Layer 0 Grounding Requirement in terms of noise performance Grounding/Shielding studies with L0 prototype Summary Kazu Hanagaki / Fermilab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LBNL PIXEL IPHC 2009_06_LG1 Flex Cable Development The development of the flex cable for sensor readout and control is envisioned as a 4 stage process.
Advertisements

M.PEGORARO Grounding Workshop 24th Jan 08 DT GROUNDING & SHIELDING Presented by A. BENVENUTI.
Grounding and Testing L0 (L1) --- noise studies --- Kazu Hanagaki, Sara Lager, Gustavo Otero Introduction of noise issue What is going on the other side.
Here’s a partial schematic we’ll use to illustrate the advantage of a ground plane. The idea is that an output pin on the microprocessor is driving an.
General needs at CERN for special PCB’s Philippe Farthouat CERN.
1Daya Bay RPC HV FDR 6/17/2008 RPC HV cable pick-up noise issue C. Lu, Princeton University (6/17/2008)
November Vertex 2002 Kazu Hanagaki1 Layer 0 in D0 Silicon Tracker for run2b Kazu Hanagaki / Fermilab for D0 run2b Silicon Tracker group Motivation.
CMPE 118 MECHATRONICS Noise Isolation Keeping the Gremlins Out.
Vertex2002, Kailua-Kona, HI 11/07/02 B. Quinn1 Carbon Fiber Grounding Issues in the DØ Run IIb Silicon Detector Design Breese Quinn Marvin Johnson, Mike.
1 Module and stave interconnect Rev. sept. 29/08.
EMC review for Belle II (Grounding & shielding plans) Sub-systems ( XXXXX)
Progress on Powering Options Satish Dhawan, Adrian Au Yale University Richard Sumner, CMCAMAC LLC SiD workshop, SLAC Jan ,
Low Noise Detector Design
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
Analog Cable Status Basic design fixed --- the latest cable has good quality. (report by Frank) Capacitance for single cable ~0.35pF/cm --- both new and.
Experimental Area Meeting V. Bobillier1 Good connection to earth (in many points) of every metallic parts to be installed in the cavern is very.
Layout Considerations of Non-Isolated Switching Mode Power Supply
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
Read-out boards Rui de Oliveira 16/02/2009 RD51 WG1 workshop Geneva.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
PCB Layout Introduction
17/06/2010UK Valencia RAL Petals and Staves Meeting 1 DC-DC for Stave Bus Tapes Roy Wastie Oxford University.
M. Szelezniak1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR Hardware Prototyping Status.
CVD PCB, first steps. 15 mm 25 mm Chip area. No ground plane underneath the chip. Bulk isolated => only one ground line Power lines Connector: 11,1mm*2,1mm:
Modelling of TPM noise problems Greg, following discussions and measurements with David and Senerath.
1 Module and stave interconnect Rev. sept. 29/08.
High Density Interconnect (WBS 1.4.3) Extension Cables (WBS 1.4.4) Douglas Fields University of New Mexico Douglas Fields, FVTX DOE Review November 17,
PCB Layout Introduction
M.Oriunno, SLAC Stave cable and module options. M.Oriunno, SLAC Background - module The IBL electrical unit for data output is a single chip The use of.
IPC Power Distribution Considerations A predominately important factor that should be considered in the design of a printed board is power distribution.
Detector R&D for Muon Chamber Anand K. Dubey For VECC group.
1 PreFPIX2 Inner board and test beam triggering Gabriele Chiodini Fermilab - Jan 07, 02.
PXL Cable Options LG 1HFT Hardware Meeting 02/11/2010.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
The LHCb Outer Tracker Front End, what does it look like and what is the status Talk for the LHCb Electronics Working Group /TS A Collaboration.
07 - Winter 2005 ECE ECE 766 Computer Interfacing and Protocols 1 Grounding Grounds: –Common reference for the circuit –Safety What is the potential problem.
Design Discussion of Mechanical / Electrical Interfaces Bill Cooper (Fermilab) (Layer 1) VXD.
Grounding Studies Metal box sensor SVX4/hybrid Analog cable GND(20W)
Grounding Guidelines Developed for LBNE
Global Circuit Page 1  Basic Design Rule for Advanced PCB (1) 1. High speed current path Load Driving gate Current trace At low frequency current, follows.
L0 Module Testing and Analog Cable What we built so far: –No.3 First prototype with SVX4 (L1 hybrid) –No.4 with irradiated sensor –No.5 Installed on the.
Possible types of module Si/W CALORIMETER CONCEPT Si/W CALORIMETER CONCEPT G.Bashindzhagyan Moscow State University June 2002 Internal structure (not in.
Compilation of Dis-/Advantages of DC-DC Conversion Schemes Power Task Force Meeting December 16 th, 2008 Katja Klein 1. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH.
Getting faster bandwidth HervéGrabas Getting faster bandwidth - Hervé Grabas1.
Production Readiness Review of L0/L1 sensors for DØ Run IIb R. Demina, August, 2003 Irradiation studies of L1 sensors for DØ 2b Regina Demina University.
ABC130 Hybrid/module and HCC Bond Detail ABC130 Left & Right Handed Hybrid and Module Topology Original proposal – same flavour hybrids Hybrid-module.
Development of radiation hard Sensors & Cables for the CBM Silicon Tracking System Sudeep Chatterji On behalf of CBM-STS Collaboration GSI Helmholtz Centre.
Silicon Meeting July 10, 2003 Module and Stave Production Status James Fast Fermilab.
R. Lipton Vertex ‘98 Santorini, Greece The D0 Silicon Microstrip Tracker (D0SMT) Outline  Design  Detector Studies Coupling capacitors Radiation Damage.
US stavelet update 12th April PPB2s on serial power side 12 Apr SAMTEC connector (floating) Bond pad (connected to EoS through WB + bus tape.
Module Radiation Length. Goals Estimate the expected radiation length of a module, based on the design and measurements on as-built modules Determine.
1 9 December 2002A.P.Kashchuk (LNF/INFN), Frascati) New approach to CPC design.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
PXD – DEPFET PS noise emission tests Mateo Iglesias Fernando Arteche.
Grounding & Shielding Ved Prakash Sandlas Director General
Belle-II bKLM RPC Readout Power & Ground Discussion 12 th Belle II General Meeting Gerard Visser Indiana University CEEM 7/24/2012.
Marc Anduze first drawings of Ecal eudet module COPIED FROM : Marc Anduze PICTURES FROM : CALICE/EUDET electronic meeting – CERN – 12 July 07.
Noise & Grounding Andrei Nomerotski (U.Oxford) 17 July 2007.
5 November 2002J.Pater - Systemtest Report1 Endcap Systemtest Current Grounding/Shielding status Recent Upgrades to sector Measurements with 6 Modules.
SVD Electronics Constraints
Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna)
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
High-Speed Serial Link Layout Recommendations –
Quality Control Chamber Production
Meeting on Services and Power Supplies
DT & RPC Grounding STATUS
HPS Motherboard Electronic Design
Compilation of Dis-/Advantages of DC-DC Conversion Schemes
Twinax A Twinax is a dual coaxial cable with a common shield (“Extension” of TWP). 3 custom prototypes were produced for R&D purposes. Currently Cu wire.
Possible types of Si-sensor: SILICON CALORIMETRY FOR A LINEAR COLLIDER G.Bashindzhagyan, Il Park August Silicon sensor.
Presentation transcript:

Layer 0 Grounding Requirement in terms of noise performance Grounding/Shielding studies with L0 prototype Summary Kazu Hanagaki / Fermilab

Best noise performance before installation capacitive load by sensor (0.7ADC~500e) capacitive load by cable (0.8ADC~600e) 2 nd chip no load One chip RMS  10 Only cable bonded Sensor and cable disabled Total noise = 2.7ADC ~ 1900e. Differential noise = 2.5ADC ~ 1800e.

Signal to Noise ratio A MIP creates 22000e. The best noise = 1800~1900e. Noise increase by 300~400e is expected after 15fb -1. The goal is to keep S/N better than 10. The current best noise performance before installing on the L0 support is already marginal.  Any additional noise must be avoided.

L0 prototype module

Grounding Studies sensor SVX4/hybrid Metal box L0 support Kapton flex Analog cable GND(20  ) GND hybrid GND sensor GND Signal return Signal ground

Noise level on the L0 support structure Hybrid only Sensor only Both hybrid and sensor

Equivalent (?) circuit (cont’d) Connection important sensor SVX4/hybrid Metal box L0 support Kapton flex GND hybrid GND sensor GND Signal return Signal ground Smaller inductance (or smaller loop) Least impedance = least inductance for high frequency (not resistance).

After putting extra grounding plane Note! Still the hybrid grounding is not perfect in terms of getting low inductance… but the effect of the extra grounding by kapton flex is so clear!!! Single ground at hybrid Common ground at both hybrid and sensor

Importance of low inductance connection 1 wire between hybrid and the extra grounding plane 3 wires4 wires

Low inductance connection (cont’d) 2 wires (~2cm) 2 wires (~4cm)

Reducing the inductance Having lower inductance connection to GND seems crucial. L ~ (wire) length/radius: M=  l/2  [log(2l/r)-1] L =  /I  ~ area of the closed circuit People know these rules well, but sometimes forget to apply. But these rules are always critical for any grounding connections, both locally and generally. better

Carbon Fiber Flex Circuits Vias Low-pass filter board for HV Sensor Copper Mesh How do we achieve???????????? Sensor grounding. The sensor and hybrid need to be connected through rigid ground plane. This should work also as a shielding.  extension of kapton flex with copper mesh embedded. Hybrid side: proposal using the similar technique, but not yet decided. Need to decide; multi point ground vs single point ground.

Summary No additional noise is allowed for L0. Low inductance ground connection is crucial, especially at the hybrid end. Grounding scheme at the hybrid must be fixed. Rigid grounding, or low inductance grounding path to the outside world must be maintained.

…Backup Slides

Signal to Noise ratio S/N=10 C Si C cable Total noise estimates VS total capacitance Noise increase by 300~400e is expected after the irradiation.

Irradiated sensor Irradiated sensor (not on the support structure) Non-rradiated sensor (on the support structure) Noise increase by ~200e. 1 ADC 0.7 ADC

Radiation length (a) 16% of area occupancy is taken account. (b) 50% of volume occupancy assumed. May be possible to reduce. (c) heavy duty aluminum foil was measured to 20  m thick. 100  m Kapton 0.04% 600  m Kapton 0.21% 3  m Cu (a) 0.02% 16  m Cu (a) 0.11% 300  m (b) polypropylene 0.07% 1300  m (b) polypropylene 0.32% 20  m Al (c) 0.02% 20  m Al (c) 0.02% Total0.15%Total0.66% Min (2 cables)Max (12 cables)

Cable design sensor cable spacer

Proximity to the grounding/shielding Only the difference is the weight on top of the cables.  Proximity to the shielding material. bottom cable top cable Noise due to capacitive coupling.

Proximity to the Shielding (cont’d) The study is still on going… cable spacer A spacer B shield weight A:nothing B:topbottom 75  m Kapton (no weight)  m Kapton  m polypropylene mesh  m Kapton  m polypropylene mesh  m Kapton

Choice of spacer Dyconex has produced three different meshes with kapton sheet. –hole radius: 60  m –hole-distance: 190, 210 and 230  m –corresponding to  r ~1.95, 2.2 and 2.45 Polypropylene mesh sheet 190  m 210  m230  m