Sheryl Welch, ATFWG Chair August 20, 2014 Portland, OR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-Tag 1.8 An industry tutorial.
Advertisements

NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
Dynamic Schedule e-tagging Requirements Criterion WECC-087 (formerly INT-008) ISAS Report January 2012.
Primary Objectives of WIT
Brenda Ambrosi Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair ISAS Presentation to the MIC March 2013 Salt Lake City, UT.
Bob Harshbarger Volunteer Order 771 January 16, 2013 Still Icy-Cold Salt Lake.
Brenda Ambrosi Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair ISAS Presentation to the OC October 2013 Salt Lake City, UT.
Load Responsibility in the NWPP Footprint
WECC BAL-STD-002 Workshop February 6, 2008
Interchange Authority Recommendations Board of Directors Meeting December 7, 2007.
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update WECC OC Meeting June 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Marilyn Franz ISAS Chair.
MIC/ISAS LIAISON REPORT June 15, 2007 April, 2007 ISAS Meeting Highlights.
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update October 2008 Gary Nolan ISAS Vice-Chair.
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
WIT Computation of Primary Inadvertent Interchange (ATEC)
ISAS Update August 2, 2011 Market Issues Subcommittee.
10 Things to Expect Regarding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting.
Sheryl Welch, ATFWG Chair August 20, 2014 Portland, OR.
ISAS Report To the OC Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee Chair October 2014 Salt Lake City, UT W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING.
NERC Operating Committee Activities Update September 16-17, 2014 Meeting.
DMVA Monthly Time Sheets Hit “Enter” or click your mouse to advance to the next screen.
After-the-Fact Workgroup Update Sheryl Welch ISAS Meeting 01/28/2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
NAESB Time and Inadvertent Management Business Practice (TIMBP) February 3, 2009 Terry Bilke.
Shawn Davis Regional Policy and Operations Analyst Portland General Electric Proposed Mid-C Scheduling Changes August 20, 2014 Interchange Scheduling and.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
Control Performance Frequency Analysis Control Standards Surveys Inadvertent Interchange Time Error Frequency Bias Settings Control Area Assistance Automatic.
Andy Meyers ISAS Chair ISAS Report WECC Operating Committees March 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup BY LOU MIRANDA BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION.
Reserves Issue For years there has been disagreement over reserves issues and what constitutes firm power. We’ve been able to function as a market, despite.
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
Date 05/01/2012 MIT Manual TEC Analysis Sandip Sharma ERCOT.
After-the-Fact Workgroup Update Sheryl Welch ISAS Meeting January 12-13, 2016 Phoenex, AZ.
ISAS Report Andy Meyers ISAS Chair Operating Committee Meeting October 2015 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
PEOPLESOFT TIMESHEET – SUPERVISOR TRAINING KCTCS Payroll Jefferson Community & Technical College.
FINANCE DIVISION Revenue Management Presenter: Louie Muller Date:28 January 2016.
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
North America Energy Standards Board Craig L. Williams, Specialist Ld./Sr. MIC Meeting March 23, 2016 La Jolla, CA W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING.
Interest, Surcharge & Compromise Penalties Estelita C. Aguirre, CPA, MM Lecture No. 16.
Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS) Charles (Bud) Freeman, SCL W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee
Faculty non-work day procedure
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report
Sheryl Welch ATFWG Chair
Kenneth Silver Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Compliance Open Webinar
Anitha Neve Operations and Interchange Specialist
Anitha Neve Operations and Interchange Specialist
Anitha Neve Operations and Interchange Specialist
After-the-Fact Workgroup Update Sheryl Welch
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Anitha Neve Operations and Interchange Specialist
North America Energy Standards Board
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Compliance Open Webinar
North America Energy Standards Board
Sheryl Welch ATFWG Chair
Andy Meyers ISAS Chair Operating Committee Meeting October 2015
WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup
Understanding the Process of Documenting Informed Consent
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Public Utilities Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Sheryl Welch, ATFWG Chair August 20, 2014 Portland, OR

 Generator was incorrectly registered in Electric Industry Registry (EIR) as a sink. ◦ Generator has been removed as a sink in EIR.  PSE tagged to and from the generator between April 28th thru April 30th.  Tags using the incorrect sink were discovered May 1st.  The PSE was asked to correct the tag problem by using the original source and the final sink with a wheel thru the generator.  Until the ATF tags were implemented, the Primary Inadvertent continued to accrue. 2

 29 WECC Schedule Change Request Forms were submitted to WECC Dispute Reports ◦ Submitted on May 1, 2014 approximately 10:30 PDT ◦ Contained 156 Scheduled hours ◦ 86 of the scheduled hours reported “Wrong Sink”  9 Balancing Authority (BAs) involved ◦ 70 of the scheduled hours reported “Wrong Source”  2 BAs involved 3

 WECC Schedule Change Request Forms were completed at approximately 1300 MDT on May 1 st. ◦ Required two WECC staff members  Approximately 16:59, WECC received a WECCNet message from BA1 reporting that it was not participating in the Automatic Time Error correction until “OATI corrects their primary inadvertent calculations.” ◦ At 08:19 on May 2 nd, WECC started an investigation with BA1 to determine why the inadvertant was incorrect. 4

 WECC received a telephone call from BA2 wanting to know why there were so many issues in WIT regarding Primary Inadvertents. ◦ Review of WIT showed the Inadvertent Interchange Accumulations for BA2 was during the same 3-day period as the WECC Schedule Change Request Forms. ◦ PSE notified BA1 that ATF tags would not be ready for implementation until late on May 2nd or not until Monday, May 5 th. 5

◦ After notified by WECC, BA2 requested that either the original schedules be put back into WIT or the ATF tags get implemented immediately.  Until ATF tags are implemented, WIT showed up to 4,000 amount of erroneous “payback” of accumulated primary inadvertent through Automatic Time Error Correction (ATEC).  WECC instructed the PSE to approve and implement ALL ATF tags immediately or all schedules would be returned to WIT until the ATF tags could be ready for processing. ◦ Until ATF tags are implemented, primary inadvertent would continue to accumulate. ◦ PSE submitted ATF Tags at 10:47 on May 2nd. 6

◦ Prior to ATF tags, Primary Inadvertent values from April 28th thru April 30, 2014, were as high as 4,000 MW ◦ After ATF tags, the On-Peak Primary Inadvertent resulted in only 287 MW (prior inadvertent value). ◦ Primary Inadvertent is to be paid back each scheduled hour through ATEC  If problem is not caught early, BAs could payback a large amount of Primary Inadvertent.  If ATF tags are not implement timely, Primary Inadvertent could in fact be in opposite direction of the correct Accumulated Primary Inadvertent. 7

 Effective April 1, 2014, WECC Standard BAL- 004-WECC-02 R3: Each Balancing Authority shall keep its ATEC in service, with an allowable exception period of less than or equal to an accumulated 24 hours per calendar quarter for ATEC to be out of service. ◦ This issue was resolved within 21hours. ◦ However, the time gets accounted for in the quarterly accumulation. 8

 ATF tags should be created and implemented in a reasonable amount of time shortly after the agreed upon WECC Schedule Change Request Forms are implemented to avoid significant Accumulated Primary Inadvertent.  Avoid creating ATF tags after 2:00 pm (PDT). ◦ WECC staff is on MDT 9