WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 16: proposal macro & microstructures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRA-W Research Strategies Kelly A. Shaw University of Richmond University of Richmond March 6, 2013.
Advertisements

Beginning Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools February, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.
SADC Course in Statistics Developing a sampling strategy (Session 05)
Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media The art of pitching Hoorcollege marketing blok 2 week 6.
July 2010 D2.1 Upgrading strategy Javier Soto Catalog Release 3. Communities.
Experiential Learning Cycle
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Shared Decision-Making November 29, 2007 LEARNERS=LEADERS.
Learning and Teaching Conference 2012 Skill integration for students through in-class feedback and continuous assessment. Konstantinos Dimopoulos City.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
D EVELOPING ASSESSMENT RUBRICS Ai Vu, Science Coordinator Integrated Middle School Science Partnership Alameda County Office of Education Materials from.
LITERACY PROFESSIONAL LEARNING RESOURCE Primary Schools Program Session 1: Overview of the Resource.
11 Speaking Informally “Speech is power: speech is to persuade, to convert, to compel.” ― Ralph Waldo Emerson, 19th century American poet.
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 14: Proposing as a social act; PIP, or proposal microstructure.
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 1: Introductions; Guidelines; Individual Project Pages;
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2004 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 4: Interview Questions for Grant Writer Shadowing Project.
Information & Interaction Design Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 3: Team & Project intros; Activity Analysis; Phase 1 presentation and Memo guidelines;
COIMBRA GROUP ANNUAL CONFERENCE Anita Lehikoinen.
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 3: Logical Structure of Proposals.
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 5: P3 guidelines; analyzing RFP’s.
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 9: Proposals - criteria for evalaution; P2 Guidelines.
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 18: P3 forecasting - summary document.
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 10: P1 presentation format; Need Statements; Next time: Field Trip!
WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 2: Tardy article & Intro to P1.
Process Mapping Using the GSBPM as a Reference Model
LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES
Software Development, Programming, Testing & Implementation.
House Ad Project: Developing an Ad Campaign R7. Using the “House Ad” as a project The “house ad” refers to a small ad agency that you might want to start.
Charting a course PROCESS.
1 The Purpose of Written Communication “Think now; write later”. ● Before one can begin to plan the “How”, he or she has to understand the “Why” of business.
Sales and Marketing Productivity Team 1 Added Value Analysis TOOL USED IN SALES AND MARKETING PRODUCTIVITY PROJECTS.
Acquisitions, a Publisher’s Perspective Craig Duncan Development Manager External Development Studio Building the partnership between.
Leading Culture Conversations The culture data offers a unique opportunity in organizations to discuss ‘how’ people work (or don’t work) together and identify.
Iowa Collaborative Assessment Modules (ICAM) Heartland Area Education Agency.
Unit #4 Grant & Proposal Writing Technical Writing 2013 Goals; Guidelines; Team Project; Genre.
Course Timeline October 7 th : Project description October 14 th : Paperwork and Budget October 21 st : Successful Grant Writers (Project description due)
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Informational Writing - Session One –Organizing for the Journey Ahead
Preparing Grant Proposals: A Session for INASP Country Coordinators Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID Knowledge Community Editor Bangladesh May 2009.
Methodologies. The Method section is very important because it tells your Research Committee how you plan to tackle your research problem. Chapter 3 Methodologies.
Introduction to Web Authoring Bill Hart-Davidson AIM: billhd30 Session 24
Proposal Writing Communication 2. Proposals. What is a Proposal? A proposal is a written report that seeks to persuade the reader to accept a suggested.
Introduction to Web Authoring Bill Hart-Davidson AIM: billhd30 Session 10
Making USDA grant submission more successful: A panelist’s perspective Brian S. Baldwin Dept. of Plant & Soil Sciences
Everyone Communicates Few Connect
Meeting Management/Planning. Today Go over basics of meeting management Introduce key elements of creating a plan.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
Problem-based Learning Cherdsak Iramaneerat Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital 1PBL.
Developing web-based CPD for group work and argumentation in science Session 2: Developing Argumentation 12/01/12.
+ ENG 105i Writing in Business Social Media Bootcamp & Interview Prep Day 1 September 11, 2015.
ALT-C 2004 Evaluating the e-Learning Experience Prof Tony Toole University of Glamorgan September 2004.
Program Evaluation Making sure instruction works..
Social Media Marketing Strategy
Marking and Feedback CPD Student approach to marking.
Marking and Feedback CPD Follow up to marking. Expectations and ground rules Respect the views of others Give everyone space to make a contribution All.
Session 3 – Evaluation process Viera Kerpanova, Miguel Romero.
Candidate Support. Working Agreements Attend cohort meetings you have agreed upon. Start and end on time; come on time and stay for the whole time. Contribute.
Introduction to Web Authoring Bill Hart-Davidson AIM: billhd30 Session 19
A Change of Heart About Animals
Interview Techniques LM10597 Designed by Learning Materials.
Pre-planning Planning to plan (and adapt) Implementation starts Here!
BSBWOR301 Organise personal work priorities and development
ELT 329 ACTION RESEARCH Week 4
How to Write a Narrative Essay
Reading Research Papers
Update on Data Use Task Force
Lecture 5: Writing Page
Introduction to Web Authoring
Learning Target: Students will provide constructive feedback to each group’s draft proposal to aid in the revision process. Language Objective: Students.
Chapter 4 Summary.
Presentation transcript:

WRA 453 Grant & Proposal Writing Fall 2005 Bill Hart-Davidson Session 16: proposal macro & microstructures

PIP : A fractal organization scheme for proposing Persuade Inform Persuade

Try it: proposing an activity Persuade Inform Persuade To ensure that our visualizations are usable, we will invite two expert reviewers from the field of information visualization to comment and give feedback on the design. Paul Dourish & Barbara Mirel are two leading researchers in the areas of information visualizationa and computer- supported cooperative work. Both have agreed to support this project by serving as reviewers. We believe that with the help of Mirel & Dourish, our visualization tool can be integrated into the work practice of proposal writers who have not previously used self-analytic tools to improve their performance.

Scaled up: PIP for methods slot Persuade Inform Persuade Line of Argument: Here is a methodological approach that has been shown to be sound in these previous studies/projects. Line of Argument: We are using the methodological approach, adapting for our specific project in these ways. Line of Argument: Based on our pilot study and previous published work, here are the positive outcomes we expect that match with the goals stated in the RFP. (e.g. replicability, validity, etc.)

Scaled down: PIP elevator speech Persuade Inform Persuade Some colleagues of mine and I are working on a way to improve proposal writing success by visualizing the proposing process. We depict proposing process as chains of communication events rather than tasks. Task-based visualizations are not detailed enough, we find, because knowledge work tasks are themselves made up of communication events - sometimes many of them!

Your PIP practice Persuade Inform Persuade Draft an elevator speech for your P2 project using the PIP structure. Post it to your project page Using the PIP structure can be a helpful, ready-to-hand strategy for all parts of the proposing process. Try it for yourself! Not only will this earn you credit for an in class exercise when you post it to your project page, you might also find yourself using it for real when talking to someone about project 2!

Scaling Up Whole Proposal This project should be supported… These are our methods… These are the expected benefits… Methods Section We propose this methodology because… This is how we will carry out the methods These are the expected outcomes… Phase X This phase is necessary because… This is what goes on during phase X Here are the expected outcomes… Task This task should be done because… Here is how the task will be done These are the expected outcomes… Level P1 Slot I Slot P2 Slot Freed p. 178

Types of Current Situations & Expected Outcomes Lack insight Have insight Want insight Lack Plan Want plan Want plan implemented Freed p. 21

Types of Current Situations & Expected Outcomes Lack insight Have insight Want insight Lack Plan Want plan Want plan implemented Freed p objective

Tell us about your P3 What are the possible current conditions? What are the possible desired outcomes? How does your project fit in? What are your objectives? (back to PIP!)