Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts J.D. Reid, R.K. Faller, R.W. Bielenberg, and K.A. Lechtenberg Midwest Roadside Safety Facility University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roadside Barriers RDG Chapter 5.
Advertisements

N u c o r h i g h w a y.com Nucor Steel Marion, Inc. TL 3 System 4400 lb Pickup Truck 1800 lb Small Car Impacting at 62 mph 25 degrees.
M.A.S.H.: The New Safety Hardware Crash Testing Criteria
Session 8 Type IX Crash Cushion CAT-350 Trinity Highway Products.
“You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy…
Status of the Roadside Design Guide Update AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July Indianapolis, Indiana Keith A. Cota, New Hampshire Department.
Florida Department of Transportation T EMPORARY C RASH C USHIONS FDOT Contacts: District One Construction Marshall Douberley marshall.douberley.
Best Practices A comparison of Mobile Barriers MBT-1 & Caltrans Balsi Beam.
Oklahoma’s Experience with Wire Rope Safety Fence.
Advanced Safety And Maintenance Technologies For Air Disc Brake Equipped Vehicles Presented By: Tom Wallace - VP Electronic Braking MGM Brakes.
“See-Through” Bridge Rails
SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety May 4, 2007.
Office of Highway Safety Simulations. Purpose of Simulations Evaluation of Vehicle speeds Drivers’ statements Pickup truck sensing diagnostic module (SDM)
Tommy Nantung INDOT Research & Development Division July 22, 2014
Light Vehicle Rollover Background on NHTSA’s Activities in this Area.
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Crash Impediments Orange County Fire Rescue February 10, 2015.
Subcommittee No. 7 - Certification of Test Facilities by Ronald K. Faller, Ph.D., P.E. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility John LaTurner, P.E. E-TECH Testing.
Jo Beth Folger MMF Site and October 14, Conventional Facilities – MMF Presentation Outline Facility Design.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
Bureau of Materials and Research 2014 AASHTO RAC/TRB Annual Meeting High Value Research Sweet 16 Ann Scholz, P.E., Assistant Research Engineer
Injury Research in Highway Safety Thomas Songer, PhD University of Pittsburgh Injury Epidemiology EPIDEM 2670.
Distracted Drivers An experiment designed to test the attention that drivers are giving to the road.
A Summit of University Transportation Centers for Safety March 19-20, 2015 Wyndham Pittsburgh University Center Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania TRB Safety Bernardo.
The Warrenton Aquatics and Recreation Facility Warrenton, Virginia Derek DiPiazza Construction Management.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
An Introduction to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
 Cross section elements consist of the following:  1.Traffic lanes (carriage ways);  2.Shoulders;  3.Medians;  4.Curbs;  5.Side slopes.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Federal Highway Administration Wisconsin Division January, 2010 Jason P. Spilak, PE, ARRA Engineer.
Why Improve Road Transport Enforcement in Europe? Ellen Townsend European Transport Safety Council.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David S. Rayburn.
Session 9 Guardrail Attachments to Bridge Ends
Crash Impediments Ordinance Update Orange County BCC September 1, 2015.
Teens and Trucks and Defeating Distracted Driving July 2011.
1 FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION November 5, 2010.
Mohammed Al-khwyldi  Introduction Safety is the condition of being protected against physical, social, political, emotional, educational or other.
Session 9 Guardrail Connections to Bridge Ends. Common Deficiencies in Bridge Railings Inadequate Dynamic Strength Potential for Snagging Use of “Safety”
Minutes from Subcommittee No. 7 - Certification of Test Facilities by Ronald K. Faller, Ph.D., P.E. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility John LaTurner, P.E.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
NCHRP 350 UPDATED. NCHRP 350 Historical Review Document Source Year Issued Number of Pages Test Vehicle & Weight HRB # lb. car NCHRP #115.
FHWA Data Mining Efforts to Develop Better Insights on Causes and Outcomes of Rollover Crashes Ana Maria Eigen Kenneth S. Opiela Federal Highway Administration.
Test Documentation and Reporting AASHTO Task Force 13 Subcommittee 7 Laboratory Accreditation Spring 2006 Meeting Lido Beach, Florida May 11-12, 2006 Subcommittee.
Two Test Level 4 Bridge Railing and Transition Systems For Transverse Timber Deck Bridges by Ronald K. Faller, Ph.D., P.E. Michael A. Ritter, P.E. Barry.
IMPROPER LANE CHANGE A Collision Countermeasures Presentation.
Number of Vehicle Type per State per Year Class Project Me/ENV 449, 2007 Fang-Yun Chou Instructor: R. Husar.
Optimizing the Control of Aggressive Braking Maneuvers for Wheeled Vehicles Via Analytical and Numerical Methods Oktay Arslan, Jason Bentley, Matthew Bigelow,
A SWOT ANALYSIS OF FUEL DUMP AND RECOMMENDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY
Summary and Wrap-up Discussion 8 July 2015
Ellen Owens The Age Of The Automobile. Henry Ford Hired as an engineer for the Edison Illuminating Company in 1896 Developed plans for the Ford Quadricycle.
Project Title sponsored by: ABC Designs, Inc team members: name 1 name 2 etc.
Research Project #3 Develop Common Denominators for Safety Measures.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
April 4, 2011 ITE Technical Conference Lake Buena Vista, Fl Implementation of AASHTO’s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Update from the.
And Maintenance Technologies For Air Disc Brake Equipped Vehicles
Implementation of MASH
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Roadside Safety Design
Bumper Trajectories During High-Speed Impacts with 6-in. Curbs
FIGURE 6-1 A hydraulic hand-operated floor jack.
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
National Standardized CPS Certification Training April 2007 – R1010
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
The Extrication Process
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Presentation transcript:

Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts J.D. Reid, R.K. Faller, R.W. Bielenberg, and K.A. Lechtenberg Midwest Roadside Safety Facility University of Nebraska-Lincoln TRB 2013 January 14, 2013

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Acknowledgments Midwest States Pooled Fund Roadside Safety Program MwRSF Staff 2

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Introduction Full-scale Crash Testing Comparison: blocked vs non-blocked Rail-Post Attachment Blockout Importance Conclusions 3

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Proprietary Non-Blocked Systems T-31 Guardrail (Trinity Highway Products) Gregory Mini Spacer Guardrail (Gregory Industries) NU-GUARD-31 (Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.) 4

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Non-Proprietary Non-Blocked Systems 5 Non-Blocked MGS for Wire-Faced Walls of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (TRB 2011)

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Design Details 6

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility MGSNB-1: deg OIV 17.1 ft/s ORD 11.5 g 7

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility MGSNB-2: deg OIV 31.3 ft/s ORD 10.2 g 8

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Blocked vs Non- Blocked 9

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Pickup Truck 10

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Pickup Truck 11

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Pickup Truck 12 BlockedNon-Blocked

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Pickup Truck 13

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Small Car 14

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Small Car 15

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility 1100c – smoother with blocks 16 BlockedNon-Blocked

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Small Car 17 Non-Blocked Blocked

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Advantages of the Blocked MGS Improved stability for both vehicles Reduced snag Reduced occupant risk measures 18

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Outline Full-scale Crash Testing Comparison: blocked vs non-blocked Rail-Post Attachment Blockout Importance Conclusions 19

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Rail-Post Attachment 20

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Rail-Post Attachment: 2270p 21

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Rail-Post Attachment: 1100c 22

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Blockout Importance 23

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Blockout Importance 24 Post 14: No Wheel Snag Major Wheel Snag BlockedNon-Blocked

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Blockout does not eliminate wheel snag 25

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility 26

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Conclusions and Recommendations MGS without blockouts successfully crash tested Rail effectively releases from post, even in worst case location Blocked system performs better and is recommended if space is available Special applications – see report 27