Multi Protocol Label Switching Allot and MPLS
Multi Protocol Label Switching MPLS Smart, fast routing mechanism to solve routing table scalability issues Predefine paths for specific traffic types Scalable virtual private networks (VPNs) “E nd-to-end ” quality of service (QoS)
Does MPLS Replace Allot QoS Solution? MythsReality “I don’t need a dedicated QoS solution – I’m moving to MPLS” MPLS has become a connectivity technology and not a QoS technology. Allot and MPLS are complementary solutions. Allot completes the MPLS solution: Classifies applications (layer 7) – P2P; Citrix; VoIP. Signals the MPLS edge router with Diffserv. Shapes traffic on the last mile. Provides detailed monitoring and accounting.
MPLS Discussion LER : Label Edge Router MPLS Cloud LER MPLS - Customer 1 MPLS - Customer 2 MPLS - Customer 3 LER Customer Branch 1 Customer Branch 2 Customer Branch 3 Customer Head Quarters
MPLS Discussion - Traffic Engineering LER Customer LAN MPLS – Service class Critical MPLS – Service Class Real Time MPLS - Best Effort MPLS – Path Real Time MPLS – Path Best Effort MPLS – Path Class Critical Application recognition, Classification, & Queuing Tagging DiffServ Mapping DiffServ & MPLS labels CPE Poor discovery performance Costly Upgrade No On-line Monitoring No Accounting No flexible provisioning
MPLS discussion - Allot Benefits LER Customer LAN MPLS – Service class Real Time MPLS – Service Class Critical MPLS - Best Effort MPLS – Path Real Time MPLS – Path Best Effort MPLS – Path Class Critical Application recognition, Classification, & Queuing Shaping Accounting Monitoring Online Tagging DiffServ Mapping DiffServ & MPLS labels CPE Central Policy Definition Virtual Bandwidth Management No CPE upgrade
MPLS discussion - Traffic Engineering Real-Time Class VoIP High Priority Best Effort Class Critical Class ERP + HTTP Downloads & P2P ERP Peer 2 Peer VoIP HTTP Downloads ERP P2P VoIP HTTP Downloads Anything From the LAN Allot Communications No-QoS MPLS – QoS Enabled Network Discover & Classify Tagging Shaping
Allot completes MPLS Solution
By the book – MPLS TRAINING GUIDE By Rick Gallaher. “I personally prefer standalone components to perform policing and traffic accounting. The argument is as old as the stereo system arguments that pitted integrated systems against component-based systems. I like to have component-based policing and accounting, because it gives network analysts better control over their data. There are several policy-based policing “switches” on the market. I have had good luck with Allot’s NetEnforcer for policy-management and accounting purposes.” Rick Gallaher.