Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2013-2014 Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Go Math!/Common Core State Standards for Mathematics K-5 Leadership Training.
Advertisements

Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
The Common Core Wisconsin Standards – Opportunities for Students’ Mathematics Learning Hank Kepner National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Past-President.
College and Career Readiness Mathematics at Middle School Poway Unified School District 2014.
Scott Adamson, Ph.D. Chandler-Gilbert Community College Ted Coe, Ph.D. Achieve THE COMMON CORE MATHEMATICAL PRACTICES GO TO COLLEGE.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
EngageNY.org Adopt or Adapt in Math: Support for Districts and Schools on Curriculum Decision Making.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Common Core Standard Implementation Our Students... Prepared for success after high school Our Promise... Leadership, Advocacy, & Support Our Future… Strong.
Sunnyside School District
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
RCSD Testing Guidance 2013 February 20, Goals Provide clarity regarding format and content of 2013 NYS Math Exams Discuss content emphases and impact.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Sunnyside School District
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
CCSS Assessments Presenter: Dr. Cindy Thomas. Session Objectives: Who developed the new CCSS assessment? What types of questions are on the math assessment?
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
+ College and Career Readiness. December present 46 of 50 states adopt Common Core Common Core State Standards.
. Do one problem “Meal Out” or “Security Camera”.
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
DO NOW On your handout, Identify what you know about the common core state standards and Questions you have about the common core.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Good Morning Task 1: Find a seat and complete the pre-quest Task 2: When finished -Turn to your neighbor and discuss (talk) the questions/your responses.
Common Core State Standards and Assessments of Student Mastery 1.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Student Success in Middle School Advanced Pathway Courses 1.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
California Common Core Standards
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Homework Discussion What is your understanding of prioritizing the clusters as major, supporting or additional? What did you learn by reading and studying the PARCC Content Framework for your grade and the grades above and below that grade?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Explanations of Major, Additional and Supporting Cluster-Level Emphases Major[m] (▲) clusters – areas of intensive focus where students need fluent understanding and application of the core concepts. These clusters require greater emphasis than the others based on the depth of the ideas, the time that they take to master, and/or their importance to future mathematics or the demands of college and career readiness. Supporting [s] clusters – rethinking and linking; areas where some material is being covered, but in a way that applies core understanding; designed to support and strengthen areas of major emphasis. Additional [a] clusters – expose students to other subjects; may not connect tightly or explicitly to the major work of the grade. *A Note of Caution: Neglecting material will leave gaps in students’ skills and understanding and will leave students unprepared for the challenges of a later grade.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee D0… Recommendations for Using the Cluster Level Emphases Do...  Use the guidance to inform instructional decisions regarding time and other resources spent on clusters of varying degrees of emphasis.  Allow the focus on the major work of the grade to open up the time and space to bring the Standards for Mathematical Practice to life in mathematics instruction through sense‐making, reasoning, arguing and critiquing, modeling, etc.  Evaluate instructional materials taking the cluster‐level emphases into account. The major work of the grade must be presented with the highest possible quality; the supporting work of the grade should indeed support the major focus, not detract from it.  Set priorities for other implementation efforts taking the emphases into account, such as staff development; new curriculum development; or revision of existing formative or summative testing at the state, district or school level.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee D0N’T… Recommendations for Using the Cluster Level Emphases Don’t...  Neglect any material in the standards. (Instead, use the information provided to connect Supporting Clusters to the other work of the grade.)  Sort clusters from Major to Supporting, and then teach them in that order. To do so would strip the coherence of the mathematical ideas and miss the opportunity to enhance the major work of the grade with the supporting clusters.  Use the cluster headings as a replacement for the standards. All features of the standards matter — from the practices to surrounding text to the particular wording of individual content standards. Guidance is given at the cluster level as a way to talk about the content with the necessary specificity yet without going so far into detail as to compromise the coherence of the standards.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Time to Test Our DOK Knowledge 1.Take one assessment question from the envelope. 2.Read the problem to the group. 3.Decide on the grade level, assessment target and DOK for the sample item. Pass the envelope and repeat the process.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Sorting Task – Answer Key 6-8 Tasks Task #1 Targets A & C 7.RP.2 MP 1 & 2 DOK 2 Task #2 Target A 6.RP.1 MP 1 & 2 DOK 2 Task #3 Targets B 8.EE.2 MP 6 DOK 1 Task #4 Targets B & F 6.NS.1 & 6.EE.6 MP 1 & 2 DOK Tasks Task #1 Targets D 3.OA.8, 3.OA.5, 3.NBT.3 MP 1 & 2 & 6 DOK 2 Task #2 Targets E 5.NF.1 & 5.NF.2 MP2 & 4 & 6 DOK 1 Task #3 Targets H 4.NF.5 MP1 & 2 & 6 DOK 1 Task #4 Target F 5.NF.5 MP2 DOK 2

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee The Importance of the Math Practices in Claim 1

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Mathematical Practices in Claim 1 This claim addresses procedural skills and the conceptual understanding on which developing skills depends. It is important to assess how aware students are of how concepts link together and why math procedures work the way they do. Central to understanding this claim is making the connection to the mathematical practices as stated in the CCSSM: MP5: Use appropriate tools strategically. MP6: Attend to precision. MP7: Look for and make use of structure. MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Smarter Balanced Mathematics Item Specifications Grades 3-5 p. 14

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee The Importance of the Math Practices How can I teach my kids to get the answer to this problem? as opposed to… How can I use this problem to teach the mathematics of this unit for student understanding? Explain the difference between these two ways of approaching mathematics teaching. SMP emphasizes Doing and Demonstrating and not ‘answer getting.’ The Standards of Mathematical Practice are critically important.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Standards for Mathematical Practice The eight Standards for Mathematical Practice place an emphasis on students doing mathematics and demonstrating learning. Equitable achievement will begin with an understanding of how the selection of tasks, the assessment of tasks, and the student learning environment can support or undermine equity in our schools. If the first 2 days of this class have been about Smarter Balanced and DOK, why are we talking about SMP?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Instruction to Assessment: Recognizing Tasks with Increased Cognitive Rigor

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DOK in Task Not all tasks are created equal: Different tasks will provoke different levels and kinds of student thinking. The level and kind of thinking students engage in determines what they learn. Hiebert, Carpenter, Fennema, Fuson, Wearne, Murray, Oliver, and Human 1997

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Sample Released Item What is the grade level? Assessment Target? DOK level? Grade level 4 Assessment Target B DOK 1

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee A Cognitively Demanding Instructional Task about Factors and Multiples Make a list of the first ten multiples of 3. Which of the numbers in your list are multiples of 6? What pattern do you see in where the multiples of 6 appear in the list? Which numbers in the list are multiples of 7? Can you predict when multiples of 7 will appear in the list of multiples of 3? Explain your reasoning. Source: Illustrative Mathematics Grade 4: Operations and Algebraic Thinking What is the DOK? What Math Practices does this emphasize?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Sample Released Item What is the grade level? Assessment Target? DOK level? Grade 7 Assessment Target B DOK 2

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee A Cognitively Demanding Instructional Task about Operations with Integers Source: Illustrative Mathematics Grade 7: The Number System What is the DOK? What Math Practices does this emphasize?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reflection: What? So What? Now What? Understand how the assessment targets in Claim 1 are related to CCSS and understand the relative importance of each target. Clarify and enhance understanding of the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels within CCSS and SBAC assessment items. What have you learned about linking assessment instruction? What actions will you take based on what we have talked about so far in regards to aligning tasks, DOK, and higher level thinking?