Presented by: Ray T. Oyakawa, M.D. Sharper Vision Centers A MEDICAL GROUP Comparison of PalmScan and IOL Master axial lengths measurements No financial.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PREDICTING AXIAL LENGTH USING AGE, KERATOMETRY AND CYCLOREFRACTION LIONEL KOWAL & PRASHANT SAHARE Center for Eye Research Australia & Ocular Motility Clinic,

Advertisements

Sharper Vision Centers

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.

Accuracy of Predicted Refractive Error in Resident-Performed Cataract Surgery Using Partial Coherence Interferometry Nickolas P. Katsoulakis, M.D., Paul.

Biometry: Long & Short eyes Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

Development of an Apple iPhone IOL Calculator Application for Cataract Surgery Rony Gelman, MD 1, Richard E. Braunstein, MD 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology,

Cataract Surgery Using Biaspheric IOLs in Patients With Corneal Irregularities James P. Gills, MD St. Luke’s Cataract & Laser Institute Tarpon Springs.

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,

Disclosure of finanacial interest * Author has no financial interest in this paper. ** Author's research is partially funded by Imperial Medical Technologies.

Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.

Vision-Related Quality of Life Assessment using NEI-VFQ-25 in Children With History of Phakic or Aphakic IOL Refractive Surgery. Claire Hartnett MD Michael.

Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,

The Effect of the Restor Multifocal IOL on Frequency Doubling Perimetry Elizabeth Yeu, MD1, Elizabeth Woznak, BS2, Nicole Kesten, BS2, Steven VL Brown,

Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus Goldmann Applanation R. S. Davidson 1 ; N. Faberowski 2 ; R. J. Noecker 3 ; M. Y. Kahook 1 1.

Bret Fisher, MD The Eye Center of North Florida Panama City, FL

Immersion A-Scan with EZ Immersion Tip The team of designers at MMD has been looking for a better way to perform immersion scans and they have come up.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2012 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan

Evaluation of Interface Reflectivity and Corneal Aberrations following DSAEK Hamid Khakshoor, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Mashhad University of Medical.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master

Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.

Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Multizone Laser Vision Correction in Presbyopic Patients ASCRS 2010 Paul Van Saarloos PhD – CustomVis, employee.

Purpose: Introduction:  At initial evaluation: For post-op day # 0 patients: Pre-op VA was 20/50.6 (0.395 ± 0.198); Post-op VA was 20/102.0 (0.196 ± 0.162);

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2011 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan Resident, Hong Kong Eye Hospital.

Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes

Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.

Klinika ocni a esteticke chirurgie in Zlin, Czech Republic Authors: Katerina Buusova Smeckova, M.D., MBA As. professor Zdenek Smecka, M.D., CSc. None of.

INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION BY IMMERSION A-SCAN BIOMETRY VERSUS CONTACT A-SCAN BIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS BEFORE CATARACT SURGERY Burak Bilgin**, M.D.,

Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.

Endothelial Dystrophy Association with Hyperopia Glenn W. Thompson, M.D. Timothy P. Page, M.D. Authors have no financial interest.

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD, Jan Willem van der Linden, BOpt,

EVALUATION OF REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER IOL IMPLANTATION

ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.

Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR, Kerry D Solomon, MD Magill research center for vision correction Storm Eye Institute Medical University.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Internal Repositioning of Posteriorly Dislocated IOL: User’s Friendly Technique The author have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Effect of Ocular Deviation on Pupil size with Implanted Multifocal Intraocular Lens Yoshihiko Iida, MDKimiya Shimizu, MD Misae Ito, CO Kitasato University.

Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,

REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES WITH TORIC ICL IMPLANTS CHIEF AUTHOR: Dr. D.RAMAMURTHY CO – AUTHOR: Dr. R.CHITRA The authors have no financial interest in the subject.

Factors which Influence Accommodative Amplitude in Crystalens HD Patients Uday Devgan, MD, FACS Devgan Eye Surgery, Los Angeles, CA FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES:

Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD

Ray T. Oyakawa, M.D., M.B.A. ASCRS Boston 2010 No financial interests Vector Analysis for Astigmatism Management in Cataract Surgery.

DGII 2008 Comparison of Aspheric ReSTOR and Tecnis multifocal IOL Dongho Lee MD, PhD Yonsei eye center, Seoul, South Korea No Financial Interest.

IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.

DR. TEJAS D. SHAH AMDAVAD EYE LASER HOSPITALS PVT LTD GOOD BYE GLASSES LASER CENTRE AHMEDABAD, INDIA NO FINANCIAL INTEREST

Long-Term Longitudinal Change in Keratometry After Pediatric Cataract Surgery Rupal H. Trivedi, MD MSCR M. Edward Wilson, MD Osman Melih, MD Dipankar Bandyopadhyay,

LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.

Efficacy and Safety of the Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Mini-Shunt with Intraoperative 5-Fluorouracil ASCRS 2009 – San Francisco A. Balashanmugam, MD, L. Farrokh-Siar,

Comparision of ultrasound A- scan with optical A-scan Dr.Somshekar.N Consultant Refractive Services Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore No Finanacial Interest.

Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.

iTrace Dynamic Laser Refraction: Clinical Application

Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.

Hongseok Yang, M.D. Dae Hee Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of medicine, Suwon, Korea The authors have no financial interest.

Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.

Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.

Shinagawa LASIK Center Evaluation of Functional Near Vision by Presbyopic Patients Implanted With Small Aperture Inlay Evaluation of Functional Near Vision.

John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.

Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.

Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.

Suppressive effect of combined treatment of orthokeratology and 0

Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.

Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery

Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.

Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices

Comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens with the Verisyse Phakic Intraocular Lens in High Myopia Jigna Joshi MD Marian Macsai MD Parag Majmudar.

None of the authors has a financial interest on the presented data.

Results of corrective surgery: secondary lens implantation at a cataract surgery training centre Mehul Shah,shreya shah, adway appalware,pramod upadhyay,

Satisfaction Survey of Presbyopic LASIK Patients Up to 11 Years Postop

Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Ray T. Oyakawa, M.D. Sharper Vision Centers A MEDICAL GROUP Comparison of PalmScan and IOL Master axial lengths measurements No financial interests ASCRS Chicago 2008

Study Design Prospective study for axial length measurement comparison between PalmScan & IOL Master. Prospective study for axial length measurement comparison between PalmScan & IOL Master. 74 consecutive eyes of patients for presbyopia correcting IOLs between January 19, 2007 & October 17, consecutive eyes of patients for presbyopia correcting IOLs between January 19, 2007 & October 17, Three eyes were eliminated-could not be measured with IOL Master V 3.02 software & 5.02 software. One eye was successfully measured with V when it could not be measured with V eyes were done with V 3.02 software and 24 eyes with V 5.02 software. Three eyes were eliminated-could not be measured with IOL Master V 3.02 software & 5.02 software. One eye was successfully measured with V when it could not be measured with V eyes were done with V 3.02 software and 24 eyes with V 5.02 software.

Patient characteristics 36 pts., one unilateral 36 pts., one unilateral Average age 68.8, range 50 to 84 Average age 68.8, range 50 to female eyes, 33 male eyes 38 female eyes, 33 male eyes 4 Refractive Lens Exchanges 4 Refractive Lens Exchanges 67 for presbyopia correcting IOL 67 for presbyopia correcting IOL

Technique IOL Master measurements were taken by two experienced technicians. IOL Master measurements were taken by two experienced technicians. All immersion measurements were taken by the author with the patient in a supine position using the Micro Medical PalmScan handheld A-scan. All immersion measurements were taken by the author with the patient in a supine position using the Micro Medical PalmScan handheld A-scan.

Eye characteristics 35 right eyes 36 left eyes 35 right eyes 36 left eyes Range mm to mm Range mm to mm One psuedophakic eye, 8 post LASIK eyes-3 also post PPV One psuedophakic eye, 8 post LASIK eyes-3 also post PPV One post PPV w/buckle One post PPV w/buckle

Results Range of axial lengths mm to mm-IOL Master Range of axial lengths mm to mm-IOL Master Average axial length mm –standard deviation 1.82 mm-IOL Master Average axial length mm –standard deviation 1.82 mm-IOL Master Average difference in axial length between the PalmScan and IOL Master Average difference in axial length between the PalmScan and IOL Master mm with standard deviation of 0.10 mm and R coef. of mm with standard deviation of 0.10 mm and R coef. of % of eyes could not be measured with the IOL Master version 5.02 software. 4.1 % of eyes could not be measured with the IOL Master version 5.02 software.

Results Correlation Coefficient = 0.998

Conclusion Axial length measurements by the PalmScan immersion ultrasound is comparable to the IOL Master and can be used when the IOL Master can not get an axial length measurement. Axial length measurements by the PalmScan immersion ultrasound is comparable to the IOL Master and can be used when the IOL Master can not get an axial length measurement. Immersion was needed in 4.1% (3/74). Immersion was needed in 4.1% (3/74). Immersion units are still need even if you have an IOL Master. Immersion units are still need even if you have an IOL Master.