St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis - Midwest Particulate Matter Supersite Project Overview February/March 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPOTLIGHT ON THE LELAND LEGACY ® PUMP FROM THE LELAND LEGACY PUMP Provides answers to particulate sampling problems. High flow rates + 24-hr run times.
Advertisements

1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
Advanced Sampling and Data Analysis for Source Attribution of Ambient Particulate Arsenic and Other Air Toxics Metals in St. Louis Missouri Department.
Allegheny County Health Department Roger Westman, Ph.D Manager, Air Quality Program 2006.
Although this monitor is owned and operated by the State of Missouri, significant research was conducted with this technology for fence-line monitoring.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Ambient Monitoring Networks and Monitoring Strategies Judith C. Chow ( ) John G. Watson Desert Research Institute Reno, NV, USA presented.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Health Effects of Suspended Particulate Matter Judith C. Chow John G. Watson Desert Research Institute Reno, Nevada, USA Presented.
Houston Regional Monitoring HRM Houston Regional Monitoring Network Overview.
A Project to Characterize The Effects of Transient Air Pollutants on the Health of African-Americans in Atlanta, Georgia John H. Hall Morehouse College.
Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Integrated Assessment of Particulate Matter Exposure and Health Impacts Sonia Yeh.
Semi-Continuous Measurement of Particulate Matter Sulfate and Nitrate Jay R. Turner Environmental Engineering Program Department of Chemical Engineering.
ADVANCES IN MONITORING METHODS FOR AIRBORNE PARTICLES Philip K. Hopke Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY USA.
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Personal Monitoring for Air Pollution Exposure Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Atmospheric Measurements Manager South Coast Air Quality Management District CAPCOA.
Apangea Learning State of Idaho Annual Superintendent’s Meeting Rob Austin, Vice President of Sales & Services Glen Zollman, Idaho Account Manager.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Fine Particulate Matter Field Campaign at Reserve, KS Neil D. Deardorff Scott A. Duthie Jay R. Turner Environmental Engineering.
Air Quality Laboratory St.Louis Supersite Project Update Meg N.S. Yu Professor Jay R. Turner Environmental Engineering Program Washington University in.
Investigation of Decadal Changes in Aerosol and Asthma Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
The Impact of Air Pollution on Human Health Fernando Holguin MD MPH Associate Professor of medicine and Pediatrics Director, Clinical and Translational.
ACTIVITIES, NEEDS, AND FUTURE ACTIONS ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY April 26, 2001 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS)
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories Lesson 1 Introduction to Fine Particles (PM 2.5 )
1 National Healthy Start Association, Inc. Prepared for Secretary Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality January 2008 Historical Overview of the Healthy.
June 12 &13, 2007 Mickey Leland National Urban Air Toxics Workshop II – Houston, Texas 1 Albuquerque, New Mexico Community Scale Ambient Air Monitoring.
Federal Transit Administration Federal Agency Update A Public Real Estate Symposium Mamie Smith-Fisher, SR/WA FTA Real Estate Manager
Pat Arnott, ATMS Air Quality Measurements, 25 Jan 2007 Basics: Do measurements of aerosol and gases at various locations on and near campus. Evaluate.
STD Surveillance Network (SSuN) Cycle 2 Objectives Lori Newman & Kristen Mahle SSuN Principal Collaborators Meeting Atlanta, GA December 2, 2008.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Project 1 Health Effects of California Agricultural Particulate Matter Kent Pinkerton – Project Leader Keith Bein – Co-Investigator Alejandro Castañeda.
How Far We’ve Come Together NIIC Conference.
1 GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground Leads: UAH UMBC NESDIS/STAR.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
Urban Air Pollution GISAT 112. Learning Objectives Regions of the atmosphere Amount, composition of air we breathe Names of selected air pollutants Health.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Targeted Monitoring, Outreach, and Education: Traditional Brick Kilns, San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora James R. Anderson, PhD Environmental Fluid Dynamics.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
National Ambient Air Monitoring Networks Now and Later PM model evaluation workshop.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study: Update March 17, 1999 Air & Waste Management Association Conference.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management A proposal to NASA Earth Science REASoN Solicitation CAN-02-OES-01 REASoN:
PARTICULATE MATTER: REGULATORY RESPONSE Presented by: Karl Loos.
South Central Louisiana June 30, What is the Advance Program? What are the Program benefits What’s it mean to this area? How can it help us stay.
Improving Communities through Integrated Data Systems Leah Hendey March 20, 2014 Urban Affairs Association Annual Conference.
Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.
Emissions Background and Rationale North American SO 2 Emission Rates North American NO x Emission Rates Contact: Bret Schichtel,
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Regional Air Quality Planning in the Upper Midwest
National Wildlife Refuge
Emerging Science EPA’s ORD Supports Regional Haze Program
Calibration of Low Cost Dust Sensors
How Can TEMPO Contribute to Air Pollution Health Effects Research
SCI 275 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
Time-Integrated Sampling
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Welcome TFMM workshop on the implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy Introduction to the monitoring strategy QA/QC activities of EMEP organisation.
Presentation transcript:

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis - Midwest Particulate Matter Supersite Project Overview February/March 2000 Update

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis - Midwest Supersite: An Overview USEPA Particulate Matter Supersites Program –Phase I Supersites Atlanta, GA Fresno, CA –Phase II Supersites New York City, NY Baltimore, MD Pittsburgh, PA St. Louis, MO Houston, TX Fresno, CA Los Angeles, CA

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Consortium Washington University –J. Turner (PI), W. White* (Co-PI), E. Macias, B. Schichtel Desert Research Institute –J. Chow* (Co-PI), J. Watson Electric Power Research Institute –T. Bahadori Harvard University School of Public Health –P. Koutrakis* (Co-PI), G. Allen University of Maryland –J. Ondov (Co-PI) University of Minnesota –P. McMurry* (Co-PI) University of Wisconsin –J. Schauer *denotes Executive Management Team

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis Supersite Project Objectives USEPA identified three overarching objectives which each Supersite must address… (1) improved understanding of source-receptor relationships to support SIP development –St. Louis is an urban island, broadly representative of the urban Midwest (2) support health effects and exposure studies –integration with three large health effects programs (3) evaluation of emerging sampling methods –battery of advanced measurements for aerosol physical properties and chemical composition –emphasis on methods with demonstrated or potential ability to operate reliably for extended periods with limited attendance

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis Supersite: Monitoring Strategy sustained measurements for a full year, CY 2001 emphasis on temporal resolution of aerosol physical and chemical properties –core site, located in north St. Louis City urban residential neighborhood full suite of measurements –movable platform rotating between three satellite sites visit each site for 3-4 weeks each quarter during CY 2001 implement a subset of the core site measurement suite at the satellite sites

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 Monitor Sites St. Louis City St. Louis County CBD core site (fixed platform) plus three satellite sites, each visited by a movable platform for 3-4 weeks per quarter (locations TBD)

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis Supersite: Sampling & Measurements in situ methods… aerosol size dist. (3nm-10mm) / 5 min integral moments (number, light scat., elec. charge) / 2 sec aethalometer / 5 min fine mass (CAMMS) / 1 hr substrate methods… PM 1, PM 2.5, PM 10 mass by various samplers / 24 hr in situ methods… sulfate / 10 min nitrate / 10 min EC/OC / 1 hr substrate methods… ions & precursor gases (HEADS) / 24 hr EC/OC / 24 hr fine/coarse metals / 24 hr selected elements retrospectively / 1 hr organic compounds retrospectively / 24 hr tox. sampling / 1 wk airborne bioallergens / 24 hr meteorological parameters (10m & 30 m), 5 min criteria gas pollutants / 1 hr (nominal) aerosol physical properties aerosol chemical properties other measurements

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis Supersite: Integration with Exposure & Health Effects Studies measurement of personal and indoor exposures –H. Suh & P. Koutrakis (EPRI Exposure Studies) cardiac vulnerability in potentially susceptible subjects –F. Speizer (NIEHS Program Project) implantable defribrillators detected arrhythmias –D. Dockery (NIEHS Program Project) conditions in elderly which predispose towards acute adverse effect of particulate exposure –J. Schwartz (EPA PM Center) chronic effects of particulate exposure –D. Dockery (EPA PM Center) in vitro toxicity of St. Louis particulate matter –L. Kobzik & P. Koutrakis (EPA PM Center)

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis Supersite: Other Features & Timeline Other Features –collaboration with USEPA researchers currently being formalized –integration with EPA Region VII St. Louis community based air toxics initiative (risk based air screening) –provide a platform attractive for single-particle analysis measurements (e.g., testing, calibration) –historical context using data from previous studies (e.g., RAPS/RAMS, Harvard Six Cities) Schedule –CY2000: planning, installation and shake-down –CY2001: full year of sustained measurements (1/1/01 through 12/21/01) –CY2002: sample analysis, data analysis –CY2003: data analysis and reporting

St. Louis - Midwest Supersite Project Overview, February/March 2000 St. Louis - Midwest Supersite for more information… St. Louis - Midwest Supersite on the WWW at - (to be activated circa March 1, 2000) contact information... Jay R. Turner Department of Chemical Engineering Campus Box 1198 Washington University One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO tel: fax: