrated Distribution Planning Process
Michael Bailey, P.E. SDS Meeting, June 25-26, 2018
Byron Woertz, Manager—System Adequacy Planning
Byron Woertz, Manager—System Adequacy Planning
Presentation transcript:

SMALL UTILITY-SCALE RESOURCES (DISTRIBUTED GENERATION) 1

Summary  Small-scale resources are often referred to as distributed generation (“DG”)  Substantial policy-driven interest in encouraging the procurement of DG in California  Specific procurement programs pay premium for the benefits and/or values provided by small-scale projects  Prior versions of the RPS Calculator have included “High DG” portfolio to study the impacts of such small-scale resources  Version 6.0 of the RPS Calculator:  Includes an updated DG resource data set for Solar PV, wind and biomass  Uses same methodology to value large and small-scale resources  Energy Division staff is seeking comment on potential modifications to Version 6.0 in Track 2

 Version 6.0 of the RPS Calculator uses same resource valuation methodology for both small-scale and large-scale resources, except transmission costs  Small-scale resources often connected to distribution and may avoid transmission costs  RPS Calculator does not assign transmission costs to small-scale resources (other than interconnection costs)  RPS Calculator thus calculates trade-off between small-scale and transmission-constrained renewables based solely on avoided transmission costs  May be additional benefits (or costs) for small-scale resources appropriate to include in RPS Calculator Valuation of Small-scale Resources in RPS Calculator 3

 Potential direct ratepayer benefits that small-scale projects located near loads may provide:  Reduced system losses  Avoided congestion costs  Avoided need for generation in capacity-constrained areas such as LCR areas  Deferral/avoidance of investments in transmission infrastructure  Deferral/avoidance of investments in distribution infrastructure  Applicability and magnitude varies considerably with location, local grid conditions, and its performance characteristics  Commission staff intends to identify and quantify additional benefits for Version 6.2 of calculator in track 2a Potential Benefits of Small Utility-Scale Resources 4

Small Utility-Scale Resource Assessment Black & Veatch completed an updated resource assessment for California for the RPS Calculator The resource assessment included large and small-scale resources Small utility-scale resources included: –Solar PV –Biomass –Wind Methodology and assumptions described in “California Renewable Energy Resource Potential and Cost Update” presentation Biomass and wind DG assessments performed in 2013 DG Solar PV dataset based on Black & Veatch large rooftop identification in 2009 and E3 Local Distributed PV study in

E3 Local Distributed PV (LDPV) Potential Study  Identified the total MW of PV on residential roofs, commercial roofs, and ground sites that could be interconnected at each substation  Defined LDPV such that its output would be consumed only by load on the feeder or substation to which it is connected: “no backflow”  Potentially less expensive/faster interconnection  May target higher value locations on the grid (where distribution avoided costs are high)  May achieve other policy goals such as reducing environmental impact, creating local jobs, enhancing energy awareness and promoting redevelopment  Study available at:  099E48B41160/0/LDPVPotentialReportMarch2012.pdf 099E48B41160/0/LDPVPotentialReportMarch2012.pdf

Results - Potential  Interconnection potential found by substation under different scenarios (least cost procurement scenario shown) 7

Refined DG PV Resource Assessment 8  In September 2013, Black & Veatch completed a “Southern California DG Potential Study” to identify PV potential around key SCE 230 kV substations affected by SONGS retirement  New analysis techniques to identify potential project size and cost of energy for all parcels tied to six substations  Included residential and commercial/industrial rooftops  First ever assessment of parking lots/structures  Study identified significant DG in urban areas, especially for high concentration DG (HCDG) potentially connected to subtransmission system  The Black & Veatch study further refined our understanding of the technical potential of wholesale DG resources and the importance of location in determining value to the grid, not arbitrary size caps (i.e. RAM)

Identified Large Roofs and Parking Lots 9 Technical Potential Capacity, MWdc 0.25 > 3

Area Near John Wayne Airport 10 Technical Potential Capacity, MWdc 0.25 > 3

 In addition to technical potential, LCOE calculated for rooftop and parking applications for each parcel. Only larger potential sites shown here Example Detail (1.1 MWdc Rooftop, 7 MWdc Parking Lot, Approx. $120/MWh) 11 Technical Potential Capacity, MWdc 0.25 > 3

 Potential estimates:  Theoretical: 11 GW  Technical: 8 GW  Near-term Developable: 800 MW  Parking lots represent about half the potential  Some sites / areas have “high concentration” DG: MW  Shopping malls, campuses, etc.  Top 11 areas are 450 MW combined  Economics potentially competitive with transmission-tied solar  New scenarios may be needed to cost effectively interconnect above distribution level (subtransmission) – very cursory assessment Preliminary Conclusions Of Southern California DG Assessment 12

 This was a preliminary study and the results have not yet been incorporated into RPS calculator Version 6.0.  The assessment found significantly more potential than previous studies – particularly by including potential for PV development on parking lots.  Version 6.0 of the calculator does not currently have functionality to distinguish the impacts of such resources may have in comparison to large-scale renewables through their value to ratepayers.  Energy Division staff intends to identify and quantify these attributes for Version 6.2 so that the RPS Calculator can be used to evaluate the degree to which small utility-scale renewable generation can displace transmission-constrained renewable resources. Preliminary Conclusions Of Southern California DG Assessment 13

RPS Calculator Guide The parameters that affect DG cost and potential can be found on the following tabs: –Resource_Char: cost and performance input assumptions for each major category of renewable technology (including distributed technologies) –Supply_Curve: renewable resource potential considered in model (including distributed technologies)