Parse this: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards 22 August 2011 Christine L. Borgman, UCLA Chair’s Welcome and Keynote.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CODATA task group for data citation standards and practise Jan Brase, DataCite 5 minute madness Nordbib 2012 Copenhagen.
Advertisements

Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research Data Management Plans Amsterdam 8 th September 2009.
Joint Information Systems Committee Digital Library Services BL/JISC Workshop Rachel Bruce JISC Programme Director The Digital Library and its Services,
DOIs for Tracking and Citing Scientific Data J. Klump, J. Wächter and M. Lautenschlager CODATA Conference 2006 Beijing, PR China.
Big Data, Open Data: Finding a Needle in a Digital Haystack Christine L. Borgman Professor and Presidential Chair in Information Studies University of.
Institutional Perspective on Credit Systems for Research Data MacKenzie Smith Research Director, MIT Libraries.
DataCite: Making Data Citable Jan Brase (DataCite/TIB Hannover) Brigitte Hausstein (GESIS) Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen (GESIS)
U.S. – China Roundtable on Scientific Data Cooperation and Joint Study on Improving Scientific Data Sharing Paul F. Uhlir, J.D. Director, Board on Research.
Welcome to CAMP Identity Management Integration Workshop Ann West NMI-EDIT EDUCAUSE/Internet2.
Status of ICT structure, infrastructure and applications existed to manage and disseminate information and knowledge of Agricultural Biotechnology Innovations.
U.S. National Committee for CODATA Overview of Recent Activities and Plans September 2006 U.S. National Committee for CODATA Overview of Recent Activities.
1 APARSEN - WP2200 Identifiers and Citability Interoperability Framework for PI systems Webinar on PI - 15 February 2013 Maurizio Lunghi.
GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY Dr Vishwas Chavan Senior Programme Officer for DIGIT Data Citation Mechanism and.
LIS 506 (Fall 2006) LIS 506 Information Technology Week 11: Digital Libraries & Institutional Repositories.
Out of Cite, Out of Mind: USNC Work on Data Citation Practices and Standards BRDI 23 September 2013 Bonnie C. Carroll Information International Associates,
11 Building a Usable Infrastructure for e-Science: An Information Perspective Christine L. Borgman Professor & Presidential Chair in Information Studies.
1 Why should “WE” CARE about data?. International initiatives OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding 2007 “Access.
The Board on Research Data and Information (BRDI) and U.S. National Committee for CODATA Director’s Report to the 10 th BRDI Meeting March 11, 2014 Prepared.
Scholarly communications Discussion group Linked Data Workshop May 2010.
Why data matters to librarians – and how to educate the next generation Christine L. Borgman Professor & Presidential Chair in Information Studies, UCLA.
Challenges for Academic Libraries in the Networked World Christine L. Borgman Professor & Presidential Chair in Information Studies UCLA & Visiting Professor.
Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles Notes [1] CODATA 2013: sec 3.2.1; Uhlir (ed.) 2012, ch 14; Altman &
Data Sharing and Archiving: A Professional Society View Clifford S. Duke Ecological Society of America September 9, 2010.
Data Infrastructure Services for Data Curation Jian Qin School of Information Studies Syracuse University Syracuse, New York ALA 2015, San Francisco, CA.
Roadmap Activity 2a: A GEOSS citation standard : Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
Cooperative Identities Hub Karen Smith-Yoshimura ALA Authority Control Interest Group, The Future Is Now: Global Authority Control ALA Annual, Chicago.
TWC Deep Earth Computer: A Platform for Linked Science of the Deep Carbon Observatory Community Xiaogang (Marshall) Ma, Yu Chen, Han Wang, Patrick West,
Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards Fifth China - U.S. Roundtable on Scientific Data Cooperation Beijing, China, October, 2011.
Research Data: Who will share what, with whom, when, and why? Christine L. Borgman Professor & Presidential Chair in Information Studies University of.
Director’s Report 5 th BRDI Meeting Washington, DC 13 June 2011 Paul F. Uhlir, J.D. Director, Board on Research Data and Information National Academy of.
SHARE (SHared Access Research Ecosystem) Tyler Walters Co-Chair, SHARE Steering Group (a joint committee of the ARL, the AAU, and the APLU) Eric Celeste.
Director’s Report 6 h BRDI Meeting Washington, DC 31 January 2012 Paul F. Uhlir, J.D. Director, Board on Research Data and Information National Academy.
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
Valentino Cavalli SEEREN Inauguration, Thessaloniki, 09/01/ Digital Divide and Policy Issues for NRENs in South East Europe Valentino Cavalli TERENA.
Improving Scientific Data Sharing — Taking Advantage of the Opportunities and Addressing the Challenges (proposed plan for the joint study on improving.
When and Why Should Research Data be Sustained? National Science Foundation Workshop Cyberinfrastructure for Large Facilities December 1-2, 2015 Christine.
Publishing & Citing Research Data Arun Prakash. Agenda  Introduction  Why is Data publishing important ?  Ongoing Work  Role of Semantics.
Data Citation in The Dataverse Network ® Micah Altman, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University Prepared for the Board on Research.
Director’s Report 8 th BRDI Meeting Washington, DC 26 February 2013 Paul F. Uhlir, J.D. Director, Board on Research Data and Information National Academy.
Strategies for Permanent Access to Scientific Information in Southern Africa: Health and Environmental Information for Sustainable Development Pretoria,
Welcome to Base CAMP: Enterprise Directory Deployment Ken Klingenstein, Director, Internet2 Middleware Initiative Copyright Ken Klingenstein This.
Why RDA? A domain repository perspective George Alter ICPSR University of Michigan.
Licensing in a European Perspective - case Finnish National Consortium ELAG 2001, Prague Kristiina Hormia-Poutanen.
TOWARDS A DATA CITATION STANDARD FOR GEOSS I. McCallum, H.-P. Plag & S. Fritz.
Considerations on barriers to data sharing Elaine Collier, MD National Center for Research Resources National Institutes of Health.
CNI Task Force Meeting April 7, 2008 OAI-ORE Project Briefing David Reynolds Tim DiLauro Sayeed Choudhury Library Digital Programs Sheridan Libraries Johns.
Data Citation Implementation Pilot Workshop
Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (Overview) The Data Citation Synthesis Group Joint Declaration.
Denise Troll Covey Chair, NISO Planning Committee on Digital Rights Principal Librarian for Special Projects, Carnegie Mellon LITA Standards Interest Group.
ICSU-WDS & RDA Data Publication Services WG. 2 Linking Research Data and the Literature: why? Why link? 1.Increase visibility & discoverability of research.
Research Data Management at Carnegie Mellon University Steve Van Tuyl Data Services Librarian Carnegie Mellon University - University Libraries
Big Data, Little Data, No Data – Who is in Charge of Data Quality? World Data Systems Webinar #9 9 May 2016 Christine L. Borgman Distinguished Professor.
Acknowledgments Funding provided by the Jewett Foundation Introduction Data collected in ocean sciences, whether generated from research or operational.
Nordic Workshop on Data Citation Policies and Practices: How to Make it Happen? ATT Forum Workshop Pekka Orponen Finnish Committee on Research.
Data sharing and exchange: Experiences within the
Responsible Citizenship of the Data World
Christine L. Borgman, Distinguished Professor and Presidential Chair in Information Studies at UCLA, is the author of more than 250 publications in.
Recent Developments in Open Data Policy
Governance of Scholarly Resources SciDataCon Denver, Colorado September 12, 2016 By Sarika Sharma Introduction and hellos.
ACS 2016 Moving research forward with persistent identifiers
THE CODATA STRATEGIC PLAN
NSDL Data Repository (NDR)
Designing an Infrastructure for Heterogeneity of Ecosystem
Activities and National Priorities of National Members
Objectives, activities, and results of the database Lituanistika
Research data in library catalogues and the joint initiative of European technical libraries for data registration Jan Brase Workshop Primary data for.
Purdue University The PURR campus data repository service: institutional effort looking towards international engagement Michael Witt, associate.
Bird of Feather Session
Digital Objects: The Science
Presentation transcript:

Parse this: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards 22 August 2011 Christine L. Borgman, UCLA Chair’s Welcome and Keynote

Attribution  NAS Staff: Paul Uhlir, Daniel Cohen, Cheryl Levey  CODATA Task Group: Bonnie Carroll (Co-Chair), Jan Brase (Co-Chair), Sarah Callaghan (Co-Chair), Micah Altman, Elisabeth Arnaud, Christine Borgman, Dora Ann Lange Canhos, Todd Carpenter, Vishwas Chavan, Nathan Cunningham, Michael Diepenbroek, John Helly, Jianhui Li, Brian McMahon, Karen Morgenroth, Yasuhiro Murayama, Soren Roug, Helge Sagen, Eefke Smit, Martie van Deventer, John Wilbanks, Koji Zettsu; Paul Uhlir and Dan Cohen (Consultants)  Symposium Steering Committee: Christine Borgman (Chair), Allen Renear, Herbert van de Sompel, Gary King, Steven Jackson, David Kochalko, John Wilbanks  Sponsors: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Institute for Museum and Library Services, CODATA, Microsoft Research, National Science Foundation

Deluge!!! Data! Scientists Social Scientists Funding agencies Policy makers Humanists Librarians 3 Publishers Internet architects

Data 4

Infrastructure Figure: Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., Ribes, D., Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L. & Allen, M. (2010). Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment. In Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L. & Allen, M. (Eds.). International Handbook of Internet Research. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands: Star, S. L. & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1):

Infrastructure for digital objects  Social practice  Usability  Identity  Persistence  Discoverability  Provenance  Relationships  Intellectual property  Policy 6

Social practice  Why cite data?  Reproduce research  Replicate findings  Reuse data  Why attribute data?  Social expectation  Legal responsibility  How to cite data?  Bibliographic reference  Identifier  Link 7

Usability of cited objects  Identify the form and content  Interpret  Evaluate  Open  Read  Compute upon  Reuse  Combine  Describe  Annotate… 8

Identity and persistence of digital objects  Identity  Identifiers  DOI, Handles, URI, PURL…  Naming and namespaces  Authors/creators: ORCID, VIAF…  Generic/specific: registry number…  Description  Self-describing  Metadata augmentation  Persistence  Permanent  Long-lived  Scratch spaces questions.blogspot.com/2010_06_21_archive.h tml 9

Finding and following digital objects  Discoverability  Identify existence  Locate  Retrieve  Provenance  Chain of custody  Transformations from original state  Relationships  Units identified  Links between units  Actions on relationships oasis_provenance_food_and.php 10

Intellectual property  What can I do with this object?  What rights are associated?  Reuse  Reproduce  Attribute  Who owns the rights?  How open are data?  Open data  Open bibliography 11

Policy for digital objects  Whose policy?  Funding agencies  Publishers  Data repositories  Universities  Investigators…  Types of policy  What to release  What description  What citation  What attribution  Who can describe, annotate… policy/ec-publications-policy 12

Driving questions for symposium 1. What are the major technical issues that need to be considered in developing and implementing scientific data citation standards and practices? 2. What are the major scientific issues that need to be considered in developing and implementing scientific data citation standards and practices? Which ones are universal for all types of research and which ones are field- or context- specific? 3. What are the major institutional, financial, legal, and socio-cultural issues that need to be considered in developing and implementing scientific data citation standards and practices? Which ones are universal for all types of research and which ones are field- or context-specific? 4. What is the status of data attribution and citation practices in individual fields in the natural and social (economic and political) sciences in United States and internationally? Case Studies. 5. Institutional Roles and Perspectives: What are the respective roles and approaches of the main actors in the research enterprise and what are the similarities and differences in disciplines and countries? The roles of research funders, universities, data centers, libraries, scientific societies, and publishers will be explored. 13

Next steps  Symposium  5 panels, Monday morning to noon Tuesday  Workshop  Tuesday afternoon breakouts  Reports  BRDI/NAS meeting report  Data Citation Best Practices  Future meetings and activities  CODATA-ICSTI Task Group  Standardization work 14 mindfulness.blogspot.com/2011/07/from-daily-om-most- fulfilling-road.html