Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillation formalism
Advertisements

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
2. Present Understandings
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
S K Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in SK-I An Updated Analysis Alec Habig, Univ. of Minnesota Duluth for the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration With much.
1 Latest CC analysis developments New selection efficiencies: –Based on C++ reco + PDFs rather than old (Fortran+reco_minos) cuts –Attempt to optimise.
S K The Many Uses of Upward- going Muons in Super-K Muons traveling up into Super-K from high-energy  reactions in the rock below provide a high-energy.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
1 Recent developments on sensitivity calculations Effect of combined le and me running –Is there a statistical advantage over pure le running? Discrimination.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
The Importance of Low-Energy Solar Neutrino Experiments Thomas Bowles Los Alamos National Laboratory Markov Symposium Institute for Nuclear Research 5/13/05.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP Lisbon July 22, 2005.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
M. Giorgini University of Bologna, Italy, and INFN Limits on Lorentz invariance violation in atmospheric neutrino oscillations using MACRO data From Colliders.
Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Michael Smy UC Irvine Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos 8 th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams & Betabeams Irvine, California, August.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Fermilab, May, 2003 Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U. Tokyo ・ Introduction ・ JHF-Kamioka neutrino project -overview- ・ Physics in phase-I ・ Phase-II ・ Summary Outline.
Bruno Pontecorvo Pontecorvo Prize is very special for us: All the important works done by Super- Kamiokande point back to Bruno Pontecorvo – 1957 First.
TAUP Searches for nucleon decay and n-n oscillation in Super-Kamiokande Jun Kameda (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration Sep.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Atmospheric neutrinos
Solar neutrino results from Super-Kamiokande Satoru Yamada for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration Institute of cosmic ray research, University of Tokyo.
Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super-Kamiokande-I 1, Solar Neutrino Oscillation 2, Super-Kamiokande detector 3, Data set for.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Mumbai, August 1, 2005 Tom Gaisser Atmospheric neutrinos Primary spectrum Hadronic interactions Fluxes of muons and neutrinos Emphasis on high energy.
J. Goodman – January 03 The Solution to the Solar Problem Jordan A. Goodman University of Maryland January 2003 Solar Neutrinos MSW Oscillations Super-K.
1 Recent Results from Neutrino Experiments and Plans for the Neutrino Super Beam in Japan Discovery of neutrino oscillations  finite neutrino masses (
Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo NOW2004, Sep 2004.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Takaaki Kajita (ICRR, U.of Tokyo) Production of atmospheric neutrinos Some early history (Discovery of atmospheric neutrinos, Atmospheric neutrino anomaly)
Takaaki Kajita (ICRR, U.of Tokyo) Production of atmospheric neutrinos Some early history (Discovery of atmospheric neutrinos, Atmospheric neutrino anomaly)
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005 Based on reports at NNN05 Next generation of Nucleon decay and Neutrino detectors
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Search for exotic contributions to Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations Search for exotic contributions to Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations - Introduction.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
Supernova Relic Neutrinos (SRN) are a diffuse neutrino signal from all past supernovae that has never been detected. Motivation SRN measurement enables.
Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo KIAS, Seoul, Nov Fig: Senda NP-4.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
News from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Simon JM Peeters July 2007 o SNO overview o Results phases I & II o hep neutrinos and DSNB o Update on the III.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Physics with the ICARUS T1800 detector
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Presentation transcript:

Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005

◆ New solar neutrino data from SNO and neutrino oscillations ◆ New atmospheric neutrino data from Super-K and neutrino oscillations

SNO collab nucl-ex/ Also, M.Chen ENTApP2005

History of SNO Pure D 2 O Salt 3 He Counters NOW ? (1)  e+ +d  e - +p+p (CC) (also compared with SK +e  +e) (2)  x d  x pn, n+d  t+  (6.25MeV) (NC) & e +d  e - +p+p (CC) (3)  x +d  x +p+n, n+ 35 Cl  36 Cl+  ’s(  8.6MeV) (NC) & e +d  e - +p+p (CC) New! (4) New! Same as (3), but with improved stat. and syst. (1) (2) (3) (4)

391-day salt phase flux measurements  CC ( e ) = 1.68 (stat.) (syst.) × 10 6 cm −2 s −1  ES ( x ) = 2.35 (stat.) (syst.) × 10 6 cm −2 s −1  NC ( x ) = 4.94 (stat.) (syst.) × 10 6 cm −2 s − − − − − − −0.34 vertex cos  sun ~ isotropy ※ The previous number based on 254days salt data was: 0.306±0.026± w/o 8 B energy constraint

e and (  +  ) fluxes e and (  +  ) fluxes SSM 68%CL SNO NC 68%CL SNO CC 68%CL SNO CC 68%CL SNO ES 68%CL SNO ES 68%CL SK ES 68%CL SK ES 68%CL All the data are consistently explained within the standard oscillation

Comparison of results from SNO-D 2 O phase and SNO-salt phase Pure D 2 O Salt phase CC spectrum constrained Un-constrained CC NC

New day-night results from the salt-phase A NC =0 not required, E spectrum unconstrained: A CC = ±0.074±0.053 A NC =0 required, E spectrum constrained: A CC = ±0.058±0.027 A CC (%) A NC (%) A = 2(  N -  D ) / (  N +  D ) LMA prediction = +2.7% Combined result with the pure D 2 O A CC (=0.070± ): A CC (phase-I+II)=+0.037±0.040 Combined result with the Super-K A ES (=0.021± ) assuming the dilution factor due to  and  fluxes is 1.55: A CC (SNO+SK)=+0.035±0.027  consistent with the LMA prediction

Oscillation Analysis with 391-day Salt global solar with new SNO salt global solar plus latest KamLAND and new SNO salt SNO collab nucl-ex/ Also many other analyses Best fit  12 =33.9deg. (previous = 32.5deg)

New SK-II data Signal (stat.) 7.0 – 20.0 MeV 622 days SK-II Preliminary SK-II Flux = 2.36 ±0.06 (stat.) x 10 6 /cm 2 /sec (SK-I flux: 2.35  0.02(stat.)  0.08(sys.) ) Ready to start the physics analysis with the SK-II data. SK collab. Y.Takeuchi WIN05 = /-0.049(stat.) (sys.) A DN = (Day-Night) (Day+Night)/2 (SK-I D-N asymmetry: / ) Preliminary

SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis with finer binning. Solar term effect and sin 2  23 (SK-I) Detection of CC  interactions (SK-I) SK-II data and 2 flavor oscillation analysis SK-II L/E analysis (preliminary) SK collab. K.Scholberg, WIN05

SK-I atm analysis with finer binning In the previous atmospheric neutrino analyses in Super-K, Zenith-angle analysis  good for sin 2 2  L/E analysis  good for  m 2 Single analysis that gives best sin 2 2  and  m 2 ? Full oscillation 1/2 osci. Important energy range to see the oscillation dip = multi-GeV Finer energy bins for multi-GeV events Important energy range to see the oscillation dip = multi-GeV Finer energy bins for multi-GeV events 180  370 bins in (p, zenith, ev-type)

Expected sensitivities (MC 5yr exposure) Zenith- 180bin Zenith-370bin 2 2 ,  m 2 ) truth = (1.00, 2.5×10 -3 ) Zenith-370bin

Allowed region from the finer binning analysis Old zenith-angle analysis L/E analysis 90% CL allowed region: sin 2 2  > <  m 2 < 3.0×10 -3 eV 2 90% CL allowed region: sin 2 2  > <  m 2 < 3.0×10 -3 eV 2 (preliminary) Also consistent with all the other data Kam Soudan-2 K2K MACRO

s 2 2  12 =0.825  m 2 12 =8.3×10 -5  m 2 23 =2.5×10 -3 sin 2  13 =0 Because of the LMA solution, atmospheric neutrinos should also oscillate by (  12,  m 12 2 ). Oscillation probability is different between s 2  23 =0.4 and 0.6  discrimination between  23 >  /4 and <  /4 might be possible by studying low energy atmospheric e and  events. s 2  23 =0.4 =0.5 =0.6 However, due to the cancellation between   e and e  , the change in the e flux is small. Peres & Smirnov NPB 680 (2004) 479 Solar term effect to atmospheric Solar term effect to atmospheric

Constraint on sin 2  23 with and without the solar terms hep-ph/ found the  2 minimum at sin 2  23 =0.46 (Also E.Lisi this conference) …We need to understand the reason for this difference. w/o solar terms w/ solar terms Still (almost) maximum mixing is most favored. (preliminary)

Search for CC  events CC  events    hadrons ● Many hadrons .... (But no big difference with other (NC) events . ) BAD  - likelihood analysis ● Upward going only GOOD Zenith angle Only ~ 1.0 CC  FC events/kton ・ yr (BG (other events) ~ 130 ev./kton ・ yr) Only ~ 1.0 CC  FC events/kton ・ yr (BG (other events) ~ 130 ev./kton ・ yr) hadrons CC  MC

Tau likelihood (or NN) analysis Selection Criteria multi-GeV, multi-ring most energetic ring : e-like log(likelihood) > 0 or NN > 0.5 total visible energy number of ring candidates distance between interaction point and decay-e point max(P  ) clustered sphericity log(sphericity) downward DATA BG-MC tau-MC Cut  likelihood upward  MC) DATA BG-MC tau-MC Cut  likelihood Number of events

Zenith angle dist. and fit results (prelim., new) Likelihood analysisNN analysis , e, & NC background Data ×1.82  MC ×1.93  MC cos  zenith Number of events 145±48(stat) +9 / -36 (osc. para. uncertainty) 152±47(stat) +12 / -27 (osc. para. uncertainty) 79±31(syst) Fitted # of  events Expected # of  events

SK-II atmospheric neutrino data FC&PC: 627days, Up-going muons: 609days e-like  -like

Allowed osc. parameter region (preliminary) SK-II data are consistent with the SK-I data. (preliminary) (SK-I + II combined analysis: next stage)

SK-II L/E analysis L/E analysis was carried out for the SK-II data with the identical selection criteria as those in SK-I. (preliminary) SK-II SK-I Osc. Decay Decoh. Consistent with SK-I. Oscillation still gives the best fit to the data. Consistent with SK-I. Oscillation still gives the best fit to the data.

Allowed parameter region based on the SK-II L/E analysis (preliminary) SK-II SK-I SK-II data are consistent with the SK-I data. (SK-I + II combined analysis: next stage)

New SNO salt result New SK(-II) atmospheric neutrino results No surprise But our knowledge on neutrino masses and mixing angles are improving.

end

Oscillation Analysis latest SAGE, final Gallex/GNO, final Cl SK 1496-day zenith-spectrum SNO-I (pure D 2 O) summed spectra day+night (CC+ES+NC+backgrounds) SNO-II (391-day salt) extracted CC spectra (day+night), NC and ES fluxes (day+night) KamLAND 766 ton-yr results Input:

Binning for new analysis (=same binning as 3 flavor analysis) E Single- Ring  Multi- Ring  Up-stop Up-through 37 momentum bins x 10 zenith bins = 370 bins in total Multi- Ring e Single- Ring e PC- stop PC- through Same as old analysis finer binning Sample used in 3-flavor Fewer number of events per bin Poisson statistics to calculate  2 Multi- GeV Sub- GeV CC e CC 