San Dieguito UHSD One District’s Journey Toward The Common Core Dr. Michael Grove, Associate Superintendent of Educational Services Brian Shay, Co-Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Advertisements

Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District Common Core Implementation Plan Presented by: Dr. Lila Bronson – Assistant Superintendent of Ed. Services Shannon.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Lessons Learned on CCSS
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Grading Practices North Providence School Department.
October 9 th, 2013 Curriculum Presentation: State Assessments Grades 3-8.
A Key Piece of the Puzzle: The EQuIP NGSS Rubric & Delaware’s NGSS Implementation Plan Shelley Rouser and John Moyer Delaware Department of Education.
Implementing Common Core Mathematics in Long Beach Unified School District Successes & Challenges Anne Oberjuerge K-5 Math Curriculum Leader Becky Afghani.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Denver Public Schools Teacher Compensation Design Team April 23,
PROPOSAL FOR REORGANIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Cambrian School District Educational Services May 7,
EduCore ™ Tools for Teaching Sherida Britt Efrain Mercado.
Wethersfield Board of Education December 10, 2013.
Tallmadge High School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: February 1999 Revised: May 2003 Revised: September 30, 2004.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
 K-12 Principal Internship and Competency Summary Aaron Freed K-12 Principal Licensure Candidate Bethel University.
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
© 2012 Providence Public School District 1 Raising the Achievement of English Language Learners in the Providence Schools: Report of the Strategic Support.
SDUHSD’s Gradual & Multi-Year Math CCSS Implementation Journey ●Our district’s approach o Big Picture o Philosophy and Structures ●Roles of District &
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
DSCYF CCSS Implementation Plan August 19 th & 20 th, 2015.
SAU 16 Curriculum Update Joint Board Meeting April 30, 2012.
Curriculum, Instruction, and Achievement Priorities (Presented to CCSD School Board - July, 2011)
1 Duval County Public Schools Summer Learning. Turnaround in Action District tiered model of clustering schools for lower performing schools; Additional.
TIMBERLANE REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ACTION PLANS Timberlane Regional Middle School Timberlane Regional High School Timberlane Regional Music Department.
WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
Student Achievement Partners – Who We Are 1 Who we are: SAP is a nonprofit organization founded by three of the contributing authors.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
November 1, 2012 Cambrian School District. School Plan (SPSA) process review Site SPSA updates Moving Forward Overview.
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
Professional Development Update Cambrian School District November 7, 2013.
Dunbar Primary School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: May 2003 Revised: April 22, 2004 Revised: September 30,
A Mission of Restoration
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Dr. Wanda Bamberg, Superintendent of Schools June 29, 2010 The Road to Broad.
One District’s Collaborative Journey To Common Core Implementation.
October 25, 2014 Differentiated Implementation of the Problem Based Task High School Integrated Math I, II, III.
Common Core State Standards Implications for Leadership Curriculum Leadership Council Networking Session.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
LEA TRANSITION PLANNING GUIDANCE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION READY, SET, GO COMMON CORE!
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP & COMPENSATION IN THE WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FEBRUARY 2015.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Transition to the Common Core LVUSD. The Challenge The Common Core curriculum itself will not look radically different from the lessons teachers.
Common Core Study Session LVUSD. Agenda LVUSD transition to Common Core Strategic Plan goals for 13/14 Demonstration of NGA & Common Core Instructional.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Bassett Unified Educational Core August 11, 2015 Presented by Dr. Rachel Monarrez, Executive Director, Educational Services Monica Murray, Coordinator,
Current StateYear 1: Year 2: Year 3: Desired State Curriculum How well is your curriculum articulated within and across grade.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
5 Year School Improvement Plan By 2015, enable students to demonstrate powerful thinking by systemically solving problems through analyzing.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
ROSEMARY SCHOOL LOCAL CONTROL & ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN Instructional Services Governing Board Presentation June 2, 2016.
Presented by: Dr. Laurie Bruton Superintendent May 17, 2017
Ready, Set, Go! Common Core
Presentation transcript:

San Dieguito UHSD One District’s Journey Toward The Common Core Dr. Michael Grove, Associate Superintendent of Educational Services Brian Shay, Co-Chair Canyon Crest Academy, HS Lead ToSA Katie Martinez, Co-Chair Canyon Crest Academy, HS Curriculum Developer

Planning Awareness & Experimentation Alignment Implementation ●Provide PD to key District, site, and departmental instructional leaders on CCSS content & instructional/assess ment shifts ●Provide PD to key District, site, and departmental instructional leaders regarding the instructional & assessment shifts inherent to CCSS ●Develop CCSS transition plan ●Provide PD to all teachers regarding CCSS content & instructional & assessment shifts ●Make key math decisions ●Teachers experiment with CCSS-aligned lessons, strategies & materials ●Identify key PD & curricular needs for future ●Educate families ●Collaborate with feeder districts ●Pilot SBAC ●Align ELO’s & Common Assessments to CCSS ●Ongoing PD & coaching to support CCSS-aligned instructional shifts ●Develop curricular materials to support CCSS ●Implement new math courses in grades 7-9 ●Begin NGSS awareness & curriculum decision- making ●Implement SBAC ●Implement revised ELO’s and common assessments ●Focus on use of collaboration & PLC’s to support implementation and ongoing improvement ●Develop curricular materials to support CCSS ●Implement new math courses in grades 7-10 SDUHSD’s Gradual & Multi-Year Transition

Key Curricular Decisions Integrated or Traditional Approach? ●All Math teachers educated on options via meetings & PD sessions ●Site departments made independent recommendations via chairs ●Unanimous recommendation to move to Integrated approach What Courses to Offer and in Which Order? ●Chairs, ToSA’s, Principals brainstormed options ●Four options presented to all teachers via PD sessions ●Departments discussed and made suggestions/revisions ●Counselors/Sped/EL/Parents/Feeders provided input ●Site departments made independent recommendation via chairs ●Resulted in 3 tier (Intervention, CP, Honors) pathways with flexible entry/exit pointspathways

Instructional Materials Selection of Instructional Materials: ●Site & committee review/piloting of potential materials (Oct-April) ●Publisher presentations - Jan 2014 ●Site depts & committees made independent recommendations ●March 2014: Chairs/Ed Serv review recommendations - unanimous decision to “home grow” using Utah MS Math Project & Mathematics Vision Project ●Community review sessions prior to Board adoption Instructional Materials Development and Customization: ●ToSA Curriculum Developers ( Spring/Summer = 10 FT/Fall = 2 FT + 4 PT ) ●Description of customization process ●Description of Instructional Materials products ●Teacher and Student/Parent support websites

Teacher Professional Development School Year: ●Four part-time Math ToSA’s ●5-6 mandatory district-level PD days for all Math & Sped teachers o CCSS structure & content o SMP’s/Instructional shifts o Curricular decision-making ●Ongoing site-based PLC collaboration & outside PD opportunities School Year: ●8 part-time ToSA’s/ 2 full-time & 4 part-time Curriculum Developers ●District-level PD days coupled with site-based instructional coaching: o Support of new instructional materials/scope & sequence o Comprehensive Mathematics Instruction framework/Instr. shifts o Group/task facilitation, assessment/calibration, content (stats/Geo) ●Ongoing site-based PLC collaboration & outside PD opportunities

Ongoing Support for Teachers ●Formal professional development ●Site-based instructional coaching ●Site-based PLC process/collaboration ●Teacher resource website ●Formal & informal feedback processes (PD, surveys, web edits, etc.) ●External PD opportunities

Admin/Staff PD & Ongoing Support ●PD for Counselors on course sequences ●PD for site admin on instructional shifts/SMP’s ●Districtwide CCSS-aligned observation rubric ●PD for site admin on observation rubric ●Calibration observations with ToSA’s & admin ●Sites examining bell schedules to incorporate more PLC and student support time

Community PD & Ongoing Support ●Community CCSS Outreach Meetings o HS, MS, and Feeder District meetings (20+) o Site Admin, Ed Services, ToSA’s ●Math Info Nights at our Middle Schools ●Math instructional materials meetings ●Surveys for all MS and IM1 HS students and families ●Ongoing Communication & Support: o Math support website Math support website o Supt columns & e-blasts o Frequent social media communication

Challenges We Face ●Time for PD/Collaboration ●Complacency & resistance to change ●Resources (fiscal, curricular, & human) ●Letting go of “transmission model” ●Parent/Student support resources for Math ●Instructional mats development & delivery/parent trust ●Fear among families about kids as “guinea pigs” ●Immensity of instructional shifts