Graham Allison Presentation to The 35 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy October 28, 2004 Anticipating and Assessing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US-India Civil Nuclear Relations ITRN 603 International Trade Relations Kristin Isabelli Slide 1.
Advertisements

Implications of the NPT on a Coordinated Approach to Triple S Dr M. S. Draper C.B.E. Past head – Non-Proliferation Policy UK Department of Energy and Climate.
To what extend has the world communitys failure to stop North Koreas nuclear weapons program emboldened other countries to pursue nuclear weapon programs?
Nuclear Suppliers Group: Its Origins, Role, Structure and Activities
April 6, NPR in Context Third comprehensive review of U.S. nuclear policies and posture –Previous reviews in 1994 and 2001 Conducted by DoD.
Dealing with North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Six Party Talks simulation briefing.
Challenge of Nuclear Weapons
Excellences, allow me first to remind you of some relevant information on the present status of peaceful use of nuclear energy within global energy strategy.
1 Can the Spread of Nuclear Weapons be Stopped? ◘ Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory November 1, 2006 ◘ Wolfgang K.H. Panofsky.
Government E-1275: Nov. 6, 2007 Session #7. The Korean Peninsula.
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence.
Nuclear Renaissance and Nonproliferation in North-East Asia Hua HAN Associate Professor School of International Affairs Beijing University.
The Regulation of International Trade in Enriched Uranium in a New Build Era Maxine Symington.
The ICAN Campaign ICAN stands for International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear weapons.
Oslo, 4 March 2005Managing Nuclear Material Stockpiles in the 21 st Century 1 Nuclear Material Security and Multilateral Agreements Stephan Klement Office.
A Nuclear Weapon-Free World?: Evaluating Obama’s Nuclear Agenda Scott D. Sagan November 30, 2011 Canberra Lowy Institute.
Nuclear Treaties Dennis Silverman, U C Irvine Source:
 One person from a team up at once.  Touch only your team buzzer (you will lose 1 point)  Answer only if you are first to buzz in (buzzer will blink)
 Nuclear Security Summit 2014 Chairs: Hank Chau, Evonne Pei, Jonathan Wu.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Sweden and the Nuclear Security Summit Process Jan A. Lodding Deputy Director Disarmament.
The Unfinished Business of Nuclear Disarmament Robert Alvarez Senior Scholar, Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. April 3, 2008.
North Korean Nuclear Affairs Bureau Prospects of the Six-Party Talks.
International Relations (13) Korean Nuclear Power/Weapons 김 병 구
The North Korean Nuclear/Missile Crisis Dr. Clay Moltz Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies June 2005.
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
The Nuclear Renaissance Dr. Charles K. Ebinger Director, Energy Security Initiative Brookings.
The Nonproliferation Treaty. Atoms for Peace December 8, 1953 President Eisenhower spoke to the UN suggesting that peaceful uses of the atom be promoted.
The Nuclear Club Who’s in? Who’s out? And where do we go from here?
Regional Security Issues in China-US Relations Guo Xuetang Department of International Studies & Public Administration Department of International Studies.
Steps to Safety: Reducing the Danger of Nuclear Weapons.
NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY: A REGIME IN NEED OF INTENSIVE CARE International Organizations and Nonproliferation Program Center For Nonproliferation.
The Presidency and Foreign Policy 9 December 2010.
Security threats in the Middle East and Northern Africa: the problem of weapons of mass destruction proliferation Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov President, PIR.
Independent Task Force Report on U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy: Presentation to Oak Ridge National Laboratory Dr. Charles D. Ferguson Philip D. Reed Senior.
A WMD-free zone in the Middle East: Desirable and Feasible – and more Necessary than ever.
Foreign & Defense Policies. Discussion Questions:  Why do you think the Founders intentionally divided responsibility for foreign affairs between president.
A BRIEF HISTORY OF SAFEGUARDS IMPLEMENTATION IN IRAQ PRIOR TO THE GULF WAR Iraq was an original signatory of the NPT (July 1968) and became a party.
Foreign Policy: Asia By Brandi, Sarah, and Mike. Foreign Policy  Highly influential on the world stage as it is a superpower  Throughout U.S. History,
Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe.
Foreign Policy 1991-Today. After the fall of the Soviet Union No common enemy for democratic world governments to focus on. No common enemy for democratic.
Lesson 2 – Disarmament.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Compare different types of weapons.  Identify key treaties regulating nuclear arsenals.  Describe.
Public Policy #3 Foreign Policy.
Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY Chapter Seventeen.
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
April 27 th  Learning Target  I can understand the threat of nuclear proliferation.  Opener  Name all the countries you can think of that have nuclear.
Summary of Scientific Studies The environmental consequences of a “regional” nuclear war would cause massive global famineThe environmental consequences.
Day 8.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Review current threats to global nuclear security.  Reflect on content & skill learning.
Nuclear Safety & Security in the DPRK Sharon Squassoni Senior Fellow & Director Proliferation Prevention Program Asan Institute “The 2012 US-North Korea.
Technical Division Overview: Nonproliferation & Arms Control Mission To promote and advance the research, development and application of effective technologies.
The 8 th ROK-UN Joint Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues, Jeju, Republic of Korea, November 2009 NPT 2010: Prospects for a New.
Post Cold war: 1990’s Iraq hardens NSG, 153 safeguards:uranium crunch? Pressures for India-Pak Bilateral/regional restraints, for signing NPT Economic.
Making Foreign Policy. The President and Foreign Policy ► Foreign Policy: a nation’s overall plan for dealing with other nations ► The most basic goal.
1 Sixth ROK-UN Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues 3-5 December 2007 CONTROLLING SENSITIVE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ACTIVITIES Mr Jeff Robinson,
1 Summary of the “Group of 7” National Laboratory Directors’ Recommendations for the Future of Nuclear Energy Craig F. Smith Lawrence Livermore National.
WHAT HAPPENS TO DETERRENCE AS NUCLEAR WEAPONS DECREASE TOWARD ZERO? INVITED TALK AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA SIDNEY DRELL STANFORD UNIVERSITY.
Nuclear Weapons Part I.
Ozersk, Russian Federation School #39
Asia’s Transformation:
Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control (Part 2)
DDG Nuclear Energy: Mr Zizamele Mbambo
What is required for nuclear disarmament?
North Korean Nuclear Proliferation Challenges
Nuclear (Non-)Proliferation
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
The Nuclear Test Ban: Technical Opportunities for the Trump Administration Stephen Herzog, Yale University United States Strategic.
Who Has the Bomb? US 1945 USSR/Russia 1949 UK 1952 France 1960
Submarines & Safeguards
Washington and the Test-Ban:
Presentation transcript:

Graham Allison Presentation to The 35 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy October 28, 2004 Anticipating and Assessing U.S. Vulnerabilities in a Changing Threat Environment: Nuclear Terrorism

Washington, DC—The White House

No Loose Nukes Actions Required for A-level Performance: Make preventing nuclear terrorism an absolute priority US and Russian presidents must engage his counterpart in a joint program to assure no nuclear weapons or materials are stolen Appoint individuals of stature reporting directly to US and Russian presidents as commanders in the war on nuclear terrorism Develop new “gold standard” for security of world’s nuclear weapons and materials Secure all nuclear weapons and materials to the gold standard as fast as technically possible on a set timetable Overcome bureaucratic obstacles, e.g., US-Russian liability and access disputes Lead a joint US-Russian campaign to persuade other nuclear states to adopt the gold standard Draw on previous nuclear cooperation with China to enlist Pakistan in the preventing nuclear terrorism club Launch Global Cleanout campaign to take back HEU from both Soviet- and US-supplied research reactors on fastest technically feasible timetable Hold accountable cabinet-level officials at DOE-State and Industry and Energy-Foreign Affairs for Global Cleanout

No New Nascent Nukes Actions Required for A-level Performance: Close current NPT loophole that permits signatories to develop nuclear fuel production capabilities Orchestrate consensus that there will be no new national HEU enrichment or Pu reprocessing Guarantee supply of reactor fuel to non-nuclear weapons states at prices less than half national production costs Organize program to securely store spent fuel from civilian reactors Persuade all states to adopt the Additional Protocol Limit import of equipment for existing civilian programs to states that have signed Additional Protocol Criminalize proliferation on both domestic and international levels Expand Proliferation Security Initiative beyond current 16 states Make grand bargain with Iran: in exchange for dismantlement of enrichment and reprocessing facilities, offer fuel-cycle agreement, acceptance of Bushehr, relaxation of trade sanctions, and security guarantee Pose credible threats to Iran sufficient to persuade it to accept grand bargain Accelerate and highlight deep cuts in US-Russian nuclear arms, and minimize role of nuclear weapons as fulfillment of NPT Article IV Resume Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT) negotiations

No New Nuclear States Actions Required for A-level Performance: Draw bright line under today’s eight nuclear powers and declare: no more Subordinate all policy objectives on N. Korea (e.g., regime change) to this goal Send Rice or Powell to Pyongyang for candid private discussions on condition that all nuclear activity is frozen for duration of talks Offer carrots in exchange for verifiable dismantlement: bilateral non- aggression pledge, expansion of food aid, resumption of Japan-S. Korea fuel shipments Describe further phased benefits: financing for natural gas pipeline, construction of two light-water reactors, aid for infrastructure reconstruction, N. Korean Nunn-Lugar, eventual normalization of relations Pose credible threat to North Korea sufficient to persuade it to choose nuclear disarmament Ratify Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT)