Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Routing Model Review: A) Data Fusion Efforts and Issues Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program Review.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 TRAFFIC AND REVENUE FORECASTING FOR THE OHIO TURNPIKE ASSET EVALUATION Presented by: Gregory.
July 22, Model Objectives Forecast ADT on the Rural State Highway System Autos & Trucks Autos & Trucks Arterial System Arterial System Complement,
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Andre Tok, Miyuan Zhao, Joseph Y.J. Chow, Stephen G. Ritchie, and Dimitri Arkhipov, University of California at Irvine 2010 Innovations in Freight-Demand.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Presented to Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Feng Liu, John (Jay) Evans, Tom Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 8, 2011.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
The Argos Freight Modeling Project Presentation to SCAG Modeling Task Force 9/22/04 Genevieve Giuliano Peter Gordon School of Policy, Planning and Development.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 ANALYZING LONG-DISTANCE TRUCK TRAVEL FOR STATEWIDE FREIGHT PLANNING IN OHIO Presented by:
Presented at the: Second Symposium Innovations in Freight Demand Modeling & Data Improvement SHRP2 Strategic Highway Research Program Washington, D.C.
The Office for Freight, Logistics and Transportation Development of a Method to Forecast Freight Demand Arising from the Final Demand Sector and Examination.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Analysis of Truck Route Choice using Truck-GPS Data
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
ODOT Freight Modeling Presented to the Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, OH September 18, 2007 By Gregory Giaimo, PE Ohio Department of Transportation.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
FHWA TRAVELER ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Bus Trip Tables May 9, 2013 Don Vary, CDM Smith Krishnan Viswanathan, CDM Smith.
Data Expansion Efforts in the Great Lakes Maritime Information Delivery System Peter S. Lindquist GLMRI Affiliates Meeting September 23, 2010 INTERMODAL.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Iowa Statewide Travel Demand Model A Status Report Paul Hershkowitz Wilbur Smith Associates Dane Ismart The Louis Berger Group Mary Lupa Wilbur Smith Associates.
Freight Data and Decision Makers: How they were Introduced in Utah David Hurst, John Stevens, & Paul Herskowitz – Wilbur Smith Associates Walt Steinvorth.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
Commodity Origin-Destination Provisional Estimates Edward Fekpe, Ph.D., PEng. Research Leader Transportation Market Sector.
FHWA TRAVELER ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Auto, Air, and Rail Tables March 18, 2013 Krishnan Viswanathan, CDM Smith Colin Smith, RSG Bhargava Sana, RSG.
FAF2 Data Disaggregation Methodology and Results presented to Model Task Force presented by Vidya Mysore, Florida DOT Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics,
Summary of Tract-to-Tract Commuter Flows by Type of Geographic Area. A useful way of comparing the general pattern of tract-to-tract commuter flows across.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
Ohio Statewide Model Passenger Transit Calibration Pat Costinett Greg Erhardt Rebekah Anderson.
1 Sources of Transportation Statistics September 23, 2009 Rosalyn Alleman National Transportation Library Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
Microsimulation of Commodity Flow in the Mississippi Valley Region The Microsimulation Team of the Center for Freight Infrastructure Research and Education.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
Topics Survey data comparisons to “old” model Bluetooth OD data findings Freight model design Q & A.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Research Project #3 Develop Common Denominators for Safety Measures.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
Tennessee Statewide Model Integration with the National Long Distance Passenger Model and Calibration to AirSage Data Vince Bernardin, PhD, RSG Hadi.
Navigating Freight Data in the FAST ACT Era
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Freight Demand Analysis
Freight Demand Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department of Transportation Vincent Bernardin Jr., Ph.D., RSG Paul Hershkowitz, CDM Smith Mary Lupa, Parsons Brinkerhoff Daniel Szekeres, Michael Baker Corp.

  What iTRAM is now  What iTRAM is adding  Rail Network  Passenger Model  New Passenger Rail Model  Other Improvements & Data  Freight Model  Iowa Freight Context  Available Freight Data  Freight Model Architecture The Iowa Travel Analysis Model

 iTRAM Now  Passenger Car & Truck  3-step model  Gravity Model  Truck Sub Model  Airport Vehicle Sub Model  3,144 Zones  National in Scope  Focus on Midwest  Interfaces with MPO Models

  Original Architecture Included Future Rail Addition  FRA Grant to Expand Model  Support Iowa DOT Rail Planning Efforts  Passenger Rail  Support Chicago to Omaha Passenger Rail Study  Freight Rail  Supports grant program & other efforts iTRAM Phase II

 Rail Network New GIS Rail Network Assignable Network Various Attributes Linkages to Highway Network

 Passenger Rail Model

  Parallel and independent model  Nested Logit Mode Choice model  Ridership forecasts between Iowa Urban Areas  Also between Iowa and Major Metro Areas  Chicago  Omaha  Kansas City  Minneapolis  Terminal Based O/D  Sensitivity to travel time and fares Passenger Rail Model

  New Trip Generation  New Destination Choice Models in place of Gravity  Multiple passenger data sources:  National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Add-On  Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP)  Census Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) Passenger Model Update

  Iowa Add-on Sample in 2009  Focuses more on rural travel  2,000 Usable Surveys  Trip Rate Development  Destination Choice Model Estimation  Trip Length Validation  O/D Patterns

  ACS Based Commuter Flow Data  Commuting Data to Supplement the NHTS  Validating Work Trip Patterns  County to County Worker Flows  Validation of Mode Choice and Trip Lengths  5-year Data Available Summer 2013

  Additional data source for block level employment data  Available for each year between  Employer and employee tax records  Noise incorporated to protect confidentiality  Will serve as check on InfoGroup derived employment  Additional source of Commuter Flow estimates to validate work destination choice Census LEHD O/D Employment

  Iowa Freight to Increase 53% by 2040  Truck handles 80% of Freight in Iowa  Rail handles 43% of total freight movements  Main Union Pacific Line Runs Through Iowa  Coal, Grain, Ethanol, Chemicals  Union Pacific main carrier  18 Railroads total  3,945 miles of track  Began with review of data sources to support model Freight Rail Model

  3-digit County to County Commodity Flows by Mode  Data Available below the FAF/CFS level  Deficiencies Exist (Agricultural Commodities)  Most recent Iowa DOT version circa 2001  High cost and High Level of Data Cleansing  Higher B/C to invest in other datasets  IMPLAN  ATRI Transearch

  No Cost FHWA Product  Commodity Flow Data by mode  Forecasts to year 2040  Based on BTS’s Commodity Flow Survey  Limitation: Iowa is ONE FAF zone  No explicit through traffic O/D FAF3

 FAF3 Zones Iowa is One FAF Zone

 Carload Waybill Sample  Obtained confidential Carload Waybill sample from STB  Large stratified sample of carload waybills for all U.S. rail traffic from carriers with more than 4,500 annual carloads  Rail Inc. Rail Station Database  GIS Database of National and Iowa Rail Stations  Necessary to process Carload Waybill Sample

 One Week of GPS Truck Flows Passing Through Indiana

  American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI)  Non-Profit Research Arm of American Trucking Association  GPS Trace Database (several billion truck positions annually)  Resource to develop Truck Origins and Destinations  Used successfully in the Indiana Statewide Model  Aid in Disaggregating FAF3 Data and for developing static pivot point ODs for truck model

  IMPLAN – Economic Dataset  County level Commodity Production and Consumption  No data forecasts  Help to disaggregate FAF3 Commodity Flows  Supplement ATRI and Carload Waybill Sample  Independent Estimate of Iowa Commodity Flows

  FleetSeek Trucking Database  Private Fleet and Owner Operator Data  Leonard’s Guide  National Warehouse and Distribution Directory  Trucking Special Generation Locations  National Motor Freight Traffic Association  Standard Point Location Code Data Special Generators

  On commodity productions and consumption  USDA Agricultural Production data  Iowa River Barge Terminal Directory  Iowa Grain Elevator Database  Iowa Ethanol Plant Locations  On commodity flows  Iowa Grain and Biofuel Flow Survey  Iowa Coal Trends Data Special Iowa Data

 Freight Model Architecture  Still being finalized, debating pivot point vs. dynamic disaggregation for commodity flows  Rail freight directly from commodity flows  Trucks pivot off of ATRI trip table based on truck model with three parts  Commodity flows by truck (long distance)  Commodity flows by truck to/from rail/barge  Local trucks (distribution, service)  Will use and integrate most data sources

 ### FAF3 Flows ### IMPLAN ### Rail Flows### Carload Waybill ### ATRI Truck Flows### Freight Model Architecture  Approach: Disaggregate FAF3 commodity flows

Freight Model Architecture, Option A: Pivot Point Approach

 Contact Information Phillip J. Mescher, AICP (515) Vincent Bernardin Jr., Ph.D (812) Paul Hershkowitz (517) Mary Lupa (312) Daniel Szekeres (717)