AEP-Texas Competitive Retailer Workshop. David Hooper Director, Customer Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Advertisements

AEP Texas Energy Efficiency / Demand Response Programs Russell G. Bego, EE/DR Coordinator AEP Texas September 24, 2014.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
Retail Market Guide Updates.  ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their.
11 Rate Design to Complement AMI Implementation in Danville, Virginia Presentation by Denise Sandlin Support Services Director Danville, VA APPA 2009 Business.
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
Inadvertent Gain Overview February Introduction Why we are here –Original Inadvertent Gain (IAG) Task Force (2004) Creation of Retail Market.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
SRC Application Process Fall 2014 Version: November 12, 2014.
Take A Load Off, Texas SM is provided by Oncor Electric Delivery LLC as part of the company’s commitment to reduce energy consumption and demand. Frontier.
Competitive Retailer Relations CR Workshop AEP Overall.
Smart Metering in ERCOT: Implementation Update CCET Board of Directors Meeting August 3, 2011 Presented by Christine Wright, Competitive Markets Division.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Getting ready for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Paper by : Rajesh Nimare Presented by : Prashant Sharma.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Future of Smart Metering Kansas Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Conference September 26, 2007.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
RMS Update to TAC August 7, RMS Update to TAC ► At July 9 RMS Meeting:   RMS Voting Items:
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott April 24,
1 Update to RMS December 8, Texas SET 4.0 Change Controls
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Small Renewable Generators Tony Marciano Public Utility Commission of Texas May 2, 2007 (512)
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
OUC’s EV Roadmap Near Term Planning Activities Develop a flexible framework and visionary roadmap Collect actionable information Business models Charging.
Ratepayer and Customer Rights Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Advanced Metering Implementation Team Update Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas October 2008.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott May 13,
Smart Grid Workforce Education Presentation Smart Grid – A Framework for Change Brad Gaskill, CEO - Poudre Valley REA May 29, 2009.
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
Competitive Retailer Relations CR Workshop Introduction Welcome Introduction of Guest Introduction of CRR Remarks by Hooper Review of Agenda Review.
TX SET v2.1 Implementation Plan. Table of Contents A.Shut Down Procedure B.Shut Down Timeline Details C.Conference Calls D.Additional Contingencies.
Texas SET Version 3.0 Production Implementation Plan.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
RMS Update to TAC October 5, RMS Activity Summary 2008 Test Flight Schedule Update on TAC directive relating to identifying issues with net metering.
Texas Competitive Market & Governance October 4, 2015.
Profiling Working Group August 14, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting August 14, 2003.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
Retail Market Update August 6, Load Profile Guides In accordance with section § (e) (3) and PUCT Project 25516, Load Profiling and Load Research.
79 th Texas Legislative Session 2005 – Summary of ERCOT Impacts ERCOT Board of Directors June 21, 2005 Mark Walker.
February 2, 2016 RMS Meeting 1. * Reasons: * Per the ERCOT Board Report dated 8/5/14 there were 6.6M Advanced Metering System (AMS) Electric Service Identifiers.
RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
Oncor Electric Delivery Project No – TDU Advanced Metering Prepaid Project Revised January 23, based on market input received at January.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Market Rules Overview Topics in this lesson...  Introduction to Market Rules Public Utility Regulatory Act PUCT Substantive.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
1 TX SET Update to RMS August 13, Issues Under Review I075 – CSA-By Pass flag is being used by CRs when they do not have a CSA established I075.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
RMS Update to TAC June 7, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR052 File Naming Convention for Customer Billing Contact Information URGENT (Vote) RMS Procedures:
1 RMS Update to RMWG June 6, Market Process for Solar & Wind Devices Retail customers are purchasing and installing wind and solar equipment on.
Settlement Timeline Workshop
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Arkansas Public Service Commission Lonni Dieck AEP May 24, 2007.
Watt, Why and How of Energy Efficiency Programs Available
PA Supplier Workshop Net Metering September 10, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

AEP-Texas Competitive Retailer Workshop

David Hooper Director, Customer Services

Meter Reading Attainment Rate

Complaints

Customer Satisfaction Index Performance AEP TEXAS

Need for Streamlined Regulation Process is too slow Process is too costly Streamlined process needs to have transparency and accountability

TCC Rate Case Update Richard Byrne Rates Manager

TCC Request Initial Base Rate Request$62.7 Merger Credits$20.0 Total Base Rate Request$82.7 Rebuttal Base Rate Request$50.5 Merger Credits$20.0 Total Base Rate Request$70.5

TCC Discretionary Fees Dollars  Total Disc. Revenues$18.9 M Discretionary Fee Increase makes up 7% of the Total PFD Recommenced Increased Revenues.

TCC Discretionary Fees  Shifts the cost responsibility to those customers causing the cost, thereby holding down/reducing base rates collected from all customers.

TCC Discretionary Fees Number of Fees by Category Prior to Rate Case Bonded  Standard (mandated)  Construction Service 11 6  Other than Construction  Total Fees: 33 38

TCC Estimated Timeline Date Exceptions Filed9/20 Replies to Exceptions10/4 Commission Decision10/18 & 11/1 Final Order Issued Mid-Nov. Rates EffectiveDecember Refunds/Surcharges beginDec./Jan.

Upcoming Issues Energy Efficiency Rulemaking AMI Plan Approval and Cost Recovery ETT Integration CREZ Implementation CCN/STM Filings Nodal Implementation

Questions?

Safety Net Spreadsheets & Modifying Existing Orders & Contacting CRR Don Lewis Retail Account Manager

Purpose of Safety Nets The Safety Net Spreadsheet process is a manual work-around used by Competitive Retailers (CR) in the Texas retail electric market to ensure that a customer receives electric service in a timely manner.

Uses of Safety Nets The safety net process should be used for legitimate purposes when sending MVI transactions and not to bypass standard rules and processes. Invalid uses are: –Reconnects after DNP –Date changes

Types of Safety Nets Standard Priority

Standard Safety Nets Safety-Net Spreadsheet process for Standard Move-Ins as outlined in section of the Retail Market Guide dated August 1, –Standard MVI transactions are orders submitted at least two (2) business days prior to the request date.

Standard Safety Nets The REP may submit a standard safety net spreadsheet one day prior to the requested MVI date if an transaction was sent but has not received an or “Permit Required” from ERCOT.

Standard Safety Nets Standard Safety Net spreadsheets should be sent between the hours of 11:00 to 12:00 PM CPT. AEP will reject safety net spreadsheets received outside the 11:00 to 12:00 PM CPT time frame and/or earlier than the day prior to the requested MVI date.

Standard Safety Nets If the spreadsheet is rejected the following message will appear on the e- mail’s subject line: “AEP-Safety-Net-RESPONSE-Dated requested“

Standard Safety Nets The following message will be in the “Reject Code 09-Completed Unexecutable” “ Pursuant to the Safety-net Spreadsheet Process for Standard Move-Ins as outlined in Section of the Retail Market Guide dated August 1,2007, AEP is rejecting this request because it was not received between the hours of 11:00 to 12:00 PM CPT the Business Day prior to the Customer’s requested move-in date.”

Priority Safety Nets Safety-Net Spreadsheet process for Priority Move-Ins as outlined in section of the Retail Market Guide dated August 1, –Priority MVI transactions are orders submitted with priority code of “99” –MVI orders received without the priority code (99) will have the request date scootched to provide AEP the required two business days notice

Priority Safety Nets The REP may submit a Priority Safety Net spreadsheet after 2PM CPT on the requested date if an transaction was sent but has not received an or “Permit Required” from ERCOT.

Priority Safety Nets AEP will reject Priority Safety Net spreadsheets received earlier than 2:00 PM CPT. If the spreadsheet is rejected the following message will appear on the e- mail’s subject line: “AEP-Safety-Net-RESPONSE-Dated requested“

Priority Safety Nets The following message will be in the e- mail: “Reject Code 09-Completed Unexecutable” “ Pursuant to the Safety-net Spreadsheet Process for Priority Move-Ins as outlined in Section of the Retail Market Guide dated August 1,2007, AEP is rejecting this request because it was received prior to 2:00 PM CPT on the requested date.”

Priority Safety Nets AEP will also reject all Priority Spreadsheets received after 5 PM CPT The following message will be in the e- mail: Reject Code 09- Completed Unexecutable “ AEP is rejecting this request because it was received after our normal business hours of 5PM CPT. Please note that we ( do / do not see a pending MVI order date for 09/13/07 )”

Modify Existing Orders

MVI/MVO Cancel Requests CRs should call our CRR Hotline as soon as possible to cancel an MVI/MVO transaction which is scheduled to be completed within two days of the requested date.

Switch Cancel Requests CRs should call our CRR Hotline as soon as possible to cancel a switch transaction which is scheduled to be completed within five days. AEP will stop the order from processing in our system but CR must also initiate Marketrak Cancel so that the switch order is canceled at ERCOT.

MVI Date Change Request If less than two (2) days prior to the request date, CR should call the CRR Hotline to change the date of the MVI and complete the transaction as a priority order.

Alternate Process If the MVI order is greater than two (2) days, please send the electronic transaction to cancel the scheduled MVI order. Send the priority (code 99) MVI order with a new requested date.

How to contact us? CRR Hotline Marketrak Account Manager

CRR Hotline AEP Market Transaction Team can be reached between 8-12 and 1-5 CPT, Monday thru Friday at with the appropriate four digit access code

CRs can always send requests to The Market Transaction Team will acknowledge your request with an immediate notification and the request will be completed within five (5) business days. Priority requests should not be sent via but should be addressed by contacting the CRR Hotline

Marketrak MT requests will be completed within the market protocol which is seven (7) business days Priority requests should not be initiated via Marketrak but should be addressed by contacting the CRR Hotline

Account Manager Issues can also be escalated to your assigned Account Manager.

Questions?

Disconnects Denial of Access DNP on Master Meter Accounts DNP on Fridays Robert De Leon CRR Manager

Denial Of Access Before 3 rd Consecutive Estimate We leave the market approved door hanger every time we are unable to read the meter for DOA. We populate the Estimation Loop on the 867 with the no read information. On the 2 nd consecutive estimate, an AEP Customer Service Representative (CSR) is assigned to contact the customer and attempts to resolve the issue.

DOA Disconnect Process After the 3 rd Consecutive Estimate AEP will wait 10 Retail Business Days before processing an internal disconnect. –CRs can send a RC004 to communicate the customer’s selection of an available resolution –CRs can send a DC004 to disconnect the customer. After 10 Retail Business Days any 650 DC004 will be rejected.

DOA Disconnect Process After the 3 rd Consecutive Estimate The order will be routed to the assigned CSR and they will make the determination of if/when the customer gets disconnected. Once a disconnect order is issued, Move In or Switch transactions will be rejected until the issue is resolved. If the issue has been resolved or is in the process of being resolved, the CSR will complete the 650 (if sent by CR) as Unexecutable.

DOA Disconnect Process After the 3 rd Consecutive Estimate Once the premise is de-energized, a 650 will be sent to the Rep of Record either by sending the (if sent by CR) or AEP will continue to work with the customer to resolve the issue.

DOA Reconnect Process After Disconnection for 3 Consecutive Estimates CRs should issue a RC004 if customer agreed to resolve the issue. Once issue has been resolved: –AEP will issue a reconnect order if an internal disconnect order was issued. –Wait for 650 RC004 if an external disconnect was issued. The order will be routed to the assigned CSR and they will determine if/when the customer gets reconnected.

DOA Reconnect Process After Disconnection for 3 Consecutive Estimates The reconnect order will be completed within 3 business days. Once the premise is re-energized, a 650 will be sent to the Rep of Record either by sending the (if sent by the CR) or

DOA Associated Fees ScenarioTCCTNC Customer was not Disconnect –Issue resolved without OMR$ 0$ 0 –Issued resolved with OMR $ 41$ 44 Customer was Disconnected –Issued resolved without OMR$132$136 –Issue resolved with OMR$173$180 Disconnect Order was Canceled$ 13$ 13

Master Meter Disconnects Requirements CR must fulfill the tenant Notification requirements outlined in PUCT Substantive Rule (j) which states that 4 days before disconnecting, CR must post at least 5 notices informing tenants of the disconnection for Non Pay in both English and Spanish.

Master Meter Disconnect Process CR should contact their Retail Account Manager before sending a 650 DC001 if they want AEP to help fulfill the posting requirement. The CR should the notice to their Retail Account Manager at least two days before the notice should be posted. The notice should be provided in both English and Spanish.

Master Meter Disconnect Process On the requested date, AEP personnel will post the requested number of notices in public place at the Master Metered complex. CR should issue a 650 DC001 with the appropriate requested date. Any 650 DC001 issued without posting the proper notification will be completed Unexecutable.

Master Meter Disconnects Associated Fees $45 per site Fee is sent on the 810 using the SAC04 code MSC034.

Disconnect for Non Pay on Fridays Orders issued for a Friday date with a “N” Flag will be scootched to Monday. Orders not completed on a Friday with a “N” flag will be rescheduled for Monday. Orders with a “Y” flag could be worked on a Friday.

Questions?

Advanced Metering For AEP TEXAS Jeff Stracener AMI Manager

Texas Advanced Metering May 2005 Texas Legislature passes AMI Legislation Summer 2005 PUCT initiates AMI Rulemaking December 2005 AEP Texas suspends AMR Program

Texas Advanced Metering On May 10, 2007 PUCT Adopts Advanced Metering Rule to: –Encourage the deployment of advanced meters in Texas –Allow for the establishment of a nonbypassable surcharge to recover the cost of deployment

AEP Texas - Key Rule Provisions Technology Requirements - Minimum system features in order to obtain cost recovery through a surcharge. –Automated or remote meter reading –Two-way communications –Remote disconnection and reconnection capability (200 Amp or less) –Direct, real-time, and unfettered access to customer usage data –Means by which the REP can provide price signals to the customer

AEP Texas - Key Rule Provisions Technology Requirements (Cont) –The capability to provide 15-minute or shorter interval data –Capability to communicate with devices inside the premises, using devices such as ZigBee, Home-Plug, or the equivalent

AEP Texas - Key Rule Provisions Regulatory Filings –Rule requires approval of deployment plan and surcharge requests –Surcharge request may be filed concurrently with the deployment plan –Surcharge request will be subject to the schedule (180 days) and discovery requirements of a rate making proceeding, deployment plan is administrative filing

AEP Texas - Key Rule Provisions Regulatory Filings (Cont) –Surcharge allows for recovery of: Capital costs for meters Pilot program costs Costs are offset by estimated net savings (meter reading, etc.) –Costs included in the surcharge will be rolled into Base Rates if the TDU files such a case. Further, the undepreciated costs of existing meters replaced by AMI are recoverable.

AEP Texas - Key Rule Provisions Regulatory Filings (Cont) –Amortization period of meters is 5-7 years –A levelized surcharge preferred –ROE from last rate case is utilized –TDU will file annual reports which will include costs incurred and revenues received from the surcharge –There is a “presumption” that costs spent in accordance with an approved plan are reasonable and necessary

AEP Texas - Key Rule Provisions Reconciliation Filings –The TDU will make reconciliation filings every 3 years to true-up actual costs

Why an AMI at AEP Texas? Texas Retail Market Benefits –Interval data on all meters (15 minute/hourly etc.) for forecasting and the development of new pricing products –Ability to support dynamic pricing (Time of Use, Real Time Pricing, etc.) –Prepaid metering possible –Ability to support consumer in-home networks –Web access to customer meter/usage data –Enable load control/DSM capabilities –Enable “faster” service connect/disconnect and special reads

Why an AMI at AEP Texas? Texas Retail Market Benefits –More granular load data to enable better market research –Lower system peak (load control)

Why an AMI at AEP Texas? AEP Texas Benefits –Voltage and load data on all meters to support system planning –Energy theft and tamper detection –Distribution equipment monitoring & control potential –Provides additional data that helps with preventive maintenance –Increased service quality (voltage data on all meters) –Reduced field visits (move-in, move-out, & connect/disconnect) –Reduction of meter reading labor expenses

2007 Texas DSM Legislation Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Programs, Goals, and Cost-Recovery –Electric utilities’ annual goal is raised to 15% of annual growth in demand for the year 2008 and program costs cannot be more than 75% above the 2007 program budget –Electric utilities’ annual goal is raised to 20% of annual growth in demand for the year 2009, and program costs cannot be more than 150% above the 2007 program budget –An Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery (EECR) Factor ensuring timely & reasonable cost recovery of Utility expenditures will be established by the PUC –PUC will establish an incentive to reward Utilities that exceed their goals

2007 Texas DSM Legislation Net Metering –Specified that it is the intent of the legislature that net metering and advanced meter information networks be deployed as rapidly as possible to allow customers to better manage energy use and control costs, and to facilitate demand response initiatives. Interconnection of Distributed Renewable Generation –Utility shall allow interconnection of generation of less than 2 MW systems that have a 5-year warranty if it doesn’t exceed the utility service capacity

2007 Texas DSM Legislation Educational Facilities –Goal to reduce a school district and higher education institution annual electric consumption by 5 percent each state fiscal year for six years, beginning September 1, –Requires schools to purchase energy-efficient light bulbs.

Project Timeline July 2005 – PUCT Rulemaking begins January 2007 – AEP Texas AMI study team commissioned May 10, 2007 – PUCT Adopts Texas AMI rule July 18, 2007 – Project Manager selected Spring 2008 – Request for vendor proposals

Project Timeline Spring 2008 – Vendor selection(s) Summer 2008 – Deployment Plan & Surcharge Plan filing with PUCT Fall 2008 – PUCT Approval anticipated; order equipment December 2008 – Initial AMI Deployment in Portland & Gregory begins 2009 – 2014 – Build out the rest of AEP Texas AMI system

Modern Grid Project Alignment Distribution Automation Compatibility Internal & External Resources

Communication Activities Future Communications Activities –TCC & TNC Major Cities – face to face –Texas Retailers and ERCOT – face to face/electronic –TCC & TNC End-Use Customers – thru news media events –AEP Employees – via AEP Now

Project Management Plan Identify key initiatives Vendor Evaluation and selection Set a schedule for milestones Active participation in Texas PUC implementation phase and QuickPoint site

Questions?

Energy Efficiency Programs Pam Osterloh Russell Bego

Energy Efficiency Policy PURA § / § PURA – “…electric utilities will administer energy savings incentive programs…” “…Market-neutral, non-discriminatory standard offer programs or limited, targeted market transformation programs…” “…incentives sufficient…to acquire additional cost-effective energy efficiency equivalent to at least 10% of annual load growth in demand …by Jan. 1, 2004.”

Energy Efficiency Policy PURA § / § Programs to be implemented through Retail Electric Providers (REPS) and Energy Efficiency Service Providers (EESPs). Programs are available to all customers, in all customer classes. – Large Commercial & Industrial customers with maximum demand of 100kw and above. – Small Commercial & Residential customers with maximum demand less than 100kw – Hard-to-reach, Low-income customers 200% below federal poverty level. Programs are designed to reduce system peak demand, energy consumption and energy costs.

§ Rule Revisions House Bill (HB) 3693 Project No Energy Efficiency Implementation Project (EEIP) PUCT Approval

Program Types Standard Offer Program (SOP) – A program under which a utility administers standard offer contracts between the utility and energy efficiency service providers. – Fixed price per kW and kWh – First Come, First Serve Market Transformation Program (MTP) – Strategic efforts to induce lasting structural or behavioral changes in the market that result in increased adoption of energy efficient technologies, services, and practices.

AEP Programs SOP – Large Commercial & Industrial (C&I) – Emergency Load Management (ELM) – Small Commercial & Residential (RES) – Hard-to-Reach (HTR) – Energy Efficiency Improvement for Not-for- Profit Agencies (EEIP) – Targeted Low Income Weatherization

AEP Programs MTP – AEP CitySmart Pilot (CS) – AEP SCORE Pilot (SCORE) – ENERGY STAR ® New Homes

AEP Budgets for Energy Efficiency Texas Central$5,238,405$5,313,405 Texas North$1,064,400$ 1,064,400

SOP Participation Process Application Security Deposit Agreement Inspections Payments

MTP Participation Process Submit Proposal Agreement Inspections Payments

2008 Program Information Available in 4 th quarter of 2007 –Direct Mail – –Workshops –Other Outreach Activities –Websites

How Can REPs Participate ? Review Program Details Submit SOP Applications Submit MTP Proposals

Utility Websites – Customer and project sponsor information – FAQs – Program contacts and links – List of participating project sponsors – Links to other utility energy efficiency web pages – Link to PUCT web site

Questions?

Inadvertent Process Cindy Juarez Debra Hille Belinda Ybarra Market Transaction Specialist

Inadvertent Process < 150 Days Inadvertent is 150 days or less –AEP acknowledges receipt of issue –AEP blocks any MVI transactions –AEP will reinstate the original CR to DOL+1, –Available meter read date, or a forward date –Once both CRs agree then AEP agrees in Marketrak –Account is setup to accept the backdated MVI

Inadvertent Process > 150 Days Inadvertent is greater than 150 days –AEP acknowledges receipt of issue –AEP blocks any MVI transactions –Both CRs must agree to cancel/rebills beyond 150 days –AEP will reinstate the original CR to DOL+1, Available meter read date, or a forward date –Once both CRs agree then AEP agrees in Marketrak –Account is setup to accept the backdated MVI

Possible Inadvertent Marketrak filed with a pending MVI –AEP gives an opportunity for the gaining CR to cancel the transaction –If the Gaining CR does not cancel the transaction, the MVI will be allowed to complete and the Standard Inadvertent Process will be followed

MVO on Inadvertent Issue If a MVO is pending –AEP will cancel the MVO –AEP will inform the CR that the MVO has been cancelled due to an unresolved inadvertent issue If a MVO is completed –Either the gaining or losing CR must issue a priority MVI (code 99) to restore the customer’s power

3 rd Party MVI on an Inadvertent Issue If a MVI is pending –AEP will cancel the MVI –Reason for the cancellation will be noted on

MVI Rejected When CR sends backdated MVI before issue is in “Agreement Reached” status in Marketrak, AEP will reject the backdated MVI

Questions?