NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Advertisements

1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
MTA Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Presentation to the Congestion Mitigation Commission October 25, 2007.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Alternatives to the City’s plan New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission December 10, 2007.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Congestion Mitigation: Options for Evaluation New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission January 10, 2008.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Financing and Funding Will Kempton Chair ASC Financing and Funding Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee on Finance and Administration Director California.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
1 The Technical Decision for Transportation Management System The Technical Decision for Transportation Management System by KUANG YANG KOU ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR.
Montgomery County Maryland I-270 Integrated Corridor Management Project Tom Jacobs, University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Steering Committee Meeting Presented to Montgomery County Department.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Planning For an Upper Valley Transportation Facility October 1 st, 2009 Howe Library, Hanover, NH Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission.
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
Transit Pricing Programs Value Pricing for Transportation in the Washington Region June 4, 2003 Richard F. Stevens Washington Metropolitan Area Transit.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
Title Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro Investigating options for improved bus service between.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
1.  Transportation Vision  Near-term Recommendations  Ongoing Work / Next Steps 2.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
Regional Roads Committee
Parking and Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
Travel Demand Management
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Presentation transcript:

NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office of Policy, Planning and Performance Peter King, Director, Planning and Program Management New York State Department of Transportation

NYSDOT Review Regional Impacts Impact on State Highway System Impact on non-MTA Transit Service Data Collection Capital Needs Future Considerations

Reviewed results from NYC Best Practice Model Congestion pricing may have impacts beyond City borders –Fewer auto trips to Manhattan CBD –Increased transit demand to CBD Regional Impacts

Impacts on Highway System Reviewed 7 major corridors Overall travel improves: –Total vehicle mileage drops slightly –Travel hours are reduced –Overall travel speed increases Monitor for Localized impacts

ITS improves system efficiency ITS will support the congestion pricing plan by improving traffic flow Recommended Projects: –Improve travel information services, –Enhance highway performance analysis, –Deploy additional ITS infrastructure, –Improve Transportation Management Center Operations ITS Enhancements

Regional transit network will require additional capital and operating investments, and interagency coordination. Most transit diversions will be accommodated by MTA system NYSDOT will work with the MTA and Counties to support express bus service from areas not well served by commuter rail Operational Needs: e.g. Parking capacity at rail stations; Feeder bus access to rail stations Commuter and Intercity Bus Service to CBD: Additional buses; Exemption from congestion fees; Regional fare media Transit

Establish a systematic, well coordinated initiative among all regional transportation operating agencies “Before and after” data collection on the operation and usage of the entire regional transportation system Expand collection locations before implementation Collect during the pilot period to evaluate actual changes Monitor freight movement impacts Data Collection

Technology and Information: –$98.6M - Technology and traffic monitoring projects Improving Travel Information Services - $12.5M Enhance Highway Performance Analysis - $28.2M Deploy Additional ITS Infrastructure - $15M Improve Transportation Management Center Operations - $42.9M –$12.5M - Regional data collection and information sharing Transit Services Other than the MTA: –$30M - Purchase/lease of suburban express bus park and ride facilities and bus shelters –$25M - Improved traveler information, integrated fare media, and transit technology. Summary of Capital Needs

Need “before and after” data on actual experience Mid-term (18-month) evaluation Make adjustments if necessary Use congestion pricing revenues for balanced investments in all modes Future Considerations