Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antoni Ribas, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Professor of Surgery
Advertisements

1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma Dr.Mina Tajvidi oncologist.
Selezione dei pazienti affetti da melanoma Vanna Chiarion Sileni Melanoma and Skin Cancer Unit IOV-IRCCS, Padova.
Immunotherapy is the Preferred Initial Treatment for Most Patients with Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutant Melanoma Michael B. Atkins, M.D. Deputy Director Georgetown-Lombardi.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Phase 1/2 Study of GSK , a Selective Inhibitor of Oncogenic Mutant BRAF Kinase in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma and Other Solid Tumors Kefford.
Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation 1 Phase III Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial (BRIM3) Comparing BRAF Inhibitor.
SYSTEMIC THERAPY FOR UNRESECTABLE STAGE III OR METASTATIC CUTANEOUS MELANOMA Sarkheil Mehdi Hematologist- oncologist.
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma O’Day S et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 4. Hodi FS et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract.
Challenges in Incorporating Integral NGS into Early Clinical Trials
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
IPILIMUMAB UPDATE. Current Status GLOBAL STUDY –17 COUNTRIES : NORTH AMERICA, EU, AUSTRALIA –Canada 6 sites PATIENTS ENROLLED (as of May 19, :20.
What are the main benefits of BRAF inhibitors in metastatic melanoma?
About these slides SPEC – Short Presentation in Emerging Concepts Provided by the CAP as an aid to pathologists to facilitate discussion on the topic.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Two Year Estimate of Overall Survival in COMBI-v, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Vemurafenib.
1 News from American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting June 2011 (Lung and Skin) Paul Donnellan Consultant Medical Oncologist Galway University Hospitals.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Prior to the start of the program, check your syllabus to ensure you have the participant survey and CME evaluation: In the front of your syllabus Remove.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
High Response Rates to Crizotinib in Advanced, Chemoresistant ALK+ Lymphoma Patients 1 Crizotinib in Advanced, Chemoresistant Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8523.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Durable Remissions in Patients with High- Risk Chronic Lymphocytic.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer Slideset on: Piccart-Gebhart M, Procter M, Leyland- Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
이근욱 분당서울대학교병원/서울의대 혈액종양내과 부교수
What should patients with BRAF mutant melanoma receive as front line therapy? Antoni Ribas, M.D. Professor of Medicine Professor of Surgery Professor of.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
KEYNOTE-021: Pembrolizumab + Ipilimumab Active in Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Melanoma Nati Lerman MD Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper September 2016.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Stage III and IV Malignant Melanoma Jennifer Carter 09/12/17.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Combined Inhibition of PD-L1, MEK, and BRAF Active in Advanced Melanoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CheckMate 204: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Pts With Advanced Melanoma and Asymptomatic, Untreated Brain Metastases CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Intervista a Angelo Delmonte
Treatment Algorithms in Melanoma: Past, Present, and Future
Mahmood rasheed Hematology/oncology fellow VCU Massey cancer center
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Figure 3 Summary of overall survival by Kaplan–Meier
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
The Changing Field of Melanoma: Ipilimumab.
Adjuvant Therapy in Melanoma
Ipilimumab plus Dacarbazine for Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma1 Phase 3 Randomized Study of Ipilimumab (IPI) plus Dacarbazine (DTIC) vs DTIC.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation of BRAF inhibition and ipilimumab? What interval should there be between BRAF inhibitors and other therapy for melanoma? What is the optimal dosing regimen for BRAF inhibitors?

Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation of BRAF inhibition and ipilimumab? What interval should there be between BRAF inhibitors and other therapy for melanoma? What is the optimal dosing regimen for BRAF inhibitors?

BRAF inhibitors beyond progression? BRIM2, BRIM3, BREAK3 and BRAF + MEK trials all allowed treatment beyond the endpoint of progression In a patient that has been treated with prior immunotherapy, I would treat beyond progression given that clear benefit has been observed with long remissions after surgical resection with continued BRAFi

Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation of BRAF inhibition and ipilimumab? What interval should there be between BRAF inhibitors and other therapy for melanoma? What is the optimal dosing regimen for BRAF inhibitors?

Rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors Pre-clinical rationale:  Murine data support the idea in vitro and in vivo to decrease generation of BRAF inhibitor resistance Clinical rationale:  Occasional patients have had late regression of disease after stopping BRAF inhibitors (rare)  Decreased selection pressure for resistance Plan: to be tested in a randomized study, but not recommended at this time

Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation of BRAF inhibition and ipilimumab? What interval should there be between BRAF inhibitors and other therapy for melanoma? What is the optimal dosing regimen for BRAF inhibitors?

BRAFi followed by Ipi or Ipi followed by BRAFi: Overall survival Ascierto et al, ASCO 2013; 9035 Median follow-up of 11 months (range: 1–34) Median OS in patient subgroups unbalanced at baseline (ipi-BRAFi vs BRAFi-ipi)  Elevated LDH: 14 months (95% CI: 13.4–14.6) vs 7.5 months (95% CI 3.6–11.4) respectively  Brain metastasis: 12.3 months (95% CI: 7.9–16.7) vs 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6–9.4) respectively Months PFS (%) lpilimumab then BRAF inhibitor (n=48) BRAF inhibitor then ipilimumab (n=45) Median OS BRAF inhibitor then ipilimumab: 9.9 months (95% CI: 5.8–14.0) lpilimumab then BRAF inhibitor: 14.5 months (95% CI: 11.1–17.9)

If BRAFi creates an “immune” milieu, then why are IPI responses poor after failing Vemu? Ackerman et al, SITC 2012: 24 Number of patients (n=40) Response to ipilimumab (36 evaluable) Progressive Disease34 Stable Disease2 Partial Response0 Complete Response0 Progression on ipilimumab No4 Yes36 Number of ipilimumab doses received < 420 > 420 Response to ipilimumab is limited following BRAFi and only half of patients can even receive all 4 doses

Combining / sequencing immune and targeted therapy for melanoma? Adapted from Ribas et al, Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 336–341 Years ImmunotherapyTargeted therapy Percent alive Years Combination? Percent alive 1230 Years Hodi et al, N Engl J Med 2010;363:711–723 Chapman et al, N Engl J Med 2011;364:2507–2516.

Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation of BRAF inhibition and ipilimumab? What interval should there be between BRAF inhibitors and other therapy for melanoma? What is the optimal dosing regimen for BRAF inhibitors?

Timing of BRAFi with XRT and ipilimumab Many investigators will stop BRAF inhibitors 24 hours before surgery or radiation and only continue 48 hours later At Melanoma Institute of Australia, BRAF inhibitors are continued through whole brain or stereotactic radiosurgery Serious concerns have arisen about administering ipilimumab and vemurafenib in close proximity

Skin toxicity from vemurafenib soon after ipilimumab Harding et al, N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 866–8 Patient numberAge Stage of metastasis Ipilimumab dose Number of doses of ipilimumab Immune-related adverse event with ipilimumab Number of days from last dose of ipilimumab to start of vemurafenibRash Number of days to onset of rash 163M1c34Yes20Grade M1c34No24Grade M1c36No28Grade M1c31Yes36No 561M1c34No51Grade 1Not reported 651M1c101Yes76No 746M1c34Yes83Grade M1c34No117Grade M1c311No147Grade M1c101Yes168No 1150M1c103Yes247Grade M1a104Yes294Grade M1b105Yes955No

Simultaneous ipilimumab + vemurafenib Ribas et al, N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1365–6 12 patients treated in two cohorts  All BRAF mutated patients One month lead-in of vemurafenib, then 4 doses of ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg standard dose  In first 6 patients at full doses of vemurafenib and ipilimumab: 4/6 DLTs of hepatotoxicity  In second 6 patients at reduced doses of vemurafenib: 3/6 DLTs of hepatotoxicity These data suggest that at therapeutic doses of the 2 agents, toxicity would preclude adequate dosing

Safe interval between BRAFi and ipilimumab? BRAFi→ipi  Data suggest that a 6–8 week interval may be needed Ipi→BRAFi  It may be more difficult to administer IPI then a BRAF inhibitor  Skin toxicity Ipi+BRAFi  Simultaneous administration associated with hepatotoxicity