1Communications Foodborne Disease Outbreak Investigation Team Training: Module 8 – Communications among Team Members.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outbreak investigation report Agnes Hajdu EpiTrain III, Jurmala, Latvia Based on EPIET material.
Advertisements

Our vision: Healthier communities, Excellence in healthcare Our values: Teamwork, Honesty, Respect, Ethical, Excellence, Caring, Commitment, Courage Preparing.
HIV Exposure: What Emergency Response Agencies Need to Know About Accessing Information.
DR. CHRISTINA RUNDI MINISTRY OF HEALTH, MALAYSIA.
Determining the True Root Cause(s) of Accidents and Safety Incidents Incident Investigation and Analysis.
Overview of Outbreak Investigations. Goals The goals of this presentation are to: Provide a general overview of the basic steps of disease outbreak investigations.
Investigating Foodborne Disease Outbreaks: The CDC Perspective Ian Williams, PhD, MS Chief, Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch Division of Foodborne,
Principles of Outbreak Management
OUTBREAKS INVOLVING FOOD & LODGING ESTABLISHMENTS PARTNERSHIPS NEEDED FOR A SUCCESSFUL INVESTIGATION Carl Williams Melissa Ham Nicole Lee.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Introduction to North Carolina Epidemiology Teams
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
1. 2 This tool focuses on the CSBG requirements relating to tripartite board composition and selection and is divided into the following four parts: 1.General.
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
EPR-Public Communications L-05
CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS PLANNING A rehearsal for crisis Planning is key.
Chapter 17 Nursing Diagnosis
WHO guidelines for investigation and control of Foodborne Diseases outbreak Dr. Christina Rundi Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-013 Roles and Coordination of Information.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Food Supply Defense Plan: Lessons from Oregon Public Health
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
EMPRICAL RESEARCH REPORTS
1 Draft for discussion only. This document is not for general distribution and has not been approved by any agency or entity. No further / external distribution.
ADHS AND COUNTY STD CONTROL AND PREVENTION PROCESSES AND ACTIVITIES Kerry Kenney ADHS/STDP STATEWIDE STD MEETING April 25, 2008.
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control June 14, 2011 : The Food Safety Modernization Act: Implications.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 3—Emergency Operations Coordination What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Comcare Compliance Assistance Section Presents Incident Notification.
Action Plan Skills Building: Module 1 Getting Started: Preparatory Tasks and Considerations January 2013.
PSO Overview for Executives (Presenter) (Date) Center for Patient Safety Toolkit for PSO Participation, Section 4.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
CR Toolkit Workshop Consultation Matrix Ref ICMM CD Toolkit #3 Trainer: Monty & Allan K Date Venue: CR Conference Tabubil.
AN INTRODUCTION Managing Change in Healthcare IT Implementations Sherrilynne Fuller, Center for Public Health Informatics School of Public Health, University.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for.
Exposure Rostering: Population Tracking Following a Disaster Melissa E. Powell, MPH Michelle F. Barber, MS Preparedness, Surveillance & Epidemiology PUBLIC.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Writing an Outbreak Report Dr Noorhaida Ujang Epid Officer Muar Alor Setar,
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 24 Public Health Surveillance.
RCA Report Writing.
Connecticut Department of Public Health - Keeping Connecticut Healthy Connecticut Department of Public Health PHABuloCiTy! Public Health Accreditation.
Increased # of AI/AN receiving in- home environmental assessment and trigger reduction education and asthma self-management education Increased # of tribal.
1 Interprofessional Health Care Team Meetings OBJECTIVES: Identify key principles and characteristics of effective interprofessional team meetings Identify.
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
Disclaimer This presentation is intended only for use by Tulane University faculty, staff, and students. No copy or use of this presentation should occur.
Lesson 3 Page 1 of 24 Lesson 3 Considerations in Planning Public Health Surveillance.
User Resources for the: One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS) and National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) Updated: 06/15/2016.
FOODBORNE DISEASE OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION TEAM TRAINING MODULE 8 – COMMUNICATIONS AMONG TEAM MEMBERS.
Applications of ICS/NIMS Training and Functions for the Emergency Operations Center Marsha Davenport, MD, MPH Nicole Brown, MS Cathy O’Neill, RN Sandra.
Emerging Infectious Disease Tabletop Exercise
Outbreak Investigation
Understanding Epidemiology
Objectives Upon completion of this training, agencies will be able to:
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 7: Epidemiology Investigation New York Integrated Center of.
Roles and Responsibilities of VDH Epidemiologists
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 5: Pathogen-Specific Surveillance New York Integrated Center.
Mark Lobato, MD Division of TB Elimination
Foodborne Disease Outbreak Investigation Team Training
ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE Internal Occurrence Reporting and Investigation.
Foodborne Disease Outbreak Investigation Team Training:
Factors that affect disease dynamics and outbreaks
Response Teams – Planning and Preparation
PSO Overview for (name of organization’s) PSES Workgroup
Presentation transcript:

1Communications Foodborne Disease Outbreak Investigation Team Training: Module 8 – Communications among Team Members

2Communications Module Learning Objectives At the end of this module, you will be able to 1.Discuss ways to improve communications among outbreak investigation team members before, during, and after an outbreak. 2.Identify key stakeholders to be notified in the event of a foodborne outbreak. 3.List considerations in dealing with the media about a foodborne disease outbreak. 4.Outline the components of a final report from an outbreak investigation. > Learning objectives

3Communications Communications between Team Members and Agencies Good communication is key to outbreak investigation success! Goal: Sharing information in a way that supports a timely, coordinated, and effective outbreak response Opportunities –Pre-outbreak –During investigation –After investigation

4Communications Pre-outbreak Designate team members (and their likely roles) before an outbreak occurs Make sure team members know each other and establish routine communications Train and exercise teams together > Pre-outbreak

5Communications Pre-outbreak (cont’d) Define formal communication processes for team member agencies Address information sharing issues –Legal authority to share certain information –Need for information sharing agreements Identify key stakeholders to be notified in the event of a foodborne outbreak > Pre-outbreak

6Communications Stakeholders Key individuals/agencies who are likely to be –Involved in the investigation –Able to provide valuable input during an investigation –Affected by outbreak Establish contact list of stakeholders, when they should be notified (i.e., triggers), and who is responsible for notifying each stakeholder > Pre-outbreak

7Communications Class Question What stakeholders would you notify in the event of a foodborne outbreak in your jurisdiction? Why? Outbreak investigation team and supervisors Leadership of agency State health department and public health lab Administrative assistants/support staff Surrounding jurisdictions Other governmental agencies Health-care providers and hospitals in community Primary media contacts Food industry contacts Others as appropriate (e.g., tribes, veterinarians, law enforcement, emergency operations entity)  > Pre-outbreak

8Communications During Investigation Notify team when outbreak suspected Assemble and brief team as soon as outbreak confirmed Hold regular meetings to –Share information collected by each investigator –Interpret findings –Decide on next activities Document actions, findings, and decisions > During investigation

9Communications Time limit: 10 minutes Group Exercise Divide into groups that have a mix of disciplines, if possible. 1.Read the initial report of an outbreak following a school awards banquet at the end of the module. 2.A decision is made to investigate the outbreak. What initial activities is each team member likely to undertake? 3.What resulting information will be useful to other members of the team and how? Be prepared to share your thoughts with the class.

10Communications Group Exercise (cont’d) What environmental health information will be of immediate interest to other team members?  Guest list  Identify potential cases (and controls) Menu from event  Identify foods to explore with ill and well persons High risk foods served  Identify exposures of interest and suggest possible causative agent Problems with preparation of specific foods  Identify exposures of interest and direct control Question 1: What activities will the environmental health investigator be likely to undertake? Interview banquet organizer, contact caterer, under- take environmental health assessment at restaurant

11Communications Group Exercise (cont’d) What epidemiologic information will be of immediate interest to other team members?  Signs, symptoms, and incubation period  Suggest causative agent and risky foods, guide laboratory testing, direct control measures Observations among persons attending banquet  Identify possible food safety problems Suspect food  Focus env’t health assessment, guide testing of food specimens, direct control Question 2: What activities will the epidemiologic investigator be likely to undertake? Interview ill persons, collect clinical specimens, undertake cohort study

12Communications What laboratory information will be of immediate interest to other team members? Group Exercise (cont’d)  Advice on clinical and food specimen collection Causative agent  Suggest food vehicle and contributory factors to focus environmental health assessment, refine case definition, direct control Isolation of causative agent from food  Focus environmental health assessment, direct control Subtyping of causative agent  Link outbreak with other outbreaks, refine case definition Question 3: What activities will the laboratory investigator be likely to undertake? Test clinical and food specimens, subtype isolates

13Communications Should You Talk with Implicated Business? Level of confidence that implicated food service establishment is source of outbreak Undertaken in concert with local legal precedence and support of legal office As agreed upon by outbreak investigation team –What to share? –When to share it? > During investigation

14Communications Should You Notify the Public? Does the public need to be notified? –Does outbreak involve distributed commercial product? –Is medical treatment necessary? –Is public reporting of illness necessary for investigation? –Does risk for exposure to source still exist? Connecting with the public through the media  > During investigation

15Communications Do’s in Talking with Media Identify spokesperson for team Identify the goal of each contact with the media and work with team to craft message. Stress key points (i.e., the who, what, when, where, why, and how). Provide factual, objective information. Develop standard explanations for difficult to understand concepts (e.g., statistical significance and uncertainty) > During investigation

16Communications Don’ts in Talking with Media Don’t talk to media unless you are the spokesperson for the team or are asked by the PIO. Don’t use jargon. Don’t wow them with your command of statistics! Don’t say “no comment.” Don’t go off the record. Don’t lose your temper.  > During investigation

17Communications After Investigation Debriefing Final report Submission of summary data by state for national reporting > After investigation

18Communications Debriefing Meeting of all team members and other investigation participants Structured review of investigation with specific topics to be covered Purpose –Identify things that went well or need improvement –Solicit input for changes –Make recommendations for future investigations > After investigation

19Communications Final Report Written document that summarizes investigation activities and findings Purpose –Documents what happened –Clarifies control and prevention measures –Documents performance to justify program resources –Acts as public record –Allows investigators and others to learn from experience > After investigation

20Communications Final Report - Outline Introduction and background Environmental health investigations –Methods –Results Epidemiology investigations –Methods –Results Laboratory investigations –Methods –Results > After investigation

21Communications Final Report – Outline (cont’d) Conclusions –Brief summary of major findings –Study limitations –Rationale to accept or reject hypothesis of outbreak source (i.e., evidence to support causation) Recommendations –Control measures for current outbreak –Measures to prevent future outbreaks –Improvement of future investigations > After investigation

22Communications Final Report - Tips Be concise Include key positive and negative findings but not supporting paperwork/details Organize in logical and meaningful way Be objective, honest, and accurate Include names and affiliations of investigation participants Write with public disclosure in mind > After investigation

23Communications Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requires disclosure of agency documents and other public records with selected exemptions In documenting outbreak investigation and in final report –Do not identify individuals or legally nonpublic information –Do not use inappropriate language –Do not express personal feelings FOIA > After investigation

24Communications Final Report - Distribution Distribute to –Persons/agencies involved in investigation –Persons/agencies involved in implementation of prevention and control measures –State health department –Others (e.g., other cities and counties, states, CDC, USDA/FSIS, FDA) Catalogue and file report with supporting documentation Make available to public on request > After investigation

25Communications Submission of Summary Data for National Reporting Summary of investigation findings submitted to CDC’s National Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System (FDOSS) Standard form (NORS report form [CDC 52.13]) Completed by state based on information provided by local investigators Purpose –Assess national trends in foodborne outbreaks –Evaluate control and prevention measures –Link related outbreaks at different sites > After investigation

26Communications NORS Report Form (CDC Form 52.13) General section –Investigation methods –Dates of illness –Location of cases –Case characteristics –Clinical manifestations Laboratory section Food-specific information –Implicated food –Where prepared and served –Contributing factors In appendix > After investigation

27Communications Quick Quiz

28Communications Quick Quiz 1.Which of the following would be reasonable to include on a local agency’s list of stakeholders to be contacted in the event of a foodborne outbreak? A.Public health laboratory B.Key health-care providers in the community C.Primary media contacts D.All of the above

29Communications Quick Quiz 2.Which of the following should be undertaken during an outbreak investigation to improve communication between team members? A.Introduce team members to each other B.Hold regular meetings C.Create a list of persons and agencies who should be contacted about the outbreak D.Develop information sharing agreements

30Communications Quick Quiz 3.Information collected by each investigator on an outbreak investigation team is only useful to that investigator. A.True B.False

31Communications Quick Quiz 4.Which of the following are good practices in dealing with the media regarding an outbreak? A.Identify a spokesperson trained in communications. B.Provide detailed tables of results and statistical analyses. C.Share names of patients so that the media can get a firsthand account of the illness. D.Use technical words to demonstrate your expertise. E.Let them know when their questions are annoying you.

32Communications Quick Quiz 5.Which of the following would be reasonable to include in the final report from a foodborne outbreak investigation? A.Notes from interviews with food workers at implicated establishment B.Individual laboratory reports C.Summary of findings from case-control or cohort studies D.Names of patients