UNOS Region 5 Meeting March 18, 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DMG Update UNOS Region 5 Collaborative
Advertisements

Optimising the brain-stem dead donor
The golden hour(s) for severe sepsis and septic shock treatment
Why you do what you do? Nikki Dotson-Lorello RN, BSN, CCRN, CPTC Organ Recovery Coordinator LifeShare Of The Carolina s.
The New Surviving Sepsis Bundles: From Time Zero to Tomorrow
Jeffrey A. Johnson, PhD Stephanie U. Vermeulen, MSc. University of Alberta & Institute of Health Economics March 11, 2008.
A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock Andrea Caballero, MD January 15, 2015 LSU Journal Club The ProCESS Investigators. N Engl.
LACTATE CLEARANCE AS AN PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR FOR SURVIVAL IN POLYTRAUMA PATIENTS DR.ASHWINI M SHAH. Post Graduate-2nd yr DNB Dept of Anesthesiology GANGA.
Workplace Partnership for Life Hospital Campaign Portland VA Medical Center Portland, Oregon Megan Crutchfield, MPH Roderick Carew, MBA, CEBT Darren Malinoski,
Dr. Abdul-Monim Batiha Monitoring in Critical Care Dr. Abdul-Monim Batiha.
Shock and Sepsis 2 of 2 William Whitehead, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Anesthesiology.
Sepsis Protocol Go Live December 1, 2009 Hendricks Regional Health.
Severe Sepsis Initial recognition and resuscitation
Michael Baram Medical Critical Care. SevereSepsis Relationship Between SIRS, Sepsis and Severe Sepsis Bone RC, et al. Chest 1992;101: Vincent.
FROM CEM SEPSIS TOOLKIT PAPERS TO COVER NGUYEN EARLY LACTATE CLEARANCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED OUTCOME IN SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK P Single.
Early Goal Therapy in Severe Sepsis & Septic Shock
Issues In Organ Donation. The Data As of 10/6/09 there are 104,043 people on the US waiting list From January to July of ,677 transplants were.
Moderator: Thomas Nakagawa, MD, Wake Forest Baptist Health Presenters: Darren Malinoski, MD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Breakout Session A: Optimizing.
Donation After Cardiac Death May 26, 2010 Margie Whittaker, RN MSN.
Pediatric Acute Renal Failure: CRRT/Dialysis Outcome Studies Stuart L. Goldstein, MD Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine.
ADMISSION CRITERIA TO THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT د. ماجد عمر القطان إختصاصي طب طوارئ.
Donor Utilization: Making Use of a Precious Resource in Cardiac Transplant Jason W. Smith, MD Assistant Professor of Surgery The University of Washington.
A MULTIDISCIPLINARY ORGAN DONOR COUNCIL AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE CAN HELP SAVE LIVES 2010 ONELEGACY CELEBRATING OUR PARTNERS May 26, 2010.
A Priority Approach to Maximizing the Gift from Donation After Cardiac Death Martin D. Jendrisak, MD, FACS Medical Director Gift of Hope Organ and Tissue.
ORGAN DONATION By: Aubree Malone. “When you’re not an organ donor when you die, you’re taking a lot of people with you.”
A Mission to Save More Lives Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to be Thomas A. Nakagawa, M.D, FAAP, FCCM Professor, Anesthesiology and.
Kidney Transplant: A Realistic Chance for Elderly Patients Reference: Munnapradist S, Danovitch GM. Kidney transplants for the elderly: Hope or hype? Clin.
Clinical Appraisal of an Article on Prognosis The Clinical Question Will the prognosis of patients with gout be affected by the administration allupurinol?
Donor Case Studies Optimal Management Harbor-UCLA Critical Care – Organ Donation Symposium April 12, 2010 Brant Putnam, MD FACS Trauma / Acute Care Surgery.
Organ Donation in DCD: 10 Year Experience at the University of Michigan A Rojas-Pena, MD; L Sall, BS; K. Koch, BS; E Cooley, RN; M Gravel, RN; R Bartlett,
UW Hospital and Clinics Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) Tony D’Alessandro, MD Medical Director, UWHC OPO November 4, 2009.
Region 7 Moving Into Action Through DSA Action Teams and Regional Forums Planning for Success.
A Guide to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Organ Procurement Organization Reports
Complete Recovery of Renal Function After Acute Kidney Injury is Associated with Long-Term All-Cause Mortality In a Large Managed Care Organization Jennifer.
Haemodynamic Monitoring Theory and Practice. 2 Haemodynamic Monitoring A.Physiological Background B.Monitoring C.Optimizing the Cardiac Output D.Measuring.
The Impact of CBIGs on Achievement of Donor Management Goals at a Level 1 Trauma Center L. Quinn, J.P. Orlowski, W. McTague, C.A. Jones Center for Donation.
“Rationale for establishing donor management goals.” Cindy Jacobs, RN, BSN, CPTC Professional Development Director.
Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) as a Novel Prognostic Marker in Heart Failure: Data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank.
2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.
Collaborating for Life: The Organ and Tissue Donation Process Presented by: Liz Lowry, Hospital Services Coordinator.
Association between Systolic Blood Pressure and Congestive Heart Failure Complication among Hypertensive and Diabetic Hypertensive Patients Mrs. Sutheera.
A Comparison of Albumin and Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in the Intensive Care Unit The SAFE Study Investigators N Engl J Med 2004: 350:
National Sepsis Audit National Registrar Research Collaborative Audit Project 2013 Nationally led by SPARCS (Severn and Peninsula Audit and Research Collaborative.
Sepsis. 54 year old man with a past history of smoking and diabetes presents to the emergency department with a one week history of progressive unwellness.
Bicarbonate-Based Solutions in the Management of Acute Kidney Injury Vania Cecilia Prudencio-Ribera, MD 1 ; Universidad Mayor de San Simón, School of Medicine,
Working Together Donation Opportunities: What’s Possible?
1 Critical Care Organ Donation Symposium April 12, 2010.
Optimizing Organ Donation
The changing face of sepsis.
United States Statistics on Sepsis
An Effort to Increase Organs Transplanted per Donor Dorrie Dils 2/20/08.
UC Davis Medical Center
Impact of Recipient and Donor Non-immunological factors on the Outcome of Expanded Criteria Deceased Donors Kidney Transplantation Dr Hajar Al Hayyan.
Vitamin D: A New Frontier in Diabetes Management Contact Information: Background Acknowledgement Methods.
Dr Alex Hieatt, EM Consultant MEHT Dr Ron Daniels, Chair of the UK Sepsis Trust and Global Sepsis Alliance (Slides with permission.)
Dr Michelle Webb Renal Consultant, Associate Medical Director Patient Safety, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust and Co-lead for Sepsis.
Update in Critical Care Medicine Ann Intern Med 2007;147:
Sepsis Are You Ready to Save a Life? By Tammy Henderson, RN, BSN Biola University 1.
Code Sepsis: Current Evidence Based Guidelines and the CMS Sepsis Core Measure Adult Patients - Abbreviated Updated May 26, 2017.
An AKI project for critically ill cancer patients
Code Sepsis: Current Evidence Based Guidelines and the CMS Sepsis Core Measure Adult Patients - Abbreviated Updated August 30, 2017.
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
UW Hospital and Clinics Organ Procurement Organization (OPO)
DMG REGISTRY WEB PORTAL UPDATE UNOS REGION 5 MEETING SPRING 2017
Region 9 Collaborative New York Academy of Medicine 3/20/18
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) as a Biomarker in the Management of Sepsis
J Foland, J Fortenberry, B Warshaw,
ANR Study UNOS Region 5 Update
Value Based Healthcare King’s Health Partners
Living Donor Transplants
Presentation transcript:

UNOS Region 5 Meeting March 18, 2015 DMG Web Portal Update UNOS Region 5 Meeting March 18, 2015 Darren Malinoski, MD Mitch Sally, MD Megan Crutchfield, MPH

INTRODUCTION Shortage of organs available for transplantation Efforts needed to increase number and quality of organs from donors after neurologic determination of death (DNDDs)

INTRODUCTION Donor Management Goals (DMGs) Checklist of critical care endpoints Standardize care of potential organ donors Normal cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, renal, and acid-base parameters

INTRODUCTION

DMG Web Portal Update SCD DCD ECD Total Number of Donors n=2,714 66%   66% DCD n=553   14% ECD n=827 20% From March 15, 2012 to March 11, 2015

DMG Web Portal Update Number of Donors by Region and OPO n=351 9%  Region 4 (n=351) (since January 2014) Life Gift of Texas (TXGC)  n=351 9%  Region 5 (n=3,644) Donor Network of Arizona (AZOB)  n=409 10% California Transplant Donor Network (CADN)  n=891 22% Golden State Donor Services (CAGS)  n=180 4% One Legacy (CAOP)  n=1234 30% Lifesharing (CASD)  n=293 7% New Mexico Donor Services (NMOP)  n=118 3% Nevada Donor Network (NVLV)  n=245 6% Intermountain Donor Services (UTOP)  n=274  Region 6 (n=99) (since November 2013) Pacific Northwest Transplant Bank (ORUO)  n=99 2%

Organs Transplanted per Donor (OTPD) DMG Web Portal Update Organs Transplanted per Donor (OTPD) OTPD Overall 3.18 + 3.00  SCD 3.76 + 4.00  DCD 1.95 + 2.00  ECD 2.08 + 2.00  Mean + SD

Individual Organs Transplanted by Donor Type DMG Web Portal Update Individual Organs Transplanted by Donor Type   Heart Left Lung Right Lung Left Kidney Right Kidney Liver Pancreas Intestines All Donors (n=4094) 1380, (34%) 914, (22%) 891 3248 (79%) 3177 (78%) 2870 (70%) 433 (11%) 32 (<1%) SCD (n=2714) 1338 (51%)  792 (29%) 769 (28%) 2339 (86%) 2302 (85%) 2147 (79%) 427 (16%) (1%) DCD (n=553) 8 469 (85%) 451 (82%) 138 (25%) 6 ECD (n=827) 42 (5%) 114 (14%) 114 (14%) 440 (53%) 425 (51%) 585 (71%)

Number of Donors That Met the DMG Bundle DMG Web Portal Update Number of Donors That Met the DMG Bundle   Referral Authorization 12-18 Hours Prior to OR  All DNDDs (n=3541) 588 (17%) 804 (23%) 1657 (47%) 2279 (64%) SCD (n=2714) 444 (16%) 641 (24%) 1371 (51%) 1863 (69%) ECD (n=827) 144 (17%) 163 (20%) 286 (35%) 416 (50%)

Percent DMGs Met at Each Time Point DMG Web Portal Update Percent DMGs Met at Each Time Point   Referral Authorization 12-18 Hours Prior to OR MAP (60-110 mmHg) 84% 91% CVP (4-12mmHg) 10% 28% 49% 50% EF (>50%) 15% 43% 62% pH (7.3-7.5) 65% 78% 87% 90% PF Ratio (>300) 39% 46% 56% Sodium (<155) 92% 71% 79% 86% Glucose (<180 mg/dL) 55% 76% 68% 81% Urine (0.5 cc/kg/h over 4 hours) 83% Pressors (<1 and low dose) 75% 66%

DMG Web Portal Update Met DMG Bundle 15% 26% 59% 68% 21% 27% 56% 79%   Referral Authorization 12-18 Hours Prior to the OR OPO 1 15% 26% 59% 68% OPO 2 21% 27% 56% 79% OPO 3 13% 31% 55% 58% OPO 4 24% 29% 57% OPO 5 20% 25% 46% OPO 6 22% 42% OPO 7 16% 32% OPO 8 37% OPO 9 11% 17% 61% OPO 10 18% 66% Average 19% 53% 64%

OTPD when bundle met v. not met DMG Web Portal Update OTPD when bundle met v. not met   Referral Authorization 12-18 Hours Prior to OR Met Not Met All DNDDs 3.44 3.12 3.64 3.04 3.77 2.71 3.75 2.35 SCD (n=2714) 4.09 3.69 4.28 3.60 4.23 3.28 4.16 2.87 ECD (n=827) 2.36 2.02 2.34 2.39 1.92 2.44 1.72

Lactate Levels as Predictors of Organ Transplantation Rates after Neurologic Determination of Death UNOS Region 5 Meeting March 18, 2015 Mitchell Sally, MD Darren Malinoski, MD, FACS VA Portland Healthcare System Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR

As you have seen, and as I hope to convey here, meeting the DMG bundle is a/w more OTPD and superior graft function in those transplanted organs. Here are examples of three of our recent publications, the first two, in JOT and CCM, that focus on OTPD, and the third, which looks at the DMGs effect on DGF and kidney function. Our group has also looked at predictors of liver graft function with DMG influence.

And I personally have been involved in improvements in DMGs, looking at one particular component of the bundle, the glucose. About two years ago, we were able to show that a glucose level of < 180 in DNDDs was independently associated with 4 or more OTPD, and we recommended raising the DMG glucose threshold from 150 to 180, which is consistent with current critical care recommendations in the ICU.

LACTATE Peripheral biomarker Common use in trauma, burns, critical illness, and sepsis to guide resuscitation SvO2, ScvO2 CVP UOP BP Well, if you’ll indulge me, I’d like to discuss another potential addition and change to the DMG bundle, one that we feel will result in improved organ outcomes. Lactate is a …. And it is commonly used in multiple disease states to guide resuscitation. Other markers of resuscitation include the biomarkers SvO2 and ScvO2, and the clinical parameters such as BP, CVP and UOP.

LACTATE End product of anaerobic metabolism (glycolysis) Usually in skeletal muscle, bowel, brain and RBC Taken up and converted to glucose (gluconeogenesis) by liver Marker for adequacy of resuscitation Normal levels: < 2 mmol/L Lactate is… Curr Opin Crit Care, 2012 Jun; 18 (3): 267-272

GUIDING RESUSCITATION Living Patient DNDD Urine output Normal BP Normal CVP ScvO2 Lactate Diabetes insipidus Vasopressor use Multiple organ issues No brain oxygen extraction Unaffected by exterior pressures DNDDs bring with them a host of complicated physiologic processes, and though they may appear to be “normal” or stable, there may be many issues underlying the actual physiology. In living patients, there may often be normal (or even high) UOP, BP, CVP, and even normal ScvO2. However, there are multiple underlying issues that may contribute to the management of the organ donor. With urine output, a DNDD may be given a diuretic, or may have the condition of diabetes insipidus, common in neurologic death, and which results in high volume urine output. Normal BP may be masked by high or multiple vasopressor use. A CVP within range for the DMGs (4-12) may not tell the entire story, for example if great volumes of fluid are needed to maintain CVP, the likelihood of using the lungs diminishes. ScvO2, a commonly used biomarker in living patients. May misrepresent oxygen utilization, as the brain, which normally extracts a significant portion of the blood oxygen, is unable to do so after neurologic injury and death. In contrast, lactate is unaffected by many of these confounding variables, and may represent the most true status of acid base physiology.

LACTATE Not currently part of the DMG Bundle Recorded only sporadically Utility in guiding donor management has not been examined We would like to propose that lactate be considered to be added to the current DMG bundle, and have a bit of data to support this notion.

Lactate Levels Present at Each Time Point DMG Web Portal Update Lactate Levels Present at Each Time Point   Referral Authorization 12-18 Hours Prior to OR TXGC (n=295) n=19 (6%) n=14 (5%) n=10 (3%) n=7 (2%) AZOB (n=312) n=32 (10%) n=27 (9%) n=15 (5%) CADN (n=828)  n=168 (20%) n=253 (31%) n=363 (44%) n=351 (42%) CAGS (n=156) n=75 (48%) n=71 (45%) n=86 (55%) n=65 (42%) CAOP (n=1105) n=283 (26%) n=708 (64%) n=1007 (91%) n=996 (90%) CASD (n=227)  n=30 (13%) n=27 (12%) n=29 (13%) n=25 (11%) NMOP (n=118)  n=38 (36%) n=14 (13%) n=9 (8%) n=8 (7%) NVLV (n=244)  n=12 (5%) n=4 (2%) n=6 (2%) UTOP (n=209)  n=101 (48%) n=134 (64%) n=110 (53%) n=103 (49%) ORUO (n=68)   n=13 (19%) n=9 (13%) n=5 (7%) n=3 (4%) TOTAL (n=3562) n=771 (22%) n=1261 (35%) n=1640 (46%) n=1571 (44%) A recent pull of data from the web portal supports the idea of lactate being inconsistently recorded, as it is not currently part of the DMG bundle. We can see that these levels are recorded or taken ranging from anywhere from 2 to 90 per cent of the opportunities. Overall, lactate levels appear to be recorded approximately 40% of the time. You will note that these numbers are slightly different than the data the I am going to present, which represent different timing of data downloads from the web portal.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To determine the association between blood lactate levels and organ transplantation rates. We hypothesized that normal lactate levels would be associated with more OTPD.

METHODS Prospective, observational study Three standard time points: All DNDDs 10 OPOs, UNOS Regions 4, 5, and 6 March 2012 - August 2014 Three standard time points: Authorization for donation 12-18 hours after authorization Prior to organ recovery This was a prospective…. The three standard time points that we chose to examine began with authorization for donation… We chose these three time points for two reasons: the first, simply because of the variability and infrequency of recording at referal for donation but perhaps more importantly, because these three time points are truly when donor management occurs.

METHODS Primary outcome: achieving ≥ 4 OTPD Secondary outcomes: individual organ transplantation rates

RESULTS 1351 donors 3.4 ± 1.8 OTPD 45% ≥ 4 OTPD Lactate values recorded: 831/1351 (61.5%) at Authorization 1090/1351 (80.7%) at 12-18 Hours 1045/1351 (77.4%) Prior to recovery

RESULTS – LACTATE Mean lactate levels (mmol/L): 2.5 + 3.1 overall 2.5 + 3.0 at Authorization 2.6 + 3.0 at 12-18 Hours 2.1 + 2.8 Prior to organ recovery 2,008/2,966 (67.7%) levels were < 2 mmol/L.

# Lactates < 2 mmol/L (n=579) RESULTS – UNIVARIATE Continuous OTPD < 4 OTPD > 4 p Overall Mean 3.11 2.88 < 0.01 Authorization Mean 3.01 2.45 12-18 Hrs Mean 2.96 2.58 Terminal Mean 2.78 2.08 Categorical   Authorization Lactate < 2 mmmol/L 60.3% 70.1% 12-18 Hours Lactate < 2 mmol/L 54.3% 66.5% OR Lactate < 2 mmol/L 71.8% 85.0% # Lactates < 2 mmol/L (n=579) 1 measurement (n=116) 18.2% 17.3% 0.76 2 measurements (n=147) 20.5% 24.6% 0.22 3 measurements (n=316) 44.3% 52.7% 0.03

RESULTS - MULTIVARIABLE Continuous OR 95% CI p Overall Mean 0.92 0.86-0.99 0.02 Authorization Mean 0.90 0.83-0.98 0.01 12-18 Hrs Mean 0.94 0.87-1.03 0.06 Terminal Mean 0.88 0.79-0.97 Categorical   Authorization Lactate < 2 mmmol/L 1.37 0.90-2.08 0.14 12-18 Hours Lactate < 2 mmol/L 1.33 0.93-1.89 0.11 OR Lactate < 2 mmol/L 1.93 1.19-3.11 <0.01 # Lactates < 2 mmol/L (n=579) 1 measurement (n=116) 1.35 0.79–2.32 0.27 2 measurements (n=147) 1.14 0.71–1.85 0.58 3 measurements (n=316) 1.22 0.81-1.84 0.35 *Results controlled for with known predictors of > 4 OTPD: age, weight, BMI, terminal creatinine, donor management bundle met at all 3 time points, standard criteria status, gender, thyroid hormone administration, and CDC high risk status.

RESULTS – INDIVIDUAL ORGANS Lower mean lactate levels found in DNDDs whose organs were utilized: Used Not Used p Hearts 2.6 + 2.9 3.1 + 3.2 < 0.01 Lungs 2.4 + 3.0 3.1 + 3.1 Livers 2.7 + 2.9 3.6 + 3.7

CONCLUSIONS Lactate measurements are inconsistently drawn in DNDDs during donor management Lower mean lactate levels remained independent predictors of ≥ 4 OTPD Terminal lactate < 2 mmol/L: independently associated with > 4 OTPD Inclusion of a lactate level < 2 mmol/L into existing DMG Bundles should be considered

QUESTIONS