ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 Aerodrome Operations under Limited Visibility Conditions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flight Operations View
Advertisements

Work load and responsibilit y npor. Ing. Miroslava Šimonová.
Air Traffic Management
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.
Part 4. ATC clearances and instructions
CERTIFICATION PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
1 ICAO Runway Safety ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar on Safety Management Systems (SMS) Mexico March 2006 Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal.
Recent Lighting and Marking Design Challenges/Trends
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
Aerodrome Certification Exercise The Process
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 ICAO Annex 14 Implementation.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Recite a prayer…(15 seconds)
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002  AERODROME MANUAL.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Presented to: Instructors and Pilot Examiners By: The FAASTeam Date: July 1 to September 30, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from
Brussels December 5,20021 New Technologies and Airport Management Presented by Cesare Bernabei Università di Piacenza & Politecnico di Milano January.
Parts Part 1 – Definitions/Abbreviations Part 21 – Certification Procedures for Products/Parts Part 43 – Maintenance, Preventative Maintenance, Rebuilding,
1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.
1 Exemption Procedure for Non-compliances at Aerodromes Module - 8 AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE October 15Module -8.
Presented to:FAA field personnel By:AOSC Date:February 17, 2006 Presented to:FAA field personnel By:AOSC Date:February 17, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: Accident Investigation LAL By: Ben Coleman (CTR), ASO Runway Safety Team Date: May 11, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Runway.
Airport, Aviation Personnel
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
Airport Markings & Signs
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
Working environment WO Blanka Zelenková. Vocabulary & Definitions & Abbreviations Tower Cab – the upper part of the Control TWR where ATC crew is situated.
LECTURE 4: ICAO CHART requirements
Reduced/Low Visibility Operations – ATAC AGM, November, 2010.
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
ICAO-ANB FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference (Atlantic City, April 2010) Yong Wang Chief, AGA/ANB International Civil Aviation Organization.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Mr. Lagomarsino Money Power with Technology Applications.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: OSWG Presented by: Chris Hope Date: March 9, 2016 ILS Performance Classification OpSpec C061.
Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety For Corporate Pilot’s Corporate Seminar August 8, 2009 Back to Basics For Runway Safety.
ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM Runway Safety/Incursion Conference
Chapter 8. Electrical Systems
Aerodrome Operations under Limited Visibility Conditions
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
OBJECTIVES Direct the aircraft on the ground and in the air by Ground-based Controllers Separate aircrafts to prevent collisions, Organize and arrange.
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
Допълнение 7 на PANS-ATM (ICAO Doc 4444)
2017 Safety Forum Runway Incursion scenarios
OPERATIONS ON PARALLEL OR NEAR-PARALLEL RUNWAYS
Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal
NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Milano-Linate Runway Incursion 8th October 2001
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
SEPARATION Module 1, Topic 1.
Chapter 5 Visual Aids for Navigation
Session – 4: Existing ICAO Standards relating to Air Traffic Control
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Aerodrome Certification Exercise The Process
Chapter 8. Electrical Systems
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
DOES THE ATC HAVE A ROLE IN THE WILDLIFE STRIKE PREVENTION ?
Magesh Mani BSACIST.
Air Traffic Control System
RNAV – process in Tartu How EAVA can co-operate with service providers ONE example - still in progress,,
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 Aerodrome Operations under Limited Visibility Conditions

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November History

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November History QWhen there was a requirement to implement the ICAO Strategy for introduction and application of non-visual aids to approach and landing, the ICAO EANPG established the All Weather Operations Group to manage the transition QDuring the first meeting of AWOG, the following was presented: - Information concerning the status of low visibility procedures (LVP) in the EUR Region - Variations in the application of LVP at various aerodromes

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November History QAs a result, the AWOG established a Project Team on Low Visibility Procedures (PT/LVP) with the task: - to review the procedures - to identify areas where further harmonization would be appropriate QIt was noted that existing guidance material in ECAC-CEAC Doc No. 17 was out of date in some respects

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November History QIntroduction of JAR-OPS (Subpart E) in some States has reinforced the urgent need to define such common and standardized practices within the ICAO EUR Region QECAC-CEAC Doc No. 17 covered three areas: - aeroplane and flight crew - aerodrome facilities - ATS procedures

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November History QIt was felt that the requirements for aeroplane and flight crew where adequately covered in current regulations QThe EANPG agreed that the AWOG should develop guidance material for aerodrome facilities and ATS procedures

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November History Draft European Guidance Material On Aerodrome Operations under Limited Visibility Conditions Version 2 EANPG December 2002

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Definitions

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Definitions Categories of precision approach and landing operations: CAT I: DH not lower than 60 m, VIS not less than 800 m or RVR not less than 550 m CAT II: DH lower than 60 m but not lower than 30 m, RVR not less than 350 m

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Definitions Categories of precision approach and landing operations: CAT III A: DH lower than 30 m or no DH, RVR not less than 200 m CAT III B: DH lower than 15 m or no DH RVR less than 200 m but not less than 50 m CAT III C: No DH and RVR limitations

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Authorization

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Authorization QAt aerodromes where LVP are established, any operation in Low Visibility Conditions is subject to authorization covering the aeroplane and the flight crew QThe suitability of an aerodrome for operations during low visibility conditions should be assessed by the State of the aerodrome QAs part of the certification process, States should ensure that the aerodrome manual will include operating procedures QThe general conditions under which Low Visibility Procedures are applied must be published in the AIP

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Safety Assessment

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Safety Assessment QWhen a RWY is to be upgraded to make it suitable for operations during low visibility conditions, it is to be appreciated that: - the lower the visibility is, the less the pilot is able to recognize and take action to avoid hazardous situations - in order to maintain the overall level of safety, an appropriate level of facilities and additional procedures may be required

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Safety Assessment QIn a number of States it has been found effective to form a working group, in order to ensure that all the elements in the ground environment are properly integrated into the total system QThe working group should be composed of representatives of all sections that are concerned with the issue QThis should include the aerodrome operator, ATS, MET services, aircraft operators, etc.

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Safety Assessment QThe working group is tasked with: - establishment of an appropriate process for the upgrade of the aerodrome - proper installation of all visual and non-visual aids - development of procedures required to ensure the safety of the operation

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (SMGCS)

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November SMGCS QVisual aids QNon-visual aids QFacilities QProcedures QRegulations QManagement QInformation facilities

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Examples of visibility conditions definitions

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example of Visibility Conditions definitions QVisibility conditions 1: - pilot able to taxi and avoid collision - ATC able to control on visual reference QVisibility condition 2: - Pilot able to taxi and avoid collision - ATC unable to control on visual reference only QVisibility condition 3: - visibility less than 550 m (LVP)

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Examples of visibility conditions requirements

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Requirements in visibility condition 1 QNo requirements additional to the present ICAO SARPS and procedures in: - Annex 11, 14 -PANS-ATM QAerodrome Design Manual, Part 4 “Visual Aids” QSMGCS Manual QAirport Services Manual Parts 1 and 8 - Rescue and Fire Fighting - Airport Operational Services

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Requirements in visibility condition 2 QMeasures dependent on dimensions of manoeuvring area and position of control tower QProcedures and visual aids should enable pilot to determine position and follow route (signs, marking, lights) QLower visibility ranges: may limit movement rate (airport lay-out, availability of SMR) QMeasures against undetected RWY intrusion (limited routes, procedures, SMR, stop bars)

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Requirements visibility condition 2 (cont) QVisibility < 1000 m RVR - withdrawal of vehicles and personnel involved in non essential activities on the manoeuvring area (construction/maintenance) - ILS sensitive area should be clear of all traffic QAt RVR  550 m, measures shall be completed

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Requirements in visibility condition 3 QATC ensures ILS sensitive area clear before issuing landing clearance QAt RVR 550 m all measures to protect RWY and ground movement should be completed QATC responsible for movement of ground vehicles in the entire movement area QRVR < 350 m: - Further restrictions for vehicles and persons on the manoeuvring area - ATC assists fire and rescue services

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Requirements visibility condition 3 (cont) QRVR < 200m: - ATC increasingly responsible for collision avoidance (shared responsibility) - Procedures and equipment should be compatible to meet this requirement QAircraft should be required to manoeuvre down to 100 m RVR; the following facilities should be adequate to enable the pilot to taxi: - TWY lights - TWY markings - route/information signs (location system)

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November responsibility ATC RVR 0 responsibility pilot shared responsibility Responsibilities

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example of Aerodrome Procedures

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Aerodrome Procedures QTDZ RVR < 1500 m and/or CB < 300 ft. Sensitive area operational RWY: - free of obstacles/ vehicles - no construction/maintenance activities QAny RVR < 1000 m and/or CB < 200 ft Movement area: - all construction/maintenance actovites will be terminated QRVR < 1500 m Aircraft towing: - permission ground control

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Examples of phases in low visibility operations

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Phases low visibility operations QPhase A: 550 m < RVR < 1500 m any RVR or CB between 300 ft and 200 ft QPhase B: 350 m < RVR < 550 m any RVR of operational RWY or CB < 200 ft QPhase C: 200 m < RVR < 350 m any RVR of operational RWY QPhase D: RVR < 200 m any RVR of RWY 24 or 27

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Initiation of low visibility procedures

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Initiation of low vis. procedures QSenior controller at TWR responsible for: - initiation - change - cancellation - exemptions of the low visibility operations phases QInformation from TWR to: - ACC - Airport operator - MET office - FIO

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Restrictions Phase A QFeeder/arrival: - preferential RWY 06/19R/27 01R - no opposite use of RWY’s - minimum separation on final approach 6 nm QGround control: - no clearance for aircraft to RWY intersections - change to TWR frequency at holding points in departure sequence - monitor ground traffic

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Restrictions Phase A QStart-up control: - minimum RETD interval 3 minutes QTower: - No opposite use of RWY’s - No intersection take-offs - no take-off RWY 19 L - Co-ordinate take-off with departure control - No take-off RWY 27 when approaching aircraft < 6 nm from TDZ - No landing clearance when traffic in sensitive area - Monitor ground traffic by SMR

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Restrictions Phase B QDifferent from / in addition to phase A QFeeder/Arrival: - preferential RWY 06/19R/27 - Minimum separation on final approach 8 nm (landing interval 3,5 min) QTower: - Take-off RWY 24/09/01L/27 QStart-up control: - minimum RETD interval 4 minutes

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Restrictions Phase B QGround control: - Monitor ground traffic on SMR and give instructions for the taxi route when required - In conflict situations give traffic info and positive instructions for actions - Vehicles and towed aircraft in the manoeuvring area after permission of the control tower. Exempted are “follow me” vehicles on some isolated aprons

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Restrictions Phase C QDifferent from / in addition to phase B QFeeder/arrival: - minimum separation on final approach 12 nm (min. landing interval 5 min.) QStart-up control - minimum RETD interval 5 minutes - no start-up when RVR for applicable aircraft is below take-off limits

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Restrictions Phase C QGround control: - No power back - Permission to taxi; after push back team reported free - Monitor ground traffic: instruct pilots on taxi route (ATC/pilots shared responsibility) - Only positive instructions to pilot - Limited possibilities for vehicles to cross TWY’s to isolated ramps (controlled) - fire fighting vehicles: ground control - No vehicles and towing of aircraft (exemptions at ground control discretion)

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Contingency procedures Stop bar(s) of one RWY U/S QPhase A: No additional requirements QPhase B: No landing or take-off from this RWY QPhase C: No landing or take-off from this RWY

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Contingency procedures Stop bars of more than one RWY U/S QPhase A: No additional requirements QPhase B: - Landing RWY 19R unrestricted - Landing RWY 27 and 06 with minimum final separation 15 nm; minimum landing interval 6 nm - Take-off RWY 01L or 24 QPhase C: - Landing on RWY 19 R only; separation on final 15 nm and minimum landing interval 6 min - Take-off RWY 24 only

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Contingency procedures Surface Movement Radar U/S QRVR  550 m - decision of senior ATC controller Q200 m  RVR < 550 m - Landing RWY 19R only - Landing interval > 10 min - Take-off RWY 24 only - Minimum RETD interval 10 min - report on ATIS - Start-up at gate only

Aerodrome Safety Workshop - Almaty, Kazakhstan - 18 to 22 November Example: Contingency procedures Surface Movement Radar U/S QRVR < 200 m - No air traffic control for departing/ arriving traffic - ATIS: “ground radar U/S, aerodrome is below operational limits”