THE INADEQUATE STUDY OF SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY AND ITS WORLD-WIDE CONSEQUENCES 欢迎 Peter Emerson The de Borda Institute 德博达研究所.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computational Game Theory Amos Fiat Spring 2012
Advertisements

On the Robustness of Preference Aggregation in Noisy Environments Ariel D. Procaccia, Jeffrey S. Rosenschein and Gal A. Kaminka.
Instant Runoff Voting (Ranked Choice Voting) Presented By: Rob Richie, Executive Director The Center for Voting and Democracy (The Center is a non-profit,
Algorithmic Game Theory Uri Feige Robi Krauthgamer Moni Naor Lecture 9: Social Choice Lecturer: Moni Naor.
Election Methods: Review of Alternatives and Oregon Proposals League of Women Voters ® of Oregon Education Fund September 2008.
Instant Runoff Voting What really happens behind the curtain? A personal opinion…
Electoral Systems & Party Systems The causes and consequences of multiparty competition.
VOTING SYSTEMS Section 2.5.
Instant Runoff Voting Presented By: Deborah Markowitz Vermont Secretary of State.
Lirong Xia Friday, May 2, 2014 Introduction to Social Choice.
TOWARDS A ‘PEACE-FUL’ DEMOCRACY The de Borda Institute
1.1, 1.2 Ballots and Plurality Method
What is your favorite food?. Preference Schedule A Preference Schedule is a way to represent the order in which people like (prefer) certain items. The.
Voting Review Material
The Distortion of Cardinal Preferences in Voting Ariel D. Procaccia and Jeffrey S. Rosenschein.
VOTING THEORY: DECISION-MAKING In th following profile, 12 voters – Messrs. i to u cast their prefereences on five different options, A.B, C, D and E.
In deeds mediation, questions are open; in politics, then, why are they closed? The de Borda Institute
Topics for Today Civil Society and Institutional Design: Electoral Systems 1.Finish group discussion activity. 2.Characteristics and consequences of three.
1.3 The Borda Count Method. The Borda Count Method In an election of N candidates, give 1 point for the last place, 2 points for the second from last.
The Electoral College and Alternative Voting Systems
Making your vote count Understanding the different electoral systems Source:
Voting Rules: What’s Fair? Q. What is the most fair voting rule? Suppose three proposals to spend $15: Z=Status Quo (currently, we spend $10 on guns and.
Social choice (voting) Vincent Conitzer > > > >
Single Transferable Vote. Multi Member Constituencies Only Voting is Preferential meaning voters indicate preference by numbers, In order of their favourite.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting The Paradoxes of Democracy Vote! In.
CPS Voting and social choice Vincent Conitzer
Ch Voting Preference tables E, F, G, and H are running for math club president If everyone is asked to rank their preferences, how many different.
Alex Tabarrok. Individual Rankings (Inputs) BDA CCC ABD DAB Voting System (Aggregation Mechanism) Election Outcome (Global Ranking) B D A C.
In mediation, the questions are open; In politics, they are closed! The de Borda Institute
Shiran Alush Shai Kerer Dor Altshuler Academic instructor: Prof. Ronen Brafman The Decider Group Decision Making.
HF3909 Alternative Voting Systems. The voter is presented with a list of all candidates and given the option of specifying his or her order of preference.
Electoral System Families The Rockridge Citizens’ Assembly April 21, 2004.
Other Voting Systems Although FPTP and AMS are used in British Parliamentary elections, there are other voting systems you should be aware of 1.Alternative.
Chapter 12 sec 1. Def. Each person votes for his or her favorite candidate. The candidate receiving the most votes is declared the winner.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems and Executive- Legislative Relations Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences.
Explaining party systems The role of electoral systems.
Great Theoretical Ideas in Computer Science.
Let’s take a class vote. How many of you are registered to vote?
Voting Methods Examples of Voting Methods (other than majority rules) –Plurality –Borda Count –Hare System –Sequential Pairwise –Approval Voting.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods.
VOTING PARADOXES AND HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM Hannu Nurmi University of Turku Turku, Finland.
Electoral Systems and Reform How democratic is our democracy?
Why We Should Use the Plurality with Elimination Voting Method.
Instant Runoff Voting Written By: Chris Gates Pam Wilmot, Common Cause MA Edited By: Michael Bleiweiss, Common Cause MA Ranked Choice Voting for Single-Winner.
Warm-Up Rank the following soft drinks according to your preference (1 being the soft drink you like best and 4 being the one you like least)  Dr. Pepper.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Preference Ballot A Ballot in which the voters are asked to rank the candidates in order of preference. 1. Brownies.
The mathematics of voting The paradoxes of democracy.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences of three basic types of electoral.
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem
Voting and Apportionment
Plurality and Borda Count Method
Introduction to Social Choice
1.5 Weighted Voting and Voting Power
SO, WHAT IS DEMOCRACY ANYWAY?
Characteristics of different versions of Single Transferable Vote
Introduction to Social Choice
1.3 The Borda Count Method.
Election (Starter) Here are three ballot papers from an election for a single candidate to represent a group of voters. If these were the only three votes.
Warm Up – 1/23 - Thursday How many people voted in the election?
Social Choice Theory [Election Theory]
Voting Rules: What’s Fair?
Classwork: p.33 (27abc run off, 29ab run off, 31, 33ab run off)
Voting Preference Ballots and Preference Schedules
Electoral Reform in BC …….but, why? (or why not?)
Introduction to Social Choice
CPS 173 Voting and social choice
Homework (day 1): p , 4, 6, 10, 12ab, 16, 18abc, 24, 26
Section 14.1 Voting Methods.
Edexcel Politics A-level
Presentation transcript:

THE INADEQUATE STUDY OF SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY AND ITS WORLD-WIDE CONSEQUENCES 欢迎 Peter Emerson The de Borda Institute 德博达研究所

ZIMBABWE President Mugabe: Elections:first-past-the-post Governance:majority vote

EGYPT Constitutional Referendum Yes77.3% No22.7% (41% turnout)

MAJORITARIANISM (majority rule by majority vote) The (simple or weighted) majority vote is the most inaccurate measure of collective opinion ever invented.

CLOSED QUESTIONS SEMI-OPEN QUESTIONS OPEN QUESTIONS ↑ All prefs Borda BC / MBC non Major- C AV = alternative vote BC = Borda Count IRV = instant run-off MBC = modified Borda count STV = single transferable vote Condorcet (Copeland) MAJORITARIANMAJORITARIAN O Some Approval voting U prefsSerial voting Sweden* AV = IRV = STV N 1 st prefs only Weighted majority SA, UN Consociational NI, Belgium 2-round voting Norway** T Simple majority Ireland, UK Twin Majority Switzerland Plurality New Zealand * a series of majority votes ** a first-round plurality and then a majority vote 1 of 2 options 1 of some options 1 or some of some options 1or some or all of all options 1 st preference onlyPreferential BINARYMULTI-OPTIONAL VOTERS’ CHOICE → → DECISION-MAKING

‘DEMOCRATIC’ (?) DICTATORS

OPTIONS Voters and their preferences ijklmnp A B C D A VOTERS’ PROFILE

OPTIONS Voters and their preferences ijklmnp A B C D A VOTERS’ PROFILE

OPTIONS Voters and their preferences ijklmnp A B C D A VOTERS’ PROFILE

OPTIONS Voters and their preferences MBC Con- dor- cet ijklmnp A B C D A VOTERS’ PROFILE

Methodology Social Choice and Social Ranking Examples of use in: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th Decision-makingElections Plurality voteAD B/CB/C UK (where it is called FPP) Kenya Two-round system DA-- New Zealand (referendums) Norway (in parliament) France Côte d'Ivoire AVBA--Australia BC/MBCCBADSlovenia CondorcetCBDA- ‘DEMOCRATIC’ RESULTS

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 pt.

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 pt. She who votes for 2 options gives her favourite 2 pts (and her 2 nd choice 1 pt).

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 pt. She who votes for 2 options gives her favourite 2 pts (and her 2 nd choice 1 pt). He who votes for 3 options gives his favourite 3 pts, (his 2 nd choice 2 pts and his 3 rd choice 1 pt).

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 pt. She who votes for 2 options gives her favourite 2 pts (and her 2 nd choice 1 pt). He who votes for 3 options gives his favourite 3 pts, (his 2 nd choice 2 pts and his 3 rd choice 1 pt). She who votes for all 5 options gives her favourite 5 pts, (her 2 nd choice 4 pts, and so on).

PARTIAL VOTING IN AN MBC If you vote for: Number of options your 1 ST pref gets: 1 pt2 pts3 pts4 pts5 pts your 2 ND pref gets: 1 pt2 pts3 pts4 pts your 3 RD pref gets: 1 pt2 pts3 pts your 4 TH pref gets: 1 pt2 pts your 5 TH pref gets: 1 pt

BORDA COUNT (BC) A full vote=n, n-1 … 2, 1 MODIFIED BORDA COUNT (MBC) A full vote = n, n-1 … 2, 1 A partial vote=m, m-1 … 2, 1

CLOSED QUESTIONS SEMI-OPEN QUESTIONS OPEN QUESTIONS ↑ All prefs Borda BC / MBC non Major- C AV = alternative vote BC = Borda Count IRV = instant run-off MBC = modified Borda count STV = single transferable vote Condorcet (Copeland) MAJORITARIANMAJORITARIAN O Some Approval voting U prefsSerial voting Sweden* AV = IRV = STV N 1 st prefs only Weighted majority SA, UN Consociational NI, Belgium 2-round voting Norway** T Simple majority Ireland, UK Twin Majority Switzerland Plurality New Zealand * a series of majority votes ** a first-round plurality and then a majority vote 1 of 2 options 1 of some options 1 or some of some options 1or some or all of all options 1 st preference onlyPreferential BINARYMULTI-OPTIONAL VOTERS’ CHOICE → → DECISION-MAKING