9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith. 9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NERC Policies Introduction
Advertisements

The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Future of OASIS II Conference Presented by Karl Tammar – NYISO For the ISO/RTO Council March 29, 2005 ISO/RTO Activities and Initiatives.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Arizona Corporation Commission Arizona Independent Scheduling Administrator (AzISA) September 22,
Cost Ranges for the Development and Operation of a Day One Regional Transmission Organization PL
Distributed Generation (DG)
Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia.
 2005 Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Palo Verde Hub Participant Meeting May 27, 2005 Arizona Public Service Company Tom Glock – Manager Power Operations.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Tucson Area Reliability Mike Flores Control Area Operations Tucson Electric Power May 2000.
George Godding Director DMC Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Federal Energy Regulatory Commission USEA/USAID Energy Partnership Program Brasilia,
Trading rules in Lithuania Giedrius Radvila Lietuvos energija AB 3 July 2006, Riga II MINI-FORA.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
2001 & 2002 Energy Preparedness Tucson Electric Power February 16, 2001 Michael Flores, Manager Control Area Operations David Hutchens, Manager Wholesale.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
International Swaps & Derivatives Association Transforming the Derivatives Business The Emerging Ontario Electricity Market July 11, Meg Timberg.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Capacity Trades. Rules and Regulations Exchange rules must comply with a Contract on Accession to Wholesale Power Market’s Trading System Exchange commodity:
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Transfer Service Meeting, October 19, 2005 Bonneville Power Administration Long-Term Transfer Service (GTA and OATT) Customer Kick-Off Meeting Garry Thompson.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
California Independent System Operator Participating Generator (PG) Certification Process CDWR Generation Resource Development Workshop 3/29/01 Kyle Hoffman.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 14, Agenda Discussion of SMD-style DAM review questions posed by the DAM WG and Coral regarding the SMD-
Arizona Corporation Commission Energy Workshop February 16, 2001.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Losses and Ancillary Services: Volume Analysis 2007 Budget Review Process August 28, 2007 Operations Planning.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
October 6, 2006 Public Stakeholder Review Portland, Oregon Conditional Firm.
COMPLIANCE ROLLOUT Vann Weldon Compliance Training Administrator March 23, 2005 NERC FUNCTIONAL MODEL REVIEW.
GENERATION PROTOCOL AND SETTLEMENT TODAY COMET WG / RMS Workshop Electric Reliability Council of Texas May 2, 2007.
April 2, 2008 CRR Team Update PCRRs CRR Team UpdateApril 2, 2008 Table of contents 1.What is a PCRR? 2.Which NOIEs are eligible for PCRRs? 3.What.
2013 Wind Conference. Congestion Management & Communication Processes CJ Brown.
1 Regional electricity market Belgrade, 23. April Ljiljana Hadzibabic Council member Energy Agency of the Republic of Serbia.
Asta Sihvonen-Punkka Director General of EMA Vice-Chair of ERGEG Baltic Electricity Mini-Forum 1 October, 2010 Jurmala ACER and regulatory empowerment.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission MISO/Alliance Companies’ RTO Status Reports Presented by: Joseph Power Tony Ingram Rahim Amerkhail Patrick Clarey.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Legal Disclaimers and Admonitions PROTOCOL DISCLAIMER This presentation provides a general overview of the Texas Nodal.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
BALTIC BALANCING MARKET Ingrid Arus Baltic Balancing Market Harmonisation WG meeting
Western Area Power Administration Transmission Customer Meeting October 17, 2007.
Understanding the Dynamics of Electricity Trade in the Philippines with the Entry of Retail Competition and Open Access.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
Market Working Group Update Presentation to CAWG March 29, 2011 Jim Sanderson, KCC.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
ERRA Workshop on Regulatory Monitoring of the Electricity Sector Almaty, Kazakhstan, January 31 – February 2, Improvement of market relations in.
ALLIANCE RTO 1 The Alliance RTO Rate Plan Presented to SPP RTWG Meeting at DFW Airport Hyatt The Alliance RTO Rate Plan Presented to SPP RTWG Meeting at.
Reliability Standards Committee 2009 Scope and Plan Judith James Manager, Reliability Standards.
1 A Conversation about MISO Paul Spicer November 8, 2007.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
EIM AWG July 5, Guiding Principles The intent of the group is to work collaboratively to better understand the WECC EIM costs and benefits analyses.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
Balancing electricity market and future of the organized market in BiH
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
STATE ENERGY AND WATER REGULATORY COMMISSION
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Solar Energy Commercialization
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith

9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith

9/22/00 3 Jerry W. Smith Total Transmission Capability (TTC) Principles Az ISA will: participates in the determination of TTC becomes an affiliate member of WSCC participates in SWRTA transmission planning Attend WSCC Operational Transfer Capability Study Group Meetings Participate in Arizona joint utility operating and planning study efforts for TTC Participate in coordination of transmission maintenance schedules TP will Determine TTC beginning in Phase II this will be in consultation with the Operating Committee of the Az ISA Notify Az ISA of changes to TTC

9/22/00 4 Jerry W. Smith Transmission Reservations & OASIS Management Defines the role of the Az ISA with respect to Retail Network Integration Transmission Service (RNITS) reservation practices and OASIS management Phase I Pre State-Wide OASIS –Same-time view into each TP’s OASIS –Upon request copied simultaneously on RNITS Schedules –Monitor release of ATC –Begin developing systems to allow Az ISA to calculate and update ATC Phase II Implementation of State-Wide OASIS –ATC posted on state-wide OASIS –State-wide OASIS receive and forward transmission reservation request –Trades of transmission access and ancillary services posted on state- wide OASIS

9/22/00 5 Jerry W. Smith Allocated Retail Network Transmission Protocol Governs the allocation of Retail Network Integration Transmission Service (RNITS) in Arizona’s competitive retail electricity market. Phase I –Transmission requirements for Retail Network Load determined monthly –Each TP’s Standard Offer SC shall trade part of its ARNT allocation to Competitive SCs Arizona Public Service Company (APS): Up to 200 MW from Palo Verde Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP): Up to 80 MW from Four Corners. For Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (AEPCo):l 4 MW from Westwing to Vail and 5 MW at Westwing for deliveries to the Western Area Power Administration For Citizens Utilities Company (Citizens Utilities): Does not apply to Citizens Utilities because there is only one ARNT path. Phase II –Monthly auctions of ARNT –Trading of ARNT allowed –Exchange of ARNT for ATC

9/22/00 6 Jerry W. Smith Defines the processes and requirements for scheduling for Retail Network Load, including losses, Must Run Generation and Ancillary Services. Scheduling Protocol

9/22/00 7 Jerry W. Smith Specifies the obligations of the SCs, TPs and CAOs concerning the provision of Ancillary Services to support retail transactions. Six Ancillary Services are: –Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch Service –Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from Generation Sources Service –Regulation and Frequency Response Service –Energy Imbalance Service –Operating Reserve – Spinning Reserve Service –Operating Reserve – Supplemental Reserve Service Ancillary Services Protocol

9/22/00 8 Jerry W. Smith Provides a framework and process governing the access to energy from Must-Run Generation to support retail transactions in a competitive market. Local Generation is generation required when there is insufficient ARNT to serve 100 percent of the Retail Network Load in a Load Zone through imports.. Implemented in two phases –Phase I No trading of ARNT –Phase II SCs manage obligations by scheduling discretionary local generation, purchasing must-offer generation, acquiring additional ARNT or dispatching direct retail load-tripping Must-Run Generation Protocol

9/22/00 9 Jerry W. Smith Establishes procedures for the accounting, after-the-fact trading and settlement for Energy Imbalance Service and to create incentives for reasonable scheduling and operational behavior by SCs. Procedures are for a two phase process –Phase I Settlement is with each individual SC Energy Imbalance dead band equal to the greater of 2 MW or +/- 10%. –Phase II Trading entity established for the trading of Energy Imbalance Trading entity settled on entire system load band is 1.5% SC’s penalty allocation factor shall equal the absolute value of the amount by which the SC’s Energy Imbalance (in MWh) exceeds the greater of 2 MW or 1.5% of the SC’s scheduled Retail Network Load in the TP’s system Energy Imbalance Protocol

9/22/00 10 Jerry W. Smith Describes the process for mitigating congestion on transmission paths where capacity has been reserved for serving Retail Network Load within the TP’s system. Uses rules established in the ARNT Protocol, Must-Run Generation Protocol and the TP’s OATT to manage congestion. Congestion Management Principles

9/22/00 11 Jerry W. Smith Describes system conditions that warrant Emergency operations and procedures used to mitigate or eliminate those system conditions and return the electric system to a normal operating condition. TP will take those actions, automatic or manual, that are necessary to: –Maintain system reliability. –Fulfill WSCC reliability obligations. –Comply with the Emergency Operations Policies of NERC, WSCC, SRSG and their successors. Emergency Operations Protocol

9/22/00 12 Jerry W. Smith Establishes procedures for determining each SC’s Final Schedule. This information is required for settlement of transmission and Ancillary Services, as well as to ensure that all involved CAOs can meet the requirements of NERC Policy 1F, Inadvertent Interchange Standard. After-The-Fact Checkout may either be done through electronic posting or via direct telephone. After-The-Fact Checkout Protocol