1 In the Trenches Peter Kiewit Computing Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unified Communications Bill Palmer ADNET Technologies, Inc.
Advertisements

Implementing IP Telephony on a Campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly MiCTA 2005 Spring Conference Brenda Helminen, Director, Telcom Engineering.
Unified Messaging/ IP Telephony Phase II Roadmap Where are we today? Where are we going? UM Roadmap IP Telephony Phase II IP Telephony rollout Questions.
University of Baltimore Telecommunications Technology
The current System Landline caller The emergency call process starts with a caller dialing (highly simplified) © 2011 Colorado Resource.
Communications Solutions for Health Care Providers
BAI613 Module 2 - Voice over IP Technology. Module Objectives 1. Describe the benefits of IP Telephony/Packet Telephony/VoIP over traditional telephone.
Introducing New Additions to ProSafe Advanced Smart Switch Family: GS724TR and GS748TR (ProSafe 24 and 48-port Gigabit Smart Switches with Static Routing)
CISCO IP TELEPHONY Phone System, 2 Years Later. Presented By: John Nickell, Technology Director and Bill Koegle, Technology and Network Specialist. North.
11 Public Safety Recording – Sharing Resources Quality, Accountability, Reliability. and Performance for the Mission-critical Environment Western Regional.
Discovering the Value of IP January 24, 2006 Don Fiorentino Vice President/General Manager.
How does Samsung compete with Cisco VoIP solutions?
1 © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved Next Generation Services Redefining Interpersonal Communication Robert Lloyd President, EMEA Operations.
Yes, but it’s only the subplot! Is VoIP the Future of Telecommunications?
© 2004, SS8 Networks, Inc. Remote Office/Branch Office IP Telephony Solutions Sean Kent – Director Architecture/Technology V18.
University of California, Irvine IP Telephony Strategy and Deployment Brian Buckler, Assistant Director Network & Telecom Operations Network & Academic.
Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. NETW-250 Outsourcing Telephony Last Update
IP Telephony Phase II Rollout OIT ComTech. Outline Why are we meeting? Roadmap Centrex vs Call Manager What happens now ? Deployment objectives Phone.
CHAPTER 15 & 16 Service Provider VoIP Applications and Services Advanced Enterprise Applications.
Data Centers and IP PBXs LAN Structures Private Clouds IP PBX Architecture IP PBX Hosting.
© 2012 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual.
In the Trenches Peter Kiewit Computing Center.
Case Study: The ROI of SIP Trunking Date:Tuesday 2/3, 8:30-10:00am Track: SIP-05 –SIP Trunking Room: B114 / B115.
Voice & Data Convergence Network Services January 11, 2001.
 CHAPTER 2  Understanding the Pieces of Cisco Unified Communication.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Confidential 1 MAP Value Proposition.
Large Enterprise with Multiple Locations Source: Avaya.
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco IP Telephony Dave Corley Engineer, IP Communications.
Effectively Explaining the Cloud to Your Colleagues.
Communications & Data Services The Evolution of Communications Cathy Avgiris EVP/GM May 10, 2012.
Presented to: BUSINESS NAME December 1,2006. A New Way to Manage Your Business Communications.
Extending Traditional Desktop Office Communication Systems Chuck Harden, System Analyst Nick Kwiatkowski, System Analyst.
The generation, storage, and movement of information are central to managing an enterprise’s business processes As a result, businesses must ensure.
© 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved..
Voice over IP Spring LNA Meeting April 1, What is Voice over IP? n A technology for transporting integrated digital voice, video and data over IP.
Optimizing Your Communications Foundation Eliminate Risk, Reduce Cost, Move to IP Telephony and Unified Communications with Confidence.
EWU Telecommunications ( EWU Telephone Systems Upgrade What This Project Does For You…
The Virtualized Enterprise MORE FUNCTIONALITY AND REDUCED IT SPEND Speaker: Frank Grillo EVP of Marketing CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS.
Basics of IP Telephony Sam Lutgring Director of Informational Technology Services Calhoun Intermediate School District.
Making the Case for Hosted IP-PBX It’s the economy…and it’s not stupid Walter Snell.
The Future of Unified Communications Jim Greenway VP, Marketing, U4EA UC Definition SMB a Large Opportunity –Market for UC in SMB –Examples Conclusion.
© 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved _03_2003_c4 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved _03_2003_c4.
MAEDS 45 th Annual Conference October , 2009.
October 10-13, 2006 San Diego Convention Center, San Diego California Making the Case for Hosted IP-PBX It’s the economy…and it’s not stupid.
A CSG Presentation January 5, 2005 Tom Ball Manager Voice Network Engineering
VoIP Implementation Pitt County Government September 13, 2004.
The Evolution and Impact of Business VoIP: A Carrier’s View Mark Fishler Vice President – Product Management, Voice and Data Business Services.
DUE Voice over IP (VoIP) Linksys Ernie Friend- FSCJ.
Converged Service A Dartmouth Perspective Bob Johnson.
U Michigan Voice Service IT Central Services Andy Palms January 5, 2005.
Voice over IP Are we there yet ? Presented by: Mark Caswell, Empire Technologies, LLC. Voice over IP.
Voice over IP (VoIP) and Unified Messaging (UM) -- NETS testing update SCD Exec Presentation 12-Feb-2002 Jeff Custard Teresa Shibao Jim VanDyke.
VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL. INTRODUCTION SCENARIOS IN INTERNET TELEPHONY VOIP GATEWAYS IMPORTANCE OF VOICE OVER IP BENEFITS & APPLICATIONS ADVANTAGES.
IP TELEPHONY AT THE AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY A CASE STUDY WIL DANIELS MANAGER, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES.
October 10-13, 2006 San Diego Convention Center, San Diego California Effective Deployment and Migration Strategies Leigh Fatzinger, VP.
Rethinking Telephone Operations at UVA-Wise Oscar Raile, MBA Director for Policy and Planning UVa’s College at Wise.
1Convergence_Internal © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. IP Telephony ROI Case Studies.
Hosted Voice & Hosted Contact Center
Softswitch SIP Proxy Server Call Manager IP Telephony Router Tablet PC IP PBX Class 5 Switch Class 4 Switch PBX Access Gateway Broadband Router Voice Gateway.
An Application of VoIP and MPLS Advisor: Dr. Kevin Ryan
1 Computing Support of Instruction Dr. H.E. (Buster) Dunsmore Purdue University Department of Computer Science PowerPoint slides.
ND 911 Association Preparing for NG /24/2010.
Small Office / Home Office (SOHO) IP Telephony Who says You Can’t Run with the Big Dogs?
“End to End VoIP“ The Challenges of VoIP Access to the Enterprise Charles Rutledge VP Marketing Quintum Technologies
The Future of IP Telephony Kevin Gavin Chief Marketing Officer Andrew Pryfogle Director of Sales GoBeam Communications.
Out of Sight, But Not Out of Touch Remote Office, Branch Office IP Telephony Solutions Charles Henderson Director, Product Management EADS TELECOM North.
January 23-26, 2007 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Leveraging Next Gen Collaborative Technologies to Make Unified Messaging a Reality Sanjeev Sawai Vice President,
Unified Communications: How We Got There and Saved Money Doing It!
Introduction to WiFi Telephony
Decisions, Decisions… Hosted vs. Premises-based VoIP Deployment
Presentation transcript:

1 In the Trenches Peter Kiewit Computing Center

2 Dartmouth at a Glance  Campus is roughly 1 mile square  Geographically Rural  Around 7000 extensions  50% faculty/staff, 50% residential  Around 120 buildings

3 Where we were- Voice Environment-2003  Ericsson MD 110 PBX  1500 digital phones  4500 analog extensions  Distributed Architecture-LIMs(line interface modules)  Main switchroom(35% of active extensions)  34 LIM distributed among 5 locations

4 Where we are- Dual System Environment  Cisco (Call Mgrs) solution integrated with Legacy PBX(MD110)  Faculty/Staff 100% VOIP-3100 extensions  Resident Students(all analog) on legacy PBX-3700 extensions  Emergency services(analog) on Legacy PBX-around 500 extensions.

5 Where we are going 100% VOIP Summer 2005 Faculty/Staff on full featured VOIP phones Residents on Analog over VOIP Gateways All greenfield installations on full featured VOIP phones, faculty/staff or residential

6 How We Got Here  Legacy PBX presented problems  Costly upgrade/forklift on the horizon  Upgrade path expensive with move to licensed price plan.  Vendor essentially pulled out of North American market, support difficult  Telephony use at time of decision relatively pedestrian(mostly analog)  VM system no longer supported  Revenue generation no longer a reality

7 How We Got Here continued  Budget Realities made convergence of Voice/Video/Data operations attractive  Cost to support separate operations for Voice, Video and Data network high  Newly Upgraded network made convergence possible  Aggressive Campus growth in 5 year plan placed pressure on a “long term” direction

8 Business Case  Upgrade/Replacement of existing System to cost close to 2.7 million(pbx, copper plant and Voic system)  Greenfield installation costs began at $50,000 for remote lim + voice infrastructure  Total Cost for Dartmouth VOIP installation 1.9 million, system can support 20,000 extensions.

9 Business Case Continued  Convergence of Voice/Video/Data operations saved close to $500,000 annually  Telecom, Network Services, CATV staffing in positions, Compensation $1,450,000  Converged Network Services Current Staffing- 12, compensation $970,000  ROI on headcount savings alone is 4 years!!!

10 Conditions for Success  Dartmouth Telephony/Network effort highly centralized  Legacy Telephony deployment not feature intensive  Most users did not understand how to use the old Telephone and Voic system.  Old system cost prohibitive for departments to take advantage of better services

11 VoIP Reality at Dartmouth  Convergence and Integration  Legacy forms and features preserved  Just like the old system if you prefer  Devices - telephones, laptops, hand-helds, etc.  Features  One number - many devices, or various groupings  Dartmouth dial-tone from anywhere on the Internet  Wireless platforms available across campus, voice anywhere, anytime.  Future: data, voice, and video integrated across applications  Unified messaging: <> Telephone, Text <> Speech  Video telephones  Cell phone and wireless phone in-one

12 Common Objections we were prepared for  VOIP does not have the features of a PBX  VOIP is not as reliable  My phone always worked when the power went out  You did not give us enough time to prepare

13 Objections we were not prepared for  Can’t separate the “IP” in VOIP from the Internet, confusion led to concerns over privacy,spam and reliability. The Reading Edge  Users could be passionate about their phones, especially cordless

14 Path to Completion Step 1-Build confidence in technology  Pilot and Seed with Key personnel  Install Core infrastructure with small production deployments  Get the “Money People” on board  Package Technology as necessary for convergence savings  Get the right Deal!!!  Get Support at the Executive Level(PAF)  Public announcement of support from President’s office

15 Installation Plan  Publicize the new technology  Spend time on discovery-meeting with all departments to review telephony needs  Train Prior to installation  Classroom training, not mandatory  2 active systems allowed for us to work at our pace

16

17 Faculty/Staff VOIP design Deciding Factors  Like-for-Like design  Analog phones replaced with single line VOIP sets  Digital phones replaced with multi-line VOIP sets  All ancillary equipment replaced (headsets…etc)  POE only provided for VOIP communication jacks  60 minute UPS backup for all VOIP switches

18 Residential VOIP design deciding factors-Why Analog?  Most Students use cordless phones today  In VOIP model, cost is in the phones. Unknown Abuse cost-recovery not attractive  Data Closets in Resident Halls lacking  Power back-up and security an issue  Life Safety Concerns

19 Life Safety-E911  College E911 environment  We supply PSAP with database of phone numbers/locations  We pulse out ANI to PSAP  POE only supplied to “VOIP” data jacks to discourage movement  Residential extensions “hardwired” to insure integrity of 911 database  Cisco Emergency Responder being installed

20

21

22 Network Enhancements for Production VOIP  Core Network installed in a mesh topology. Routers all have dual supervisors/power supplies  QoS enabled system-wide to insure integrity of Voice Services  Layer III routing enabled to VOIP edge switches  UPS backup for all closets and core

23 Gotcha’s from Cisco  Beware of the upsell  New technology for them causing “best practice” design to change a fast pace  QoS and layer III routing set-ups required network upgrade as subscriptions for phones per uplink changed dramatically  Gateway boards required “Hybrid” mode in routers  Bottom line, get a contract guaranteeing that design flaws are the vendor’s responsibility.

24 What went right  The phones rang, message lights lit and folks could make calls  Logistics of cut went well, work at night made cutover almost transparent  Building by building cut allowed us to change tactics on the fly.  Users from old Analog world loved the new features and ease of VOIP sets  95% of campus thrilled

25 What went Wrong  Not enough time spent in training to explain subtle differences  Reception features of new system not adequate with software in GR at cutover.  Lack of a consistent phone type led to complaints  Privacy panels on desks made placement of phones difficult, extending cutover

26 Lessons Learned  Train staff prior to cutover or hire in- house expertise.  Make training mandatory and more detailed  Spend more time on “discovery” phase with main call points(reception)  Triage necessary with upgrades

27 Conclusion  For years the promise of cost savings has driven the advancement of networks on college campuses. Convergence of communication’s services is finally delivering on that promise, both technically and fiscally. It is no longer a question of if…but when.