ORDER 450.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF DOE POLICY -- USE OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS COLLEEN OSTROWSKI (202) 586-4997

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Will it Help Me Do My Job?
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
DOE O Changes and the CRS
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP The Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems (UFP-QS) Emile I. Boulos.
Administration, Management, and Coordination of Supportive Housing: Guidelines from CSH’s Dimensions of Quality MHSA TA Operations Call September 1, 2010.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
ISO EMS Policy Statement N.C. Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance.
Environmental Management System (EMS)
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
CCTC Background Process coordinated by NASDCTEc 42 states, DC, and one territory involved in development Modeled the process and outcomes of Common Core.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Lessons Learned for Institutional Controls at the Weldon Spring Site.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
ISO Current status of development
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Operational Risk Management
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Thomas Russell, P.E. U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Partnership for Peace Conference,
Medicare Certification Systems Thilak Wickremasinghe, Director/CEO Sri Lanka Accreditation Board.
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard CWA 15793:2008
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHM’s commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
California’s Climate Future: Discussion Draft of the Governor’s Environmental Goals and Policy Report Louise Bedsworth, Deputy Director Governor’s Office.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Margaret Dennison Thresholds for access to services and neglect practice guidance.
RESPONSIBLE CARE ® POLLUTION PREVENTION CODE David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Slide 1 An Alfred McAlpine plc company. Thursday, 04 October 2007 Land Management Guidance (v2) Philippa Towler.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
1 Interim Report of the IWGDD May Overview: Pursuing Goals to Harness the Power of Digital Data for Science and Society The IWGDD recommends that.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
International Security Management Standards. BS ISO/IEC 17799:2005 BS ISO/IEC 27001:2005 First edition – ISO/IEC 17799:2000 Second edition ISO/IEC 17799:2005.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Monitoring the Long-Term Effectiveness of Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Implementation Through Use of a Performance Dash Board Process Mike.
 Before a company decides to close it’s power reactors the facility must be put in to a state that no longer has a residual radioactive level, clean.
Update: AUL Guidance Revisions Summary of Comments June 23, 2011 Peggy Shaw Workgroup Chair.
SEA in New Zealand1 Developments on Two Converging Paths Martin Ward, Independent Advisor, New Zealand.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
BLM Decision Making Process
Participatory governance of natural resources in the Caribbean
GS-R-3 vs. ISO 9001:2008 Requirements - 4
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
OVERVIEW OF INTERAGENCY VISITOR CAPACITY AND MONITORING GUIDEBOOKS
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Leadership and Management for Safety
Model Contract for Health
QAPI Design and Scope.
Presentation transcript:

ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF DOE POLICY -- USE OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS COLLEEN OSTROWSKI (202)

2 Use of Institutional Controls Policy (DOE P 454.1) DOE O establishes a general framework for DOE’s Environmental Protection Program. DOE P will provide a framework for the use of institutional controls that will assist DOE in the protection of the public health and the environment. Institutional controls are tools to be integrated into the EMS implementation framework.

3 Institutional Controls “Institutional controls” are mechanisms designed to appropriately limit access to or uses of land, facilities, and other real and personal properties, to protect cultural and natural resources, to maintain physical security of DOE facilities and to prevent or limit inadvertent human and environmental exposure to residual contaminants. Institutional controls include methods to preserve knowledge and to inform current and future generations of hazards and risks.

4 Institutional Controls Institutional Controls are a necessary part of DOE’s efforts to protect human health and the environment. DOE uses institutional controls to:  protect the environment;  appropriately limit access or uses of land, facilities or other properties;  maintain the physical safety and security of DOE facilities; and  limit inadvertent exposure to residual contaminants and other hazards.

5 Institutional Controls Policy The first major element of an EMS is a Policy Statement endorsed by top management of the organization. The Institutional Controls Policy, when finalized, would demonstrate a written, DOE senior-level management commitment to the effective implementation of institutional controls.

6 Institutional Controls Policy-- Purpose To establish a consistent approach to the implementation, maintenance and reevaluation of institutional controls as an integral part of DOE mission and operational activities; To integrate (within an EMS/ISMS) the use of effective institutional controls along with other tools to manage, monitor and transfer lands and property under DOE control;

7 Institutional Controls Policy-- Purpose cont’d To apply institutional controls in a cost-effective way and maximize the use of low-maintenance institutional controls; and To indicate DOE’s preference for permanent and passive remedies over those requiring active maintenance and long-term commitment of resources.

8 Institutional Controls Policy -- Content Purpose and Scope Background Policy Section  Introductory discussion  Implementation Goals  Property Issues

9 Institutional Controls Policy – Content cont’d Purpose and Scope Section:  notes that DOE will use Institutional Controls to manage resources, facilities and real and personal properties, and to implement programmatic responsibilities.  states that P454.1 guides site specific and programmatic decisions for DOE’s own planning, maintenance and implementation of institutional controls.

10 Institutional Controls Policy – Content cont’d Background Section:  briefly discusses DOE’s role as a Federal land manager and steward of natural and cultural resources.  notes that in some cases institutional controls may be authorized by various laws, while in other cases DOE has decided to use institutional controls to supplement various activities.  recognizes that the term “Institutional Controls” is used in the Policy in a broader context than in internal and external regulatory requirements or policies established under statutes.  gives examples of how DOE uses institutional controls.

11 Institutional Controls Policy – Content cont’d Policy Section: Introductory discussion  identifies issues such as limitations on unrestricted use or release of property;  states DOE policy is to use institutional controls as an essential component of a defense-in-depth strategy for protection;  notes that institutional controls are not to be used to circumvent or substitute for permanent solutions when they are reasonably achievable;  states that institutional controls will not be applied, or will be terminated, when DOE determines that they are no longer needed or required.

12 Institutional Controls Policy – Content cont’d Policy Section: Implementation Goals  Lists goals for application and implementation of institutional controls.  Several goals contain provisions closely linked to ISM/EMS approaches, such as those related to planning, maintenance and periodic reevaluations. Policy Section: Property Issues  identifies issues related to the need for institutional controls on real and personal property and transfer of property issues; clearly states responsibilities of DOE organizations for implementation of the Policy; and  contains an explicit statement that the Policy is intended to improve internal DOE management.

13 Institutional Controls Policy – Current Status FMC review and comment period ended in September Satisfactory resolution of comments/ concurrence from PSOs except for EM Currently working to close with EM. When P454.1 is finalized, implementation guidance will be developed.

14 Institutional Controls Policy – Final word It is important that the need for, and use of Institutional Controls be considered when you are implementing an EMS. Institutional controls may not always be the best solution, but when they are, we need to use them effectively and within the context of a management system.